EX-MUFTI ZUBAIR BHAYAT, EX-MUFTI TAQI & OTHER BE-HAYAA (SHAMELESS) FUSSAAQ

By Jamiatul Ulama Northern Cape

FLAGRANTLY LECTURING WOMEN!!! AND EVEN LOOKING AT THE WOMENS’ FACES???

IS THE SO-CALLED ‘MUFTI’ TAQI A PROPER AALIM??? OPENLY SPEAKING TO A WOMAN FOR MORE THAN 30 MINUTES AND EVEN LOOKING AT HER FACE? OPENLY VIOLATING THE LAWS OF HIJAAB!

DOES ZUBAIR BHAYAT, TAQI UTHMAANI AND THEIR ILK HAVE ANY HAYAA (MODESTY) LEFT???

OPENLY MISLEADING THE UMMAT!

Allah Ta’ala commands: ‘And (O Women!) Remain firmly in your homes.’ (Surah 33 – Aayat 33) ‘And, when you (men) ask them (women) something (of need) then ask them from behind a screen. That (form of Hijaab of the separating screen) is purest for your hearts and their hearts.’ (Surah 33 – Aayat 53)

Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “Hayaa (Shame) is a branch of Imaan.” (Nasaai – Ahmed – Jaami’ul Usool – Ibn Majah – and many more Authoritative Kutub)

“Hayaa and Imaan are interlinked (the two coexist). If one is eliminated, so is the other.” (Mustadrak Haakim)

Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “Name him so that people are saved from (the Fitnah) within him.” This is amongst the beautiful advices Imaam-e-Aa’zam, Hadhrat Imaam Abu Hanifah Rahimahullah proffered to his illustrious student Imaam Abu Yusuf Rahimahullah. Such people are to be exposed!

SEGREGATION AND THE SHARIAH

Notwithstanding the piety and holiness of Rasulullah’s (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) household and the Honourable Sahaabah, the Qur’aan commands: “When they (the Sahaabah) ask you for something, they (the Sahaabah) should ask you from behind a screen.” (Aayat 53 Surah Ahzaab)

Even the Holy Wives of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) were ordered to remain within the confines of their homes, observing the laws of Hijaab. When there was a need for a Sahaabi to enquire about anything from the Wives of Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam), he had to do so from behind a screen. Yet Muslims of this age despise and even mock the Qur’aanic injunction of the segregation of sexes.

In this very same Aayat (No.53 of Surah Ahzaab) Allah Ta’ala states the reason for Hijaab: This (i.e. speaking from behind a screen) is purer for their (i.e. the Sahaabah’s) hearts and your heart (i.e. the hearts of the Holy Wives.)”

Now who can claim greater Taqwa and purity of heart than the Sahaabah and the Holy Wives of Nabi (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam)? When purdah was obligatory in that noblest age on men and women of the highest degree of Taqwa and holiness, then what does the Aql (intelligence) demand in this regard in this age of total corruption and impiety? They should study Ma’aariful Qur’aan properly!

Hadhrat Ali (Radiyallahu Anhu) narrates that he was with Nabi (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) when he (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) said: “What is best for woman?” Hadhrat Ali (Radiyallahu Anhu) said: “All the Sahaabah remained silent. When I returned to Faatimah (Radiyallahu Anha) I said to her: ‘What is best for women?’ She replied: “They should not look at men nor should men look at them.’ I [says Hadhrat Ali (Radiyallahu Anhu)] mentioned this to Nabi (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) who then exclaimed: ‘Fatimah is part of me.’ ” – (Daara Qutni)

In a Hadith which appears in Abu Dawood, Nasaai, Mishkaat, etc., a woman handed a letter to Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) from behind a screen. This establishes that Hijaab was observed for even Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam).

HIJAAB FROM EVEN A BLIND SAHAABI

Hadhrat Umme Salma (Radhiyallahu Anha) narrates: “Hadhrat Maymoona and I (Radhiyallahu Anhuma) were seated in the company of Rasulullah (SallallahuAlayhi Wasallam) when Hadhrat Abdullah Ibn Umme Maktoom (Radhiyallahu Anhu) suddenly approached and entered the home. So Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam instructed us: “Adopt hijaab for him,” (i.e. withdraw from the place and go into seclusion).

Hadhrat Umme Salma Radhiyallahu Anha said: “O Nabi of Allah, isn’t he blind, (which means that) he cannot see us, (i.e. so why should we observe Hijaab)?”

Rasulullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “Are both of you also blind? Can you not see him?” (Muslim – Tirmizi – Abu Dawud –Bayhaqi – Sunanul Kubra, Nasaai – Saheeh Ibn Hibbaan – Fathul Baari – Kanzul Ummaal – Mushkilul Aathaar – Mishkaat – Many more Kutub)

THE ACCURSED ULAMA-E-SOO & THEIR FOLLOWERS

Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “Allah curses the one who looks (at females) and the one to whom the gaze was directed (i.e. the woman who emerged unnecessarily from her home and thus caused men to glance at her).” (Bayhaqi – Kanzul Ummaal – Mishkaat)

Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “Woman is Aurah (i.e. an object of concealment). When she emerges (from her home) shaitaan casts surreptitious glances at her (to ambush her and manipulate her for fitnah). And undoubtedly the closest she is to Allah Ta`ala is when she is at the innermost corner of her house. ”

The following shameless Munkaraat (sins) also took place:

1. Molvis are addressing woman directly – no screen – no pardah – no curtain in between. Shamelessness piled upon crass shamelessness. Haraam piled upon filthy Haraam!

