THE MAYYIT’S ESTATE – THE FIRST CONCERN

By Mujlisul Ulama

The custom which is universally prevalent after burial of the mayyit (deceased) is involvement in futility and even frivolity. The family members assemble at the home of the deceased for some feasting, crying, perhaps even wailing, discussing the exploits of the mayyit, and some even for gheebat. In the variety of activities in which the family members engage, the first and foremost Waajib act commanded by the Shariah is disregarded with wanton neglect and even disdain. Attendance to the estate – the assets – of the mayyit is not accorded the least bit of attention although this is the first compulsory obligation after burial.

This neglect perpetrated by 99.9% of the people invariably leads to misappropriation of the mayyit’s assets, usurpation, defrauding, and denial of the correct shares which Allah Ta’ala has apportioned for the heirs. In almost all cases of such flagrant disregard of the Shariah’s command, the consequences are heartrending and vile in the extreme. After some time has lapsed without proper accountability and division of the estate in accordance with the Shariah, the heirs – brothers and sisters – mother and children – aunts and uncles, etc become life-long enemies, each one accusing the other of having usurped his/her rightful share of inheritance.

The prime culprits usually in fiascos of this type are the mayyit’s sons who operate and manipulate the mayyit’s business and assets as if they are the sole owners. Nothing is recorded. No agreement is made with the other heirs. The daughters are generally ignored, and the sons continue with the business as if they have become the sole owners. The estate is allowed to drag on indefinitely until ultimately the issue becomes confrontational. Then commences the long uphill battle of acrimony, accusation, counter-accusation, even violence and kuffaar-court actions to resolve an Islamic issue with kuffaar law. When this stage of corruption is reached, the adversaries, despite professing to be faithful Mu’mineen, see only kuffaar law as their succour. In so doing, they move directly into the glare of Allah’s Decree: “Those who do not rule according to that (Shariah) which Allah has revealed, verily they are the kaafiroon.”

There is a glut of cases of this sort of misery. Whenever Muslims do not submit to the directives of the Shariah, the inevitable consequences are misery, animosity and even life-long disruption of very close family ties. Brothers become enemies to one another; brother becomes the enemy of the sister; mother becomes the enemy of her children; grandchildren become the enemies of their seniors who had perpetrated the corruption in the first instance. Muslims – close family members — are squandering millions of rands in legal fees fighting one another in the courts for the carrion of the world. All the noble and lofty ideals produced by blood ties are eliminated. Observers viewing the scenario from outside are aghast and could be forgiven for doubting the legitimacy of those clawing at each other in their homes and in the courts to lay their hands on the rotting meat of this dunya. If an observer concludes that those fighting each other over inheritance issues are perhaps the illegitimate offspring of the deceased, he could be forgiven because true blood brothers and blood sisters do not or are not supposed to conduct themselves with such vehement acrimony and intense animosity as heirs do for the acquisition of money.

What is the duty of the heirs? After the mayyit has been buried, the first duty of the senior members – usually the adult sons – is to make a detailed meticulous inventory of the mayyits assets – all his assets – even the shoes and the unwashed pair of socks he was last wearing. Every item of the estate has to be recorded. It is essential to understand that every heir’s right pervades every single item in the estate of the mayyit. There is not a single heir, male or female, who has the right to claim a specific item in the estate. Since the rights of all the heirs are related to every item, the division of the assets will have to be with understanding, give and take – with compromise – as is expected of Muslims who have some fear of Allah Ta’ala in their hearts. The heirs are not expected to behave like cats and dogs. They are expected to act responsibly with bigness of heart as is expected of Mu’mineen.

After returning from the Qabrustaan (graveyard), instead of assembling for refreshments and nonsensical conversation, the male heirs and even the female heirs, if they are not ghair mahram, should immediately commence with the work of the inventory. Not an item should be excluded. The emphasis is more on a physical stock-taking of the business assets. The stock and other assets in the shops and factories must be accurately listed. In fact, the stock-taking has to be 100% genuine, unlike the estimates which are prepared for tax purposes.

The male heirs who are in charge of the business of the mayyit should understand that it is haraam for them to continue business operations without an agreement with the other heirs. Every heir has his/her proportionate ownership in every item of the stock, equipment and vehicles, etc. which had belonged to the mayyit. The ownership of the heirs is established simultaneous with the death of their father/relative. It is therefore not permissible for any heir to utilize any asset of the estate without a proper agreement having been made.

If those in charge of the business continue to trade without any agreement with the heirs, they are guilty of usurpation of the assets of the heirs. This happens in 99.9% of cases in which the mayyit leaves behind a business. The trading continues for years and sometimes for even decades. At such a stage more than one generation of heirs become entangled in an almost insoluble mass and mess from which amicable extrication is a virtual impossibility.

One very important fact which all heirs should take note of in a case of such usurpation of assets with which some of the heirs continue the operation of the business, is that despite the usurpation, all future profit yielded by the business belongs to those who operated the business. The future profit, that is, after the demise of the mayyit, does not form part of the estate. The rights of the heirs are related to only the assets which the mayyit had left, not in future profit acquired from the usurped assets. The usurpers will have to face the Reckoning in the Divine Court for their usurpation – for having utilized the assets without the consent of the owners.

An extremely contentitious issue due to ignorance and greed develops when the usurper heirs have to pay the other heirs for the assets they had utilized without consent. The usurpers invariably claim that the value of the assets on the day of demise has to be paid while the other heirs claim the current value. The heirs are entitled to demand that the usurpers pay their share with tangible assets. For example, if the business assets comprised of groceries, and the estate is finalized only after five years, the heirs can claim that their share of the assets be paid in groceries. The usurper heirs may not argue that they will pay whatever the value of the groceries was five years ago at the time of demise. Either they have to pay with groceries or make a reasonable settlement which is acceptable to the heirs.

If the usurper heirs had utilized the gold coins of the mayyit, they have to pay the other heirs in the form of gold coins. They will have to buy gold coins at today’s price and pay the heirs therewith. The value of the coins five years ago has no validity. There are therefore three options to settle the usurpation: (1) Pay in the form of tangible assets (2) Pay the current value of the assets (3) Arrange a compromise settlement acceptable to the aggrieved heirs.

Usually the mayyit’s vehicles are appropriated and misappropriated by the sons who utilize the vehicles to the exclusion of the daughters and other heirs. This issue should be resolved the very day of the demise, immediately after burial of the mayyit. A price mutually agreed on should be fixed for the vehicles. Whoever among the heirs desires to retain the vehicles will have to pay the price minus his share. The cash should then be divided among the heirs in accordance with the law of Inheritance. It is haraam for any one heir to simply take possession of a vehicle and utilize it for himself to the exclusion of the others. The heir purchasing the vehicle/s may arrange to pay the other heirs in instalments. It should however be remembered that all dealings have to be by mutual cooperation and agreement. An heir by virtue of his seniority has no right of imposing his will and decision on the other heirs. It should be expected and accepted that there will have to be a degree of compromise in the process of physically dividing the assets. Most assets cannot be physically divided into bits and pieces. For a successful settlement in this area, the attributes of Imaan play a prominent role. We are not expected to behave like animals and such persons who have no belief in the Aakhirah and the Reckoning in the Divine Court. When distributing the assets, always bear in mind the following advice and promise of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam):

“I guarantee a (special) palace in the middle of Jannat (i.e. the prime site in Jannat) for one who abandons a dispute despite him being rightful (in his claim).”

The score of the household furniture, crockery, cutlery and the mayyit’s clothing, etc. should be settled on the very day of the demise. The distribution of these items should be effected by physical division of the various items into lots of approximately equal value, or individual articles should be sold to heirs who wish to acquire such items or by compromise settlement.

It is of great importance to understand that gifts made by heirs of their shares or waiving of their rights are not valid prior to taking physical possession of their respective shares of the assets. Thus, if an heir makes a ‘gift’ of his/her share of the assets, such gift will not be valid. The heir still retains his/her right. He/she should first be given physical possession of his/her share of the assets. Thereafter, the heir may decide what to do with the assets.

Many people simply donate the mayyit’s clothes to charity. This is not permissible. If all the adult heirs unanimously decide to make a donation of the clothes or of any specific item, then too the rule of possession is essential. The garments should be physically divided into lots and handed over to the heirs. Thereafter they may donate whatever they wish and to whomever they wish. It is impermissible for an heir to canvass the others and to induce them to donate any part of their assets to charity, etc.

The shares of minor (nabaaligh) heirs have to be compulsorily held in trust until they are of discerning age capable of handling their own finances.

This discussion is a brief outline of the action which should be taken by the heirs immediately after burial. An inventory of all the assets immediately after burial is Waajib. All other related issues – and there are many – should be solved and settled with the guidance of Ulama who are experienced in the matter of Inheritance.

Usurpation of the assets of heirs is akin to the crime of murder for which ‘everlasting’ punishment in Jahannum has been threatened.

ﻣﺰﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﭘﺮ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﯼ ﺩﯾﻨﮯ ﺳﮯ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﯽٰ ﻣﺸﮑﻼﺕ ﮐﯿﻮﮞ ﺣﻞ ﮐﺮﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ؟

ﻣﺰﺍﺭﻭﮞ ﭘﺮ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﯼ ﺩﯾﻨﮯ ﺳﮯ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﯽٰ ﻣﺸﮑﻞ ﺣﻞ ﮐﯿﻮﮞ ﮐﺮﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ، ﯾﮧ ﺣﻘﯿﻘﯿﺖ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺍﯾﻤﺎﻥ ﮐﺎ ﺍﻣﺘﺤﺎﻥ ﮨﮯ ﺍﻭﺭ ﮔﻤﺮﺍﮦ ﮨﻮﻧﮯ ﻭﺍﻟﮯ ﮐﯽ ﺭﺳﯽ ﮐﻮ ﮈﻫﯿﻼ ﮐﺮﻧﮯ ﻭﺍﻟﯽ ﺑﺎﺕ ﮨﮯ. ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﯽٰ ﺍﻧﻬﯿﮟ ﺳﺮ ﮐﺸﯽ ﻣﯿﮟ ﮐﻬﻼ ﭼﻬﻮﮌ ﺩﯾﺘﺎ ﮨﮯ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻭﮦ ﺳﺮﮔﺮﺩﺍﮞ ﺭﮨﺘﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ.

ﺍﺱ ﮐﻮ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﮐﮯ ﺳﺎﺗﮫ ﺳﻤﺠﮭﻨﺎ ﮨﻮ ﺗﻮ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻭﻟﯿﺪ ﺭﺿﯽ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﻋﻨﮧ ﮐﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﮧ ﺑﮍﯼ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺩﻟﯿﻞ ﮨﮯ: ﺟﺐ ﻭﮦ ﻧﺒﯽ ﺍﮐﺮﻡ ﷺ ﮐﮯ ﺣﮑﻢ ﺳﮯ ﻃﺎﺋﻒ ﮐﮯ ﻣﺸﮩﻮﺭ ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﮯ ‘ﻋﺰﯼٰ’ ﮐﻮ ﮔﺮﺍ ﮐﺮ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍﺱ ﮐﮯ ﺗﯿﻦ ﺩﺭﺧﺘﻮﮞ ﮐﻮ ﮐﺎﭦ ﮐﺮ ﻭﺍﭘﺲ ﺁﺋﮯ ﺗﻮ ﻧﺒﯽ ﺍﮐﺮﻡ ﷺﻧﮯ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﯾﺎ: ﺍﮮ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﮦ ﺟﺎﺅ ﺗﻢ ﺍﺑﻬﯽ ﺗﮏ ﮐﭽﮫ ﺑﻬﯽ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ ﮐﺮ ﮐﮯ ﺁﺋﮯ، ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﺭﺿﯽ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﻋﻨﮧ ﺗﻠﻮﺍﺭ ﻟﮯ ﮐﺮ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﮦ ﮔﺌﮯ ﺗﻮ ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﮯ ﮐﯽ ﺟﮕﮧ ﭘﺮ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﺭﺿﯽ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﻋﻨﮧ ﻧﮯ ﺑﺮﮨﻨﮧ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺑﮑﻬﺮﮮ ﮨﻮﺋﮯ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﮞ ﻭﺍﻟﯽ ﻋﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﯾﮑﻬﯽ ﺟﻮ ﺍﭘﻨﮯ ﺳﺮ ﭘﺮ ﻣﭩﯽ ﮈﺍﻝ ﺭﮨﯽ ﺗﻬﯽ ﺗﻮ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﺭﺿﯽ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﻋﻨﮧ ﻧﮯ ﺗﻠﻮﺍﺭ ﮐﯽ ﺿﺮﺏ ﺳﮯ ﺍﺱ ﮐﮯ ﺩﻭ ﭨﮑﮍﮮ ﮐﺮ ﺩﺋﮯ ، ﭘﻬﺮ ﻧﺒﯽ ﺍﮐﺮﻡ ﷺ ﮐﻮ ﺁ ﮐﺮ ﯾﮧ ﻭاﻗﻌﮧ ﺑﺘﻼﯾﺎ ﺗﻮ ﺁﭖؐ ﻧﮯ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﯾﺎ : ﯾﮧ ﻋﻮﺭﺕ ‏(ﺷﯿﻄﺎﻥ) ﻋﺰﯼٰ ﺗﻬﯽ ، ﺟﻮ ﻟﻮﮔﻮﮞ ﮐﯽ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﯾﮟ ﭘﻮﺭﯼ ﮐﺮﺗﯽ ﺗﻬﯽ ‏[ﺗﻔﺴﯿﺮ ﺍﺑﻦ ﮐﺜﯿﺮ]

ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﮨﻮﺍ ﮐﮧ ﻣﺰﺍﺭﻭﮞ ﭘﺮ ﭼﻮﻧﮑﮧ ﻟﻮﮒ ﻏﯿﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﮐﻮ ﺳﺠﺪﮦ ﮐﺮ ﮐﮯ ﺷﺮﮎ ﮐﺮﺗﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ ،ﻟﮩٰﺬﺍ ﺍﯾﺴﮯ ﺷﺮﮎ ﮐﮯ ﺍﮈﻭﮞ ﭘﺮ ﺷﯿﺎﻃﯿﻦ ﮈﯾﺮﮦ ﮈﺍﻝ ﻟﯿﺘﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺁﻧﮯ ﺟﺎﻧﮯ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﮞ ﮐﯽ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻭﮞ ﮐﻮ ﭘﻮﺭﺍ ﮐﺮ ﺩﯾﺘﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ، ﺟﺲ ﺳﮯ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﻣﻨﺪ ﮐﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﭘﺨﺘﮧ ﮨﻮ ﺟﺎﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ ﮐﮧ ﯾﮩﺎﮞ ﭘﺮ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﯼ ﮐﯽ ﻭﺟﮧ ﺳﮯ ﻣﯿﺮﺍ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﮧ ﺣﻞ ﮨﻮﺍ ﮨﮯ ﺟﺒﮑﮧ ﯾﮧ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﮧ ﺍﺱ ﺁﺩﻣﯽ ﮐﮯ ﺷﺮﮎ ﮐﯽ ﻭﺟﮧ ﺳﮯ ﺷﯿﻄﺎﻥ ﻧﮯ ﺣﻞ ﮐﯿﺎ ﮨﻮﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ. ﺑﻌﺾ ﺩﻓﻌﮧ ﺷﯿﻄﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻬﯽ ﮐﻮﺋﯽ ﺗﮑﻠﯿﻒ ﭘﮩﻨﭽﺎﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ ﺟﺲ ﮐﺎ ﺁﺩﻣﯽ ﮈﺍﮐﭩﺮﻭﮞ ﺳﮯ ﻋﻼﺝ ﮐﺮﻭﺍﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ ﺗﻮ ﮐﺎﻣﯿﺎﺏ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ ﮨﻮﺗﺎ ﭘﻬﺮ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻭﮞ ﭘﺮ ﺟﺎ ﮐﺮ ﺷﺮﮎ ﮐﺮﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ ﺗﻮ ﺷﯿﻄﺎﻥ ﭼﻬﻮﮌ ﺩﯾﺘﺎ ﮨﮯ ﺟﺲ ﺳﮯ ﺁﺩﻣﯽ ﮨﻤﯿﺸﮧ ﮐﯿﻠﺌﮯ ﺷﺮﮎ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻣﺒﺘﻼ ﮨﻮ ﺟﺎﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ.

ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﮐﯽ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺳﮯ ﮨﺮ ﺑﯿﻤﺎﺭﯼ ﮐﯽ ﺷﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻣﺸﮑﻞ ﮐﮯ ﺣﻞ ﮐﺎ ﺍﯾﮏ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻣﻘﺮﺭ ﮨﻮﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ، ﻣﺰﺍﺭﻭﮞ ﭘﺮ ﻣﻨﺘﯿﮟ ﻣﺎﻧﮕﻨﮯ ﻭﺍﻟﮯ ﯾﮩﯽ ﺳﻤﺠﻬﺘﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ ﮐﮧ ﮨﻤﯿﮟ ﺷﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻭﺭ ﮨﻤﺎﺭﯼ ﻣﺸﮑﻼﺕ ﮐﺎ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺰﺍﺭﻭﮞ ﭘﺮ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﯼ ﺩﯾﻨﮯ ﯾﺎ ﻣﻨﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﮕﻨﮯ ﺳﮯ ﮨﻮﺍ ﮨﮯ، ﺍﺱ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻭﮦ ﺍﯾﮏ ﺷﺮﮎ ﺍﮐﺒﺮ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻣﺒﺘﻼ ﮨﻮ ﺟﺎﺗﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ .
ﻗﺎﺭﺋﯿﻦ ﮐﺮﺍﻡ ﺁﭖ ﺫﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳﻮﭼﯿﮟ!

