Category Archives: History

The 3 Attempts to Steal the Body of the Prophet (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) in History

You might have heard some people asking where is the body of Prophet Muhammad (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam)? Well, everybody knows the body of Prophet Muhammad (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) is buried inside Masjid al Nabawi in his chamber under the green dome. They ask this question because Non-believers have made many attempts to steal the body of Prophet Muhammad (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) in history.

In this specific writing, we will talk about the first attempt made to steal the Holy Body of Prophet Muhammad  (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) from the Green Dome in Madinah. However ALLAH Almighty arranged a great defeat for all such morons.

Historians have reported three attempts made by the Non-Believers to steal the Holy Body of Prophet Muhamad (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam).

1st ATTEMPT

Nur ad-Din Mahmud Zangi (Rahmatullahi Alayh)’s Dream

Some Christians planned to steal the body of Prophet Muhammad S.A.W in 557AH. It was the time of a very pious Muslim ruler Nur ad-Din Mahmud Zangi. The commander of his soldiers was Asad ad-Din Shirkuh the uncle of Great Salah ud Din, the one who conquered Jerusalem.

One night Nur ad-Din Mahmud Zangi was blessed with a dream and he saw Prophet Muhammad (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam). The Holy Prophet pointed at two people of red color hair (at their heads) and Said, “Mahmud, Save Me from them” .

Al Zangi (may Allah Bless him) woke, offered prayer and slept. He saw the same dream again. He got up from the bed again, offered prayer and tried to sleep and saw the same dream for the third time . He then called his advisor Shaikh Jamal ud Din, and discussed the matter with him.

He Left for Madinah Immediately

Shaikh advised him to go to Madina immediately and asked him to not to relate the dream to anyone else. Nur ud Din Mahmud Zangi took his advisor with him and a Historian Majd al Din. The caravan comprised thousands of camels carrying expensive gifts on them.

Mahmud Zangi reached Madinah from Syria in sixteen days. He directly went to Masjid al Nabawi where he offered prayers.

He Arranged a Feast for Everyone

With the consultation of his advisor, he summoned all the people of Madinah in order to present them with alms. Nur ud Din Zangi looked carefully at each of the visitors but could not see those he saw in a dream. He inquired if all the residents have received the alms.
The people replied in Yes. He asked them again and some people told him that there are two pious people who don’t accept any alms. They feed the needy people generously, observe fast on regular basis, perform tahajjud and offer salah day and night and once a week they visit Masjid al Nabawi.

He Recognized them Immediately

Nur ud Din ordered the two to be presented to him. They were exactly the two people he saw in the dream. He recognized them immediately and asked them why they are here.

They replied that they are Moroccans, came for hajj and wish to stay in Madina as neighbors of the Holy Prophet.
Nur ud din Zanki insisted them, to tell the truth, but they kept quiet.

There was a Tunnel directing to Prophet’s Sacred Chamber

He asked about their residence and went there. He inspected their residence near the sacred chamber and when an old rug was lifted, a wooden board was found and under that a newly dug tunnel.

The tunnel was approaching the Sacred Chamber. They got terrified and confessed that they are Christians and the king of Iberia sent them with a huge sum of money to steal the body of Prophet Muhammad (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam).

They rented the house nearest to the Holy Chamber and used to dig the tunnel in the night and throw out the soil in the day.

He Ordered the Execution of Both

They also told that when they got near to the sacred chamber an earthquake shook the earth and a fearful thunder was observed. Nur ud Din Mahmud Zanki ordered the immediate execution of the culprits and thanked Allah who blessed him with the honor of saving the sacred chamber.

Arrangements made to protect the Holy Body of Prophet Muhammad (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam):

After this attempt, Nur ud Din Zangi (Rahmatullahi Alayh) ordered a deep trench to be dug around the Holy Chamber and then filled it with melt lead so that nobody could ever reach the sacred chamber again.

2nd ATTEMPT

The love for Prophet Mohammed (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) has always been a trademark of Muslims. This is the reason that non-believers of all the times targeted the Personality of Prophet (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) directly.

They tried to shake the belief of people on Him (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) and when they failed, they tried to cause harm to the Prophet (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam).

In this specific writing, we will talk about the second attempt made to steal the Holy Body of The Prophet Mohammad (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) from the Green Dome in Madina. However ALLAH Almighty arranged a great defeat for all such morons.

Famous historian, poet, and geographer Ibn Zubayr explain the Second attempt. He says that he was in Egypt in 578 AH and he left Alexandria on the 8th day of Dhul Hijjah. He saw a big crowd coming out of homes to see the Roman prisoners.

These Roman Christians were brought in a humiliating way; they were tied with the camels with their faces facing the tails of camels. Ibn Zubayr was told about the activities of those prisoners in detail. The Syrian Christians built some boats and equipped them with weapons for war.

They headed to the sea and in their way, they looted many caravans of pilgrims and burnt many of their boats. They looted the trade caravans as well. They killed everyone they found in their way.

Haji Luhluh Destroyed them

They boldly announced that they are going to Madinah to steal The Holy Body of The Prophet (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam).

When they were at a traveling distance of one day, Haji Luhluh attacked them with a few Moroccan young people who were experts in the sea war. They killed some of the Christians and arrested the others.

They sent some prisoners to other places so the people can see them how they are being put to the sword. Some of them were also sent to the Holy cities of Makkah and Madinah.

3rd ATTEMPT

Imam Muhammad ibn Jarir Al-Tabari describes the Third attempt. He says that Shams ad-Din Sawawab Lamti was the head of the people who served the mosque of the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam). One of the friends of Sawab was known to the ruler of Madinah.

Some people from Halab bribed the ruler: One day his friend told Shams ad-din Sawawab that some people from Halab (Syria) have bribed the ruler and have demanded the Holy Bodies of Abu Bakr (May Allah be pleased with him) and ‘Umar (May Allah be pleased with him) the ruler of Madinah has agreed with them.

Soon after this news, the ruler called for Shams ad-Din and told him that some people will come at night and he has to open the door for them and let them do whatever they want to. Shams ad-din got worried.

Someone knocked on the door: After the doors were closed after ‘Isha prayer, someone knocked on the door, Baab al-Salaam.

Ruler’s house was in front of this door. Shams ad-din opened the door and 40 people carrying torches and equipped with equipment for demolishing buildings entered and headed towards the sacred chamber. The earth split suddenly and all of them were buried there with their equipment.

There was no sign of their presence on the ground. After some time, the ruler called him and asked if the people have arrived. He told the ruler the whole happening.

The ruler was astonished and demanded Shams ad-Din to not to tell the incident to anyone else. This incident is also reported by Abu Mohammad Abdullah Marghani.

Muslim world in a great panic as some unbelievable and terrifying news was being heard. It was reported that few people were of the view to remove the Holy Bodies from the Sacred Chamber and demolish the Sacred Green Dome.

But Allah wanted to keep the Holy Bodies safe and they are safe till today and will remain safe until the Day of Judgment.

