The Fiction of so-called ‘Imam turned Christian’ Mario Joseph – White Lie of a Moron Christian Missionary

[Majlisul Ulama]

THE DEVIL-WORSHIPPER

His Fiction The  article (or a  video),  “Changing Tracks”  is the work of  some crank Christian missionary  who has descended to the  very bottom of the barrel of fraud and  falsehood with his lies, and the  hallucinatory ‘muslim’ who has  reneged from Islam. His article is a stupid fiction.  

There is no such thing as a “parish priest” in Islam. The tenor and  tone of the fictitious “man” clearly indicate that the  fabrication is the work of a crank  Christian missionary who is  completely unaware of the manner in which Muslims conduct  themselves in speech and  argument. No Muslim Imaam/Aalim preaches that Jesus is not  God. This is a fact which every  Muslim child is aware of. No one  in any Muslim community adopts  this crystal clear, self-evident fact  as a topic for a lecture. Just as no  Muslim will preach that the sun  emits rays of light, so too will it  not be preached that Jesus is not God.

In order to weave his fictitious  tale, the fraud adopted this topic for the fiction he fabricated.

His Stupid Principle

Let us now examine the very silly  and spurious argument the crank  presents to “prove” that Nabi Isa  (alayhis salaam) is superior to  Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi  wasallam) and that he is “the son  god” – Nauthubillaah! Thus, the  moron missionary says:

“When I read it  (i.e. the Qur’aan), the Name of Prophet Muhammad I found in the Quran 4 places but the name of Jesus I found in 25 places. There itself I was a little confused. Why does the Quran give more preference to Jesus?”

The stupid missionary has  fabricated a principle: Superiority is based on the number of times a being is mentioned in the Qur’aan. The one who is mentioned a greater number of times, is given more preference by Allah, hence he is the most superior.”  

On the basis of this silly,  spurious, ludicrous and laughable ‘principle’, the crank missionary  contends that Jesus is given  greater preference, because he is  mentioned 25 times in the  Qur’aan while Nabi Muhammad  (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) is mentioned only “four” times.

In the Qur’aan Majeed, Nabi  Ibraaheem (alayhis salaam) is mentioned 69 times. On the basis  of the moron’s principle, Nabi  Ibraaheem is given greater  preference and is thus superior  to ‘Jesus” who the stupid  Christian believes to be god.

Nabi Musa (alayhis salaam) is  mentioned 136 times in  lthe Qur’aan. In terms of the moron’s  principle, he has to concede that  Nabi Musa (alayhis salaam) is  superior to the one whom he  believes is ‘god’ because Jesus is  mentioned only 25 times while  Nabi Musa (alayhis salaam) is mentioned 136 times.

Nabi Aadam (alayhis salaam) is  also mentioned 25 times in the  Qur’aan. Thus, Aadam (alayhis  salaam) in terms of the moron  missionary’s principle, is on par  with the Christian deity. In fact,  it shall be shown later, that  Aadam (alayhis salaam) according  to another stupid convoluted  ‘principle’ of the moron, is  superior to the Christian  lgod  whom they designate as the ‘son  of god’. May Allah Ta’ala save us from such abhorrent blasphemy.

Nabi Nooh (alayhis salaam) is  mentioned 42 times in the Qur’aan Shareef. Thus, he too  surpasses the rank of the god of the moron missionary. 

Let us examine the moron’s stupid principle further. Fir’oun  (Pharoah) who was destroyed by  the punishment of Allah Ta’ala, is  mentioned 77 times. Thus,  according to the moron’s  principle even Fir’oun is superior  to his god or son-god.

The moron’s Devil-God

The stupid missionary’s density ofbrains is indeed astounding. He  has fabricated a principle in  terms of  which even the devil  (shaitaan) is superior to the  Christian god. In the Qur’aan,  shaitaan is mentioned 102 times  whilst Jesus is mentioned only 25  times. This then is the logical conclusion of the flotsam which  the moron missionary has disgorged in his silly article of  fiction. It appears that the moron  is a devil-worshipper. He  therefore elevates the devil way  above the person whom he  believes to be ‘god’ and the ‘son of god’ – Nauthubillaah!

Rasulullah’s mention 218 times,  not four times

The moron has conspicuously  portrayed his stark ignorance and downright stupidity by  claiming that Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) is  mentioned only four times in the  Qur’aan Majeed. Even if this had  been so, it would have been an  argument devoid of substance  and pregnant with stupidity to  assert superiority and truth on  the basis of the greater number  of times a name appears in the  Qur’aan. It has already been  shown that the devil is  mentioned 102 times.