ﺟﻮ ﻣﺰﺍﺭﻭﮞ ﭘﺮ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﯾﺎﮞ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻣﻨﺘﯿﮟ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ ﻣﺎﻧﮕﺘﮯ ﮐﯿﺎ

ﻭﮦ ﺑﮭﻮﮐﮯ ﺳﻮﺗﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ؟
ﯾﺎ ﻭﮦ ﺑﮯ ﺍﻭﻻﺩ ﻣﺮﺗﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ؟
ﯾﺎ ﻭﮦ ﺷﻔﺎﺀ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ ﭘﺎﺗﮯ؟
ﯾﺎ ﻭﮦ ﺍﭘﻨﯽ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﯾﺎﺕ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ ﭘﻮﺭﯼ ﮐﺮﻧﮯ ﺳﮯ ﻗﺎﺻﺮ ﺭﮨﺘﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ؟

ﯾﻘﯿﻨﺎ ﺳﺐ ﮐﭽﮫ ﺍﻧﻬﯿﮟ ﺩﻭﺳﺮﻭﮞ ﮐﯽ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻣﯿﺴﺮ ﮨﻮﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ. ﺟﺐ ﻣﺰﺍﺭﻭﮞ ﭘﺮ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﯾﺎﮞ ﺩﯾﻨﮯ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻧﮧ ﺩﯾﻨﮯ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﮞ ﻣﯿﮟ ﮐﻮﺋﯽ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻓﺮﻕ ﻧﻤﺎﯾﺎﮞ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ ‘ ﺗﻮ ﭘﻬﺮ ﮐﯿﻮﮞ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﮧ ﻭﺗﻌﺎﻟﯽٰ ﮐﮯ ﺳﺎﺗﮫ ﺍﺱ ﮐﯽ ﮐﻤﺰﻭﺭ ﻣﺨﻠﻮﻕ ﮐﻮ ﺷﺮﯾﮏ ﭨﻬﮩﺮﺍ ﮐﺮ ﺍﭘﻨﯽ ﺁﺧﺮﺕ ﺑﺮﺑﺎﺩ ﮐﺮﯾﮟ. ۔۔۔

ﺑﮩﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ!-
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﭖ ﮐﺴﯽ ﻗﺒﺮ ﭘﺮﺳﺖ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻗﺒﻮﺭﯼ ﺷﺮﮎ ﮐﺮﻧﮯ ﻭﺍﻟﮯ ﺳﮯ ﮐﮩﯿﮟ ﮐﮧ ﻣﺰﺍﺭﻭﮞ ﭘﺮ ﺟﺎ ﮐﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﮕﻨﺎ ﺷﺮﮎ ﮨﮯ ، ﺗﻮ ﻭﮦ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺩﯾﮟ ﮔﮯ ﮐﮧ!

ﺟﺐ ﮨﻢ ﻣﺰﺍﺭ ﭘﺮ ﺟﺎﺗﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ ﺍﻭﺭ ﭨﮑﭩﮑﯽ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﮪ ﮐﺮ ﻣﺰﺍﺭ ﮐﯽ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﯾﮑﮭﺘﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ ﺗﻮ ﮨﻤﺎﺭﺍ ﺻﺎﺣﺐِ ﻣﺰﺍﺭ ﺳﮯ ﺑﺮﺍﮦ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﮧ ﮨﻮ ﺟﺎﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍﯾﺴﮯ ﻣﯿﮟ ﮨﻤﺎﺭﯼ ﻣﺎﻧﮕﯽ ﮔﺌﯽ ﺩﻋﺎﺋﯿﮟ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﮨﻮ ﺟﺎﺗﯽ ﮨﯿﮟ۔

ﺍﯾﺴﮯ ﻟﻮﮔﻮﮞ ﺳﮯ ﮐﮩﺎ ﺟﺎﺋﮯ ﮐﮧ ﮐﯿﺎ ﺁﭖ ﮐﮯ ﻗﺮﺏ ﻭ ﺟﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﯿﮟ ﮐﻮﺋﯽ ﻣﻨﺪﺭ ﮨﮯ ﺗﻮ ﺁﭖ ﺍﺱ ﻣﻨﺪﺭ ﻣﯿﮟ ﭼﻠﮯ ﺟﺎﺋﯿﮟ ﺍﻭﺭ ﯾﮩﯽ ﻋﻤﻞ ﯾﻌﻨﯽ ﭨﮑﭩﮑﯽ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﮪ ﮐﺮ ﮐﺴﯽ ﺑﮭﯽ ﺑُﺖ ﯾﺎ ﺩﯾﻮﯼ ﮐﻮ ﺩﯾﮑﮭﺘﮯ ﺭﮨﺌﮯ۔ ﮐﭽﮫ ﮨﯽ ﺩﯾﺮ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺁﭖ ﮐﺎ ﺩﯾﻮﯼ ﺳﮯ ﺫﮨﻨﯽ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﮧ ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﮨﻮﺟﺎﺋﮯ ﮔﺎ، ﭘﮭﺮ ﺍﺳﯽ ﻟﻤﺤﮧ ﮐﭽﮫ ﻣﺎﻧﮓ ﮐﺮ ﺩﯾﮑﮭﺌﮯ۔ ﯾﻘﯿﻨﺎً ﺁﭖ ﮐﯽ ﻣﺎﻧﮓ ﭘﻮﺭﯼ ﮨﻮﮔﯽ۔

ﺍﺱ ﺑﺮ ﺻﻐﯿﺮ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺍﯾﮏ ﺍﺭﺏ ﺳﮯ ﺯﺍﺋﺪ ﻟﻮﮒ ﻣﻨﺪﺭﻭﮞ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻣﺎﻧﮕﺘﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ۔ ﺍﻥ ﮐﯽ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﯾﮟ ﺑﮭﯽ ﭘﻮﺭﯼ ﮨﻮﺗﯽ ﮨﯿﮟ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ ﮨﻮﺗﯽ ﺗﻮ ﺁﺝ ﻭﮨﺎﮞ ﮐﻮﺋﯽ ﺑﮭﯽ ﻧﮧ ﺟﺎﺗﺎ۔ ﺁﭖ ﺑﮭﯽ ﺟﺎﮐﺮ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻣﺎﻧﮓ ﮐﺮ ﺩﯾﮑﮭﺌﮯ۔

ﮐﺴﯽ ﻣﺰﺍﺭ ﯾﺎ ﻣﻨﺪﺭ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻣﺎﻧﮕﻨﮯ ﭘﺮ ﻣﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﮯ ﮐﺎ ﯾﮧ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﮨﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ ﮐﮧ ﺍﻥ ﺳﮯ ﻣﺎﻧﮕﻨﺎ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ ﺷﺮﯾﻌﺖ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺟﺎﺋﺰ ﮨﮯ۔ ﺩﯾﻨﮯ ﻭﺍﻻ ﺗﻮ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﮨﮯ ﺟﻮ ﮐﺎﻓﺮﻭﮞ ﮐﻮ ﺑﮭﯽ ﺩﯾﺘﺎ ﮨﮯ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻣﺸﺮﮐﻮﮞ ﮐﻮ ﺑﮭﯽ۔ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻭﮦ ﮐﺎﻓﺮﻭﮞ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻣﺸﺮﮐﻮﮞ ﮐﻮ ﺍﻥ ﮐﮯ ﮐﻔﺮﯾﮧ ﻭ ﺷﺮﮐﯿﮧ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﮐﯽ ﺑﺪﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﯾﻨﺎ ﺑﻨﺪ ﮐﺮﺩﮮ ﺗﻮ ﺩﻭﺳﺮﮮ ﮨﯽ ﺩﻥ ﺳﺎﺭﮮ ﻣﺸﺮﮎ ﻭ ﮐﺎﻓﺮ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﮨﻮﺟﺎﺋﯿﮟ ﮔﮯ۔ ﻟﯿﮑﻦ ﭘﮭﺮ ﯾﮧ ﺍﻣﺘﺤﺎﻥ ﻧﮧ ﮨﻮﮔﺎ ﮐﮧ ﯾﮧ ﺩﻧﯿﺎ ﺗﻮ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻻﻣﺘﺤﺎﻥ ﮨﮯ ….. ۔

ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﺭﺿﯽ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﻋﻨﮧ ﮐﯽ ﺑﯿﻮﯼ ﺳﯿﺪﮦ ﺯﯾﻨﺐ ﮐﯽ ﺁﻧﮑﮫ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺩﺭﺩ ﮨﻮﺗﺎ ﺗﻮ ﻭﮦ ﺍﯾﮏ ﯾﮩﻮﺩﯼ ﺳﮯ ﺩﻡ ﮐﺮﻭﺍﺗﯿﮟ ﺗﻮ ﺗﻨﺪﺭﺳﺖ ﮨﻮ ﺟﺎﺗﯿﮟ ‘ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﺭﺿﯽ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﻋﻨﮧ ﮐﻮ ﭘﺘﮧ ﭼﻼ ﺗﻮ ﺍﻧﮩﻮﮞ ﻧﮯ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﯾﺎ ﯾﮧ ﺷﯿﻄﺎﻥ ﮐﯽ ﮐﺎﺭﺳﺘﺎﻧﯽ ﮨﮯ ﺟﺐ ﺗﻮ ﯾﮩﻮﺩﯼ ﺳﮯ ﺩﻡ ﮐﺮﻭﺍﺗﯽ ﮨﮯ ﺗﻮ ﻭﮦ ﺁﻧﮑﮫ ﮐﻮ ﺗﮑﻠﯿﻒ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ ﭘﮩﻨﭽﺎﺗﺎ ﺟﺐ ﺗﻮ ﺩﻡ ﮐﺮﻭﺍﻧﺎ ﭼﻬﻮﮌ ﺩﯾﺘﯽ ﮨﮯ ﺗﻮ ﻭﮦ ﺁﻧﮑﮫ ﮐﻮ ﭼﻬﻮ ﮐﺮ ﺩﺭﺩ ﭘﯿﺪﺍ ﮐﺮ ﺩﯾﺘﺎ ﮨﮯ . ﻟﮩٰﺬﺍ ﯾﮩﻮﺩﯼ ﺳﮯ ﺩﻡ ﮐﺮﻭﺍﻧﮯ ﮐﯽ ﺑﺠﺎﺋﮯ ﺗﻮ ﻣﺴﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﻡ ﮐﺮﻭﺍ . ﻏﻮﺭ ﻃﻠﺐ ﺑﺎﺕ ﮨﮯ ﮐﮧ ﺟﺐ ﺍﯾﮏ ﺻﺤﺎﺑﯿﮧ ﮐﻮ ﺷﯿﻄﺎﻥ ﮐﯽ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺳﮯ ﺗﮑﻠﯿﻒ ﭘﮩﻨﭻ ﺳﮑﺘﯽ ﮨﮯ ﺍﻭﺭ ﯾﮩﻮﺩﯼ ﺳﮯ ﺩﻡ ﮐﺮﻭﺍﻧﮯ ﺳﮯ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﺁ ﺳﮑﺘﺎ ﮨﮯ ، ﺣﺎﻻﻧﮑﮧ ﺍﻥ ﮐﺎ ﺍﯾﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﮍﺍ ﻣﻀﺒﻮﻁ ﺗﻬﺎ ﺗﻮ ﺁﺝ ﺷﯿﻄﺎﻥ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﺳﮯ ﺗﻮ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ ﺑﯿﭩﮫ ﺳﮑﺘﺎ ‘… ﻭﮦ ﻟﻮﮔﻮﮞ ﮐﻮ ﮔﻤﺮﺍﮦ ﮐﺮﻧﮯ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻟﮕﺎ ﮨﻮﺍ ﮨﮯ . ﻟﮩﺬﺍ ﺟﻮ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﺮﮎ ﮐﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﮑﺎﺏ ﮐﺮ ﮐﮯ ﯾﮧ ﺳﻤﺠﻬﺘﮯ ﺭﮨﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ ﮐﮧ ﻓﻼﮞ ﺯﯾﺎﺭﺕ ﯾﺎ ﻓﻼﮞ ﻣﻨﺖ ﺳﮯ ﺷﻔﺎﺀ ﯾﺎ ﻣﺸﮑﻞ ﺣﻞ ﮨﻮﺋﯽ ﮨﮯ ﺗﻮ ﺍﻧﮩﯿﮟ ﺳﭽﯽ ﺗﻮﺑﮧ ﮐﺮ ﮐﮯ ﺍﭘﻨﮯ ﻋﻘﯿﺪﮮ ﮐﯽ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﮐﺮ ﻟﯿﻨﯽ ﭼﺎﮨﺌﯿﮯ ﮐﮩﯿﮟ ﯾﮧ ﻧﮧ ﮨﻮ ﮐﮧ ﭼﻬﻮﭨﯽ ﺳﯽ ﻣﺸﮑﻞ ﺣﻞ ﮐﺮﻭﺍﻧﮯ ﮐﯽ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﯾﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﮯ ﮨﺎﺗﮫ ﺩﻫﻮ ﺑﯿﭩﮭﯿﮟ .
ﮐﺴﯽ ﺟﮕﮧ ﺳﮯ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﮐﺎ ﭘﻮﺭﺍ ﮨﻮ ﺟﺎﻧﺎ ﯾﮧ ﺍﺱ ﮐﮯ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺑﺮﮐﺖ ﮨﻮﻧﮯ ﮐﯽ ﺩﻟﯿﻞ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ ‘ ﮐﺘﻨﮯ ﻟﻮﮒ ﮨﯿﮟ ﺟﻮ ﺍﭘﻨﮯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﯿﻦ ﭘﺮ ﺟﺎﺩﻭ ﮐﺮ ﮐﮯ ﺍﻧﮩﯿﮟ ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﭘﮩﻨﭽﺎﺗﮯ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍﭘﻨﺎ ﻣﻘﺼﺪ ﺣﻞ ﮐﺮﻧﮯ ﻣﯿﮟ ﮐﺎﻣﯿﺎﺏ ﮨﻮ ﺟﺎﺗﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ ﺗﻮ ﮐﯿﺎ ﺟﺎﺩﻭ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻋﻤﻞ ﮐﮩﻼﺋﮯ ﮔﺎ .. ؟ ﺑﯿﺸﮏ ﺟﺎﺩﻭ ﺳﮯ ﮐﻮﺋﯽ ﻣﺸﮑﻞ ﺣﻞ ﮨﻮ ﺟﺎﺋﮯ ﯾﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﭘﻮﺭﯼ ﮨﻮ ﺟﺎﺋﮯ ‘ ﭘﻬﺮ ﺑﻬﯽ ﺍﺳﮯ ﺳﯿﮑﻬﻨﺎ ‘ ﺳﮑﻬﺎﻧﺎ ‘ ﮐﺮﻧﺎ ‘ ﮐﺮﻭﺍﻧﺎ ﺻﺮﯾﺤﺎ ﮐﻔﺮ ﮨﮯ.

ﻟﻮﮔﻮﮞ ﮐﮯ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻇﻦ ‘ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﯾﺎ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺳﮯ ﮐﻮﺋﯽ ﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﺣﻼﻝ ﺍﻭﺭ ﮐﻔﺮ ﺍﯾﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ ﺑﻦ ﺳﮑﺘﺎ . ﺍﻭﺭ ﺑﮩﺖ ﺳﺎﺭﮮ ﻟﻮﮒ ﭼﻮﻧﮑﮧ ﻋﻘﯿﺪﮮ ﮐﯽ ﺍﮨﻤﯿﺖ ﺳﮯ ﻧﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻒ ﮨﯿﮟ ‘ ﺗﻮﺣﯿﺪ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺷﺮﮎ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺗﻤﯿﺰ ﮐﺮﻧﮯ ﺳﮯ ﻗﺎﺻﺮ ﮨﯿﮟ . ﻟﮩﺬﺍ ﺍﻥ ﮐﮯ ﮨﺎﮞ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﯽ ﺳﮯ ﻣﺎﻧﮕﻨﺎ ﯾﺎ ﻏﯿﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﺳﮯ ﻣﺎﻧﮕﻨﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﮨﮯ ، ﺑﻠﮑﮧ ﻏﯿﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﺳﮯ ﺍﻥ ﮐﯽ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﯽ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﯽٰ ﺳﮯ ﺑﻬﯽ ﺯﯾﺎﺩﮦ ﮨﻮﺗﯽ ﮨﮯ . ﻋﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺟﺲ ﻗﺪﺭ ﮐﺜﯿﺮ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﯿﮟ ﮐﺴﺐ ﻓﯿﺾ ﯾﺎ ﻣﺸﮑﻼﺕ ﮐﮯ ﺣﻞ ﮐﯿﻠﺌﮯ ﻣﺰﺍﺭﻭﮞ ﭘﺮ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﯼ ﺩﯾﺘﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ ﺍﺗﻨﮯ ﺑﮍﮮ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﮯ ﮐﯽ ﺩﻟﯿﻞ ﺗﻮ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﻣﺠﯿﺪ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﻣﯿﮟ ﮨﻮﻧﯽ ﭼﺎﮨﯿﺌﮯ ﺗﻬﯽ . ﻣﮕﺮ ﭘﻮﺭﮮ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﻣﯿﮟ ﮐﻮﺋﯽ ﺍﯾﮏ ﺁﯾﺖ ﺑﻬﯽ ﻗﺒﺮﻭﮞ ﺳﮯ ﮐﺴﺐ ﻓﯿﺾ ﮐﮯ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ ﺩﮐﻬﺎﺋﯽ ﺟﺎ ﺳﮑﺘﯽ ﺗﻮ ﭘﻬﺮ ﺍﺱ ﮐﺎ ﻣﺎﺧﺬ ﮐﯿﺎ ﮨﮯ ۔۔۔۔

TARIQ JAMEEL’S BAATIL ‘TABLEEGH’

By Mujlisul Ulama

It is mentioned in the Hadith, that there are some creatures who are shayaateen (devils) in human form. They beguile the ignorant and the unwary with their glib tongue disgorging haraam and baatil coated with a deceptive ‘deeni’ veneer. One such shaitaan in human form, is the character Tariq Jameel who is causing much damage to the Tablighi Jamaat. He is an enemy from within the ranks of the Tabligh Jamaat. The sooner the Jamaat weeds him out, the better. His propagation of haraam and baatil is undermining not only the Jamaat, but Islam itself. In exposition of Tariq Jameel’s deviation, a Brother wrote:

“The following are some of the excerpts of the speech this deviate Tariq Jameel, delivered in the Central Masjid, Birmingham on 19th November 2013, and in the Baitus Salam Masjid DHA, Karachi on 15th September 2013. In these two foul speeches Tariq Jameel speaks of meeting the Indian actor, Amir Khan, and in this context he advocates baatil in the name of Tabligh. He said:

‘One of our members, Jawwad Waseem sahib who used to indulge in dramas spent four months in Jamaat. When he came to meet us, there was a Moulvi saheb with us, he was saying, “Moulana (Moulana Tariq Jameel’s teacher), this is Jawwad saheb, he used to work in dramas. Now     that he spent four months in Tabligh we are telling him to quit dramas. Moulana replied, “Who will raise those who are lying there, who will raise them’. In order to anger him, he said, ‘Moulana, girls dance nude there’. Moulana replied, “They are our daughters only, our daughters.”