 

Heresies of Dara Shikoh

Dara Shikoh was the son of Shahjahan and the brother of Aurangzeb, the propagandists in the social media paint a picture that he was executed by Aurangzeb as “unjustifiable” and “oppressive”, but this is far from the truth and isn’t compatible with recorded facts. This post is an exerpt from the book Saviours of the Islamic Spirit where its author Maulana Abul Hasan Ali al-Nadwi (rahimahullah) highlights the heresies of Dara Shikoh:

It would not be fair to depend on the court historians of Aurangzeb’s reign for condemning Dara Shikoh as an apostate from Islam nor the war of succession between Dara and his brothers could be conceived as a struggle between Islam and infidelity, nor yet was it a conflict of ideologies and philosophies. Dara’s own writings, however, confirm the charge of his contemporaries, both Muslims and non-Muslims, who allege that he had discarded the essential dogmas of Islam and wanted to renew Akbar’s electicism. This mystic prince had unfortunately fallen under the spell of the pseudo fake-sufis like Mian Mir, Mulla Shah and Sarmad. It did not take him long to claim that he was an ‘Arif Kamil, a knower through God, and to declare that “the wealth of divine knowledge is not bestowed on every person, but it has been bestowed especially on me”.[1] By the time he was in his late twenties, he had developed hatred towards dogma and (Islamic) orthodoxy: he wrote to an eminent mystic saint, Shah Dilruba, in a letter, “Esoteric Islam has ceased to influence the mind of this meek-hearted and the real esoteric infidelity has shown its face to him”.[2] In his streak of egoism and self-commendation, Dara often indulged in aphorisms and mystical utterances repugnant to Islamic beliefs and practices. He argued that distress or calamity made the prayer necessary for the immature, while an ‘Arif Kamil, as he was, had no need of prayers. Accordingly, he had suspensed with the prayers and fasts enjoined by Islam.[3] Meanwhile, his studies of Sanskrit led him to Vedenta and Yoga philosophy, to Hindu rituals and mythology. Fascinated by mystical pantheism he wanted to renew Akbar’s syncreticism. The Holy Qur’an he found enigmatical, its meaning hidden and the Upanishads as the original revelation in which Quranic verses could be found in entirety.[4] Dara kept the company of Brahmins, yogis and sanyasis and regarded them as true masters of wisdom. As a contemporary historian has reported, “He considered their books… …the word of God, and …… employed himself in translating them…….More specifically, Dara had taken up the Hindu name Prabhu (Lord) and inscribed it on the rings which he wore, he had given up the prayers, fasting and other obligations imposed by the law……It became manifest that if Dara Shikoh obtained the throne and establi shed his power, the foundations of the faith would be in danger and the precepts of Islam would be changed for the rant of infidelity and Judaism.”[5]

The Muslim chroniclers’ accounts could be coloured by their prejudice, but there are also corroborative evidences left by contemporary Hindu writers about the censurable beliefs and conduct of Dara Shikoh. Sujan Singh writes in the Khulasatut-Tawarikh, “………Data Shikoh being inclined towards the religion of the Hindus, associates with Brahmins, yogis, and saniyasis, and regards them as his guides and protectors, and looks upon their Books, known as Veda, as ancient and revealed from God, and spends his precious time in translating them, and composing poems in Hindi; calls them “tasawwuf,” and, in stead of the name of God, he has inscribed Hindi names which denote Reflection of God to Hindus, on diamond, ruby, and other stones, and puts them on as a charm and has discarded fasting and prayers and the ways of a Musalman; has usurped power—determined to pay respect to His Majesty.”[6]

Dara’s thoughts and behaviour, portending renewal of Akbar’s religious eclecticism, which were never kept secret by the conceited prince, must have caused serious misgivings to the Indian Muslim society, and provided a God-send opportunity to the practical and astute Aurangzeb to take advantage of the situation. It is also quite reasonable that the Muslim scholars, right-minded sufis and their disciples, would have recoiled in horror at the thoughts and doings of Dara for they had been a witness to the indignities heaped on Islam and the Muslims during Akbar’s time. They would have been sympathetic or rather actively helped the Prince whom they knew to be virtuous, God fearing and the defender of orthodox faith.[7]

The final outcome of the war of succession is too well known to be recounted here. Aurangzeb ascended the throne in 1068/1659 and ruled over the country for half a century.

References:

[1] Dara Shikoh, Risala Haqnamah, Litho, Newal Kishore Press, p. 5

[2] Fourth letter to Shah Dilruba in Faiyyaz-ul-Qawanin cited by Bikramajit Hasrat in Dara Shikoh: Life and Works, (Shanti Niketen, 1953), p. 65

[3] Khafi Khan. Muntakhab-ul-Lubab, Vol. I, pp. 717, 725 (Bibliotheca Indica Series; Elliot and Dowson); Muhammad Kazim’s ‘Alamgir Namah), Vol. VII, p. 179

[4] Sirrul Asrar (British Museum). In some Mss. the book bears the title of Sirr-i-Akbar. Also see Majma’-ul-Bahrain by Dara Shikoh, pp. 1,18.

[5] Mohammad Kazim, ‘Alamgir Namah, Elliot and Dowson, Vol. VII, p. 179

[6] Sujan Singh, Khulasat-ut-Tawarikh, p. 58 cited from Aurangzeb and His Times, p. 48

[7] See for details Prof. Muhammd Aslam who has thrown light on the role played by the scholars and mystics in the victory of Aurangzeb in one of his essays included in the Tarikhi Maqalat.

ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺀ ﮐﯽ ﺗﺎﺭﯾﺦ

ﺑﮭﺎﺭﺕ ﮐﮯ ﺷﮩﺮ ﭘﯿﻠﯽ ﺑﮭﯿﺖ ﮐﮯ ﺭﮨﺎﺋﺸﯽ ﺷﯿﺦ ﺭﺣﯿﻢ ﺑﺨﺶ ﮐﮯ ﯾﮩﺎﮞ ﺳﻦ 1883 ﺀ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺑﯿﭩﮯ ﮐﯽ ﭘﯿﺪﺍﺋﺶ ﮨﻮﺋﯽ ﺟﺲ ﮐﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﺠﯿﺪ ﺭﮐﮭﺎ ﮔﯿﺎ۔ ﯾﮩﯽ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﺠﯿﺪ ﺁﮔﮯ ﭼﻞ ﮐﺮ ﺣﮑﯿﻢ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺳﻌﯿﺪ ﮐﮯ ﻭﺍﻟﺪ ﺑﻨﮯ۔ ﺁﭨﮫ ﺑﺮﺱ ﭘﯿﻠﯽ ﺑﮭﯿﺖ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺭﮨﺎﺋﺶ ﮐﮯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺷﯿﺦ ﺭﺣﯿﻢ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﮨﻠﯽ ﮐﮯ ﻋﻼﻗﮯ ﺣﻮﺽ ﻗﺎﺿﯽ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﮨﻮ ﮔﺌﮯ۔ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺳﮯ ﻓﺮﺍﻏﺖ ﭘﺮ ﺣﮑﯿﻢ ﺣﺎﻓﻆ ﺣﺎﺟﯽ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﺠﯿﺪ ﺑﺎﻧﯽ ﺩﻭﺍﺧﺎﻧﮧ ﮨﻤﺪﺭﺩ ﮐﺎ ﻧﮑﺎﺡ ﺭﺍﺑﻌﮧ ﺑﯿﮕﻢ ﺳﮯ ﮨﻮﺍ۔ ﺁﭖ ﺍﻧﺘﮩﺎﺋﯽ ﻧﯿﮏ، ﺍﻃﺎﻋﺖ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﮔﺰﺍﺭ، ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﮦ ﺍﻭﺭ ﭘﺮﺩﮦ ﮐﯽ ﭘﺎﺑﻨﺪ، ﻣﺤﻨﺘﯽ، ﻭﻓﺎﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﮧ ﻓﮩﻢ ﺧﺎﺗﻮﻥ ﺗﮭﯿﮟ۔۔