The Holy Prophet (on whom be  peace) is mentioned  218 times  in the Qur’aan, not four times as  the moron claims. He is  mentioned by his name,  Muhammad four times, by the  lofty title of Rasool 181  times,  and by the other lofty title of  Nabi 33 times. The titles of  Rasool and Nabi are more in  consonance with the lofty Office  of Nubuwwat (Prophethood)  than the name, Muhammad. By  referring to Muhammad  (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) as the  Rasool and the Nabi, his divine  status and divine proximity are  well borne out. His Prophethood  is thus confirmed hundreds of times in the Qur’aan. This  irrefutable fact has escaped the understanding of the moron, crank and fraud who fabricated the fiction.

Hadhrat Maryam (alayhas salaam)

Explaining his second ‘proof’ for  Jesus being god, the ignoramus says:

“And the second thing: I could  not see any woman’s name in the Quraan…..NO in the Quraan,  there is only one woman’s name I found, Mariam, the mother of  Jesus…..And in the Holy Quraan  Chapter 3 the name of the  Chapter is ‘Family of Mariam’  and the Holy Quraan chapter 19,  the name of the Chapter itself is Mariam.”

The moron has displayed  monumental ignorance throughout his fiction. In  addition he has betrayed his identity. Only a non-Muslim  because of lack of Islamic understanding could have  written the above statement. A person who had been a Muslim  for decades, since birth, and who  had allegedly studied the  Qur’aan for ten years, would not  have written the stupidity that  Chapter 3 of the Qur’aan is  named  ‘Family  of  Mariam’.  There is no chapter in the Qur’aan called ‘Family of Mariam’.  The name of the third Surah is  Aal-e-Imraan (the Family of  Imraan).  The  moron has confused Imraan with Maryam.

The 19th Surah is named  ‘Maryam’ on account of the importance of the true story of  Hadhrat Maryam (alayhissalaam).  The Yahood had slandered her,  accusing her of fornication. Her  life was shrouded in mysticism,  hence while the Jews slandered  her, the Christians fabricated stupidities about her. On the  basis of her giving birth to Nabi  Isa (alayhis salaam) miraculously,  the Christians elevated her to the pedestal of godhood.

The Qur’aanic Surahs take their  names from some significant  episode. Thus, the second Surah  is called Baqarah (The Cow). One  Surah is named Luqmaan although he was not even a Nabi.  Another  Surah is called Al-Munaafiqoon (The Hypocrites.).  One Surah is called, Al-Maaidah  (The Food-cloth). The name of a  Surah is merely for highlighting a significant episode/fact in  he  Surah. Since a number of verses  explain the truth about Maryam (alayhas salaam), the Surah is  named Maryam just as the fourth  Surah is called, An-Nisaa’  because it deals significantly with rules pertaining to women. 

The Qur’aan highlights the story  of Hadhrat Maryam (alayhas  salaam) to refute the moronic,  irrational, polytheistic Christian  doctrine of her being the  ‘mother of god’ – the mother of  the ‘son of god’.  It also  highlights her story to refute the  notorious Christian belief of  Jesus being the son of God.    And, it exonerates her of the  slander which the kuffaar had  levelled against her. While the  stupid missionary mentions that  the name of the Surah is Maryam, he is conveniently silent about  exactly what the Surah says about Maryam.

While the crank with a  rodomontade attitude proclaims  the name of the Surah, he does  not mention that relative to Maryam and Nabi Isa (Jesus),  speaking in his infancy, the Qur’aan states in verses 30 and  31: 

“Verily I (Jesus) am the Slave of  Allah. He (Allah) has given me the  Scripture and has made me a  Nabi. In Surah Maryam, Jesus  does not say that ‘I am the son  of God.’  Surah Maryam refutes  the polytheistic doctrines of the  moron, crank, stupid missionary.  But he cites the name of the  Surah to substantiate his belief, while the Surah refutes him.

The stupidity of original sin

The crank missionary says:

“About Mariam, the Holy Quraan chapter 3 verses 34 onwards say that Mary was born without original sin.”

This averment further confirms  that the moron never had studied the Qur’aan for ten years  under an Ustaadh as the stupid  missionary claims. Neither in  these verses (34 onwards) nor in  any other verse does the Qur’aan  mention anything about Maryam  (alayhas salaam) being “born without original sin”, nor  anything whatsoever about the stupid belief of original sin.  Original sin – that every  person is born with sin – is not an  Islamic belief. It is the belief of the polytheist Christians.  Maryam (alayhas salaam) and all human beings are born without  sin. The fact remains that these verses do not even touch on this topic.

Verse 34 does not even deal with  Maryam (alayhas salaam). Verses  35 and 36 deal with the mother  of Maryam (alayhas salaam), and verse 37 states:

“Then her Rabb accepted her with a beautiful acceptance, and He granted her a beautiful upbringing, and He placed her in the custody of Zakariyya.  Whenever Zakariyya went to her in the sanctuary, he found by her food. He said: ‘O Maryam! From whence did you obtain this?’ She replied: ‘It is from Allah. Verily, Allah provides for whomever He wills magnificently.”