He said they are our daughters only. I have learned the Qur’an from this teacher. They have taught us love – to give love to people. Give love, give love. (A concept of ‘giving love’ which accommodates dalliance with   nude, dancing girls is zina and prostitution – The Majlis) I met Amir Khan (the Indian actor). I didn’t tell him anything about Deen. It was just love. Still I receive his messages. (The moron is over-awed by the messages of a cinema-owner – The Majlis) He said he was never influenced by anyone. I am the one by whom he was influenced. Did I do any magic? It was just love. (It was satanistic ‘love’. – The Majlis) Give love to people. They will come   close. There was no way for meeting (the Indian actor). He didn’t know me, I didn’t know him. I was not getting any opportunity to meet (him). (What is so extraordinary in meeting a cinema-owner? This character betrays his mental inferiority complex. – The Majlis) Allah sent Shahid Afridi (Pakistani cricketer) who is our cricketer. He had a friendship with the actor. I told him over phone to arrange a meeting with him. He arranged the meeting. He said that we have half an hour. I said OK. I went. He (Amir khan) was fearful that a Moulana came. He did not know what to expect. (A faasiq neither fears nor respects a bootlicking molvi who grovels at his feet. – The Majlis)

Would he say: “What you are doing is Haraam. Dancing and singing are haraam. Therefore repent otherwise hell will be your lot. He did not know what would happen. He was afraid.

As soon as I sat down, I started speaking about films. (If this bootlicking molvi had to visit a prostitute, the first thing he would have done would have been indulgence in zina, for such indulgence finds room in his concept of deceptive ‘tableegh’. – The Majlis) After sometime I felt that from 1960 to 1972, he didn’t know the film industry as much as I knew. (He testifies to his own fisq and fujoor. – The Majlis) So he was awed by my knowledge. (Knowledge of fisq, fujoor and Satanism – The Majlis) It was the knowledge of his profession. He was amazed and tense. Sometimes Dilip Kumar was mentioned, sometimes Raj Kapoor, sometimes Mehboob saheb, and sometimes Madan Mohan. That half an hour passed like that. After half an hour, I said, “Our time is over, let us go, let us sit there at the dining table’. We went and sat there. Again the same conversation started. When all his fear had vanished and he was relaxed, 45 to 50 minutes had passed in that conversation. Then I said, “Amir bhai, you have come on Hajj, shall I tell you the Hajj of our Nabi if you permit?’ He replied, ’Yes, surely tell’. Then I   spoke for one and a quarter hour, and he was sitting and listening. He didn’t move from his place. People are hungry for love, but you start giving Fatwas. I learned about Junaid Jamshed (ex-Pakistani singer) that Tablighi members don’t have food at his home because his earning is Haraam. He is very disheartened. He had just recently come into Tableegh. I had a journey ahead. We were going in Jamat. We had to go via Karachi, so I phoned him   to inform him that I would be coming and that I would have food at his home. He said; “At my home?” I said, “Yes, at your home”. He again said, “At my home?” I said, “Yes, at your home”. He repeated: ’Really at my home?” I said, ‘Really at your home’. (Devouring haraam has completely disfigured this molvi’s spiritual countenance. His brains and heart are soiled and corrupted with all the haraam he consumes and in which he so much relishes. – The Majlis)

I was sitting in Raiwand when a person came and said: The owner of Mubarak cinema which was in Lahore, will be coming to Raiwand for a few days. Today he (the cinema-owner) brought something from home and gave it to someone in Raiwand. But he refused to accept it, saying that he could not eat it as his (the cinema-owner’s) earning is Haraam. The cinema-owner was really embarrassed. I said: “Make haste, and bring him to me.” When he came, I asked his name. He said: “Haroon.” I asked about his occupation. Lowering his head, he said that he had a small business. I asked about the type of business he had. He said that it was a small business. I said: Brother, at least tell me what kind of business is it.” He said: “It is a cinema” I asked: “Which cinema is it?”. He replied: “Mubarak cinema, Mubarak.” I said: “Mubarak?” He said: “Yes”. I said: “The one in which I had seen (the film) Shama Parvana’? Mubarak sahib was its owner. His photo appeared. He had died. His sad music used to be played.” (This moron molvi is Shaitaan incarnate! – The Majlis)

He (Haroon) looked at me in amazement. In this way I befriended him. When I saw him   again after some time, he was spending four months (in Tableegh) and he had a big beard. People are hasty in issuing Fatwas. If someone has 100 virtues and one defect, they write off all the virtues.

When we left after the meeting of two hours, Amir Khan came down to see us off. I asked if there shall   be another meeting after today? He said sure. Thereafter I received his message that he had gone to Madinah, and he apologised. I informed him that I would come to Madinah. I had been to Madinah before Hajj, so he said come on 14th. He had  fixed the   time from 4-6 pm for me. So Junaid, another member (Tablighi) and I went there at 4pm. At 4:15 pm our sitting with him started. From 4:15pm to 10:15pm, 6 hours continuously, and he did not even frown or display any sign of being bored. (We wonder what had happened to Maghrib and Isha’ – The Majlis) Then we got up, ready to leave. But he was not happy for us to leave.  

Give love. Then I faced a test. Last year I was in the Ijtima of Raiwand. I received his message that his film ‘Talaash’ is being released. And that I should pray for its success. I thought: “What  now?” Replying is also necessary and prayer also cannot be done. When I received the message, some 10-12 ulama were sitting before me. I asked: “Brothers, I have received this message. Give a response.” They said that this was not their field and that only I should reply. I had been thinking all the day. I didn’t understand   what to reply to save me as well as answering. (Because you are a faasiq moron! What was the   conundrum? What was the mystery which could not be unravelled? When public indulgence in fisq and fujoor – sitting in a cinema, praising fussaaq and fujjaar, praising evil films, dancing with nude dancing girls, etc., etc., are all valid in the wretch’s concept of ‘tableegh’, then why is praying for the success of the pornography not permissible? What is so difficult about this? – The Majlis) Then, the next day also passed. I didn’t understand anything (because your brains are fossilized with fisq and deception – The Majlis). I was making wudhu of Asr when suddenly Allah put an idea in my heart. So I immediately texted him the message, “Amir bhai, Allah rarely gives a creative mind to someone. He doesn’t give it to everyone. This will be a great gift of Allah. In the time I had spent with you, I saw that Allah had   given you a creative mind. You are a creator (of haraam, fisq and fujoor  –The Majlis), and the people who are of this kind, don’t care about success and failure. They are only concerned with   their work.” Immediately I received his response. “You are right, you are right.”

(The following is a different incident). I messaged him (i.e. the Indian actor Amir Khan) that I am Tariq Jameel and am in Hong Kong. Could I call him? If I don’t get his reply, I don’t call him. Sometimes he himself calls me; sometimes he sends me a message that I could call him. So after a while he phoned that he was in Delhi. He was in a conference (with the devils – The Majlis). He had come out when he saw my message. Now he would speak to me. While speaking he said his film (Talaash) succeeded as a result of my dua. I said I had not prayed. 

Brothers, distribute love.….   Pleasure is when you hold someone falling down. What is difficult in calling an evil person evil. Holding the hand of the evil person, and taking him out of the evil is the actual work.

Madrasah is the (place for) the language of Fatwa. The language of the mimbar (pulpit) is not Fatwa. The language of pulpit is persuasion, winning the hearts. If Fatwas are issued against each other from here too, then what is now happening will happen.” (End of the moron’s disgorgement of ghutha (baatil rubbish.)

COMMENT (By Mujlisul Ulama):

Distribution of Muhabbat (love) which is integral to the Qur’aanic methodology of Da’wat and Tableegh commanded in the aayat: “Dispute with them with wisdom”, and in the aayat: “Call to the Path of your Rabb with wisdom and beautiful calling..”, never ever envisages commission of zina with a prostitute in order to please her and to entice her into joining the ladies tabligh jamaat. It (Muhabbat) does not countenance consumption of liquor with a drunkard in order to befriend him for bringing him into the path of Islaah (reformation).   It does not permit the perpetration of fisq, fujoor and haraam to hook flagrant sinners into tableegh activities or to the path of moral reformation.

No one has ever disputed the method of calling people to the Path of the Deen with love and kindness, and with tender words. But, to deceive a transgressor and to minimize the major sins in which he/she indulges by casting oneself into the dregs of Satanism and flagrant sin, is deception piled on deception. It is pure Satanism. It testifies for the fact that this miserable Tariq character is firmly enmeshed in shaitaan’s tentacles. He propagates Satanism whilst labouring under the satanistic deception of his shaitaani method being valid Tableegh. His jahl-e-murakkab is indeed mind boggling.

Contrary to the averment of this moron, the mimbar in fact is the valid and best platform for the dissemination of fatwas – the fatwas of the Deen – the fatwas of the Qur’aan and Sunnah. Fatwas are not meant for assignment into antiquity or for oblivion in the kutub or for wiling away the time in academic and technical hair-splitting and atom-splitting argument in Madaaris. The objective of Fatwa is amal to gain Allah’s pleasure and for Najaat (Salvation) in the Aakhirah. But for the moron with his hideous idea of ‘tableegh’ which embraces all shades of fisq, fujoor, baatil and kufr, the masaa-il of the Shariah are a past-time hobby not intended for practical implementation. His jahaalat is colossal.

To win over a person who is plodding the path of sin and baatil, it is never permissible to consume his haraam food, as this vile Tariq moron advocates and practices. If a cinema-owner or a prostitute or a gambler, etc. is engaged in discussion with a view to invite him/her to the Path of Islaah, no one advocates being rude and harsh with them. They are not to be despised. Denying them the display of good conduct is not promoted. But, participating with them in their sins or consuming their haraam food is never ever allowed in the Shariah. The moron’s brains and heart appear to be totally corrupted as a consequence of devouring the haraam gifts offered to him.

When refusing the haraam gift of a person, it is not said that the person should be humiliated or embarrassed. In privacy, the person should be politely and affectionately explained. Amr Bil Ma’roof Nahy Anil Munkar is Waajib, and this obligation can be discharged beautifully with muhabbat.

Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) did not participate in the shirk and idolatry of his kinsmen in order to entice them to the Tauheed of Islam. He was commanded by Allah Ta’ala to proclaim the Haqq without the slightest ambiguity. Words may not be minced. It is haraam to speak with a forked tongue thereby casting the audience into doubt, uncertainly and even dhalaal (deviation). The Haqq is crystal clear. It may not be contaminated with the darkness of the bestial nafs and the deceptive methods of ‘tableegh’ which Shaitaan inspires into the clogged brains of the likes of the Tariq Jameel character.

The Ummah is not in need of deviate morons such as Tariq Jameel to teach Muslims his rubbish methods of satanic propagation. There is a wealth of guidance and a plethora of examples in the glittering ways of our Akaabir Auliya and Ulama who had practically demonstrated the Qur’aanic methodology of calling to Islaah with Beautiful Aquittal. Once Hadhrat Ibraahim Bin Adham (rahmatullah alayh) passed by a man who laid sprawling on the ground. Foam was gushing from his mouth. He bent down to inspect. The man was ‘dead’ drunk. Overcome with grief, Hadhrat Ibn Adham with his handkerchief wiped the foam from the mouth of the drunkard. Whilst wiping, he sadly said: “Allah Ta’ala has bestowed the bounty of the tongue for His Thikr.” After wiping the foam from the man’s mouth, Hadhrat Ibn Adham departed. That night, in a dream he sees a Vision of Allah Ta’ala exclaiming: “O Ibraahim! For My Sake, you cleaned his mouth. Now, for your sake, I have cleansed his heart.” When the drunkard had sobered up, people who had witnessed the episode, informed him. Hadhrat Ibraahim’s statement struck a responsive chord in his heart. He hastened to the Shaikh, made taubah, took bay’t and joined the Jamaat of the Sufiya.

To achieve this objective of Islaah, Hadhrat Ibraahim (rahmatullah alayh) did not consume liquor. He did not have to beat about the bush and convey the idea that liquor is halaal as Tariq Jameel had created the satanic idea of haraam food and haraam earnings being halaal, and of music and cinema being halaal. Regardless of the moron’s intention, his ostensible acquittal is kufr for he, by his practical action, traded the idea that music, haraam food and the fisq and fujoor of the cinema-owner are all halaal. He should renew his Imaan and also his Nikah.

Beautiful Preaching never means forked-tongued ‘tableegh’ which   leaves a man to flounder in the zulmat (darkness) of jahaalat. “Giving love” of which he pretends to be having a monopoly, must never compromise the clear and glittering Haqq of Allah’s Shariah. Consorting with baatil is not Mauizah Hasanah (Beautiful Preaching). On the contrary, it is Satanism. It is talbees-e-iblees.

Conveying the vile notion of nude dancing girls being acceptable in Islam, speaks volumes for this man’s deviation from Siraatul Mustaqeem. He lacks the ability of distinguishing between left and right, hence he is capable of uttering such blasphemous rubbish. Falling head over heels to curry favour with a wealthy cinema-owner bears testimony to this man’s greed for the dunya. He further suffers from gross mental inferiority. Did he ever search for a faqeer in some squatter camp or someone sleeping in the streets for his tableegh? But he went out of his way to gain the favour of a faasiq of wealth. His efforts in this direction are tantamount to bootlegging and bootlicking. Under guise of tableegh he pursues the dunya. Thus, coming within the purview of the Hadith: “With the amal of the Aakhirah, they will pursue the dunya.” This is among the Signs of Qiyaamah. He bootlicks the wealthy fussaaq while ignoring the poor fussaaq. He accords obsequious attention to the wealthy fussaaq. But for the poor who are surrounding him, he has a different approach and treatment. A scholar at the door of the wealthy is indeed a vile character.

This vile character proudly displays his knowledge about haraam films. He excelled even the cinema-owner in this haraam science of fisq and fujoor. And, he is proud of it. His concept of love and tableegh requires the lauding of praise on fussaaq and fujjaar actors, prostitutes and scoundrels in direct conflict with the Ahaadith. Invite the sinners to the Path of Islaah without making a hash of the Deen. The  ‘give love’ concept of Tariq Jameel is a lot of hogwash.

“Moving for four months in jamaat”, is not a halaalizer of haraam food. For the sake of enticing a man into four months, haraam food does not become halaal. It is the abundant consumption of haraam food which has corroded the thinking process of this moron ‘tablighi’.

When an ignoramus requests that dua should be made for the success of his zina, fisq and fujoor, there is no need to wait for kashf (divine inspiration) for understanding what the response should be. But, this moron was in a quandary for a couple of days when he was requested by the cinema-owner to make dua for the success of his zina film. He had to hallucinate some weird response which he attributes to divine inspiration for placating the cinema-owner. His fossilized brain failed to understand the simple logical command of Amr Bil Ma’roof to be beautifully acquitted. A response which   further solidifies the haraam indulgence of the cinema-owner is a satanic response.

This utterly shameless, impostor molvi proudly advertises that he had “watched the sharma parvana film”. He furthermore praises the haraam photo and the haraam music which the moron describes as ‘sad music’. What kind of devilish ‘tablighi’ is this mudhil (one who deviates others from Siraatul Mustaqeem). Regarding such vile specimens of deceit and misguidance, Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “Verily, I fear for my Ummah the aimmah mudhilleen.” So-called scholars who mislead people are among these ‘aimmah’ for whom Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) expressed fear.

Uttering a blatant lie, Tariq Jameel said: “If someone has a 100 virtues and one defect, they write off all.” From whence did he suck out this blatant falsehood. He should cite specific examples to bolster his baseless contention. If one abstains from eating the haraam food of a cinema-owner, it does not follow therefrom that he has been written off and consigned to Jahannum. If people do not associate with a prostitute, it does not follow that she has been condemned to Jahannam. Dissociation from flagrant sinners is a Shar’i command. Such dissociation is not necessarily the effect of pride. The flagrant sinner is not being despised when he/she is ostracized. We say ‘flagrant’ because everyone is a sinner. But there is a vast difference between those whose sins are hidden, and those who display blatant disregard for Allah’s commands. They recklessly sin and rebel against Allah Ta’ala in public. They advertise their villainy. They are proud to display and promote their fisq and fujoor.

If a faasiq comes forward and expresses the desire to enter into the Path of Taubah and Islaah, no one will despise him/her. On the contrary, he/she will be welcomed. Yes, a moron mudhil has to be written off for not safeguarding the Imaan and Akhlaaq of Muslims.

No one objects to ‘holding the hand of the evil person and taking him out of his evil’. The episode of Hadhrat Ibraahim (rahmatullah alayh) mentioned earlier, adequately portrays the Tareeqah of our Tableegh. The objection is directed at the one like this moron who indulges in the evil of the one who is trapped in evil. He indulges in the evil with the ludicrous and haraam justification of ‘tableegh’. He participates in the fisq and fujoor of the person whom he supposedly invites towards virtue. It is his participation which is abhorrent, haraam and objectionable, not his ‘holding the hand of the evil person’.

Muslims should beware of this fake ‘muballigh’. He is a threat for Imaan. He is a halaalizer of haraam. With his forked tongue he seeks to deviate people to take the path of Jahannam. It is not permissible to listen to his lectures. His speeches are ‘zukhruful qaul’ (satanically adorned speech) according to the Qur’aan Majeed.

POPULARITY THE HAQQ AND BAATIL

Beware of the Tariq Jamil Dajjaal

Since the inception of the long and glorious chain of Nubuwwat with its 124,000 links of Ambiyā and Rusul, every Nabi was a lone, forlorn stranger in a world in which baatil (falsehood) preponderated.

The Ambiya were always supposedly “negligible” and “insignificant”. They were strangers and ridiculed by their communities. They were labelled “Madmen, Sorcerer, Liars, Poets,” etc. They were persecuted and murdered and, ultimately, by the command of Allah Azza Wajal, the Ambiya cursed their Kuffar communities. The Qur’aan Majeed confirms these facts.