2. The speaker (Ex-Mufti Zubair Bhayat) shamelessly looking at women and Ex-Mufti Taqi Uthmaani looking at the female for the sake of Riba so-called ‘Islamic’ Finance!

3. The bare-faced women looking at the bald-faced Molvis.

4. Animate Photography and videoing. They legalized the Fitnah of TV, Videos, etc. So the very same Fitnah now rebounds on them and exposes them.

5. In another event where Zubair Bhayat hosted Fati Chohan, the men and women were mixed. Intermingling of the sexes and even Fati Chohan addressed the mixed gathering. The men could clearly see her and the other females in attendance, etc.

6. With their Haraam actions openly committed in public without any shame whatsoever, they are misleading the Ummat. What did they learn in Madrasah?

7. Taqi Uthmaani allows himself to be interviewed by a female. So much knowledge, but no fear for Allah. ‘Taqi’ means a person who has Taqwa. Looking at a woman is Fisq – not Taqwa. These Molvis should ponder over their names and then compare it with their flagrant acts of Fisq advertised to the whole world!

In light of the above, the actions of Zubair Bhayat and Taqi Uthmaani are clear acts of fisq. The Ahkaam pertaining to Fussaaq are applicable to them.

Imaam Muhammad (Rahmatullah Alayh) said: “Regarding the man of hawa (lust) who perpetrates it flagrantly in public and the faasiq who commits fisq flagrantly (in the public), there is nothing wrong mentioning these two along with their deeds.”

The faasiq mu’lin (the faasiq who himself exposes his sins in public) is bereft of honour, and he does his own naming and shaming. The basis for naming and exposing those who pose a danger to the Imaan of people is the Hadith: “Why do you desist from mentioning the faajir (an immoral person) with his indulgence (in fujoor)? Expose him until the people are aware of him. Mention him with his indulgence so that the people are saved from him. Mention him so that the people are saved from him, for there is no gheebat of him.” (The double mention of mentioning and exposing the Mudhil is emphasized in the Hadith)

Once when Imaam Ahmad Bin Hambal (Rahmatullah Alayh) was severely criticizing a narrator, someone admonishing him said: “O Shaikh! Do not make gheebat of the Ulama.” Imaam Ahmad responded: “O miserable one! This is naseehat, not gheebat.”

When Hadhrat Abdullah Ibn Mubaarak (Rahmatullah Alayh) had criticized a narrator, it was said to him: “You have indulged in gheebat.” He replied: “Shut up! If we do not explain (i.e. expose the deviate), how will the Haqq be distinguished from baatil?”

Hadhrat Hasan Basri (Rahmatullah Alayh) said: “Your naming a man who publicly sins and does not conceal it, is a virtue recorded for you.” A Hadith narrated by Imaam Muslim (Rahmatullah Alayh) states: “Everyone of my Ummah is forgiven except the mujaahiroon”. The mujaahiroon are those who advertise their sins thereby exposing what Allah has concealed for them. They make this lawful for no valid reason.

Hadhrat Hasan Basri (Rahmatullah Alayh), putting his life on the line, said to Hajjaaj, the brutal ruler of Iraq: “O Worst of the Fussaaq! O Worst of the Fujjaar! The inhabitants of the heavens are wrathful to you. The inhabitants of the earth curse you”. Then when he left the palace of Hajjaaj, Hadhrat Hasan commented: “Verily, Allah has taken a pledge from the Ulama to proclaim the Haqq, and not to conceal it.”

THIS THROWS SOME GOOD LIGHT ON THE SHAYAATEEN KNOWN AS SAUF & THEIR ‘9TH FORUM’ WHICH IS HOSTED BY THE ZUBAIR BHAYAT-CLIQUE AT ‘DARUL IHSAN’ IN DURBAN.

THEY ARE ALSO VERY FOND OF QUOTING EX-MUFTI TAQI UTHMAANI AT THEIR GATHERINGS. THE FOLLOWING HADEETH HAS BECOME A REALITY IN THESE TIMES:

Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “Soon will there dawn an age when nothing of Islam will remain except its name – nothing of the Qur’aan will remain except its text. The Musaajid will be elaborate (and ornate) structures, but bereft of guidance. The worst of the people under the canopy of the sky will be the ulama. From them will emerge fitnah, and the fitnah will rebound on them.”

STAY FAR AWAY FROM SUCH EVIL SO-CALLED ‘ULAMA’!

One thought on “EX-MUFTI ZUBAIR BHAYAT, EX-MUFTI TAQI & OTHER BE-HAYAA (SHAMELESS) FUSSAAQ”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s