Maryam’s Ascension?

There is absolutely no mention of  the stupid doctrine of ‘original  sin’. The moron then avers: 

“Quraan chapter 50 verse  23  says that she went to heaven  with her physical body.”  

Again he has conspicuously  advertised his ignorance and the  fictitious nature of the supposed  Muslim scholar of ten years  converting to Christianity. It  appears that at the time when  the moron was writing his  fiction, he was under the influence of some intoxicating  substance such as dagga (marijuana). Verse 23 of Surah 50 (Surah  Qaaf) does not have the  remotest reference to anything  pertaining to Maryam (alayhas  salaam), leave alone her physical ascension into the heaven hallucinated by the moron.

Verse 23 of Surah 50 reads: “His  companion will say: ‘This what is by me is ready.’ 

This verse depicts a scene which  will take place on the Day of  Resurrection. The companion,  according to one version, refers  to the Angel who accompanies  man.  Whatever it means, it does  not have the slightest  relationship to Maryam (alayhas  salaam).  This man is too  ignorant or he was too drunk when he spoke his fiction of his hallucination.

Islam does not teach the belief  that Maryam (alayhas salaam)  ascended physically or even  spiritually into the heavens. The  Islamic belief is that Nabi Isa  (alayhis salaam) had ascended physically into the heavens.

The Moron’s 10 points

The crank avers: “And then  about Jesus when I read chapter  3 verses 45 to 55, there are 10  points which the Quraan makes  about Jesus, the first thing  Quraan says, Kalimatullah, the  Arabic word which means ‘word  of God’, and the second thing,  Roohullah which means spirit of  God and the third Isalmaseeh  which means Jesus Christ. So Quraan gives the name for Jesus,  word of God, spirit of God and  Jesus Christ. And then Quraan  says that Jesus spoke when he  was very small, like 2 days old  after his birth. Quraan says that  Jesus created a live bird with mud…….And  then  Quraan  says  that  Jesus  cured  a  born blind man and a man with leprosy, etc. ………
When I saw all these things in  Quraan my thinking was what the  Quraan says about Mohammed.  You know according to Quraan  Prophet Mohammed is not the  word of God, not the spirit of  God, never spoke when he was 2 days old, never created any bird  with mud, never cured any sick  people, never raised any dead  people, he himself dies and  according to Islam he is not alive  and he will not come back. So  there is a lot of difference  between these two prophets. I  don’t call Jesus as God you  know, my idea was, he is a  Prophet, but he is a Prophet  greater than Mohammed.”

The crank contradicts himself  with his blasphemy. While here  he says that Jesus is a Prophet,  in the very same fiction he says:  “….Christians say word is son of  God.” Then he stupidly proceeds  to substantiate that Jesus is the  son of God. The moron’s  intellectual density is  staggering. Firstly, to establish  his man-god’s superiority over  Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi  wasallam), he sucked from his  finger the convoluted ‘principle’  of the ‘greater number’. If a  name is mentioned a greater number in the Qur’aan, then in terms of the stupid missionary’s  logic, that person is greater.  Well, in terms of his stupid  ‘principle’ it has been shown that even the devil is greater than the  moron’s god whom he calls the  ‘son of  god’. For shaitaan is  mentioned 102 times in the Qur’aan.

Miracles only with Allah’s  Permission

Every  Nabi  performed  miracles  –  numerous  miracles. Rasulullah  (sallallahu  alayhi  wasallam)  had  displayed thousands of miracles.  But miracles are not proof of godhood. The Ambiya (Prophets)  demonstrated miracles by the  permission of Allah Ta’ala, not by  their volitional power and will.  They have no power to create or  to demonstrate supernatural  feats without Allah’s permission. Thus, regarding the miracles of  Nabi Isa (alayhis  salaam) – Jesus  – the Qur’aan states with clarity  the statements of Nabi Isa:

“Verily I have come to you with a  sign from your Rabb (Creator  and Sustainer). I create for you  from sand the likeness of a bird,  then I blow into it; thus it  becomes a bird with the  permission of Allah. And, I cure  the born blind and the leper, and  I restore to life the dead with the  permission of  Allah……………….And, I have come  to you with a sign from your Rabb. Therefore fear Allah and obey me. Verily, Allah is my Rabb  and your Rabb, therefore worship  Him. This is the Straight Path.    [Aal-e-Imraan, Verses 49 – 51]

While the crank and fraud  mentions the miracles of Nabi Isa  (alayhis salaam), he remains  stupidly ignorant of the astoundingly stupendous miracle of the splitting of the moon into  two parts by Muhammad  (sallallahu alayhi wasallam)  mentioned in the Qur’aan. Since  the crank missionary has  accepted the Qur’aan as the basis  of proof for his copro-argument,  he has no option but to accept  what the Qur’aan says about this  most marvellous miracle demonstrated by Muhammad  (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). The  very first verse of Surah Al-Qamar reads: “The Hour (of  Qiyaamah) has approached, and  the moon has been split.” All and  sundry in Makkah, and travellers  far afield had physically seen the  moon split into two parts. By a sign of his finger, the moon had split into two for all to witness.