Although the Ambiya (Alayhimus Salaam) were unpopular, despised and rejected during the greater part of their mission, Allah Ta’ala bestowed Victory to Them. Thus, the Qur’aan says: “The ultimate Victory is for the Muttaqeen.”

Victory in this context does not mean popularity of the type enjoyed by Iblees, Dajjaal, Pop-singers and the league of Iblees such as Tariq Jamil and the host of other Mudhilleen, no does “Victory” envisage numerical and material superiority. It means acceptance by Allah Azza Wajal and the disgrace of the Kuffaar.View the Victory of Nooh (Alayhis Salaam). After 9 Centuries of Da’wat and Tableegh, only about 80 members of his community accepted Islam. The entire nation was destroyed by Allah Ta’ala in the Great Flood. Hadhrat Nooh (Alayhis Salaam) was extremely unpopular among his people.

There will be a Nabi who will enter Jannat with only one follower. In his entire mission, the Nabi managed to convert only one man to Islam. In Allah’s Wisdom, this was Victory.

Muslims should not follow someone on the basis of his popularity and eloquence of speech. These accomplishments are necessary attributes of Shaitaan and Dajjaal. That is why the Small Dajjaal, Tariq Jamil, is able to adroitly acquit himself with Satanism and dajjaaliyat.

Those who fall into the Shaitaani trap of popularity and the snare of oratory and eloquence, come within the purview of the Qur’aanic Aayat: “If you follow the majority on earth the verily, you will become Mushhrikoon.”

Munaafiqeen Flee From The Musaajid

By Mujlisul Ulama

An adage of the Mashaaikh is:

“A Mu’min in the Musjid is like a fish in water, and a Munaafiq in the Musjid is like a bird in the cage.”

While an encaged bird is restless in its enclosure seeking an escape route, hence will fly out if the cage door is left open, a fish is at ease, comfort and tranquil in the water.

This is the similitude which aptly fits all those who rush out from the Musjid wildly in droves on Fridays immediately after the Fardh Salaat. They have assigned the Sunnatul Muakkadah Salaat to the domain of abandonment.

Those who rush from the Musjid on Jumu’ah to escape the Sunnatul Muakkadah Salaat acquit themselves like ‘wild donkeys’ mentioned in the Qur’aan:

“What is the matter with them turning away from Tadhkirah (admonition/ibaadat), as if they are wild donkeys fleeing from a lion.”

Worse than ‘wild donkeys’ is the danger of nifaaq (hypocrisy) which the ‘wild donkeys’ display when they rush madly out of the Musjid after the Fardh of Jumu’ah Salaat.

The practical consequence of abandoning Fardh, Waajib and Sunnatul Muakkadah Salaat is the same. The consequence is the Fire of Jahannam.

It is haraam to abandon the Sunnatul Muakkadah without a valid reason. The satanic practice of constant abandonment of the Sunnatul Muakkadah Salaat is akin to kufr.

These “wild donkeys” are not occasionally abstaining from the Sunnatul Muakkadah Salaat for a valid reason. They have permanently expunged the Sunnatul Muakkadah Salaat of Jumu’ah.

In view of this evil shaitaani attitude, they should understand that the Wrath and Curse of Allah Ta’ala settles on them.

Allah Ta’ala does not accept even the Fardh Salaat of those who behave like the munaafiqs who are like birds in a cage seeking to fly out. With such conduct, they are not performing Jumu’ah Salaat, their performance is a mock ‘Jumu’ah’ which is struck into their faces like a dirty rag by the Angels.

Even the four Sunnatul Muakkadah prior to the Jumu’ah Fardh have been abandoned by those behaving like ‘wild donkeys’ and hypocrites (munaafiqeen). They shamelessly congregate outside the Musjid indulging in worldly conversation and even satanically smoking. This too is a display of nifaaq.

Before the Fardh, there are four rakaats Sunnatul Muakkadah. After the Fardh, are again four rakaats Sunnatul Muakkadah, then two rakaats Sunnatul Muakkadah.

May Allah Ta’ala guide them to understand their villainy and folly of hypocrisy.

Secularism: A Statolatric Religion to end all Religions

By Umar Rumi

Since the very beginning of the inter-related sister (and sinister) ideologies at the backbone of secularism (liberalism, nationalism, etc) – in XIX-century western Europe, it clearly emerged how – in their polemics with the centuries-long oppression by the catholic church – they aimed not simply at limiting its “interference” [1] in the political realm, but rather at substituting it with a civil religion of State worship, where the all-controlling Westphalian nation-State machine is seen as the ultimate authority and source of morality and guidance, object of blind obedience and utter devotion, not excluding a complete paraphernalia set of praising hymns, compuncted lacrimating odes, official State-related celebrations and festivities, civic mass rituals officiated by the State authorities-priests, worship of flag, graves, monuments mausoleums and secular temples (sic! Such as the “temple of reason” in France), and even “martyrs” who gave their lives for the “higher glory” of their State (as well as – not coincidentally pagan/civic-“divinities”, “goddesses”-portrayed – of Ideals (read, idols and tawaghit) of “Freedom”, “Liberty”, etc.).

image

Thus, in a short time, what was supposed to free oppressed people from the abuses, exaggerations and yoke of the catholic church, instead enslaved them to the pathetic freemasonic idols of the civic state religion – and this is just but a single example of the common dajjalic strategy of claiming something only to cover up its exact opposite – and I plan to in sha’ Allah complete a series of posts on this #DajjalicInversion.

Even when transplanted in Muslim countries [2], we see how strongly and clearly this secularist/nationalist disease took all the worst expression from its European colonial masters, and, if possible, (as it’s always the case in such cases of emulation, where the subject has to show his iron-like obedience) with even more pathos and ridiculous kitschy applications (just as an example, Google the scenes of collective hysteria and authentic worship taking place at Atatürk’s (Atakufr) shrine/
mausoleum (in pic).

image

To the point that (if calling to “martyrdom” for the sake of some English-designed flag and boundaries wasn’t enough of nonsense), we often hear the secularists objecting to some minor re-introduction of Islamic practices and laws in Muslim countries (other than by ridiculously shouting “Islamization!!!” – as if Islam had arrived only now in centuries-old Muslim lands!), by invoking its incompatibility with their kuffar colonial-masters-copied “constitutions”, or with the “vision and ideals” of Atakufr/Jinnah or whoever else “father of the country” – who are thus by all means treated as – respectively – “holy Books” and “chosen anbiya'” of their civic religions, against whose “revelations” any law ought to be weighted.

So much, for “open-mindedness” and “rationality”: they replaced the authentic Books of Allah and the Prophets ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ with some loser drunkards, even writing their “ahadith” at every angles of the roads, and erecting them statues for their civic worship.

One would then expect religion to at least be left in peace in its reduced, limited, confined new “private” spaces and mosques, but far from it, the truth is that the secular states are those who actually exploit religion more than any “theocracy” [3] ever would: from Ataküfr-funded “ministry for religious affairs” under full State control, to the nationalized awqaf put under state control (and thus losing their independence – their and that of `Ulama’) all over the Islamic world, from UAE-financed conferences, think-tanks and fatawa to try and get a “religious legitimacy” for their satanic humanist/secularist project, to Sisi co-opting al-Azhar (and coptic priests) having them stand by his side on national TV and demanding them the religious reforms he wants; from Bourghiba (again on national TV) trying to get a fatwa on the permissibility to eat and drink during Ramadan in order to achieve his socialist productivity utopia; from the hailed as “moderate and secular protector of minorities” Bashar al-Asad resting on the back of sectarian fundamentalist militias of foreign volunteers and even threatening to send supposed “mujahidin” to blow-up is European cities when he felt his power was at stake, to other leaders (name withheld) urging Muslims to take filthy offenses on our Prophet ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ without saying a word, but then organizing civil disobedience and violent revolts across European capitals once some representatives of his party didn’t get permission to hold a speech in some foreign countries (and then, suddenly goodbye “you have to follow the law of the land” which is instead invoked in every other situation); from khutbahs written by the intelligence departments of “secular” States according to the agenda of the government in charge, to the “collective fatawa” urged by the same apparatuses to back their actions…

The common element in all of these cases is that the real defining of the limits and boundaries of what is deemed right or wrong, acceptable or unacceptable, the real loyalty, authority and worship, is taken away from God, and placed in the State and its interests, with a sanitized, pacified, reduced version of the Din being sacrificed and exploited for the “higher needs and interests” of the “real god”: the State.

It is thus clear how secularism, far from being an ideology promoting the mere separation of political and religious authority, is the civil religion of Statolatry and consists in the subduing/sanitization of any religion, only tolerated (and manipulated) as long as it accepts to fulfill the “higher objectives” of the State interests and needs, but otherwise replaced with the civic religion of the modern western idols and dogmas and of the state interests.

[1] “interference” is actually specific concept only validly applying to a (that too specific) understanding and definition of “religion”, which is not the Islamic concept and definition of Din, which can’t thus be said to “interfere” in that which is simply one of its branches, rather than a completely separated realm – as instead is for modern Christianity on the basis of its surrender to secularism (not without centuries of bloody resistance) [and with some basis involuntarily having been posed centuries before by its demonification of the “civitas terrena” contrasted to the “civitas dei” by Augustine of Hippo].

[2] I find this term to be inexact in its application to Muslim polities, because, unlike Christian theocracy, the ruler (Khalifah/Sultan) doesn’t claim to rule “on behalf of God”, nor is part of a (for us non-existent) priest class; rather, his role is primarily to overlook at the implementation of the Divine Law (to which he himself is subject, and which he has no authority to twist or change) and protect the rights of Muslims and the protected religious minorities living in the Muslim polity – hence, someone has rather suggested the term “nomocracy”.

[3] Countries whose very nation-building involved the artificial resurrection of their jahili pre-Islamic past in order to forge a new nation with a made-up identity rooted in a distant past as an alternative to Islam – from here, the whole b**s**t about Faraonic Egypt, Sasanid Persia, Turanist heritage, etc.

****************************

Similar Readings:

1. Islamic Refutation of Liberalism

2. ISLAM AND NATIONALISM

3. Islamic Refutation of Communism

4. DEMON-CRAZY (DEMOCRACY) IS NOT AN ISLAMIC SYSTEM

Is “Yahweh” Referred to in the Qur’an??

By Ebrahim Saifuddin

There are Christians who tend to make a point that the Bible mentions in Exodus 3:14 that the name of God is “Yahweh” or “Jehovah” (depends on where one puts the vowels) but this name does not appear in the Qur’an. Hence they claim that the Qur’an cannot be the Word of God and Prophet Muhammad ﷺ cannot be a Messenger of God, because there is no reference to the personal name of God which appears in the Old Testament 6823 times.

YHWH (Yahweh) in the Bible

Let’s first read the concerned verse in the Bible in context:

Moses said to God, “Suppose I go to the Israelites and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they ask me, ‘What is his name?’ Then what shall I tell them?”
God said to Moses, “I am who I am. This is what you are to say to the Israelites: ‘I AM has sent me to you.’”
God also said to Moses, “Say to the Israelites, ‘The LORD, the God of your fathers—the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob—has sent me to you.’ This is my name forever, the name by which I am to be remembered from generation to generation. – [Exodus 3:13-15]

The Hebrew word that is translated as “I AM” in English, is YHWH (known as the Tetragrammaton) which commonly the Christians read as Yahweh or Jehovah by inserting vowels. The Hebrew form of YHWH is as below:

יהוה

The objection which Christians raise is that as we see in Exodus 3:15, God says that this is his name forever thus they say if Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was a Messenger of Allah then he should have made some reference to this personal name of God, Yahweh/Jehovah, to prove that he is really a Messenger of God.

Pronunciation of the word YHWH

“Yahweh” and “Jehovah” are two pronunciations formed by humans much later. Although the Jewish Encyclopedia labels the word “Jehovah” to be a philological impossibility, the Christian world tends to use this pronunciation till this day. Coming back to the pronunciation of this word YHWH, the Catholic Encyclopedia brings it to our attention:

“According to a Rabbinic tradition the real pronunciation of Jehovah ceased to be used at the time of Simeon the Just, who was, according to Maimonides, a contemporary of Alexander the Great. At any rate, it appears that the name was no longer pronounced after the destruction of the Temple.”

Moreover we are also informed by the same encyclopedia that “the modern Jews are as uncertain of the real pronunciation of the Sacred name as their Christian contemporaries” [emphasis added]. Hence one thing has been made apparent that neither the Jews nor the Christians know the true pronunciation of this word. This word was considered to be ineffable by the Jews and thus with time people lost the knowledge of its true pronunciation.

Meaning of YHWH (Yahweh)

As it was made apparent that we do not know how to pronounce the word “YHWH”, we must now look and understand what this word means so as to get an understanding of the word itself. The Jewish Encyclopedia informs us that the meaning of the name “YHWH” is “‘He who is self-existing, self-sufficient’, or, more concretely, ‘He who lives’” [emphasis added]. Hence in simplest of terms “YHWH” means The Living and Self-Subsisting.

Did Biblical Jesus use the name YHWH?

Up till now two things have been made clear; the real pronunciation of the word is not available and that the meaning of this word is “self-existing and self sufficient”, in short “He who lives”. So now it must be established whether Jesus did use this name Yahweh in any place. The only verse which Christendom can quote to try to prove that Jesus used this word is in the Gospel of John which is as below:

“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!” – [John 8:58]

As we see that the verse consists of the phrase “I am”, the Christians say that Jesus has used the word YHWH. So let us take a look at the Greek version of the verse as we all know that the biblical manuscripts with the Christian world are in the language Greek although there is no concrete evidence that Jesus knew this language.

The words translated as “I am” are: ἐγώ εἰμί
Transliterated as: egō eimi
Pronounced as: eg-o’ i-mee’

So the words used here are “ego eimi” which simply means “I am” – a means of designating oneself. Not only “ego eimi” simply means “I am” as one would use “I am” in their everyday talk in the English language, “ego eimi” is no where near to the meaning of YHWH which is seen above to mean The Living, Self Subsisting. So not only does this not sound anything like the proposed pronunciation of the word YHWH, it does not even carry the meaning of the word.

Was “ego eimi” used Exclusively by Jesus?

The term “ego eimi” which simply means “I am” is used in numerous places in the Bible and there are instances when this term is used by people other than Jesus. Just to give a quick example, the blind man whom Jesus cured uses the same words as well in the Gospel of John:

Some said, This is he: others said, He is like him: but he said, I am he.  – [John 9:9]

Do note the deception which the Christian world uses. In the Greek manuscripts there is no “he” in the text. The verse ends at “I am”. The same phrase “ego eimi” is used in the Greek texts. Due to the absence of “he” in the biblical manuscripts, “Young’s Literal Translation” provides the following translation for the same verse:

Others said — `This is he;’ and others — `He is like to him;’ he himself said, — ‘I am [he].’ – [Young’s Literal Translation of John 9:9]

Notice that the term “he” is placed in parenthesis because this word is not present in the biblical manuscripts. Any form of term that is not in the text being translated should be written in parenthesis to convey the meaning and not cause deception such that people would believe that it is part of the original text.

So by using the phrase “ego eimi” was the blind man suggesting that he was YHWH? Obviously not and no Christian would dare to claim that he was. So then why did he use the term “ego eimi”? Simply because this word means nothing but the same as “I am” in the English language.

Similarly there are other examples in the Bible which prove that this phrase “ego eimi” was not used only by Jesus and it certainly does not hold the meaning of YHWH as seen earlier.

If, however Christendom wants to claim that “ego eimi” refers to “YHWH”, the personal name of God, they have to accept that when traveling from Hebrew to Greek, the word was not used as “YHWH” (Yahweh) but an alternate word(s) was used “ego eimi” which was a reference to the actual name YHWH.

Does Qur’an Make Any Reference to YHWH?

So far we have learnt 4 points which I will list so as to refresh all that we have learnt so far:

⚫ Actual pronunciation of YHWH is lost

⚫ YHWH means “Self-Subsisting”, “The Living”

⚫ Jesus did not use the term “YHWH”

⚫ Christians cannot deny that traveling from Hebrew to Greek another term was used to refer to YHWH.

Thus we see that the Qur’an should have a reference to the term YHWH rather than having the term “YHWH” as the Qur’an was revealed in the Arabic and not the Hebrew. The golden question thus would be was any such reference made to the term “YHWH” in the Quran or by Prophet Muhammad ﷺ?

The answer is a definite “YES”.

We have learnt so far that the meaning of the term “YHWH” is The Living, Self Subsisting and although the term “Allah” is used in the Quran, this word simply means “The God”.

However, we know that Islamic teachings inform us of 99 names (attributes) of Allah and the Quran informs us that to Allah belongs the most beautiful names and we can call him by any of these beautiful names:

He is Allah, the Creator, the Evolver, the Bestower of Forms (or Colours). To Him belong the Most beautiful names: whatever is in the heavens and on earth, doth declare His Praises and Glory: and He is the Exalted in Might, the Wise.  – [Quran 59:24]

Say: “Call upon Allah, or call upon Rahman: by whatever name ye call upon Him, (it is well): for to Him belong the Most beautiful names. Neither speak thy Prayer aloud, nor speak it in a low tone, but seek a middle course between.”  – [Quran 17:110]

Thus we see that there are many different names of Allah, some of which I have listed below:

Al-‘Adl – The Just, The Equitable
Al-‘Afuw – The Pardoner
Al-‘Asim – The Protector
Ad-Dafi` – The Remover of Tribulations
Ar-Rahman Ar-Raheem – The Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Just like these above-mentioned beautiful names of Allah we also learn of two other names which combined are read as Hayyul-Qayyum:

Hayyul-Qayyum – The Living, Self-Subsisting

YHWH – The Living, Self-Subsisting

Here it has been proven that there is clear reference to the name YHWH in the Qur’an which crumbles the Christian stand that Islam has no reference to the name YHWH and thus Prophet Muhammad ﷺ is not the Messenger of Allah.