ﺣﮑﯿﻢ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺳﻌﯿﺪ ﮐﮯ ﻭﺍﻟﺪ ﺣﮑﯿﻢ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﺠﯿﺪ ﺍﯾﮏ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺗﮭﮯ۔ ﺁﭖ ﮐﻮ ﺍﺩﻭﯾﺎﺕ ﮐﮯ ﺧﻮﺍﺹ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺩﻟﭽﺴﭙﯽ ﺗﮭﯽ۔ ﺷﻮﻕ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻣﮩﺎﺭﺕ ﮐﮯ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺍﻧﮭﻮﮞ ﻧﮯ ﻣﺴﯿﺢ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﮏ ﺣﮑﯿﻢ ﺍﺟﻤﻞ ﺧﺎﮞ ﮐﮯ ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﮐﺮﺩﮦ ﮨﻨﺪﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﯽ ﺩﻭﺍﺧﺎﻧﮯ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻣﻼﺯﻣﺖ ﮐﺮﻟﯽ۔ ﺍﺱ ﻋﺮﺻﮯ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻃﺐ ﮐﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﮧ ﺑﮍﯼ ﮔﮩﺮﺍﺋﯽ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻃﺐ ﮐﯽ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﮐﺘﺎﺑﻮﮞ ﮐﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﮧ ﺑﮍﯼ ﺑﺎﺭﯾﮏ ﺑﯿﻨﯽ ﺳﮯ ﮐﯿﺎ۔ ﺁﭖ ﮐﻮ ﺟﮍﯼ ﺑﻮﭨﯿﻮﮞ ﺳﮯﮔﮩﺮﺍ ﺷﻐﻒ ﺗﮭﺎ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍﻥ ﮐﯽ ﭘﮩﭽﺎﻥ ﮐﺎ ﻣﻠﮑﮧ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺗﮭﺎ۔ ﺁﺧﺮﮐﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﮩﻮﮞ ﻧﮯ ﻧﺒﺎﺗﺎﺕ ﮐﮯ ﻣﯿﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺍﺗﺮﻧﮯ ﮐﺎ ﻧﮧ ﺻﺮﻑ ﻓﯿﺼﻠﮧ ﮐﯿﺎ ﺑﻠﮑﮧ ﺑﯿﻤﺎﺭﯾﻮﮞ ﮐﯽ ﺷﻔﺎﺀ ﮐﮯ ﻟﯿﮯ ﮨﻨﺪﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﮭﺮ ﺳﮯ ﺟﮍﯼ ﺑﻮﭨﯿﺎﮞ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﮐﺮﻧﮯ ﮐﺎ ﺑﮭﯽ ﻓﯿﺼﻠﮧ ﮐﯿﺎ۔ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺣﮑﯿﻢ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺳﻌﯿﺪ ” ﺁﭖ ﺍﯾﮏ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﭘﺎﯾﮧ ﻧﺒﺾ ﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺟﮍﯼ ﺑﻮﭨﯿﻮﮞ ﮐﮯ ﻣﺎﮨﺮ ﺗﮭﮯ۔ ”
ﺣﮑﯿﻢ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﺠﯿﺪ ﺑﮍﯼ ﻣﺤﻨﺖ ﺳﮯ ﺣﮑﯿﻢ ﺍﺟﻤﻞ ﺧﺎﻥ ﮐﮯ ﺳﺎﺗﮫ ﮐﺎﻡ ﮐﺮ ﺭﮨﮯ ﺗﮭﮯ ﮐﮧ ﺍﻧﮭﯿﮟ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﮨﻮﺍ ﮐﮧ ﺣﮑﯿﻢ ﺍﺟﻤﻞ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻥ ﮐﯽ ﺩﯾﺎﻧﺖ ﭘﺮ ﺷﮏ ﮐﺮﻧﮯ ﻟﮕﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ ۔ ﻏﯿﺮﺕ ﻭ ﻓﻄﺮﺕ ﻧﮯ ﯾﮧ ﺷﺒﮧ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻧﮧ ﮐﯿﺎ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍﺱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻧﮯ ﺍﯾﮏ ﺗﺎﺭﯾﺦ ﺳﺎﺯ ﻓﯿﺼﻠﮧ ﮐﯿﺎ۔ 1904 ﺀ ﻣﯿﮟ ﮨﻤﺪﺭﺩ ﺩﻭﺍﺧﺎﻧﮧ ﮐﯽ ﺑﻨﯿﺎﺩ ﮈﺍﻟﯽ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍﺱ ﮐﮯ ﺳﺎﺗﮫ ﺳﺎﺗﮫ ﺟﮍﯼ ﺑﻮﭨﯿﻮﮞ ﮐﯽ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﮭﯽ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﮐﯽ۔ ﮨﻤﺪﺭﺩ ﺩﮐﺎﻥ ﮐﻮ ﭼﻼﻧﮯ ﮐﮯ ﻟﯿﮯ ﺣﮑﯿﻢ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﺠﯿﺪ ﻧﮯ ﻧﺒﺎﺗﺎﺕ ﺳﮯ ﺩﻭﺍﺋﯿﮟ ﺑﻨﺎﻧﺎ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﮐﯿﮟ، ﺍﻥ ﮐﯽ ﺍﮨﻠﯿﮧ ﺭﺍﺑﻌﮧ ﺑﯿﮕﻢ ﻧﮯ ﮨﺮ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﮯ ﭘﺮ ﺍﭘﻨﮯ ﺷﻮﮨﺮ ﮐﺎ ﮨﺎﺗﮫ ﺑﭩﺎﯾﺎ۔ ﮨﻤﺪﺭﺩ ﺩﻭﺍﺧﺎﻧﮯ ﮐﯽ ﭘﮩﻠﯽ ﺩﻭﺍﺋﯽ ’’ ﺣﺐ ﻣﻘﻮﯼ ﻣﻌﺪﮦ ‘‘ ﺗﮭﯽ۔ ﺭﺍﺑﻌﮧ ﺑﯿﮕﻢ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍﻥ ﮐﯽ ﺑﮩﻦ ﻓﺎﻃﻤﮧ ﺑﯿﮕﻢ ﺩﻭﻧﻮﮞ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﺠﯿﺪ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﮐﺎ ﮨﺎﺗﮫ ﺑﭩﺎﺗﯽ ﺗﮭﯿﮟ، ﺍﻭﺭ ﺳﻞ ﺑﭩﮯ ﺳﮯ ﻧﺒﺎﺗﺎﺕ ﭘﯿﺲ ﮐﺮ ﮨﺎﺗﮫ ﺳﮯ ﮔﻮﻟﯿﺎﮞ ﺑﻨﺎﺗﯽ ﺗﮭﯿﮟ۔