Then the Satanist Christian  missionary blows hot air about the miracles of Nabi Isa (alayhis  salaam) while ignoring the  miracles of Nabi Ibraheem  (alayhis salaam), also mentioned  in the Qur’aan. Just as Nabi Isa  (alayhis salaam) had brought to  life the dead with Allah’s  permission, so too had Nabi  Ibraheem (alayhis salaam). With  the permission of Allah, he killed  four birds. Cut them into bits  and mixed all the parts into one  whole. Then he divided the  mixture into four parts, placing  one portion on a different hill.  Then with the permission of  Allah, he commanded the birds  to come to life. Instantaneously,  the birds came to life, running to  Nabi Ibraheem (alayhis salaam).  All the parts miraculously  separated themselves from the  admixture and accumulated separately to form the birds.

Then there is the miracle of Nabi  Ibraheem (alayhis salaam) cast  into the fire by Nimrood, and the  fire becoming a garden for him.  All the Ambiya displayed  miracles. But the display of  miracles does not make them gods as the moron believes. All miracles by the  Ambiya are Kalimatullah. They are by the command of Allah Ta’ala.

The superiority of a being is not  measured by the number or type  of miracles he displays. Even the  devil too displays miracles. The crank perhaps is a devil-worshipper, hence in terms of  his convoluted principle of a  greater number, the devil is  superior to Jesus, since Nabi Isa  (alayhis salaam) is mentioned  only 25 times in the Qur’aan  while shaitaan (the devil) is mentioned hundreds of times.

Then the moron makes a big,  stupid issue out of the term, Kalimatullaah (the Word of Allah).  He is ignorant of the Arabic  language, hence he has miserably  failed to understand the meaning of the term. It never means ‘god’ or the ‘son of god’ nor does it  imply superiority over another being.

The Meaning of Kalimatullah

Kalimatullah, is explained in  Verse 59 of the same Surah, which states:  “Verily, the  likeness of Isa by Allah is like that  of Aadam. He (Allah) created him  from sand, then said to him: ‘Be! Thus he came (to life).”

Kalimatullah – the word of Allah –  is His command: “BE!”
The verse states with clarity that  just as Allah Ta’ala had created  Aadam (alayhis salaam with His  word (command): “Be!”, so too had He created Nabi Isa (alayhis salaam). 

Just as Allah Ta’ala had created Aadam (alayhis salaam) from sand, so too had He  created Nabi Isa (alayhis salaam). And, unto both these Nabis,  Allah Ta’ala proclaimed at the time of their non-existence: “Be!”,  and they came to life into  existence. In this verse, the  Qur’aan compares Nabi Isa (alayhis salaam) to Hadhrat  Aadam (alayhis salaam), a created  human being. The comparison is  not with Allah. In fact, the  miraculous nature of Aadam’s  creation is of a greater marvel  than the miracle of Nabi Isa’s  birth. Whilst Nabi Isa (alayhis  salaam) had at least a human  mother and was born in exactly  the same way as all humankind,  the creation of Nabi Aadam  (alayhis salaam) was without the medium of a human father and a human mother.

Furthermore, Aadam (alayhis  salaam) was created in Heaven  while Isa (alayhis salaam) was  created on earth in the same way  and substratum where and as all  men are created. In addition,  Aadam (alayhis salaam) inhabited  the celestial realm of the  Heaven, and he was honoured  with the prostration of countless  millions/billions/trillions of Angels. But not a single Angel  prostrated for Nabi Isa (alayhis salaam).

Even the creation of Hawwa  (alayhas salaam) has greater marvel than the creation of Nabi  Isa (alayhis salaam). While he was born from a woman in the  normal/natural way, and on  earth, Hawwa (alayhas salaam)  was created without the agency  of a human mother nor was she subjected to the normal process  of human birth. She was created from the rib of Nabi Aadam  (alayhis salaam), and in Jannat.  In  addition, she never was an  infant or a child. She came into  existence, a fully grown, fully  developed and perfect woman  spontaneously. Thus, relative to  these two progenitors of the  human race, there is no marvel in  the miraculous birth of Nabi Isa  (alayhis salaam). But no one has  elevated Nabi Aadam (alayhis  salaam) and Hawwa (alayhas  salaam) to the pedestal of  godhood on the basis of all the wonders and miracles related to them.