Stressed Importance of Hayyul-Qayyum

One of the verses which has Allah referred to by the name Hayyul-Qayyum is in Ayat-ul-Qursi (The Verse of the Throne). Ayat-ul-Qursi has multitude benefits but apart from Ayat-ul-Qursi having its benefits, this verse with “Hayyul-Qayyum” mentioned in it was referred to by Prophet Muhammad ﷺ as the “greatest”:

Ubayy bin Ka’b said: Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) said: O Abu’ al-Mundhir, do you know the verse from the Book of Allah which, according to you, is the greatest? I said: Allah and His Apostle (May peace be upon him) know best. He again said: Abu’l-Mundhir, do you know the verse from the Book of Allah which, according to you, is the greatest? I said: “Allahu La ilaha illa Huwal Hayyul Qayyum.”  Thereupon he struck me on my breast and said: May knowledge be pleasant for you, O Abu’l-Mundhir! – [Sahih Muslim, Book 4, #1768]

In another narration, Prophet Muhammad ﷺ heard the man use “Hayyul-Qayyum” in his supplication and the Prophet ﷺ said that he has supplicated using Allah’s Greatest Name:

Narrated by Anas Ibn Malik: I was sitting with the Apostle of Allah ﷺ and a man was offering prayer. He then made supplication: O Allah, I ask Thee by virtue of the fact that praise is due to Thee, there is no deity but Thou, Who showest favour and beneficence, the Originator of the Heavens and the earth, O Lord of Majesty and Splendour, O Living One, O Eternal One.

The Prophet ﷺ then said: He has supplicated Allah using His Greatest Name, when supplicated by this name, He answers, and when asked by this name He gives. – [Abu Dawood, Book 2, #1490]

Yet another hadith to show the importance stressed by Prophet Muhammad ﷺ on the Hayyul-Qayyum:

Narrated by Asma’ daughter of Yazid: The Prophet (pbuh) said: Allah’s Greatest Name is in these two verses: “And your deity is one deity; there is no deity but He, the Compassionate the Merciful,” and the beginning of Surah Al ‘Imran, A.L.M. “Allahu La ilaha illa Huwal Hayyul Qayyum.”– [Abu Dawood, Book 2, #1491]

Conclusion

With the grace of Allah it can be seen that there is a clear reference to YHWH in the Quran. This reference is much stronger than what the Christians claim to be a reference to YHWH in the New Testament. The word “ego eimi” is in no way the Greek word for YHWH nor does it hold the meaning of YHWH. However as seen, there is a clear reference to the term YHWH in the Quran as well as the Hadith.

The Quran gives us many beautiful names of Allah, some of which have been mentioned above, and a Muslim can call upon Allah with any of his beautiful names unlike the followers of the Bible who do not even know how to pronounce the ‘personal name’ revealed to them. Indeed much of the truth in those books is lost just like the pronunciation of YHWH is lost and the Quran is sent to restore that which is lost – The Criterion.

Some More Beautiful Names of Allah

Al-Ghani – The Self-Sufficient, The Rich Beyond Need

Al-Awwal – The First

Al-‘Aakhir – The Last

Al-Barr – The Source of All Goodness

Al-Baaqi – The Everlasting One

Al-Haqq – The Truth

Al-Khaliq – The Creator

Al-Kafi – The Sufficient One

Ash-Shahid – The Witness

Tabligh Jamaat and the Criticism about them Not giving Da’wah to Non-Muslims

By Mujlisul Ulama

Question: Some people claim the Tabligh Jamaat is not doing what our beloved Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had done, which is calling non-Muslims towards Allah Ta’ala because till this day there is no effort made to call non-Muslims to enter Islam by this Jamaat. They say that the Tabligh Jamaat only emphasizes on spending time in the path of Allah for 3 days, 40 days and 4 months, and this they say has no basis whatsoever in the Qur’ aan and Sunnah. What is the Shariah’s view pertaining to this matter?

Answer (by Mujlisul Ulama):

Their grounds on which they are criticizing the Tablighi Jamaat are baseless. They are in fact talking drivel. If a person recites Qur’aan Shareef in abundance every day, but does not perform Tahajjud, it will be wrong to criticize him for reciting Qur’aan in abundance by saying that it is not Sunnat to recite 12 and half Juz a day. No one has the right to impose on another person his personal fancy and inclination. The Shariah allows a man to recite 12 and half Juz a day. It is stupid to argue that because there is no basis in the Qur ’aan and Sunnah for reciting twelve and half Juz a day, it is wrong and not permissible for this person to recite this amount of Qur’aan.

You should ask those people who are criticizing the Tabligh Jamaat if they are calling non-Muslims to the Path of the Deen? How many of them are making Da’wah to non-Muslims? Why do they want to impose this act on the Tabligh Jamaat when they themselves are not executing it? If a group chooses to do a particular Deeni activity, no one has the right to criticize them for not doing another Deeni activity. If someone performs 50 raka’ts Nafl a day, no one has the right of criticizing him for not keeping Nafl fasts. If there is a group giving da’wat to non-Muslims, but not to Muslims, then no one has the right to criticize them. They are doing an activity for which they have an inclination.

Similarly, if we are engaged in writing Deeni books and our form of da’wat is restricted to publications distributed to only Muslims, no one has the right to criticize our ‘Demi activity because we are not printing books for non-Muslims. If there is someone who distrib­utes books to non-Muslims, and not to Muslims, then no one has the right to criticize him for not distributing to Muslims. Everyone is entitled to engage in any field of Tabligh and Da’wat to which his heart inclines.

The Tabligh Jamaat is not denying that Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had called non-Muslims to Is­lam. But what is wrong with calling Muslims who have be­come like non-Muslims back to the Path of Islam? And, did Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) not give da’wat to Muslims? Those who deny this, must produce their evidence. Did Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) not spend 23 years teaching Muslims how to perform Sa­laat, Fast, perform Hajj, trade, eat food; go to the toilet, dress, get married, bury the dead and all the thousands of masaa-il related to all the departments of Islam? Who taught the Sahaabah all the rules of Islam? Were the Sahaabah Muslims or non- Muslims when Nabi-e-Kareem (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) gave them the da’wat of the masaa-il of the Deen?

The objectors are plain stupid and soft in the brains. The greater part of Rasulullah’s mission was devoted to teaching Muslims, not non-Muslims. Once the non-Muslims embraced Islam, the da’wat did not end with their acceptance of Islam. In fact the da’wat then commenced and continued until the demise of Rasu­lullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) to Muslims.

What is wrong if anyone spends 3 days, 40 days and 4 months in the path of Allah? What is wrong if someone spends one hour in the path of Allah? What is wrong if someone spends 10 minutes or 10 years in the Path of Allah? What is their logical and Shar’i basis for this stupid objection? When some of these objectors go for Umrah for 19 days or five days or one month, are they committing a haraam deed because they do not spend exactly the same time in Umrah as Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had done? Are they committing a haraam deed if they have undertaken 20 Umrahs which has no basis in the Qur’aan and Sunnah?

Even if there is no specific basis for the specific methodology of the Tablighi Jamaat; the question to be asked is: On what basis does this methodology conflict with the Sunnah? Why would this methodology not be permissible? And, why would the methodology of pub­lications, Madaaris, Khaanqas, etc. be permissible? The objectors Should present arguments based on the principles of the Shariah to vindicate their case. Personal opinion and stupid logic have no Shar’i validity.

It should also be understood any method which does not violate any tenet, principle or the spirit of the Deen, and if its objective is the da’wat or teaching of the very same acts of Ibaadat and the very same masaa-il of the Shariah taught by Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), then such a method will be classified as Mulhaq Bis-Sunnah and it will hold Sunnah status irrespective of such a method not having existed during the time of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahaabah.

The methodology of the Tabligh Jamaat envisages the da’wat of the very same masaa-il which were imparted by Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). They are not teaching anything knew. New practices are not being incorporated into the Deen as the Ahl-e-Bid’ah are perpetrating. The Jamaat teaches nothing but the Kalimah and Salaat. So what is wrong with teaching Salaat and the Kalimah?

The objections of the detractors have to be rejected and dismissed as utterly baseless. There is no Shar’i substance in their objections.

Refutation of the “Cape Accord”

THE CAPE DISCORD OF THE HUMUR MUSTANFIRAH – A SHAR’I ANALYSIS

By Mujlisul Ulama

Bismillaahir Rahmaanir Raheem

INTRODUCTION

“What is the matter with them for turning away from the  admonition (of the Qur’aan) as if they are wild donkeys fleeing from a lion?” [Al-Muddath-thir,  Aayaat 49, 50,51]

A cartel of modernists zanaadaqah had abortively attempted to mislead the Muslim community with a scrap paper ‘accord’ which they dubbed ‘The Cape Accord’, but which has culminated in nothing other than discord. It has also exposed the Shiah element lurking in the Muslim community in the guise of Muslims. These are the munaafiqeen who are working from within the Muslim community to undermine Islam.

In this brief treatise we have analyzed every point mentioned in their scrap document which has been rejected by the Ulama and the Muslim community of South Africa. The Shariah with its Qur’aanic terminology and strident form of admonition have been branded ‘hate speech’ by the modernist cartel. They insinuate that the Qur’aan fosters ‘hate speech’. These people flee from the Shariah in the manner described by the Qur’aan Majeed in the  above mentioned Verses.

Describing them, the Qur’aan says that “they are like wild donkeys fleeing from a lion.” When the Shariah is mentioned to them, they regard it as a lion, and they flee pell-mell in disarray and confusion like wild donkeys. That is on account of the kufr lurking within their hearts. That is precisely why Qur’aanic terms such as kuffaar, munaafiqoon, zaalimoon, mushrikoon, etc. are regarded as ‘hate speech’ by the modernist deviates who have lost their Imaan.

Their ‘accord’ paper is an accord of Kufr. Every provision percolates with kufr which they have polished and deceptively adorned with flowery language to deceive and appease the authorities and others who entertain inimical attitudes for Islam and Muslims, The type of deceptive flowery language in which they camouflage their kufr is called Zukhruful Qawl in the Qur’aan. It is shaitaani inspiration about which the Qur’aan Majeed states:

“Thus, have We appointed for every Nabi enemies (who are) human and jinn devils (shayaateen). They whisper to one another (zukhrufal qawl) satanically polished and adorned statements for deceiving.” [Al-An’aam, Aayat 112]

Of course, for the munaafiqeen and zanaadaqah this castigation is also “hate speech”.

The Makkah Accord

The Mushrikeen of Makkah too had attempted to strike a ‘Makkah Accord’ with Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) to prevent him from criticizing their ideology of shirk and their idols. The ‘Makkah Accord’, in the attempt to buy the silence and co-operation of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), had offered him wealth, women and leadership if only he would agree to the type of co-existence and harmony which the shaitaani cape accord advocates. Its advocacy is compromise with baatil – baatil which has as its cardinal article of faith that kufr/atheism/denial of the Haqq of Islam, is a basic human right which must be respected. Thus, despite a man professing to be a ‘Muslim’, his basic human right according to the ‘Cape Accord’, is to subscribe to kufr and to propagate it as if it is part of Islam.

The Quraish met to discuss how to deal with the propagation of the Deen of Tauheed by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). “Let us send the most versed among us in sorcery, soothsaying and poetry to this man who has disunited us, caused discord among us and reviled our religion (with hate-speech).

They sent Utbah Bin Rabee’ah. He came to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and said: “O Muhammad! Are you better or Abdullah (the father of Rasulullah Sallallahu  alayhi wasallam)?”

Utbah: “Are you better or Abdul Muttalib (the grandfather of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam)?” Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) kept quiet.

Utbah: “If you take them to be better than you, they worshipped the idols which you have reviled (with your hate-speech). And if you think that you are better than them then speak so that we can listen to what you have to say. Verily, Wallah, we have not seen a junior more unfortunate to his people than you. You have disunited us, caused discord among us (with your  hate-speech), reviled our religion (with  your hate-speech) and disgraced us among the Arabs…”

Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) asked: “Are you finished?” Utbah: “Yes.”

Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) then started reciting Surah Haa Meem Sajdah from the beginning till he came to the Aayat:

“If they turn away then say: ‘I warn you lot of a Saa’iqah (Allah’s punishment in the form of a destructive screech) like the Saa’iqah of the Aad and Thamud (which utterly destroyed them).”

Utbah, terrified, put his hand on the mouth of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and implored him to stop.

This episode confirms that the originators of “Accord” stunts were the Mushrikeen. The objective of this initial “Makkah Accord” was to undermine Islam, but it was absolutely rejected by Allah Ta’ala. For confirming this rejection of the “Makkah Accord”, Allah Ta’ala specifically revealed more than a dozen Aayaat of Surah Haa Meem Sajdah.

In another narration it appears that Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) recited till the Sajdah Aayat of this Surah and made Sajdah to practically demonstrate this Message of Tauheed which does not tolerate the slightest vestige of compromise with baatil.

On another occasion renewing their attempts to forge an accord the Mushrikeen said to Abu Taalib: “Verily, Wallah, we cannot tolerate his (Muhammad’s) hate-speech against our forefathers and our gods and him labelling us as morons. Hence you should stop him.”

From this narration it is quite clear that the Munaafiqeen of the “Cape Accord” are following in the footsteps of the Mushrikeen of Makkah. Just as these Mushrikeen had endeavoured to silence Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) from the Haqq by enlisting the aid and support of the most senior chief of his tribe (the government), in the same manner the Munaafiqeen of this “Cape Accord” are plotting to enlist the support of the government in a bid to silence the Ulama-e-Haqq from proclaiming what Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had proclaimed more than 14 centuries ago.

When Abu Taalib spoke to Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) about this, Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) responded: “O My Uncle! If they place the sun in my right hand and the moon in my left hand for me to abandon this Deen, I shall not desist from it.”

This is the Ta’leem of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam); for the Ulama-e-Haqq not to compromise with this satanically-inspired accord in abandonment of the propagation of the Haqq of Islam.

On yet another occasion in pursuit of forging an accord of compromise the Quraish dangled in front of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) the chimera of wealth, women and kingship only if he compromises and abstains from hate-speech against their idols and their religion.

Alternatively, the ingredients of the compromise would be similar to the objectives of the kufr interfaith movement which the “Cape Accord” promotes. This interfaith type compromise with baatil entails acceptance of this kufr movement’s cardinal article of faith, namely, all religions and ideologies are on par. Thus the “Makkah Accord” required that the Muslims worship the gods of the Mushrikeen for one year and reciprocating this concession the Mushrikeen for one year will worship Allah Ta’ala as Islam requires. Categorically rejecting this Satanism, Allah Ta’ala revealed Surah Kaafiroon. In this Surah of the Qur’aan, with great clarity in such speech which the Cape Accord Munaafiqeen term “hate speech” (Kaafiroon), Allah Ta’ala confirmed that there is absolutely no scope for tolerating and compromising with kufr:

“Say (O Muhammad)! O Kaafiroon! I do not worship what you worship and you do not worship Who I worship. I will not worship what you worship and you will not worship Who I worship. For you is your religion and for me is my Deen.”

This Surah unequivocally rejects any form of accord which conflicts in any way with Qur’aanic Tauheed, and this rejection is stated explicitly in the Aayat: “For you is your religion and for me is my Deen.”

ANALYSIS OF THE KUFR DISCORD

THE ORIGINATORS – HUMUR  MUSTANFIRAH

The noble Mashaaikh of Islam say that for understanding a venture’s direction, whether Haqq or Baatil, the originators should be examined. If those who initiate an organization are Men of the Sunnah, then the venture will be of the Haqq. On the other hand, if the originators are men of Baatil, then most certainly, the organization will be Baatil.

Those who have put together the scrap paper ‘cape accord’ are a group of non-entities  from the Islamic point of view. The members of this cape accord cartel are all people of baatil – modernists, Shiahs/hidden  Shiahs/Shiah supporters, bid’atis zanaadaqah and anti-Sunnah. There is not a single Islamically creditable person associated with the ‘cape accord’. Precisely for this reason is their founding statement filled with drivel full of sound and fury signifying bunkum. It is devoid of practical reality, and from the Islamic perspective it is plain garbage. In Qur’aanic language, they are “wild donkeys fleeing from a lion.” They flee from the Qur’aan and Sunnah.

Let us examine the drivel in their statement.

UNWARRANTED ATTACKS

(a) It is mentioned in the ostentatious statement:

“…unwarranted attacks on foremost figures, by individuals and groups within our broader faith community….”

Response:

What are these “unwarranted attacks” and who are these “foremost figures”, and who are these “individuals”? The supposed ‘accord’ is initiated with discord by these unwarranted remarks.   The initiators of the scrap accord with their ambiguous remarks and cracks begin their hallucinated accord with discord with these baseless and false comments. It is necessary that they mention with clarity what exactly is the meaning of these ambiguities.

Every criticism by the Ulama-e-Haqq on the baatil beliefs of kufr of the Shiahs, Munaafiqeen and Zanaadaqah is a warranted ‘attack’ intended for the guidance of the Muslim community, and to save the unwary and ignorant from the deceptions of these mudhilleen

They dare not elaborate for fear of their hidden kufr being exposed. The claimed “unwarranted attacks” consist of nothing other than the proclamation and dissemination of the Haqq Aqeedah of Islam as enshrined in the Qur’aan and Sunnah, and as believed by the Ummah since the age of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).  

For example, stating that those who revile the Sahaabah are kuffaar, and labelling such villains as kuffaar are deemed as “unwarranted attacks” on those who propound and disseminate the kufr.

EXTREMISTS

(b) The statement mentions:

“eradication of extremists”

Response:

Who are these “extremists” and what is their extremism? The ambiguity conceals the hidden meaning and agenda of the juhala who disgorge such garbage. They will not explain with clarity because they know that their nifaaq and kufr will be exposed.   These terms are monotonously sung by the deviates and agents of Iblees to deceive stupid audiences who do not have the haziest idea of the meaning of these ambiguities.

In which way do these juhala plot to eradicate the proclaimers of Allah’s Haqq? The plot envisages silencing the Ulama-e-Haqq by the authorities. The endeavour is to convince the authorities that certain Qur’aanic Truths are tantamount to ‘hate speech’, hence the Ulama who state the Haqq should be silenced.

COLLABORATION

(c) The following contention is indeed laughable for its portrayal of the stupidity and insipidity of the thinking of these modernist juhala:

“AND WHEREAS, such an alliance fosters greater connectivity, increases collaboration, promotes comprehension and enhances contribution to the attainment of the higher objectives of the shariah.”

Full of sound and fury signifying nothing. It is a meaningless statement which may impress only morons. They should elaborate these ambiguities. The collaboration and connectivity are in fact with Shaitaan who has inspired these deviates to plot alliances against the proponents of the Deen – the Deen which was handed to the Sahaabah by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) – the Sunnah which  these munaafiqeen and zanaadaqah brand as extremism belonging to some hallucinated ‘dark age’. This is their conception of the Glittering Shariah of Islam. It is a product of some ‘dark age’ in their belief system – their system of kufr.