ﺣﻮﺽ ﻗﺎﺿﯽ ﺳﮯ ﮨﻤﺪﺭﺩ ﮐﯽ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻠﯽ ﻻﻝ ﮐﻨﻮﯾﮟ ﮐﯽ ﺍﯾﮏ ﺩﮐﺎﻥ ﻣﯿﮟ ﮨﻮﺋﯽ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺟﺐ ﺍﺱ ﮐﺎﺭﻭﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻭﺳﻌﺖ ﭘﯿﺪﺍ ﮨﻮﺋﯽ ﺗﻮ ﺍﺱ ﮐﻮ ﻻﻝ ﮐﻨﻮﯾﮟ ﺳﮯ ﺍﺱ ﮐﯽ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺋﯽ ﺟﮕﮧ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﮐﺮﻧﺎ ﭘﮍﺍ۔

ﺣﮑﯿﻢ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﺠﯿﺪ ﮐﮯ ﮨﻤﺪﺭﺩ ﺩﻭﺍﺧﺎﻧﮯ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺣﮑﯿﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺧﺎﻥ ﺑﮭﯽ ﻃﺒﯿﺐ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍﺩﻭﯾﮧ ﺳﺎﺯﯼ ﮐﮯ ﺷﻌﺒﮯ ﺳﮯ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮧ ﺗﮭﮯ۔ ﺍﻥ ﮐﺎ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﮭﺎﺭﺗﯽ ﺻﻮﺑﮯ ﺍﺗﺮﭘﺮﺩﯾﺶ ﮐﮯ ﺷﮩﺮ ﺳﮩﺎﺭﻧﭙﻮﺭ ﺳﮯ ﺗﮭﺎ، ﻟﯿﮑﻦ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﻌﺎﺵ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻭﮦ ﺩﮨﻠﯽ ﺁ ﺑﺴﮯ ﺗﮭﮯ۔ ﭘﺎﮐﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻨﻨﮯ ﮐﮯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻭﮦ ﮨﺠﺮﺕ ﮐﺮ ﮐﮯ ﮐﺮﺍﭼﯽ ﺁﮔﺌﮯ۔ ﺳﻦ 2003 ﺀ ﺗﮏ ﻭﮦ ﮐﺮﺍﭼﯽ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻣﻘﯿﻢ ﺗﮭﮯ، ﺍﻥ ﮐﯽ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ‘ 120 ﺳﺎﻝ ﮨﻮﮔﯽ۔ ﺍﻧﮩﻮﮞ ﻧﮯ ﮨﯽ ﺍﯾﮏ ﺍﻧﭩﺮﻭﯾﻮ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺍﭘﻨﯽ ﯾﺎﺩﻭﮞ ﮐﮯ ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﭘﻠﭩﺘﮯ ﮨﻮﺋﮯ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﮐﯽ ﺗﯿﺎﺭﯼ ﮐﯽ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﺎﺋﯽ۔ ﯾﮩﯽ ﻭﮦ ﭘﮩﻠﮯ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺗﮭﮯ ﺟﻨﮩﻮﮞ ﻧﮯ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﮐﺎ ﻧﺴﺨﮧ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﮦ ﺗﺮﺗﯿﺐ ﺩﯾﺎ ﺗﮭﺎ۔