The moron missionary saw in a  verse the word, Kalimatullah,  used in relation to Nabi Isa  (alayhis salaam) – Jesus – hence  he stupidly concluded his  convoluted theory of divinity/godhood for Nabi Isa (alayhis  salaam).

But, the stupid did not realize  that in the Qur’aan, the word,  Kalimatullah, does not refer  exclusively to Nabi Isa (alayhis  salaam). Verse 40 of Surah At-Taubah reads: “And Kalimatullah  (the Word of Allah), it is  dominant.” Here Kalimatullah  does not have the slightest  relationship with Nabi Isa  (alayhis salaam). The word,  kalimah appears dozens of times  in the Qur’aan without having  the slightest reference to Nabi Isa (alayhis salaam).

Refuting the divinity of Jesus  with the greatest clarity, the Qur’aan states:

“Remember when Allah will say  (on the Day of Judgment: ‘O Isa,  Son of Maryam! ‘Are you the one  who said to the people: ‘Accept  me and my mother as gods  besides Allah?’ He (Nabi Isa) will  say: ‘Glory to You! I had no right  to say what was not true to  me………I did not say to them  except what you had commanded  me (to say): ‘Worship Allah Who is my Rabb and your Rabb.”  [Surah Maaidah, verses 116/117]

It should be noted that the  moron missionary has built his stupid case on the basis of the  Qur’aan thereby conceding the authenticity and truth of the Qur’aan. He cites from only the  Qur’aan to ‘prove’ his flotsam  belief pertaining to Nabi Isa  (alayhis salaam). The sources  which constitute the basis of  one’s case, must necessarily be  authentic. If the Qur’aan is  unauthentic, then the moron has  no right to cite verses from the  Qur’aan to substantiate his  copro-claims. Therefore, utilizing  only the Qur’aan to establish his  copro-ideas, the moron has  implied the authenticity of the Qur’aan.

Since he cites and draws proof  from the Qur’aan, let him listen to  what the Qur’aan has to say  about Nabi Isa (alayhis salaam). Verses 72 and 73 of Surah Maaidah read:

“Verily, those who said: ‘Verily,  Allah is the Maseeh, the son of  Maryam.’, have committed kufr.  (On the contrary) Maseeh said:  ‘O Bani Israaeel! Worship Allah  Who is my Rabb and your  Rabb……….Verily, the kuffaar  said: Verily, Allah is the third of  the trinity.’ There is no deity  except the One God. If they do  no desist from that (trinity)  which they speak, then verily, a  painful punishment will  overtake  those who commit kufr.”

Verse  74  of  the  same  Surah  states: 

“Maseeh the son of Maryam is  nothing but a Messenger.  Messengers have gone before  him. 

Emphatically negating the idea  of godhood from the term  Kalimatillah, Verse 171 of Surah  Nisaa’ states:

“O People of the Book! Do not  commit excess in your Deen, and  do not say about Allah, but the  truth. Verily, Isa, the son of  Maryam was only a Messenger of  Allah and His word (His word of  command) which He cast to  Maryam, and a Rooh from Him.  Therefore believe in Allah and His Messengers, and do not  ay:  ‘trinity’.  Desist (from this blasphemy), for it is best for  ou.  Verily, Allah is One God. Glory  unto Him! (He is pure) from there  being a son to Him.”

The terms,Kalimatullah and  Roohullah are expressly coupled  to and explained with the term,  Rasool. That is: Isa is not a god.  He is nothing but a Messenger  just as the Messengers which  came before him. He was created  by the word of Allah (‘BE!’) and  by the mercy and power of Allah (Roohullah). Why does the moron not also quote the Qur’aanic  verses which negates divinity for  Nabi Isa (alayhis salaam) and  which maintain with great clarity  that Nabi Isa (alayhis salaam) is a Messenger?

The terms, Kalimatullah and  Roohullah have been added to the verses by Allah Ta’ala not to  confirm divinity for Nabi Isa  (alayhis salaam). If the moron  Christian missionary had understood Arabic, he would havecomprehended that these terms  are actually to refute the  Christian blasphemous doctrines  of Jesus being the ‘son of God’.  The words serve the purpose of  clarification and refutation. In  the context of clarification and  refutation, the meaning of the  relevant verses is:

There is no deity but the One  Allah. Isa, the son of Maryam, is  not god. On the contrary, he is  the word of Allah, i.e. he came  into existence with the command  of Allah by the word: ‘Be!, and he  is the Rooh of Allah. i.e. the Will, Intention. Mercy and Power of  Allah. His creation is by Divine Will.