The chap who drafted the stupid ‘accord’ scrap paper mentions the conundrum of the “higher objectives of the shariah”. He does not have the haziest idea of these objectives of the Shariah. The highest objective of the Shariah is the Ibaadat of Allah Ta’ala for which He has created us. Stating this objective, the Qur’aan Majeed says:

“I have not created jinn and man except that they worship Me.”

The higher and the only objective of the Shariah is to secure mankind’s everlasting salvation in the Aakhirah, and this is possible only by acceptance of Islam and adoption of the Sunnah. It can never be attained by interfaith accords and such collaboration which compromise and even eradicate the Aqaaid and A’maal of Islam.

Islam, not the corrupt conception of Islam of modernists, is the sole repository of salvation. All other ideologies are baatil and Jahannami, and are not acceptable to Allah Ta’ala. Stating this fact with emphasis, the Qur’aan Majeed states:

“Whoever searches for a deen (accord/religion/ideology) other than Islam, never ever will it be accepted from him.”

Those who seek accords in conflict with Islam and its Shariah are doomed for everlasting perdition in Jahannam. And, this proclamation of Qur’aanic Truth is ‘hate speech’ for those who collaborate with Iblees to forge accords which have no validity in the Shariah.

The objectives of the Shariah do not pertain to worldly prosperity and success although these transitory earthly gains may be acquired in the wake of obedience to Allah Ta’ala via His Shariah and adoption of the Sunnah.

All the ahkaam of the Shariah are designed for the attainment of the success and salvation of the Aakhirah via the Pleasure of Allah Ta’ala. Islam does not have worldly prosperity as an objective. The fellow who spoke about the objectives of the Shariah in all probability is ignorant of the rudiments of Tahaarat and Salaat, hence he shoved the ‘higher objectives of the Shariah’ into the effluvium of a stupid earthly scrap paper fabricated for the appeasement of a shaitaani alliance which has no relationship with the Islam taught to us by the Qur’aan and Sunnah.

Any person who has a proper understanding of the higher objectives of the Shariah will never strike up an alliance nor collaborate with such elements   who are the very antithesis of   the Objectives of Allah’s Shariah. Minus the Sunnah of the Sahaabah there is not the remotest possibility for the attainment of any of the objectives of the Shariah.

This dunya is ‘jeefah’ (carrion), said Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). It is never among the objectives of the Shariah.

AMMAN ACCORD

(d) The drivel accord mentions some incongruent ‘spirit of the Amman Accord’. This too is a shaitaani accord which has no validity in the Shariah. The life of Muslims is governed by the Sunnah not by some modernist ‘amman accord’ which is also one of the scrap papers signifying drivel.`

Imagining themselves to be the leaders of the global Ummah, the morons of the baatil ‘ammaan accord’, making a mockery of themselves, state in their scrap accord:

“AND WHEREAS, such Amman Accord, constitutes a global and universal principle of persuasive and binding effect upon all Muslim Societies”

These wayward liberals with bloated egos are labouring in a state of intellectual concussion to believe that the global Ummah assigns any importance to their drivel ‘principle’ of which 99% of the Ummah is not even aware.   The only universal principle for the global Ummah is the Shariah as enshrined in the Qur’aan and Sunnah. Muslims do not accept any other western-tutored principle/accord forged and frauded by the liberal humur about whom the Qur’aan says:  “(They are) like wild donkeys fleeing from a lion”. They flee from the Shariah just as wild donkeys flee from a lion.

With their liberal western-influenced attitude the humur of these stupid paper accords seek to impress their western kuffaar masters who have firmly fitted their brains with the straightjackets of zandaqah and kufr. That is precisely why these humur incline towards and always propagate western kuffaar values in flagrant conflict with Islam, and that is why Qur’aanic and Hadith terminology is ‘hate speech’ for them. The only spirit which true Muslims understand is the spirit which ensues as an effect of the adoption of the Sunnah.

HATE SPEECH

(e) Satanically disguising their hatred for the Qur’aan, the munaafiqeen, disgorge in their scrap paper:

“AND WHEREAS, we, the representatives of Communities United Against Hate Speech, Division and Discord, in the Republic of South Africa;”

Firstly, the cape accord characters do not represent Muslim communities in South Africa. They are a handful of zanadaqah and munaafiqeen representing themselves. They lack in entirety the support of the Ulama of all persuasions. Even the   miscreants and mudhilleen of the MJC and the NNB jamiat felt constrained to withdraw their initial veiled and guarded support for the baatil ‘accord’ of the deviates. The distancing from this ‘cape accord’ by even members of bogus ‘uucsa’ and even pro-Shiah Radio Ansar (Ansaarush Shaitaan) should send a clear message to the fabricators of the haraam ‘accord’ of discord – that their plot is doomed for failure.

Their theme of ‘hate speech’ disgorged with insipid monotony only reveals their hatred for the Qur’aan and Sunnah, and exposes their Shiah tendencies. The only so-called ‘hate speech’ which these juhala are able to attribute to the Ulama-e-Haqq is their proclamation of the ahkaam, of the Shariah couched in Qur’aanic terminology. But cowards are unable to declare their kufr, hence they seek to camouflage their kufr with the designation of ‘hate speech’ which is quite palatable to the authorities of the state whose ears they are dinning with the garbage of their sinister plot against Islam.

While they vociferously trumpet their slogan of ‘hate speech’, they have hitherto not elaborated on the supposed ‘hate’ content of the speech they have in mind. They dare not present any elucidation of their concept of ‘hate speech’, for they know that it will expose their hidden kufr. There is not a single statement made by the Ulama which comes within the purview of ‘hate speech’ as understood by the kuffaar authorities. But for these cape accord munaafiqeen, Qur’aanic terminology which is anathema for the Shiahs constitutes ‘hate speech’.

They lack intelligence because Allah Ta’ala has cast RIJS (filth) on their brains. In a statement which will be typical ‘hate speech’ for the munaafiqeen, the Qur’aan states:

“He (Allah) casts RIJS on those who lack intelligence.” [Yoonus. Aayat 100]

“Those in whose hearts is Rijs – their rijs is compounded with (more) rijs, and they will die whilst they are kaafiroon.” [At-Taubah, Aayat 125]

This is the type of ‘hate speech’ – Qur’aanic speech – with which the Ulama castigate those who profess to be Muslims but   conspire to undermine and destroy Islam for promoting Shi’ism in the guise of Islam.

The pollution which has deranged the intelligence of those who promote hatred for the Sahaabah is described in the Qur’aan as RIJS (filth) which for the ilk of the cape accord characters is ‘hate speech’ to be banned. Allah Ta’ala says in this regard:

“(O Muhammad!) Say: ‘Verily RIJS has been cast on you (munaafiqeen and haters of the Sahaabah) from your Rabb. What! Do you dispute  with me…..?” [Al-A’raaf, Aayat 71]

CURSES

(f) In their endeavour to obfuscate the issue of ‘hate speech and hatred’, the juhala of the shaitaani cape accord aver in their scrap paper:

“RECOGNISING the Prophetic Command: “The Believer is never one who taunts, curses; nor is indecent nor abusive.” [Tirmidhi, Bayhaqi]  

In a nut-shell, the Qur’aanic response which is ‘hate speech’ for these munaafiqeen is: “Behold! The LA’NAT (CURSE) of Allah is on the zaalimeen.”   [Hood, Aayat 18]

In the context of the Qur’aan Majeed, ‘zaalimeen’ refer to the kuffaar. According to the Qur’aan there is no greater oppression than kufr, hence the kuffaar are described with the term, ‘zaalimeen’ (oppressors). Curses and taunts are Qur’aanically justified when the need for such invocation develops.

This Hadith has been torn from its context to defend those evil ones who curse, taunt and acquit themselves indecently. Who are the targets of these people for their curses, taunts and abuse?

The targets of vilification and abuse are Hadhrat Abu Bakr, Hadhrat Umar, Hadhrat Uthmaan, Hadhrat Aishah and almost 124,000 Sahaabah (Radhiyallahu  anhum). And, those who disgorge the curses, taunts, abuse and the worst hate speech against the most illustrious and noblest of mankind are the Shiahs. Their books of theology loudly testify to this villainy. Yet, the shayaateen of the cape accord deem it appropriate to present the Hadith against those who are defending the Sahaabah of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Their vindication of Sahaabah-Haters speaks volumes for their kufr and nifaaq.

And, why would people target the Sahaabah for vilification? Answering this question, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that they do so because “they hate me”. The cape accord deviates should understand that this Hadith of Nabi-e-Kareem (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) places the seal on their nifaaq, for they are defending those who hate and vilify the Sahaabah, and they seek kuffaar aid to silence Muslims from proclaiming the Haqq. But they must fail. Their end will be miserable. Allah Ta’ala will apprehend them with His whip.

“We shall let them taste the severe punishment because of the kufr they perpetrated.” [Yoonus, Aayat 70]

RELIGIOUS PLURALISM

(g) Piping the kufr theme of the kuffaar interfaith movement, the juhala of the cape accord say in their scrap paper:

“ACKNOWLEDGING that we live in a world of religious pluralism;”

This acknowledgement further testifies to their nifaaq and kufr. The meaning of acknowledgement in the context of this argument is palpable acceptance of other religions as ideologies of truth and repositories of salvation. But this is a violent rejection of Tauheed – Qur’aanic Tauheed.

According to Allah Ta’ala the worse scum in creation are those who reject Tauheed – Qur’aanic Tauheed. In the following Aayat which is ‘hate speech’ for the humur mustanfirah of the shaitaani cape accord of discord, Allah Ta’ala states:

“Verily, the worst of animals by Allah are the (spiritually) deaf and dumb, those who have no Aql (they lack intelligence).” [Al-Anfaal, Aayat 11]

Deaf, dumb, the worst of animals, bereft of intelligence, the enemies of Allah, the kaafiroon, jaahiloon, zaalimoon, faasiqoon, etc., etc. are all Qur’aanic terminologies which constitute ‘hate speech’ for the munaafiqoon of the cape discord. They should state with clarity which are the terms of ‘hate’ the Ulama are using and to whom are they directing these Qur’aanic epithets employed by Allah Ta’ala to describe the kuffaar.

Every moron on earth is aware of the existence of a plethora of religions and other ideologies of atheism. What is the need for having incorporated this stupid acknowledgment into a scrap paper which has greater value and significance than the Qur’aan for these juhala and mudhilleen from whose faces drip nifaaq?

While Islam accepts the existence of a multitude of religions, it came to abolish religious pluralism. Religious pluralism is the recipe for everlasting perdition in Jahannam. Stating this Divine declaration, the Qur’aan Majeed emphasizes:

“Whoever searches for a deen (religion) other than Islam, never ever shall it be accepted from him, and he will be among the losers in the Hereafter.” [Aal-e-Imraan, Aayat 75]

“Verily, Allah is not pleased with people who are faasiqoon (kaafiroon/munaadiqoon).” [At-Taubah, Aayat 96]

These Aayaat and many other Qur’aanic verses emphatically reject acknowledgement of religious pluralism. This is a kufr postulate of the kufr interfaith movement with which all these munaafiqeen have an accord in flagrant denial of the Qur’aan. Further rejecting ‘religious pluralism’ and the interfaith movement, the Qur’aan states:

“This, MY PATH is Straight. Therefore follow it, and do not follow different ways (accords and ideologies), for then it will split you (into satanic accords and sects) and deviate you from His Path. This is what He (Allah) has commanded you (to acknowledge and submit to) so that you may gain taqwa.” [Al-An’aam, Aayat 153]

For Muslims there is no religion other than Islam. There can be no compromise with beliefs which are in conflict with Islam. But to interpret our Islamic attitude to mean ‘hatred’ and ‘hate speech’ is the effect of the evil ideology of the accord characters who profess to be Muslims when in reality they are munaafiqeen.

The hatred Muslims are commanded by Allah Ta’ala to have for kufr does not breed violence. Its effect is only dissociation and to refrain from fraternizing with kuffaar whom the Qur’aan labels as the enemies of Allah because of their kufr.   Muslims are prohibited from fraternizing and praying for those who reject the Tauheed of Allah Ta’ala. The following Aayat which according to the munaafiqeen will undoubtedly be ‘hate speech’ and the advocate of hatred and violence, states:

“It is not befitting for the Nabi and the Believers to seek forgiveness for the Mushrikeen even if they are close relatives after it has been clarified that they are the companions of the Fire (of Hell).” [At-Taubah, Aayat 113]

“When it was made clear to him (Ibraaheem) that his father (because of kufr) was the enemy of Allah, he (Ibraaheem) dissociated himself from him.” [At-Taubah, Aayat 114]

The munaafiqeen of the scrap cape town accord should now state with clarity if this aayat and innumerable other Qur’aanic verses are ‘hate speech’ and if this is advocacy of hostility and violence by the Qur’aan.

Numerous episodes in the life of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahaabah voluminously and vociferously testify to the fact that the Qur’aan’s prohibition of fraternizing and socializing with the kuffaar does not promote hatred for them. We shall mention just two of these numerous incidents to confirm this fact.

Almost every intelligent Muslim is aware of the sternness of Ameerul Mu’mineen Umar Bin Khattaab (Radhiyallahu anhu) who is known as Saahib-Durra (the Man with the Whip). On one of his supervisory excursions of Madinah he found an old and blind Yahudi begging. Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) asked him why he was begging. Responding, the Yahudi said: “Destitution and payment of the jizyah tax.”

Hadhrat Umar, gently taking hold of the Yahudi, led him to the Baitul Maal. After presenting him with a quantity of provisions, Hadhrat Umar ordered the public treasurer of the Baitul Maal to exempt this Yahudi and all other destitute non-Muslims from the jizyah tax, and he furthermore commented something to the effect that it is unfair for us Muslims to take jizyah tax from the old and destitute.

The second episode pertains to Sultan Salaahuddeen (Rahmatullahi alayh). In the midst of a crucial battle a Muslim soldier on horseback succeeded in dropping King Richard of England from his mount. The king continued the combat from the ground with the Muslim soldier on horseback.

Sultan Salaahuddeen was viewing the scene from a distance and he commented: “It is unfair for such a brave fighter to be at such odds.” Overcome emotionally with chivalry, Sultan Salaahuddeen promptly sent his own horse to the king. King Richard mounted the horse and continued the fight. An exaggerated emotion of fairness and chivalry had overwhelmed the intellect of Sultan Salaahuddeen (Rahmatullahi alayh) at that moment, hence he sent his horse to the king and in so doing the pious sultan committed a fatal blunder and a disservice to Islam and the Mujaahideen on the battlefield because the consequence of this kind and chivalrous act of the Sultan was the death and martyrdom of numerous Muslim soldiers and defeat for the Muslim Army. In fact, the Sultan for his kind and chivalrous act was worthy of being court-martialled.

There are numerous such acts of kindness and affection displayed by Muslims for non-Muslims since the time of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) throughout the  history of Islam.

It were the Muslims who gave the Jews refuge during the dark Middle Ages when the Christian Church had invented equipment to torture and rip apart the bodies of Muslims and Jews. The Christian Spanish Inquisition is notorious for such brutality condoned and promoted as acts  of worship by the Christian  Church.

Muslims in North Africa and the sultan of the Ottoman Empire gave the Jews safe haven. All this kindness and affection to non-Muslims by Muslims was despite the Qur’aanic prohibition of socializing and fraternizing with the kuffaar. The objective of this prohibition is to save Muslims from being assimilated into kuffaar lifestyles as is the case today, and thereby destroying their salvation in the Hereafter.

The bigotry of these accord chaps dictates to them to infringe on the freedom of religion and freedom of expression which the constitution of the country grants all people. To achieve their diabolical objective they are at pains to hoodwink the authorities with their claim of ‘hate speech’. But hitherto, they have not yet expounded what exactly the terms of ‘hate’ are of which they accuse the Ulama.

Why have even the liberals and others who are in diametric opposition to the Ulama-e-Haqq withdrawn from this false accord which has produced nothing but discord? What has constrained them to withdraw? The real hate speech of the Shiahs which the cape accord supports has compelled even the liberals and modernists to disembark from the diabolical Cape Discord. Islam’s rejection of religious pluralism is not based on hatred nor is it hate speech as the deviates of the ill-fated cape accord contend.

DIVERSITY OF FAITHS

(h) Stating a superfluity, the accord gang says:

“APPRECIATING that South Africa is a state model of multi-culturalism and diversity of faiths;”

It is their penchant for nonsense which constrained them to include drivel in their scrap accord paper. Of what benefit does this statement serve? No sane person has ever claimed that there is no diversity of faiths and cultures in South Africa. Just what is their stupid or ulterior point in making this redundant statement?

BASIC HUMAN RIGHT

(i) Uttering kufr, the proponents of the scrap accord say:

“NOTING that the right to follow one’s faith or conscience is among the basic human rights that underpins our South African Constitution;”  

This idea is palpably to impress the authorities. If these fellows of the scrap accord had true Imaan, never would they have uttered this statement of kufr. The constitution of the country is secular and has no relationship with The Almighty Creator, hence such provisions of kufr are understandable for a secular state. However, from the Islamic perspective, if the faith is not Islam, adopting it is not a basic human right as the cranks contend.

Allah Ta’ala has ordained Islam for every human being. Thus, the Hadith states very clearly that every child is born on FITRAH, i.e. Islam which is the intrinsic, natural demand of the Rooh (Soul). Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) explicitly mentioned that the parents corrupt this Fitrah. The parents corrupt this Allah-bestowed Fitrah with baatil religions and ideologies. 

The basic human right is Tauheed – Islamic Tauheed – which Allah Ta’ala has embedded in every Soul. The Souls of all mankind had testified to Tauheed in the celestial realm. Mentioning this Pledge given by all Souls, the Qur’aan refers to that occasion when Allah Ta’ala had assembled all the Souls of entire mankind and asked them: “Am I not your Rabb?” In unison, the vast multitude of Souls responded: “Yes (O, our Rabb!)”.

This Pledge taken from the Souls in the celestial realm long long prior to the creation of our physical bodies is revived here on earth by Muslims when they recite the Athaan and Iqaamat in the ears of the newborn babe on the very first day after its birth, as soon as it has been cleansed.