ﯾﮧ ﺳﻦ 1907 ﮐﯽ ﺑﺎﺕ ﮨﮯ۔ﺍﺱ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﮯ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﭘﮭﻠﻮﮞ، ﭘﮭﻮﻟﻮﮞ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺟﮍﯼ ﺑﻮﭨﯿﻮﮞ ﮐﮯ ﺷﺮﺑﺖ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩﯼ ﻃﻮﺭ ﭘﺮ ﺩﺳﺘﯿﺎﺏ ﺗﮭﮯ۔ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺷﺮﺑﺖ ﮔﻼﺏ، ﺷﺮﺑﺖ ﺻﻨﺪﻝ، ﺷﺮﺑﺖ ﺍﻧﺎﺭ، ﺷﺮﺑﺖ ﺳﻨﮕﺘﺮﮦ، ﺷﺮﺑﺖ ﮐﯿﻮﮌﮦ، ﻭﻏﯿﺮﮦ ﻭﻏﯿﺮﮦ، ﺟﻮ ﺍﭘﻨﯽ ﺗﺎﺛﯿﺮ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺫﺍﺋﻘﮯ ﮐﮯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺳﮯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺗﮭﮯ۔ ﮨﻤﺪﺭﺩ ﺩﻭﺍ ﺧﺎﻧﮧ ﮐﮯ ﺑﺎﻧﯽ ﭼﺎﮨﺘﮯ ﺗﮭﮯ ﮐﮧ ﭘﮭﻠﻮﮞ، ﭘﮭﻮﻟﻮﮞ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺟﮍﯼ ﺑﻮﭨﯿﻮﮞ ﮐﻮ ﻣﻼ ﮐﺮ ﺍﯾﮏ ﺍﯾﺴﺎ ﺑﮯﻧﻈﯿﺮ ﻭ ﺑﮯﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻧﺴﺨﮧ ﺗﺮﺗﯿﺐ ﺩﯾﺎ ﺟﺎﺋﮯ ﺟﻮ ﺫﺍﺋﻘﮯ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺗﺎﺛﯿﺮ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺍﭘﻨﯽ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺁﭖ ﮨﻮ، ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍﯾﺴﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﺪﻝ ﮨﻮ ﮐﮧ ﺑﭽﮯ ﺳﮯ ﺑﻮﮌﮬﺎ ﺗﮏ ﮨﺮ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﮐﺎ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺍﺱ ﮐﻮ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﮐﺮ ﺳﮑﮯ۔ ﺟﺴﮑﮯ ﻟﯿﮯ ﺍﻧﮩﻮﮞ ﻧﮯ ﻧﺴﺨﮧ ﮐﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺗﺒﺪﯾﻞ ﮐﺮﮐﮯ ﺍﺳﮑﻮ ﮐﺎﺭﻭﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻨﺎﯾﺎ ﯾﮩﯿﮟ ﺳﮯ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﮐﯽ ﺗﯿﺎﺭﯼ ﭘﺮ ﮐﺎﻡ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﮨﻮﺍ۔ ﺣﮑﯿﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺧﺎﻥ ﻧﮯ ﺍﭘﻨﯽ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺣﮑﻤﺖ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﺹ، ﺟﮍﯼ ﺑﻮﭨﯿﻮﮞ ﮐﺎ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﮧ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﮐﮯ ﻧﺴﺨﮧ ﻭ ﺗﺮﮐﯿﺐ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻣﺰﯾﺪ ﺳﻤﻮ ﺩﯾﺎ۔ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺻﺮﻑ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﮐﯽ ﺗﯿﺎﺭﯼ ﭘﺮ ﮨﯽ ﺍﻥ ﮐﻮ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﮐﮯ ﻟﻘﺐ ﺳﮯ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﺍ ﺟﺎﺋﮯ ﺗﻮ ﺑﮯﺟﺎ ﻧﮧ ﮨﻮﮔﺎ۔ ﻟﯿﮑﻦ ﮐﯿﺴﯽ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﺱ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺣﯿﺮﺕ ﮐﯽ ﺑﺎﺕ ﮨﮯ ﮐﮧ ﯾﮧ ﺷﺨﺺ ﮔﻤﻨﺎﻣﯽ ﮐﯽ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ ﺑﺴﺮ ﮐﺮﮔﯿﺎ ﻭﺭﻧﮧ ﺑﺠﺎ ﻃﻮﺭ ﭘﺮ ﺗﻤﻐﮧ ﺣﺴﻦ ﮐﺎﺭ ﮐﺮﺩﮔﯽ ﮐﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻖ ﺗﮭﺎ ﺍﻧﮉﯾﺎ ﮐﮯ ﮨﻤﺪﺭﺩ ﻭﻗﻒ ﺩﻭﺍﺧﺎﻧﮧ ﻭ ﻟﯿﺒﺎﺭﭨﺮﯾﺰ ﮐﯽ ﻭﯾﺐ ﺳﺎﺋﭧ ﭘﺮ ﺍﻥ ﮐﺎ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺑﺤﯿﺜﯿﺖ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﮐﮯ ﺍﻭﻟﯿﻦ ﻧﺴﺨﮧ ﺳﺎﺯ ﮐﯽ ﺣﯿﺜﯿﺖ ﺳﮯ ﺩﺭﺝ ﮨﮯ۔ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﭼﯿﺪﮦ ﭼﯿﺪﮦ ﺍﺟﺰﺍ ﺍﭘﻨﯽ ﺗﺎﺛﯿﺮ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺑﮯﻣﺜﻞ ﺗﮭﮯ۔ ﺟﮍﯼ ﺑﻮﭨﯿﻮﮞ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺣﮑﯿﻢ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻧﮯ ﺗﺨﻢ ﺧﺮﻓﮧ، ﻣﻨﻘﮧ، ﮐﺎﺳﻨﯽ، ﻧﯿﻠﻮﻓﺮ، ﮔﺎﺅﺯﺑﺎﻥ، ﮨﺮﺍ ﺩﮬﻨﯿﺎ ﻭﻏﯿﺮﮦ، ﭘﮭﻠﻮﮞ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺳﻨﮕﺘﺮﮦ، ﺍﻧﻨﺎﺱ، ﮔﺎﺟﺮ، ﺗﺮﺑﻮﺯ، ﻭﻏﯿﺮﮦ۔ ﺳﺒﺰﯾﻮﮞ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺳﮯ ﭘﺎﻟﮏ، ﭘﻮﺩﯾﻨﮧ، ﮨﺮﺍ ﮐﺪﻭ، ﻭﻏﯿﺮﮦ۔ ﭘﮭﻮﻟﻮﮞ ﻣﯿﮟ ﮔﻼﺏ، ﮐﯿﻮﮌﮦ، ﻟﯿﻤﻮﮞ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻧﺎﺭﻧﮕﯽ ﮐﮯ ﭘﮭﻮﻟﻮﮞ ﮐﺎ ﺭﺱ، ﺧﻮﺷﺒﻮ ﺍﻭﺭ ﭨﮭﻨﮉﮎ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺑﮯﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺧﺲ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺻﻨﺪﻝ ﮐﯽ ﻟﮑﮍﯼ ﻭﻏﯿﺮﮦ۔ ﺍﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﺟﺰﺍ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻋﺮﻗﯿﺎﺕ ﮐﻮ ﺍﯾﮏ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺗﺮﺗﯿﺐ ﺳﮯ ﻣﻼ ﮐﺮ ﺟﻮ ﺷﺮﺑﺖ ﺗﯿﺎﺭ ﮨﻮﺍ، ﻭﮦ ﺑﻼﺷﺒﮧ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﮐﮩﻼﻧﮯ ﮐﺎ ﮨﯽ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻖ ﺗﮭﺎ ﻟﯿﮑﻦ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﮐﮯ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺳﮯ ﯾﮧ ﺑﻠﮑﻞ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﻮﮞ ﮐﮯ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺗﮭﺎ ۔ ﻣﮕﺮ ﭘﮭﺮ ﺑﮭﯽ ﺟﻮ ﺩﯾﮑﮭﺘﮯ ﮨﯽ ﺩﯾﮑﮭﺘﮯ ﻃﺐ ﻣﺸﺮﻕ ﭘﺮ ﭼﮭﺎ ﮔﯿﺎ، ﺍﻭﺭ ﺁﺝ ﺗﻘﺮﯾﺒﺎ ” 110 ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺰﺭﻧﮯ ﮐﮯ ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺱ ﮐﯽ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻟﯿﺖ ﻣﯿﮟ ﮐﻤﯽ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ ﺁﺋﯽ۔