This is the meaning of  kalimatullah and roohullah. It appears in the Qur’aan in  refutation of the Christian doctrine of the divinity of Nabi  Isa (alayhis salaam). The title of  Jibraeel (alayhis salaam) is also  Rooh. He too is Roohullah. In  fact, in the Qur’aan he is  specifically referred to as Roohul  Quds (the Holy Spirit). This title  does not confer divinity to  Jibraeel (alayhis salaam). In the  Qur’aan, the term Roohullah also  means “the mercy of Allah”. Verse 87 of Surah Yusuf states: “And  none but a kaafiroon nation despair of the mercy of Allah (Roohullaah).”

Even Aadam (alayhis salaam) is  the effect of Roohullah.Verse 72  of Surah Saad states: “Then  when I (Allah) have fashioned  him (Aadam) and infused in him  MY ROOH, then fall down in  prostration for him (Aadam).” 

Now both Aadam (alayhis  salaam) and Nabi Isa (alayhis  salaam) are Roohullah. Why does  the moron’s belief exclude Aadam (alayhis salaam) from the corrupt,  blasphemous Christian concept  of divinity? The words, RasoolKalimatullah and Roohullah  serve the specific objective of  negating the Christian concept of Isa’s divinity.

The Fiction of Nabi Isa’s divinity Negating in entirety the divinity  of Nabi Isa (alayhis salaam), Allah Ta’ala states in the Qur’aan:

“Remember when Allah said: ‘O  Isa, son of Maryam! (NOT SON  OF GOD) Remember My favour  on you and on your mother.  Remember when I aided you with  Roohul Quds (i.e.  Jibraeel). You  spoke to people in the cradle and in manhood. And remember whenI taught you the Kitaab and  Hikmah, the Taurah and the  Injeel. And remember when you  made from sand the likeness of a  bird with My permission. Then  you blew into it, then it became a  bird with My permission. And you cured the born blind and the leper with My permission. And  remember when you brought to  life the dead with My  permission.”  (Surah Maaidah, Verse 110)

The clarity with which Nabi Isa’s  divinity is negated in the Qur’aan  is brighter than the sun’s light.  All of these miracles performed  by Nabi Isa (alayhis salaam) were  the commands of Allah Ta’ala.  Without the permission of Allah  Ta’ala,  Nabi Isa (alayhis salaam)  and all the Ambiya were  incapable of displaying any  miracle. Hence, Allah Ta’ala repeatedly proclaims: “With My permission.”

Only Allah is The Creator

Disgorging another lie, the crank  (the supposed renegade who  had become a kaafir) says: 

“So one day I went to my teacher,  the one who taught me 10 years  in Arabic college, and I ask him,  “teacher, how did God create the  universe?” Then he said, “God  created the universe through the  word” THROUGH THE WORD!”

With this lie, the moron only  succeeded in portraying his falsehood and ignorance. A  Muslim who has studied 10 years  in a Madrasah will not ask the  silly question attributed to the  fictitious renegade, nor would  the Ustaadh (Teacher) proffer  such a stupid answer as the crank  has disgorged. The answer to  the stupid question would have been simple:  Allah created the  universe with His power. He  simply says, “Be!”, and whatever  He wills, comes into existence.  There is no conundrum to  warrant the stupid rigmarole  hallucinated by the moron, who  says: “Then my question, “word    is creator or creation?”…….Quraansays Jesus is word of God. If my  teacher said the word of God is Creator, which means Jesus is  creator, then the Muslims must become Christian!”

The ignorance of the moron is  colossal. The ‘word’ (Kalimatullah  – the Word of Allah) is the  Command of Allah. The Teacher  never would have answered so  stupidly by saying: “God created  the universe through the word.” A  Muslim will simply answer: “Allah  created the universe by his  Qudrat (Power).” The Teacher  would not have said that the  ‘word’ is the creator. He would  say that ‘Allah is the Creator’.  The hallucination of the word  ‘through’ does not feature as far  as Muslims and the Qur’aan are concerned. Allah creates by His command, “BE!”, and with His  Qudrat (Power). He does not  create ‘through’ a created human  being who was born of a woman,  who ate food and who was the  substratum of all human frailties  and attributes.

Allah Ta’ala Himself is the  Creator. There is no separate ‘word’ which creates. Then the  moron says:   

“In Suppose if he says the word of  God is creation, he will be trapped. You know why? He said  everything is created through the word.”  

No Muslim can be trapped with  stupidities. A man of knowledge  will not proffer the stupid  answer the moron has  hallucinated here. The only  Creator is Allah – nothing more  and nothing less. There is  nothing to be trapped in this answer. He Alone Creates by His Qudrat.