The baby is not as ignorant as these accord and discord munaafiqeen. The Athaan and Iqaamat refresh the memory of the baby, reminding it of the Pledge. The baby possesses greater intelligence than munaafiqeen. Therefore, Allah Ta’ala has commanded the parents to remind their newborn baby of this basic human right of Tauheed. This Pledge of Tauheed and Imaan is the basic human right. Kufr is never a basic human right. It is an artificial ‘right’   fabricated by the kuffaar and adopted by the munaafiqeen who masquerade as Muslims.

Kufr is not a ‘basic human right’ as contended by the cape accord munaafiqeen. Yes, it is aconstitutional right. Man-made constitutions bestow this right. In a true Islamic governed region by the Shariah, the kuffaar citizens will enjoy a ‘constitutional’ right, not a basic human right, to practise their kufr religion.

In South Africa it is our constitutional right to practise our religion. For this right we firstly express our profoundest Shukr to Allah Ta’ala for granting us this freedom. While we are extremely appreciative of this constitutional right, the Muslim community should not abuse it in the manner they are currently doing. The objective for guiding the authorities to grant us the right to practise the Deen is to enable us to adhere to the Sunnah and to make maximum use of this right to submit to Allah’s Shariah. But the reality is that the Muslim community, the vast majority, has thrown the Deen behind their backs. Instead of fulfilling Shukr to Allah Ta’ala for this favour, Muslims have abandoned the Sunnah and have adopted the life style of the western kuffaar in every sphere of life. The lamentable consequence of this treachery is that Allah Ta’ala will inspire the kuffaar authorities to revoke this constitutional right. Then we shall be denied even our basic human right as has happened in many countries. The freedom of religion and expression currently enjoyed by Muslims will be snatched away by Allah Azza Wa Jal as a punishment for our treachery.

Every atom and iota are in Allah’s control. Not a leaf drops from a tree, but it is with His intervention and command. It is of the Sunnah of Allah Azza Wa Jal to snatch away rights and impose oppression on a treacherous community. The Muslim community today is guilty of treason against Allah Ta’ala. The community is awash with fussaaq, fujjaar, zanaadaqah and munafiqeen. Such a community will not escape Divine Chastisement. Kufr is never a basic human right.

AFFIRMING KUFR

(j) “AFFIRMING that such right resonates with the Maqasid of the Shariah in promoting the welfare and goodness of the human being;”  

Those who subscribe to this dastardly blasphemous idea of kufr can never be Muslims.

They are unadulterated munaafiqeen and kuffaar. This belief is kufr which violently militates against the Maqaasid of the Shariah. The juhala who have frauded this kufr drivel do not have the haziest idea of the meaning of the Maqaasid of the Shariah. They have stupidly utilized this terminology to convey Shar’i expertise whilst they are dwelling and drowning in a cesspool of jahaalat and kufr which percolates from every  aperture of their bodies.

Islam came to eradicate every vestige of kufr and shirk. But here in this garbage accord of discord are characters professing to be Muslims whilst promoting blatant kufr. Affirmation of kufr being a basic human right is blatant kufr which expels such a proponent from the fold of Islam. The claim that even kufr which the shayaateen are hallucinating as a ‘basic human right’, achieves the objective of the welfare and goodness of human beings is a blatant denial of the entire Qur’aan. These miserable agents of Iblees are blatantly denying every command of Allah Ta’ala pertaining to the eradication of kufr for which all the battle campaigns of the Sahaabah were waged and for which the Qur’aan was revealed, and for which Muhammad (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) was raised as the Final Nabi of Allah Ta’ala.

This villainous idea of brazen kufr is the very antithesis of Qur’aanic Tauheed. It is the effect of shaitaani insanity to aver that this vile idea of  kufr ‘resonates with the Maqaasid of the Shariah’. On the contrary, it resonates with the maqaasid of shaitaaniyat. It is pure Satanism urinated into their brains by Iblees-in-Chief.

This convoluted kufr, satanic conception which will doom its proponents to everlasting perdition in Hell-Fire resonates and reverberates with the objectives (maqaasid) for which Allah Azza Wa Jal has created Shaitaan. These fellows should apprize themselves of the rudiments of Istinja before venturing in a domain which is beyond their intellectual grasp. They are bereft of any understanding pertaining to Maqaasid of the Shariah. They have only advertised their hidden state of kufr with this corrupt satanic belief.

What human welfare and m goodness can there be in a belief which culminates in man’s ruin and destruction everlasting chastisement in Jahannam? The entire theme of the Qur’aan is anti-kufr. Nothing is as evil as kufr and shirk for which there is no forgiveness if the mushrik perishes prior to having made Taubah. Yet the juhala and munaafiqeen of the haraam Cape Discord affirm goodness for it. Their status in terms of the Shariah is worse than that of the mushrikeen idol-worshippers.

MATERIAL WELFARE

(k) “ASSESSING the critical importance of social stability and peace for the promotion and material welfare of South African Civic Society;”  

This is simply another drivel disgorgement to impress the authorities. It is a drivel utterance devoid of significance and valid meaning. It is calculated to charm and impress with figments of hallucination.

Social stability and the like are the obligations of the government. The breakdown of law and order, the anarchy and the shocking crime rate affirm the failure of the authorities in the domain of social stability and the welfare of society. But a stupid so-called accord by a handful of deviates cannot in any way whatsoever contribute towards the attainment of social stability in the country. The very sinister motive of the haraam Shiah accord is a plot for silencing the Ulama of Islam. It is unable to contribute even an iota towards the stability of society.

The objective of this shaitaani accord of discord is nothing other than to influence and dupe the authorities for achieving the pernicious aim of silencing the Ulama-e-Haqq to enable the Shiahs to propagate their baatil religion without any hindrance of the Haqq.

THREAT OF IMBECILES

(l) “DECLARING our firm resolve to dissuade and/or engage and/or take appropriate legal action within the framework of the South African Constitution and the Chapter 9 Provisions against any individual or group who abuses the higher ethical principles of Islam as the basis for a deliberate and unwarranted attack on the dignity of a fellow South African citizen or group or entity with malicious intent, publicity and incitement to harm;”

The formulation of drivel resolutions such as the aforementioned claptrap is an empty threat. It is a toothless mongrel dog. This stupidity has been designed by a stupid conglomerate of munaafiqeen to intimidate the Ulama-e-Haqq in a bid to scare them into silence and abstention from Amr Bil Ma’roof Nahy Anil Munkar. If they had the slightest idea of the meaning of “the higher ethical principles of Islam”, they would not have acquitted themselves with the puerility which they have displayed in their scrap accord paper. They would have been recluses from whom Tawaadhu’, Sidq, Ibaadat and Taa-at would have exuded. They would not have acquitted themselves with the arrogance they have displayed in their silly scrap accord paper nor would they have been western bootlickers.

Those whose lives were conducted in terms of the higher ethical principles of Islam were the Sahaabah and the Auliya. Men who lap up western concepts of kufr and who emulate the lifestyles of the western kuffaar and who think with brains fitted and strapped with the straitjackets of western indoctrination can never even dream of the meaning of the higher ethical principles of Islam. They disgorge trash, for it is trash that they think.

There is adequate provision in the secular law for instituting haraam legal action against the Ulama if the human-devils (Shayaateenul Ins) are able to establish valid grounds for such haraam action in terms of the laws of the kuffaar. A genuine Muslim does not display this type of sewerage mentality which is inherited from the western masters whom these munaafiqeen bootlick.

A Muslim whose life is conducted in terms of the higher ethical principles of Islam believes and consciously feels in his heart that he is the most contemptible creature of Allah Ta’ala, more contemptible than even a dog. This is the teaching of the higher ethical principles of Islam. But those who are the victims of western kufr indoctrination to which they were subjected to at the kuffaar universities over brim with pride and arrogance. They are unable to bear criticism, especially if it emanates from the Qur’aan and Sunnah, hence they seek the aid of kuffaar courts. They fail to understand that salvation also requires the belief of being more despicable than even the lowly animals. And, this is the teaching of the higher ethical principles of Islam of which the western bootlickers do not have the haziest idea. The following anecdote will illustrate what is meant by the higher ethical principles of Islam.

One day while crossing a narrow bridge, a dog approached from the other side. To avoid brushing against the dog, Baayazid pulled his cloak towards himself. The dog spoke: “Why did you do this? If I am dry, there is no harm in your garment touching me. If I am moist, a little water can cleanse your cloak. But, even the seven oceans cannot purify you of your pride.”

Baayazid said: “You have spoken the truth. While there is zaahiri (external) impurity in you, there is baatini (spiritual) impurity in me. Come live with me so that I may be purified.”

The dog: “We cannot live together. You are the Maqbool (accepted) and honoured) leader of mankind while I am mardood (accursed and buffered). Secondly, I do not hoard a bone for the next day while you hoard food for tomorrow.”

Baaayazid lamented: “Alas! When I am not deserving of the company of even a dog, how can I gain Allah’s Proximity?”

Any sincere Muslim who has been tricked into joining the haraam shaitaani accord, after being apprized of this anecdote will, Insha-Allah, gain a valid understanding of the higher ethical principles of Islam, and he will also realize the Imaani danger in which he has become involved with the miserable accord crowd of munaafiqeen. There are innumerable similar anecdotes of the Auliya who were the highest paragons of Islamic virtue, moral character and ethics – of Akhlaaq-e-Hameedah of which munaafiqeen lack the ability of even hallucinating.

THE SPIRIT OF THE AMMAN MESSAGE

(m) “DO HEREBY, by our signatures hereunder…SOLEMNLY AFFIRM the spirit of the Amman Message and strive to uphold the dignity of Muslims and the positive image of Islam and call upon all South African Muslims to protect, promote and advance this image as commanded by our Prophet Muhammed (Upon Whom Be Peace).”

The Amman message is another specimen of a drivel message. The fact that they have dubbed their ideas the ‘amman accord’ displays their lack of Islamic understanding. Despite the motley of supposedly religious elements at this so-called amman accord professing to be religious personnel they were too stupid to understand that for the Ummah there is only one Accord, and that is the Qur’aan and Sunnah.

These miserable westernized characters searched all over the   show for guidance but could find no direction in the Qur’aan and Sunnah, hence they felt constrained to fabricate and fraud a puerile document which would appease the tastes of the western kuffaar whose boots they are ever ready to lick. Lapping up the vomit of western concepts and ideas, these miscreants forge ‘accords’ of kufr couched in deceptive flowery language termed in the Qur’aan as zukhruful qawl, i.e. satanically adorned speech whispered into convoluted brains by shaitaan.

The only spirit Muslims have to incumbently infuse in themselves is the spirit of the Qur’aan and Sunnah, and this spirit has been extinguished by the Ummah in the wake of the insane emulation of the lifestyle of the West. True Muslims have no affinity and absolutely no desire for a spirit which is a waste product of some kufr ideology such as the amman accord and of the even more ludicrous cape accord.

The positive image of Islam is portrayed only when Muslims adhere to the Qur’aan and Sunnah as did the Salafus Saaliheen. Only these illustrious personalities had displayed the positive image of Islam. The positive image can never be expected to be portrayed by munaafiqeen and Shiah supporters or by western bootlickers and by Muslims who emulate the western way of life. The positive image of Islam is displayed only when all departments of the Deen are implemented in practical life in conformity with the precepts of the Shariah.

Furthermore, the positive image of Islam is not displayed by a desire to impress others. When Muslims submit fully and wholeheartedly to the Shariah and the Sunnah in all aspects of life, then Allah Ta’ala displays the wonderful image of Islam on the adherents of Islam. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “Allah elevates the one who adopts humility for the sake of Allah.”  

The Mu’min does not adopt humility or the attributes of moral excellence for gaining elevation or for impressing others. He is completely oblivious of such objectives. His only intention is the attainment of Allah’s Pleasure. When he succeeds in the rectification of his niyyat and his focus is on only Allah Ta’ala, then he is elevated by Allah Ta’ala,  and then he displays the positive image of Islam which guides people towards the destination of the Aakhirat. The objective of this fleeting life on earth is success and salvation in the Aakhirat, not worldly and material prosperity and perfection. This conception of Islam is alien to the western bootlickers who formulated the scrap cape accord designed for only discord.

The call by these votaries of the haraam accord is rejected by the Ummah. Only Shiahs, Shiah supporters and western bootlickers will be receptive to the haraam drivel forged into the scrap paper. But the Ummah has no inclination towards a piece of garbage which has been cunningly but stupidly designed to undermine Islam and to promote Shi’ism with the plot of passing off Shi’ism as Islam. The Ummah rejects the haraam accord in entirety.

APPEAL FOR KUFR

(n) “EARNESTLY APPEAL to our communities to be tolerant of the differences of opinion between Muslims and not to escalate intra-faith hostilities between Sufi/Salafi, Sunni/Shi’a, Hanafi/Shaf’i, Barelwi/Deobandi, and Liberal/Conservative schools of thought… “  

What is their conception of toleration? As far as Muslim are concerned there is no tolerance for kufr. This ‘intolerance’ does not promote hate or violence in any manner whatsoever. Its demand is to dissociate from those who promote kufr and deny Tauheed. It precludes us from becoming the bosom friends of kuffaar without advocating hatred for them. And, how is it possible for Islam to promote hatred when the focus of Tabligh and Da’wat is the kuffaar?

Muslims have lived for centuries in South Africa alongside the kuffaar without the slightest perpetration of violence or hatred. Although we adhere to our Deen, never can it be shown that Muslims have ever advocated hatred and violence.

Tolerance for the munaafiqeen of the baatil cape accord is to abandon the proclamation of the Truth. Tolerance for them means that Muslims, especially the Ulama, should refrain from informing Muslim of the kufr which the Shiahs and other modernists are cunningly disseminating among the unwary and ignorant Muslims. Tolerance for these modernist juhala is to maintain silence when the Sahaabah are insulted or when Shi’ism is propagated as Islam.   For the cartel of deviates tolerance is to accept the kufr differences of false religions and ideologies, all the kufr, and to refrain from stating the Haqq which the Qur’aan declares regarding kufr. Tolerance in their understanding means that we all should clamber aboard the kufr interfaith wagon and submit to the kufr articles of faith of this shaitaani ideology.

The averment of ‘intra-faith hostilities’ is a filthy canard. Proclaiming the Truth does not initiate hostility. However, the bigoted modernists and munaafiqeen are the criminals who display lack of tolerance. Since they refuse to listen to the Truth of the Qur’aan which is unpalatable to the Shiahs and other sinister cranks and crooks lurking in the Muslim community, they seek to hoodwink the authorities with their falsehood of hostilities.

There is no Hanafi-Shaafi’ hostility despite the differences. The differences of the Math-habs are honourably accepted. There never ever was any Hanafi-Shaafi’ hostility in South Africa, and to the best of our knowledge elsewhere in the world. Hanafis and Shaafi’s perform Salaat together. The Imaam of the one Math-hab leads the followers of the other Math-hab. The attempt to trade the idea of Hanafi-Shaafi’ hostility in South Africa, is a despicable LIE. We challenge these agents of Shaitaan to produce just one anti-Shaafi’ statement issued by a Hanafi Aalim or vice versa. On the contrary, we have always resolutely propagated that the followers of a Math-hab should zealously adhere to their Math-hab and not become freelancers and slaves of desire as are the modernists who recklessly and ignorantly abandon the Math-hab. The attempt to create the impression of Hanafi-Shaafi’ hostility conspicuously displays the falsity and dishonesty of the accord cartel of deviant modernists.

There is also no Sufi-Salafi hostility in South Africa. These modernist liars are simply compounding their lies. Strident  academic debate is not hostility nor hatred. The debate pertains to academic and doctrinal issues. The parties in the dispute tender their respective arguments. But this is not hostility as the liars of the accord seek to convey. Salafis, Hanafis and Shaafis perform Salaat in the same Musaajid all over the world. There has never been physical hostility in South Africa between the followers of the Math-habs and Salafis as is falsely alleged by the liars of the cape accord. Let them produce their evidence for all their despicable canards.

In fact there is no Muslim-Shiah hostility in the meaning which the modernist juhala munaafiqeen are portraying. The debate pertains to the realm of Amr Bil Ma’roof, and the strident method of acquittal of the Ulama is not hostility. These deviates should elaborate and explain exactly their concept of hostility and how and when did the Ulama ever incite violence.

Hostility emanates from the modernists who label themselves as the ‘liberal school’ in opposition to what they term the ‘conservative school’. There is no liberal and no conservative school of thought in Islam. There is only one Islam – the Sunnah of Rasulullah sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Any precept, belief or practice which is in conflict with the Sunnah is not of Islam. There is no room for a liberal school of thought in Islam. Islam is the one and only Islam about which the Qur’aan declares:

“This Day have I (Allah) perfected your Deen for you, and completed for you My Favour, and chosen Islam for you as your Deen.”

The Deen of Islam was perfected more than 14 centuries  ago. The Qur’aan confirms this irrefutable reality. Precepts and opinions which are the products of liberal opinion are kufr. Liberalism is the teaching of the western kuffaar who are the tutors of the deviant liberals who were born in Muslim homes but who abandoned Islam as a consequence of western indoctrination. Proclaiming the modernist deviates such as the cape discord zanaadaqah and munaafiqeen is not an incitement to violence. It is the presentation of the Truth in the manner in which the Qur’aan addresses such issues. The manner is Qur’aanic and the terminology is Qur’aanic.

It is impossible for the Ulama to resort to LIES by pretending that kuffaar, murtaddeen and munaafiqeen are above board when the Qur’aan categorically proclaims them as the inmates of Jahannam. We cannot socialize and fraternize with those whom Allah Ta’ala regards as His enemies. This fact is proclaimed with clarity for the benefit of the zanaadaqah – the modernist deviates and liberals – to induce them to reflect and save themselves from everlasting damnation in Jahannam with their kufr. Their claims regarding hostility are absolutely baseless.

Incidents such as the violence at the Shiah temple in Verulam and the Musjid in Cape Town have no relationship with the Amr Bil Ma’roof of the Ulama.

A FALLACIOUS AGREEMENT

(o) “ACKNOWLEDGE that we can agree to disagree without disrespect to each other.”  

