Do the Deobandi Ulama Approve of Such Disrespect of the Qur’an that Which the Ghair-Muqallid Jaahil of gift2Deobandis.com alleges??
[PROCLAMATION OF “INSULT”]
Flaunting his moronic ignorance, the buffoon utters the following notoriety against Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi (Rahimahullah) in his blog over here
“I ask my brothers and sisters that adhere to this book (Behishti Zewar) to please help me increase my knowledge for the sake of Allaah and tell me if its alright to tie quranic aayah on thighs of women. Allah has given us thighs that is very very near the private parts. Is there Any Quranic aayah, any sahi hadeeth or any saying of Imam Abu Hanifa rahimahullah to justify this? This book is supposed to be one of the top books on hanafi fiqh according to deobandis“
The Jaahil is not the first deceiver to proclaim Hadhrat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi (rahmatullah alayh) as an ‘insulter’. Whilst the Qabar Pujaaris (Grave Worshippers) label Hadhrat an ‘insulter’ for his strident criticism of their grave-worshipping stunts and other bid’ah activities, The Munkar e Fiqah of the moronic ilk clutch at the straw of this one single Ta’weez prescription mentioned in A’maal-e-Qur’aani. Besides the jaahil’s ‘fatwa of Insulter’ being hilariously stupid, it displays his appalling ignorance of the Shariah.
Before proclaiming Hadhrat Thanvi (rahmatullah alayh) an ‘insulter of Qur’anic verses’ on the stupid basis of the misconception of the Ta’weez around the thigh being an act of insult, the accuser should supposed to have checked the kutub of the Shariah to ascertain what the other primary Imaams, viz.
Shaikh Ibn Taimiyyah, and Hadhrat Imaam Ahmad Bin Hanbal (rahmatullah alayh), and the many other authorities of the Shariah have to say on the type of Ta’weez which constitutes the basis for the moron’s ‘fatwa’ of jahaalat – his ‘fatwa of insulter’ against Hakimul Ummat Hadhrat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi (rahmatullah alayh). Let us first, with Shaikh Ibn Taimiyyah’s fatwa, dispel the moronic-haze which shrouds the brains of the Jaahil.
In his Majmu’ Fataawa, Vol. 19, page 63, Shaikh Ibn Taimiyyah states:
“It is permissible to write from Kitaabullah (the Qur’aan Majeed) and His Thikr with permissible ink something for the benefit of one stricken (with a problem) and for sick persons, and to wash (what has been written from the Qur’aan) and to give it to them (the stricken and the sick) to drink as Imaam Ahmad and others have explicitly said.
Abdullah, the son of (Imaam) Ahmad said: ‘I recited to my father (Imaam Ahmad) —the chain of the Hadith – that Ibn Abbaas (radhiyallahu anhu) said: ‘When birth pangs become difficult for a woman, then write:
(The relevant Qur’aanic verses)
My father (Imaam Ahmad) said: ‘Aswad Bin Aamir narrated with his Chain of Narration similarly, and he said: ‘It should be written in a clean basin and given to drink.’ My father (Imaam Ahmad) said:
Waqee’ added: ‘It should be given to her to drink and (the balance of the water) should be sprinkled (on the area) below her navel.’
Abdullah (Imaam Ahmad’s son) said: ‘I saw my father write (these Qur’aanic verses and the other athkaar) on a clean basin for a woman (in labour).”
Whilst Hadhrat Maulana Thanvi (rahmatullah alayh) prescribed a Ta’weez sewn securely in a cloth to be tied around the thigh of the lady suffering birth pangs, the Sahaabah, Taabi-een, Tab-e-Taabieen, Imaam Ahmad Bin Hanbal (rahmatullah alayh), Shaikh Ibn Taimiyyah (rahimahullah) and all the Fuqaha and Auliya of Islam prescribed water on which Qur’aanic verses are recited to be sprinkled on the genital organ of the woman.
Now whose so-called ‘insult’ is greater?? The ‘insult’ of Hadhrat Thaanvi or the ‘insult’ of the galaxy of illustrious personalities mentioned above?? What is ‘worse’ – the thigh or the genital organ?? Whilst Hadhrat Thanvi’s Ta’weez containing the mubaarak Qur’aanic verse is applied to only the thigh, the water on which the mubaarak verses are recited are applied to both the thigh and the genital organ in terms of the prescription of the illustrious personalities mentioned above.
In the book, Amalul Yaum wal-Lailah, page 188 appears the following narration:
“Ibn Abbaas narrated from Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wasallam): ‘When labour becomes difficult for a woman, then the verses… (of the Qur’aan)…………………… Should be written on a clean basin. Then it should be washed and given to the woman to drink, and it (the water) should be sprinkled on her stomach and her genital organ (farj).”
Will the jaahil Ghair Muqallid now apply his fatwa of ‘insult’ to even Hadhrat Ibn Abbaas (radhiyallahu anhu) and to even Rasulullah (salallahu alayhi wasallam)?? There is the need for the moron to proclaim all of the Salaf-e-Saaliheen ‘Insulters’ before even the slightest attention could be afforded to his branding of Hadhrat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi (rahmatullah alayh). His argument is bereft of even an iota of Shar’i substance.
Hadhrat Thanvi’s Beheshti Zewar is indispensable for laymen. It is the ‘Scholar’ which resides or should reside in the home of every follower of the Hanafi Math-hab. A’maal-e-Qur’aani is an extremely beneficial kitaab. Every prescription in this kitaab is fully in accord with the Shariah regardless of how much the jaahil and the deviant Ghair-Muqallideens howl and disgorge their epithets of insult.
[By Maulana Ahmad Sadeq Desai (Emphasis is mine)]