ﻣﺠﮭﮯ ﺍﭘﻨﮯ ﺑﭽﭙﻦ ﮐﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﮧ ﯾﺎﺩ ﮨﮯ ﮐﮧ ﺟﺐ ﺟﻮﻥ ﺟﻮﻻﺋﯽ ﮐﯽ ﺗﭙﺘﯽ ﮔﺮﻣﯿﻮﮞ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺩﻭﭘﮩﺮ ﮐﮯ ﻗﯿﻠﻮﻟﮯ ﮐﮯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺷﺎﻡ ﭼﺎﺭ ﭘﺎﻧﭻ ﺑﺠﮯ ﮐﮯ ﻗﺮﯾﺐ ﮔﮭﺮ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﺗﯿﺎﺭ ﮐﯿﺎ ﺟﺎﺗﺎ ﺗﮭﺎ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍﯾﮏ ﮔﻼﺱ ﺑﺮﻑ ﺳﮯ ﯾﺦ ﺑﺴﺘﮧ ﺧﻮﺷﺒﻮﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺷﯿﺮﯾﮟ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ، ﺟﺴﻢ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺍﯾﮏ ﻋﺠﯿﺐ ﺳﮑﻮﻥ ﺍﻭﺭ ﭨﮭﻨﮉﮎ ﮐﺎ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺟﮕﺎ ﺩﯾﺘﺎ ﺗﮭﺎ۔ ﮐﺴﯽ ﮔﮭﺮ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﺑﻨﺘﺎ ﺗﻮ ﭘﮍﻭﺱ ﺗﮏ ﺍﺱ ﮐﯽ ﻣﮩﮏ ﺟﺎﺗﯽ ﺗﮭﯽ ﺍﺱ ﻭﻗﺖ ﮨﻤﺪﺭﺩ ﺩﻭﺍﺧﺎﻧﮧ ﺍﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻣﮑﻤﻞ ﮈﺍﻟﺘﺎ ﺗﮭﺎ۔ ﺍﻓﻄﺎﺭ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﺗﻮ ﺗﺐ ﺳﮯ ﮔﻮﯾﺎ ﻻﺯﻡ ﻭ ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻡ ﮨﯿﮟ۔ ﺭﺍﺕ ﮐﻮ ﺳﻮﺗﮯ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﯾﮏ ﮔﻼﺱ ﺩﻭﺩﮪ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺗﯿﻦ ﺑﮍﮮ ﭼﻤﭻ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﮐﺮﻧﮯ ﺳﮯ ﺭﻧﮓ ﮔﻮﺭﺍ ﮨﻮ ﺟﺎﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ، ﺍﻭﺭ ﺩﻣﺎﻏﯽ ﺳﮑﻮﻥ ﻣﻠﺘﺎ ﮨﮯ۔ ﺁﺝ ﺑﮭﯽ ﻗﻠﻔﯽ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻓﻠﻮﺩﮦ ﭘﺮ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﮐﯽ ﮈﺍﭦ ﻟﮕﺎ ﮐﺮ ﮐﮭﺎﯾﺎ ﺟﺎﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ۔ ﻓﺮﻭﭦ ﮐﺮﯾﻢ ﭼﺎﭦ، ﻓﯿﺮﻧﯽ، ﮐﺴﭩﺮﮈ، ﮐﮭﯿﺮ ﻭﻏﯿﺮﮦ ﭘﺮ ﺑﮭﯽ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﮐﯽ ﺳﺮﺧﯽ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻣﮩﮏ ﻟﻄﻒ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﻻ ﮐﺮ ﺩﯾﺘﯽ ﮨﮯ۔ ﺗﭙﺘﯽ ﮔﺮﻣﯽ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻟﻮ ﺳﮯ ﺑﭽﺎﺅ ﮐﮯ ﻟﯿﮯ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﮐﺎ ﺛﺎﻧﯽ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ۔ ﺗﺮﺑﻮﺯ ﮐﮯ ﺷﺮﺑﺖ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺗﺨﻢ ﻣﻠﻨﮕﺎ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﮐﺮ ﮐﮯ ﺍﯾﮏ ﺍﻧﺘﮩﺎﺋﯽ ﻧﻔﯿﺲ ﺷﺮﺑﺖ ﺗﯿﺎﺭ ﮐﯿﺎ ﺟﺎﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ ﺟﻮ ﺷﺪﯾﺪ ﮔﺮﻣﯽ ﮐﺎ ﺗﻮﮌ ﮨﮯ۔ ﮐﭽﮫ ﺟﺎﮨﻞ ﻟﻮﮒ ﻟﺴﯽ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺑﮭﯽ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﮐﺮ ﺩﯾﺘﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ۔ ﮔﺮﻣﯿﻮﮞ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺧﺮﺑﻮﺯﮮ ﯾﺎ ﭼﮭﻮﭨﮯ ﮔﺮﻣﮯ ﮐﻮ ﺩﺭﻣﯿﺎﻥ ﺳﮯ ﭼﺎﮎ ﮐﺮ ﮐﺮ ﺑﯿﺞ ﻧﮑﺎﻟﻨﮯ ﮐﮯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺱ ﻣﯿﮟ ﻣﻠﮏ ﭘﯿﮏ ﺑﺎﻻﺋﯽ ﮈﺍﻟﯿﮟ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺍﺱ ﭘﺮ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﮈﺍﻝ ﮐﺮ ﭼﻤﭽﮯ ﺳﮯ ﮐﮭﺎﺋﯿﮟ ﺗﻮ ﻣﺰﮦ ﺁﺟﺎﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ۔ ﺍﺳﯽ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﭩﺮﺍ ﺑﯿﺮﯾﺰ ﮐﻮ ﮐﺮﯾﻢ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﻣﯿﮟ ﮈﺑﻮ ﮐﺮ ﮐﮭﺎﺋﯿﮟ ﺗﻮ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻟﻄﻒ ﺁﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ۔
ﮔﻮ ﯾﮧ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﺏ ﺗﺎﺛﯿﺮ ﻣﯿﮟ ﭨﮭﻨﮉﺍ ﮨﮯ ﻟﯿﮑﻦ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﮦ ﮔﺮﻣﯿﻮﮞ ﮐﮯ ﮨﻮﮞ ﯾﺎ ﺟﺎﮌﻭﮞ ﮐﮯ، ﺍﻓﻄﺎﺭ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﺍﯾﮏ ﻻﺯﻣﯽ ﺟﺰ ﮐﯽ ﺣﯿﺜﯿﺖ ﺭﮐﮭﺘﺎ ﮨﮯ۔ ﭘﮭﻞ ﻓﺮﻭﺷﻮﮞ ﮐﯽ ﺩﮐﺎﻥ ﭘﺮ ﺁﭖ ﮐﻮ ﻻﺯﻣﯽ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﺑﮭﯽ ﻣﻠﮯ ﮔﺎ۔ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﭘﺮ ﺗﺤﻔﮯ ﺗﺤﺎﺋﻒ ﮐﮯ ﺳﺎﺗﮫ ﺟﻮ ﭘﮭﻠﻮﮞ ﮐﺎ ﭨﻮﮐﺮﺍ ﺟﺲ ﮐﻮ ﮈﺍﻟﯽ ﺑﮭﯽ ﺑﻮﻻ ﺟﺎﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ، ﺍﺱ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺁﭖ ﮐﻮ ﺳﺖ ﺭﻧﮕﮯ ﭘﮭﻠﻮﮞ ﮐﮯ ﺳﺎﺗﮫ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﮐﯽ ﺑﻮﺗﻞ ﻻﺯﻣﯽ ﻣﻠﮯ ﮔﯽ۔ ﻣﮩﻨﺪﯼ ﻣﺎﯾﻮﮞ ﮐﯽ ﺗﻘﺮﯾﺐ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺑﮭﯿﺠﯽ ﺟﺎﻧﮯ ﻭﺍﻟﯽ ﮈﺍﻟﯽ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺑﮭﯽ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﮐﯽ ﺑﻮﺗﻠﻮﮞ ﮐﯽ ﺟﻮﮌﯼ ﻻﺯﻣﯽ ﺳﺠﺎﺋﯽ ﺟﺎﺗﯽ ﮨﮯ۔ ﺍﺏ ﺳﮯ ﮐﻮﺋﯽ ﺑﯿﺲ ﭘﭽﯿﺲ ﺑﺮﺱ ﻗﺒﻞ ﮨﻤﺪﺭﺩ ﺍﭘﻨﮯ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﮐﮯ ﺍﺷﺘﮩﺎﺭ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺩﻋﻮﯼٰ ﮐﺮﺗﮯ ﺗﮭﮯ ﮐﮧ ﻭﮦ ﺍﺏ ﺗﮏ ﺍﺱ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﺏ ﮐﯽ ﺍﺗﻨﯽ ﺑﻮﺗﻠﯿﮟ ﺗﯿﺎﺭ ﮐﺮ ﭼﮑﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ ﮐﮧ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺗﻠﻮﮞ ﮐﻮ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺳﮯ ﺯﻣﯿﮟ ﭘﺮ ﺭﮐﮭﺎ ﺟﺎﺋﮯ ﺗﻮ ﭘﻮﺭﮮ ﮐﺮﮦ ﺍﺭﺽ ﮐﮯ ﮔﺮﺩ ﺍﯾﮏ ﺣﻠﻘﮧ ﻣﮑﻤﻞ ﮨﻮ ﺟﺎﺋﮯ ﮔﺎ۔