It is not possible for the Mu’mineen to agree with kufr. This type of agreement is a kufr principle of the western kuffaar. It is not an Islamic principle. Agreement on baatil is haraam. It is incumbent for the Ulama to proclaim the Haqq regardless of its unpalatibility, and no matter how undigrable it may sound. The Qur’aan Majeed states:

“And, the Haqq has arrived and falsehood has perished, for falsehood (by its very nature) must perish.”  

“We strike the Haqq against baatil. Then it smashes out its brains.”

Those bereft of Imaan can find agreement with the variety of forms of kufr, for all breeds of kufr is reality one breed. Al-kufru millatun waahidatun. All persuasions of kufr are in an alliance against Islam. That is why the U.S.A. has succeeded in imposing the cult of Islamophobia on almost the entire kuffaar nations of the world whether they are African, Asian, Arab or European. For all of them the profile of a terrorist is a true Muslim who dresses in Sunnah attire, has a beard, performs Salaat and proclaims the Haqq. And, the munaafiqeen who profess to be Muslims have also joined this league of Shaitaan. Despite overtly reciting the Kalimah and performing mock acts of worship, they cherish an inveterate hatred for the Sunnah and the adherents of the Sunnah. But Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) has informed us of these times. He said:

“Then there shall dawn an age when holding on to the Deen will be like holding onto a glowing ember (a red hot coal).”  

Furthermore, for the adherents of the Sunnah, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) announced Glad Tidings from Allah Ta’ala:

“Islam began ghareeb (forlorn and as a stranger). Soon will it return to that state of forlornness. Therefore, Glad Tidings for the Ghuraba (those who practise the Deen when the entire world has turned against them).”

UNITING AGAINST ISLAM

(p) “Communities United Against Hate Speech and Discord.”  

This is the very initial, opening statement of the cape town haraam, bogus accord of discord. The handful of misguided modernist Shiahs or Shiah supporters had made a dishonest attempt to trade the idea that Muslim communities all over the country are in support of this haraam accord. However, they were soon divested of their hallucinatory ‘importance’. They soon discovered that Muslim communities and organizations, far from supporting their hate programme, were opposed to this baatil so-called accord.

There is no ‘hate speech’ against which Muslims are required to unite. Only deviates, munaafiqeen and modernist zanaadaqah require to unite against the Qur’aan and Sunnah. We call on this company of mudhilleen and munaafiqeen to elaborate on their false claim of ‘hate speech’. Since they are embroiled in stirring up hatred with their ‘hate speech’ slander it devolves on them religiously, morally and legally to expound their slander and to pinpoint exactly which are the terms of ‘hate speech’ against which they are seeking a stupid accord. We await their elucidation.

Currently they wander aimlessly in riddles designed to hoodwink and deceive. They will not be inclined to elaborate for fear of their hatred for the Qur’aan being exposed.

Their opening statement confirms that the only motive for the baseless ‘accord’ attempt was to gain support against the Ulama, and that too, a small group of Ulama-e-Haqq who is holding aloft the Banner of Haqq in the ocean of baatil, fisq, fujoor, bid’ah and kufr.

There never was the intention of engaging honourably and with sincerity with Muslims. Therefore the deviant zindeeq cartel of modernists did not even attempt to engage liberals in the Muslim community such as the NNB jamiat, bogus uucsa, Darush Shaitaan and similar other ‘Dumb Devils’.

It is of imperative importance to inform the Muslim community that we are dealing with characters who are not Muslims. Despite professing to be Muslim, they are munaafiqeen. For them is their religion and for us is our Deen. And this is Qur’aanic Speech and Qur’aanic Command which will obviously be ‘hate speech’ for the shayaateenul ins.

From the Islamic Perspective the consequence of embracing the “Cape Accord” consisting of diabolical characters is spiritual haemorrhage causing spiritual, moral and intellectual concussion culminating in eternal perdition and doom in the Hereafter.

The platitude of harmony and co-existence piped by these diabolical characters with insipid monotony is kufr because the type of harmony and co-existence which they preach is among the fundamental articles of kufr of the kufr interfaith movement.

KUFR is the worst form of ZULM (OPPRESSION) as mentioned in the Qur’aan Kareem:

“Verily Shirk (Kufr) is Colossal Zulm”.

Saudi America: A Modern Secular Muslim State is Reborn

By Maulana Khalid Dhorat

image

From being the most powerful, honourable, respectable, chivalrous, pious, progressive, courageous and admirable nation once on earth, the Arab leaders of today have sullied the name and the race of our most noble Prophet Muhammad (may peace and blessings be upon him). The present Arab powers, far from their previous prestige, have indeed greatly deteriorated in stature to such an extent that they are now known for everything un-Islamic.

These include their exploitation of labour, oppression of others, opulent and decadent lifestyles, betrayal of their own race, war mongering, extremism in religion, manipulation and selective application of religion, and the cherry on the top – their open love, alliance, and adoration of USA and Israel. If this love was kept hidden in the heart, one could still be in doubt, but the Arab leaders have demonstrated themselves their willingness to be the Zio-Western underdog and poodle on all levels: economic, social, political and even religious.

The only thing now left to change is the Saudi flag. The pure Kalimah (Islamic Creed) should be removed and be replaced by a woman in a bikini.

But being a friend of the devil is no ordinary task. You need to do two things to be afforded this disgraceful privilege. Firstly, you have to sell your religion – a demand which is currently being fulfilled; and secondly, you have to take your Lord and Protector to be the mighty West, the formidable East, or anyone else besides the One Almighty. This has already been done many decades ago. In return, you get protection of your throne and license to kill your own people.

These leaders profess Islam outwardly, but our most noble Prophet Muhammad (may peace and blessings be upon him) desisted from the type of behavior openly exhibited nowadays. For starters, our most noble Prophet Muhammad (may peace and blessings be upon him) refused to be crowned a king by the Quraish, to be treated like a king, to live like a king, to dress like a king, to be given the powers and privileges of a king, and to being given the status of a legislator king. But today’s Arab rulers want to be styled as “King” and ‘Emirs.” What difference is there then between them and people like Firoun, Qarun, and Abu Jahal?

Let it be known that such leaders do not represent the Muslim ummah, nor the lands they rule over. Rather, they represent the great demon Iblees, and his terrorist henchmen in the USA, UK, France, India, Israel and in other countries leading the trend of mass murder, mass corruption, and mass destruction on earth. Muslims do not regard such leaders as their guides, even if they are styled “Custodians of the Two Holy Mosques,” and appear in holy garb now and then. They are just secular political leaders who have turned their back on Islam and are enjoying the sunshine and hay of this earth for as long as they can.

Although Arab treachery has been prevalent for many years, albeit covertly, it has now taken a bold twist with the rise of the present Crown Prince MbS, a mere lad of 32, who seem to be bent on satanising the Holy Lands upon which our noble Prophet Muhammad and his venerable Sahabah (Companions) trod. Swinging from the ultra-conservatism to ultra-modernism, women who were forced to don full body covering and not allowed to drive at all, are now  allowed to go naked on ‘international standard’ resort beaches, travel without maharim (legal guardians), seek employment in the private sector, and attend musical concerts, cinemas and night clubs. The once feared “Shariah Police” are now not only downsized, but also downdumbed.

Having previously had far reaching powers, they now can only offer friendly ‘advise’ to transgressors with no legal clout at all. Shops can now remain open during prayer times, and nude billboards are appearing all over the scene. Although I agree with uplifting the driving ban, the new reforms have largely taken women out of the sanctity of their homes and transformed them into sexual symbols.

But more fearful developments have taken place on the religious front. For years, leading scholars bold enough to criticize the policies of the Kingdom have been silently jailed, but this year more than 40 top-ranking shuyookh have been jailed in one fell swoop –  jailed solely because they speak the truth to a tyrant taghoot. Shortly thereafter, the world was shocked when one the famous royal blue-eyed Imams of the Haram said that Israel is an ally to the Muslims, and an Imam who spoke out against Israel on a Jumu’ah platform was dubbed “an escaped madman” and forcibly removed from the podium. Sadly, all the current Imams and teachers in the country are state-owned and state-controlled. Teaching Islam for them is just like teaching a history lesson to a bunch of 8 year olds. Every talk is scripted and monitored, and every lesson delivered is recorded.

But if this is not serious enough, to further appease their western patrons, all the university and madrassah Islamic textbooks of the country have been sent to the Pentagon for “revising and modernizing.”

I have not seen any of these “Pentagon approved” textbooks yet, but I’m pretty sure they will probably contain the following teachings:

All religions are equal. The Jew, Christian, Buddhist, Hindu and Taoist are all equal. Everyone can pray in anybody’s temple, in whichever way, via an idol, an image or a bonfire, it will be the same God. Any person from any race can intermarry too, and the forbidden teachings of one religion will not apply to followers of the next religion.

Muslims are a peaceful people. When others murder, rape or bomb them, it’s because of their own sins, and a form of well deserved divine punishment upon them. There is no such a thing as Jihad, speaking the truth or defending the oppressed. Even when children of six and grandmothers of 68 are gang raped, mind your own business, as these are internal issues of different countries.

The current Muslim western-approved political leaders are your true leaders and spiritual guides. They are not the law, but above the law and divine. They need to be obeyed in all respects, even in the disobedience of the One and True Almighty. Fear them, not the Almighty. They are wise, powerful, sinless, and your ticket to peace.

Everyone has a choice on how to live and to treat their body. The LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, & Transgender) movement is legitimate, and sexual perversity is a natural disposition. Qur’anic references to homosexuality refers to the act of rape (forced sexual intercourse), not the nature of the intercourse.

Israel has a right to exist and is unilaterally entitled to the land they illegally invaded. Masjid al-Aqsa belongs to the Zionists, since the conquest of Jerusalem by Sayyadina Umar ibn al-Khattab is not recognized by international secular law. Besides, both being Semite, the Jews and Arabs are brothers. The Palestinians and all those who support the resistance constitute an “Axis of Evil” and must be eradicated.

Everyone should adopt Sufi Islam and indulge in all forms of weird dancing and chanting to enhance their spiritual states. The study of the Qur’an, Sunnah and any authentic Islamic literature should also be abandoned. Rather just blindly follow and over-venerate your Shaikh (Sufi Mentor) who would most probably be on the payroll too.  If you want to protest or say anything against the government, do so in a peaceful online petition or in a controlled street demonstration. Remember, trouble-makers are always marked.

The current world order is not to be challenged. Politically, your fate is sealed and humiliation is your destiny. All things good and pure are now old-fashion. If a Muslim desires a peaceful existence, he/she should modernize and be in the service of the prevalent philosophy. There is no such a thing is ummatic brotherhood, a desire to unify the Muslim world under a righteous Caliph, forbidding the evil or promoting the good. Every person should be for himself, and avail himself to all the attractions and pleasures of the world currently on offer, even in the Holy Lands.

Now having firm control over the religious class and the masses, even the Royal family and political elite have not been spared. In a blitz operation, over 200 members of Saudi elite were held to ransom in the Ritz Hotel, and only released after their fortunes were looted, and their economic and political clout vastly diminished. Everything now seems to be in control for MbS, but things are looking bleak. When the Saudis held fast to their religion, they were prosperous to a degree. But as soon as they started modernizing and war mongering, things have changed. Saudi currently is heavily indebted to the IMF. Unemployment continues to rise, taxes have been introduced, and the price of oil is continuing to fall. In foreign affairs, the war in Yemen & Syria, and the dispute with Qatar appear to be in stalemate.

Our Lord Almighty says that one who lives a life in the remembrance of his Lord will be prosperous, and those who don’t will have poverty stare them in the face. This is exactly what is happening in Saudi today. The more ills in the form of resorts, cinemas, casinos, concerts, night clubs, musicals, comic cons, and forbidden entertainment is introduced to bridge the deficit, the more people will suffer. As an example, a beach resort is proposed to be built on the Red Sea between the towns of Umluj and Al-Wajh in northern Hejaz. This project will involve ‘50 islands upon 34 000 square kilometers in a global up-market tourism and leisure mega-development’ and will be ‘governed by laws on par with international standards.’ This will allow women to wear bikinis in the pool and beach areas

Vision 2030 is aimed at bringing prosperity to this beleaguered country, but by 2030, the country may be already turned to dust. A hadith speaks about Madinah al-Munawwarah becoming desolate at the end of time, and huge armies emanating from Sham attacking the forces of Imam al-Mahdi in Makkah al-Mukarramah. These are all signs that as Saudi is responsible for the destruction of Yemen, Syria and Palestine, the same plight will befall it. It will become lawless, leaderless, desolate, and a playfield for the superpowers of the time.

Lastly, there are many pro-Iranians who gleefully read articles such as this condemning the Saudis, but little do they know that the Saudi about-turn in 2017, was already done by Khomeni in 1979. The Shi’ah have a 40 year start in apostasy over the Saudis! Khomeini, like MbS, was a Shi’ah asset who not only disfigured Islam beyond recognition (Shi’ism equals Zionism), but whose presence in the Middle East have kept the Arabs in balance. The only difference is that the Bedouin Arabs are not polished diplomats enough to hide their alliances with the Zionists, but the Iranians are.

The Shi’ah have been secretly funded by Israel to destabilize the Arab world for four decades now, and have also been granted the green light by the UN to develop nuclear capability. In retrospect, the Arabs have not been allowed to win an easy war in Syria and Yemen despite their vast weapon arsenals in seven years, but they are stupid enough not to realize these glaring discrepancies.  In the ultimate end, both the Arabs and the Persians will join the forces of Dajjal in order to fight the true Muslims. On whose side will you be then?

Kufr Upheavals in Saudi Arabia

Please comment on the sweeping changes to the Shariah’s laws enacted by King Salman of Saudi Arabia. The ban on women driving has been totally abolished. The king’s decree becomes effective in June 2018. During the ‘preparatory period’ until June 2018 will be developed the infrastructure to accommodate an expected million female drivers.

Western governments, agencies and women in Saudi Arabia are rejoicing this new-found freedom which heralds big changes in all spheres of life. Reporting on this ‘shock’ announcement, the western media say:  

“The announcement follows a dazzling gender-mixed celebration of Saudi national day at the weekend, the first of its kind which aimed to spotlight the kingdom’s reform drive despite a backlash from religious conservatives.

Men and women danced in the streets to drums and thumping electronic music, in scenes that are a stunning anomaly in a country known for its tight gender segregation and an austere vision of Islam.

Women were also allowed into a sports stadium to watch a musical concert, a move that chimes with the government’s Vision 2030 plan for social and economic reform. …..Crown prince Mohammed bin Salman, the king’s son and the architect of Vision 2030, is seen as catering to the aspirations of the youth with measures that include promoting women empowerment.” (End of western press statement)

What is happening to Saudi Arabia?

COMMENT (al-haqq):

Allah’s Plan is unfolding in Saudi Arabia. The Qur’aan Majeed states: “They (the kuffaar- which includes the king, his son and the vast majority of the fussaaq/ fujjaar populace) plot, and Allah (also) plots, and Allah is the Best of the plotters.” What is currently transpiring in Saudi Arabia, is depicted in the following Qur’aanic Aayat:

“When We intend to destroy a city, then We command its affluent people, then they go on (a rampage of) flagrant sin (fisq) in the city (town or country). Thus Our decree (of universal punishment) becomes justified for them. Then We utterly annihilate them.” [Al-Israa’, Aayat 16]

It is the standing, unchangeable Sunnah of Allah Azza Wa Jal to grant free rope to the   transgressors who have crossed the point of no return. Prior to their destruction by Divine Chastisement, the evil people are allowed to plunge recklessly into the worst of sins and transgression. Then suddenly the Athaab of Allah Azza Wa Jal overtakes them.

The true condition of the Saudi masses is being reflected in the fisq, fujoor and kufr decrees of the Saudi king who has prepared the ground for his kaafir son to succeed him on the throne. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “Your deeds are your rulers.” Allah Ta’ala imposes on a population such rulers who reflect their misdeeds and villainy. The rotten state of the Saudi populace is reflected in the rotten rulers who have been imposed on the land by Allah Ta’ala. It is only Allah Azza Wa Jal Who appoints and dismisses kings, rulers and governments. The Qur’aan Majeed explicitly confirms this fact.

Kuffaar rulers with Muslim names in Saudi Arabia and in all Muslim countries, reflect the kufr of the masses. The vast majority of the masses is kaafir in reality. Mentioning this fact, Hadhrat Abdullah Bin Amr (Radhiyallahu anhu) said:

“There will dawn an age when the people will gather in their Musaajid and perform Salaat whilst not a single one among them will be a Mu’min.”

This fact is quiet evident from the state of the masses in all Muslim countries. The Vision of fisq, fujoor and kufr which the king’s son has engineered by the command of the U.S.A. is actually what the Saudi masses are clamouring for. The million  women who are expected to obtain driving licences, the men and women dancing in the streets, the blaring music, etc. all indicate the lusts of the masses. They are actually clamouring for giving expression to these evil lusts of bestiality, hence they have received the type of rulers which will ensure the attainment of the objectives of their lusts.

Ultimately, Allah’s Athaab will utterly destroy them. The massive upheavals of fisq, fujoor and kufr    being enacted currently in Saudi Arabia is the prelude to Allah’s Athaab which will utterly destroy them. The Saudi plunge into filth and evil will be incremental. It will become worse by the day. This will be a necessary development to justify the Divine Punishment which will destroy and annihilate those who are plundering the Deen of Allah Azza Wa Jal.

While the situation in Saudi Arabia, as well as in all Muslim lands, is extremely lamentable, it has to be expected. There is nothing surprising about the   swift degeneration of the Ummah. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had predicted this state of affairs. When Muslims plunder the Deen, then Allah Ta’ala imposes on them kuffaar domination. The kuffaar will mercilessly pillage and plunder the Ummah. Predicting this state of affairs, Nabi-e-Kareem (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:

“You (the Muslim Ummah) will (at that time be ghutha’ (rubbish/ flotsam/ the mass of mess of floodwaters). Allah will remove   fear for you from the hearts of your enemy, and most certainly Allah will create wahn in your hearts.” When he was asked for the meaning of wahn, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) responded: “The love of the world and detestation for Maut.”

This is exactly the condition of the Saudis and of all Muslims   today. They all are bootlickers of the kuffaar. The Saudis specialize in licking the boots of Trump in particular. Whatever is transpiring today in Saudi Arabia is dictated by the U.S.A.

Anyhow, whatever we say and diagnose, in the final analysis the reality on the ground is the decree of Allah Azza Wa Jal.