Jesus is Allah’s creation. Just as  Nabi Isa (alayhis salaam) is  Kalimatullah, so too is the entire  universe Kalimatullah. The  Qur’aan and stable brains  confirm this simple, self-evident  reality denied by the crank, devil-worshipper. We don’t say that  the ‘word’ is the creator. We say  that Allah is the Creator. A  polytheist such as the moron,  and idolaters believe in a  plurality of ‘creators’. The crank  has no option but to believe  what the Qur’aan says, namely,  only Allah is Khaaliq (The  Creator). He has presented the  Qur’aan as his evidence, hence he is logically obliged to accept the  ruling of the Qur’aan which says  that Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi  wasallam) is the Messenger sent  to all mankind, and that Isa  (alayhis salaam) is not the son of  god, and that trinity is  blasphemy, and that Isa (alayhis  salaam) is Allah’s Servant and Messenger. 

What the Qur’aan Commands

The lying fraud should heed the following commands of the Qur’aan and submit in obedience, for he himself has chosen the  Qur’aan as the basis of evidence  for his stupid ideas of blasphemy:
*    “(And Allah’s Wrath and  Punishment are on them) because of their (blasphemous)  statement: “Verily, we have killed  Maseeh Isa, the son of Maryam,  the Messenger of Allah. (But)  they did not kill him nor did they  crucify him, but it (the matter)  was confused upon them. Verily,  those who dispute regarding him  (Nabi Isa) are in doubt regarding    him. They have no knowledge  about it except following    conjecture. For a certainty they  did not kill him. On the contrary,  Allah raised him unto Himself.  And Allah is Mighty and Wise.”  (Surah Nisaa’, aayat 156)

*     “Most certainly, the kuffaar  who said: ‘Verily Allah is Maseeh  the son of Maryam, have  committed kufr. Say: ‘Who can  do anything to  Allah if He  intends to destroy Maseeh the  son of Maryam and his mother  and all on earth? Unto Allah  belongs the dominion of the  heavens and the earth and  whatever is between them. He  creates whatever He wills. And,  Allah has power over all things.” (Al-Maaidah, aayat 17)

*   “Verily, the kuffaar have  committed kufr by saying: ‘Verily,  Allah, He is Maseeh, the son of  Maryam. (But) Maseeh said: “O  Bani Israaeel! Worship Allah Who  is my Rabb and your Rabb. Verily,  he who associates partners with  Allah, Allah has forbidden for him  Paradise, and his abode is the  Fire. There will be no helpers for  the transgressors.”   (Al-Maaidah, aayat 72)

*   “Verily they have committed  kufr – they who say: ‘Verily, Allah  is a third of trinity.’ (Know!) that  there is no god but the ONE  GOD. If they do not desist from  (the blasphemy) they utter, then  most assuredly a painful punishment will overtake the  kuffaar among them.”    (Al-Maaidah, aayat 73)

*    “Maseeh, the son of Maryam  is only a Rasool (Messenger of  Allah). Messengers have passed  before him. And, his mother is  truthful. They both used to eat  food. Just look! How We explain  for them the signs. But, then just look how they drift (into error  and blasphemy)”  (Al-Maaidah, aayat 75)    

Muhammad, The Seal of the Prophets

The copro-moron Christian  missionary now has no option but to accept that Jesus was the  Prophet (Messenger) of Allah  Ta’ala, and to become a Muslim.  He has no option because he has  made the Qur’aan the basis on  which he structured his drivel.  He has thus implied the authenticity of the Qur’aan, for one does not    present a fabrication as the basis of one’s evidence.

In addition, the moron has no  option but to accept Muhammad  (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) as  the greatest and the final Rasool  (Messenger) of Allah Ta’ala. The Qur’aan states:

“Those who believe, practise virtue and believe that which has  been revealed to Muhammad –  and he is the Truth from their  Rabb—He (Allah) will forgive  them their sins and reform their  state.”  (Surah Muhammad, verse 2)

“Muhammad is not the father of any men among you. But, he is the Messenger of Allah and the  Seal of the Prophets. And Allah has knowledge of everything.” (Surah Ahzaab, verse 40)

“(The people of piety are) those  who follow the Rasool (Messenger) who is the Nabi  (Prophet), the Unlettered one, the one whom they (the Jews  and Christians) find written by  them in the Tauraah and Injeel.  He (Nabi Muhammad) commands righteousness and he prohibits evil…….Therefore follow  that  Noor (Celestial Light – the Qur’aan) which has been revealed to him. They are the successful ones.” (Surah A’raaf, verse 157)

“Say (O Muhammad!): ‘O people! Verily, I am Allah’s Messenger  unto you all. (He is Allah) unto  Whom belongs the heavens and the earth. There is no god but  He. He gives life and causes death. Therefore, believe  in Allah and His Messenger, the  Unlettered Prophet who believes in Allah and  His Law. Follow him  (Muhammad) so that you may be guided.”   (Surah A’raad, verse 158)

The Qur’aan is replete with verses  declaring the Nubuwwat  (Prophethood) of Muhammad  (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), and  commanding obedience to him.  The copro-moron has no  alternative but to accept  Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi  wasallam) as the greatest and  the final Prophet of Allah. He  has entrapped himself into this situation where he has to embrace Islam since he has implied the  authenticity of the Qur’aan from  which he cites his ‘proofs’ to  substantiate the blasphemy of  Jesus being the son of God, and even god, the creator. 