ﺍﻓﺴﻮﺱ ﮐﮧ ﺍﺏ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﮐﯽ ﻧﮧ ﻭﮦ ﺧﻮﺷﺒﻮ ﮨﮯ ﺍﻭﺭ ﻧﮧ ﻭﮦ ﻣﻌﯿﺎﺭ۔ ﭘﮭﺮ ﺑﮭﯽ ﺣﮑﯿﻢ ﺳﻌﯿﺪ ﮐﯽ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ ﺗﮏ ﺗﮏ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﺑﮩﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﭘﻨﺎ ﻣﻌﯿﺎﺭ ﺍﯾﮏ ﺣﺪ ﺗﮏ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺭﮐﮭﮯ ﮨﻮﺋﮯ ﺗﮭﺎ، ﻟﯿﮑﻦ ﺍﻥ ﮐﮯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﺑﮭﯽ ﮔﻮﯾﺎ ﺍﭘﻨﯽ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺳﮯ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﮨﻮﮔﯿﺎ ﺍﺱ ﮐﯽ ﺍﯾﮏ ﺗﻮﻭﺟﮧ ﯾﮧ ﭘﯿﺶ ﮐﯽ ﺟﺎﺗﯽ ﮨﮯ ﮐﮧ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍ ﮐﯽ ﺗﯿﺎﺭﯼ ﻣﯿﮟ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﮐﭽﮫ ﺍﺟﺰﺍ ﺍﺏ ﺍﻧﺘﮩﺎﺋﯽ ﻣﮩﻨﮕﮯ ﺩﺍﻣﻮﮞ ﻣﻠﺘﮯ ﮨﯿﮟ ﺟﺴﮑﯽ ﻭﺟﮧ ﺳﮯ ﺍﻧﮑﻮ ﮨﻤﺪﺭﺩ ﺩﻭﺍﺧﺎﻧﮧ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﻧﮩﯿﮟ ﮐﺮﺗﺎ ﺍﻭﺭ ﮐﭽﮫ ﺍﺟﺰﺍ ﮐﻮ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﺑﮭﺎﺭﺕ ﺳﮯ ﺑﮭﯽ ﺍﻣﭙﻮﺭﭦ ﮐﯿﺎ ﺟﺎﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ۔

Al-Nanawtawi’s Political Ideology

Al-Nanawtawi’s Islamic Political Ideology: Paradigms from Rudad, Sawanh Qasimi and other Selected Writings

Author: Dr. Atif Suhail Siddiqui*

Abstract

Imam Muhammad Qasim Al-Nanawtawi’s intellectual height is not limited to only Islamic religious sciences. At the one hand he is known as the most towering figure who revived Islam’s intellectual heritage in the Indian-subcontinent, on the other hand, he was also aware about the political and diplomatic loss of Muslims. He defended political and diplomatic affairs of the Muslims from Islam’s point of view. Al-Nanawtawi addressed not only the common people but also the Ulama and convinced them to raise concrete steps for defending the political hegemony of Muslims in their respective regions against the aggressive forces. This paper studies the religio-political arguments of Al-Nanawtawi, which he produced in the defense of his opinion and was successful to mobilize the larger section of elite and common Muslims in one political direction. This paper also gives a direction to develop ideas about the religio-political impacts of Al-Nanawtawi’s thoughts, which even until the modern period are most significant factor for different political movements among the present Muslim communities.

Introduction

The most important factor in the development of Al-Nanawtawi’s personality is his balanced thought. As a political leader, he was actively engaged in war against British imperialism and wanted to liberate his home country from external aggression and occupation. Secondly, as a social reformist he initiated several social reform movements, and thirdly as a neo-philosopher, thinker and polemicist, he served knowledge and Islamic religious sciences. Thus, Al-Nanawtawi’s entire life was focused on three dimensions[1]. While his thoughts in religious, political and social reforms were single-dimensional and they were premised upon Islam’s fundamental teachings and traditions of Prophet Muhammad. The exceptionality of Al-Nanawtawi’s thought is its functionality in the practical fields of human life. Instead of merely philosophical ambiguity and gnomic, Al-Nanawtawi’s thoughts are pragmatic in social, religious and political arenas. His thoughts are erected upon the paradigms from the character (sIrah) of the Messenger of God and his pious companions.[2]

In the Battle of Shamli

In 1857 during mutiny of sepoys against British colonial regime in India Imam Muhammad Qasim Al-Nanawtawi actively participated in an armed struggle. Armed participation against British imperialism is an important chapter of his life and movements.[3] The epicenter of the mutiny was Meerut Cantonment, where several sepoys raised weapons against their officers and killed them. This mutiny spread in different parts of North India and thus, Al-Nanawtawi did not remain uninfluenced.[4]

After the news of munity reached to Thana Bhawan,[5] Al-Nanawtawi’s spiritual mentor Haji Imdad Allah Muhajir al-Makki was elected Amir al-Mu’minin (the leader of the believers), while Al-Nanawtawi was elected Commander-in-Chief for leading the armed struggle against the British colonial forces.[6]

During famous battle of Shamli,[7]Al-Nanawtawi was injured[8], while one of his famous companions Hafiz Muhammad Zamin was killed.[9] Eventually, the Muslim empire of India came to an end, Delhi fell to the British. Also the battle of Shamli came to an end with loss of lives to both sides. Imdad Allah left permanently to Makkah, Al-Nanawtawi was declared a rebel and sought for trial in British court, which was feared into a death penalty. On the behest of his relatives, Al-Nanawtawi went to hiding, he spent three days in hiding. After three days, he came out from the hiding and said, “I cannot spend more than three days in hiding, because the sunnah of the hiding[10] is only three days.[11]” This statement of Al-Nanawtawi is an evidence of his religio-political aphorism, which he developed from the example of the life of the Messenger of God.

The Shamli battle did not bring desired results. Al-Nanawtawi changed his modus operandi; he alienated from direct political movement and avoided confrontation with the government, and he and his colleagues launched the movement of educational uplift of the Muslim society. Dar al-Uloom Deoband and other similar institutions were developed for protecting the religious ideologies of Muslims in India. Al-Nanawtawi though excluded politics from the curriculum of these institutions but the succinct mottoes of these institutes have broad explanations; according to the beliefs of Islam, he and his colleagues kept alive the spirit of struggle of independence and religious-political persuasions.[12]

Explanation for participation in the Battle of Shamli

Before the battle of Shamli, the Ulama were discussing the possible strategy against British forces but amid these talks influential scholar Shaykh Muhammad Thanwi disagreed with this formula that the Muslims should go in direct and armed confrontation with the British forces. He was of this opinion that in such pathetic and weak conditions, Muslims will only suffer from severe losses. This disagreement from such influential person was evidently affecting the opinion of a large section of community. Other leading Ulama tried to convince him privately and publicly but they were unable to force him to change his opinion. At the end in the presence of Imdad Allah Thanwi Al-Nanawtawi put his arguments, which Shaykh Muhammad Thanwi simply rejected. Shaykh Muhammad Thanwi said,

“In case all your arguments in favor of an armed struggle against British forces are accepted, but the major condition for jihad is to have an Imam. Where is an Imam, under whose guidance we fight?”[13]

Without thinking even a single moment Al-Nanawtawi immediately responded his question, he pointed out towards Imdad Allah Thanwi[14], because of his fame in Tadhkiyah and Suluk  Imdad Allah was the most revered personality of his time. Hundreds of Ulama and common Muslims already had paid their allegiance to him. Al-Nanawtawi said to Imdad Allah Thanwi that he was their leader in the affairs of religion, so he requested him also to take the responsibility of worldly administrative affairs and by holding the office of the Chief of the believers to settle their differences.[15]