If the copro-moron rejects these  verses which establish the messenger-ship of both Nabi Isa  and Muhammad, and declare Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi  wasallam) as the final Messenger,  then he concedes that his entire  argument is baseless since then, it has been raised on a ‘spurious’ basis.

The Qur’aanic Context of the  mention of Nabi Isa (alayhis salaam)

Not a single verse of the 25  verses in which appears Nabi Isa’s name, is there the slightest  support for the blasphemous  contention of the copro-moron.  On the contrary, every one of the  25 verses negates godhood and divinity from Jesus. Every verse  confirms that Nabi Isa (alayhis  salaam) was the Rasool  (Messenger) of Allah Ta’ala. While the stupid missionary patted  himself because Nabi Isa’s name  appears 25 times in the Qur’aan, the moron has conveniently    refrained from stating the  context in which Nabi Isa  (alayhis salaam) is mentioned in    each one of the 25  verses. The  mere mention of Nabi Isa’s  name in no way whatsoever  supports the blasphemous case  of the copro-moron.

A wife for a son

In a silly attempt to ‘prove’ that  God has a son (Nauthubillaah!),  the moron, devil-worshipper  says:   

“Then he (i.e. the imaginary  teacher of the imaginary Muslim  who had reneged from Islam) told me if there is a son of God, I must show him the wife of God.  Without wife, no chance for having a son. Then I showed him  a portion from the Quraan,  Quraan says that God sees  without eyes, God can talk  without tongue, God can hear  without ears. Its written in the  Quraan, I said if that is the case,  he can have a child without a wife.”

The ignorance  and intellectual  density of this copro-moron are  indeed stupendous. There is  absolutely no intellectual worth  in this stupid argument. Firstly,  there is consensus of Christians,  Jews and Muslims that Jesus was  born from an earthly woman. He  was a human being. The Qur’aan  states that Nabi Isa (alayhis  salaam) and his mother ate food.  The logical consequence of  eating food on earth is not a conundrum. It is known to even  the moron. It is precisely for this  consequence that the Qur’aan  mentions them eating food to  dispel the stupid blasphemy of  Nabi Isa (alayhis salaam) being the son of God.

If the stupidity of a  son  for  God  had been a possibility, such a  ‘son’ would not have had the needto go to the toilet. He would not  have consumed food. He would  not flee from people who are  created weaklings bent on killing him. He would not have been able to die. He would have enjoyed all  the attributes of God. He would  not have been born of a woman  in the way all people are born.  Confirming this argument, the Qur’aan states:

“If Allah had intended to have a  son, He would have chosen from  what He creates. Glory unto Him  (Pure is He). He is Allah, The One,  The Most Powerful.” (Surah Zumar, verse 4)

In this verse Allah Ta’ala scorns  and scoffs at the stupidity of the  Christians who claimed that Allah Ta’ala took as a son a human being born from a woman. 

Intelligence demand that at least  God would have created a powerful ‘son’ having His  likeness, and not adopt as a son  a weak, frail human being born from a woman.

The copro-moron has to accept  what the Qur’aan says in this  regard, for he is in a trap. Then  with regard to a wife, the moron  has no option but to accept the  verdict of the Qur’aan which  conforms the need for a wife in  order to beget a son. This issue,  in Qur’aanic terms, may not be analogized with tongue, eyes  and ears. And, the moron is under rational obligation to  accept what the Qur’aan says. Just as it is written in the  Qur’aan, so too is it written in  the Qur’aan that a wife is  necessary for a son. Thus, the Qur’aan states:

“How can He have a son when He  does not have a wife? He created  everything, and He is aware of  everything.”    (Surah An’aam, verse 101)

“Most exalted is the Majesty of  our Rabb. He has not taken a wife nor a son.” (Surah Jinn, verse 3)

The Qur’aan views the  blasphemous doctrine of  ‘the  son of God’ a stupidity  hallucinated by deranged brains,  and which is impossible because  God has no wife. Since the Qur’aan cites the dimension of a  wife being necessary for a son,  the copro-moron’s argument of  the possibility of a son without a  wife is devoid of intelligent  substance. 

The entire article of  the moron is a stupid, insipid fiction.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s