Ashiq Ilahi further writes that Imdad Allah had to accept their offer.[16]At the end, Al-Nanawtawi questioned, “Are we weaker than the mujahidin of Badr?”[17] It made Muhammad Thanwi speechless. One single sentence of Al-Nanawtawi ended the confusion and disagreement.[18]

Al-Nanawtawi further suggested that all the important offices, which shall work under the Chief (AmIr), should be accordingly set. In the words of Al-Nanawtawi’s biographer,

Imdad Allah Thanwi was receiving the allegiance from the mujahidin as the Chief of the Believers (Amir al-Mu’minin). Muhammad Zamin was the flag bearer of the jihad, Rashid Ahmad Gangohi was the preacher, who was motivating the mujahidin, while Al-Nanawtawi was the commander-in-chief of the armed forces.”[19]

At the home, Al-Nanawtawi feared that he could also face opposition from his mother. He did not directly inform his mother about his participation in armed struggle against British colonial forces. At the first stage, Al-Nanawtawi explained the importance of jihad against the oppressors, he explained the importance of jihad from Qur’anic perspectives and the traditions of the Messenger of God, Muhammad (Peace be upon him and mercy of God) and the Sahabah. He motivated his mother and explained about the rewards to the parents who sacrifice their wealth and children in the path of Allah.[20]

After these explanations, Al-Nanawtawi informed his mother about his intention. He also included that, “Creatures’ opposition has no value in following the instruction of the Creator.”[21] The purpose was to make his mother aware that while neither they (Al-Nanawtawi’s parents) required him for personal services nor were they in need of his services,[22] in such a condition, if they try to stop him from jihad, it shall not be mandatory upon him to follow their instruction. Thus, he requested his mother, “I wish, you allow me to participate in jihad gladly and get full reward from Allah.”[23] His mother, who was a very pious and learned lady, said, “You are from Allah and I give you to Allah gladly.”[24]

A Review of Rudad: Support to Turks

In 1874 CE (1294 AH), Imam Muhammad Qasim Al-Nanawtawi wrote a religious decree for supporting Ottomans against Russian Empire. A report (Rudad)was compiled regarding the efforts of the Ulama for collecting funds to support the Mujahidin in Balkan. These Mujahidin were the part of the Ottoman Empire and were fighting war against Russian aggression on the Balkan territories of Ottoman Empire. This report has great importance for understanding the religio-political philosophy of Al-Nanawtawi. In 1294 A.H., Al-Nanawtawi has written a detailed treatise in Farsi (Persian), in which he had explained the importance of this war including supporting the Turk-Ottoman army and especially to provide them financial support. This treatise was translated in different languages and was published in numerous newspapers and magazines.[25] It got vibrant support from the Ottoman Empire.[26]

In the first step, this report mentioned Russian attempts on Turkish-Ottoman territories and its negative impacts including the killings of Muslim men, women and children. Later, this report mentioned the importance of the Caliph’s authority, which is very important for the safety and dignity of the two Holy Shrines of Islam in Makkah and Madinah. This report forecasted the global harm of the Muslim community if the Muslim community decentralized; this centrality exists due to the Caliph’s regime.[27]Thus to support the Caliphate is must and compulsory. It is a religious obligation and duty, which every Muslim must fulfill. If the centrality of the Muslims is decentralized, the entire Islamic world will face the severe consequences.[28]

The Rudad (report) explained motivating factors with special reference to Islam’s teachings. This Rudad is a fine example of Al-Nanawtawi and his colleagues’ Islamic religious political ideology. It depicts their political perceptions strictly confined within the fold of religion; they did not allow any outside, secular or non-religious factor to pollute it.  The first factor is counted as Islam’s urge to support the oppressed. It portrays the Turk troops as the oppressed ones who were guarded for the protection of the Holy Shrines of Islam and a war has been imposed upon them. Now their lives are under serious threat and the Muslims should firmly stand to support them in dire needs.[29] Secondly, Muslim sensitivity on any issue related to Islam is one of the major factors behind the call to support the Turk forces.[30]Thirdly, it motivates Muslims to pay other Muslim brothers and fellows from the bounties of God, which they are enjoying without any hindrance. At the time of hardship of other Muslims, it becomes incumbent to support them from these favors.[31]Fourthly, it explains a hierarchy in actions, during the time of jihad the priorities are shifted. It is important to be aware about the priorities; thus, some actions become compulsorily primary and others become secondary. For instance, building mosques and serving the pilgrims can never be equal to fighting and spending in the way of God.[32] Fifthly, the Rudad explains from the worldly and Godly point of view. In case the Turks are fighting for mere worldly and political benefits even their support is compulsory. It strictly condemns the conjectures regarding intentions of Turk troops. It belongs to God only. Even they fight for worldly political gains, their victory would be better than the victory of the infidels in all circumstances.[33] Finally, from the then political circumstances in India this Rudad motivates Muslims to support Turks. During this war, the British regime was in support of Turks against Russia. It was a good opportunity to provide maximum support to the Turk forces.[34]

In the opinion of Al-Nanawtawi, his disciples and colleagues at that time, the most important task was to support Turk forces against Russian aggression and this task was more important than building the mosques and supporting the educational institutions. Even according to them, any other religious obligation became secondary against the support of Turks. Initiatives like building mosques and supporting educational institutions were not considered as important as to support Turkish forces, because they were seen as the catalysts that could help to maintain Islamic centrality and unity.[35]

Al-Nanawtawi decided to raise two steps in support of Turk forces and the regional Muslims in the fighting zones of the Turkish Empire. First was to provide financial support to the Mujahidin and the armed forces of Turkish Empire including the widows and orphans of the army personnel and common Muslims in Eastern Europe. This support, according to Al-Nanawtawi, would boost them on moral grounds and they will not feel themselves alone in their struggle and hardship. They should realize that their Muslim brothers in India are with them in their hardship and time of sorrow[36].[37]

Al-Nanawtawi was the first person who donated the first amount for the Turk forces. He donated the jewelry of his wife. This donation was given immediately after his marriage with the fair consent of his wife.[38]

The biographer of Al-Nanawtawi Manazir Ahsan Gīlānī describes this event as:

“At the first night after his marriage, he (Al-Nanawtawi) persuaded his wife for donating all her jewelerywith the noble purpose to support Turkish forces. His wife donated all her ornaments immidiately at that night. When his wife went to her father’s home and her father saw her without even a single peice of ornament, he questioned about the matter. When he knew about the fact, he purchased new jewelry for the daughter. But Al-Nanawtawi did the same with new ones.”[39]

The other people who were involved in collecting funds were Ahmad Ali Muhaddith of Saharanpur, Mazhar Nanawtawi and great jurist and friend of Al-Nanawtawi Rashid Ahmad Gangohi. These learned scholars of Islam have done their best efforts for collecting the funds. The collected amount was delivered to the Consulate of the Ottoman Empire in Bombay. This amount was sent in several installments.[40]

This collection was not limited to Deoband or local vicinities, on the behest of Al-Nanawtawi, it had become a national movement. Muslims, rich or poor, from each part of the country were collecting funds with zeal and enthusiasm, which was filled in them. This zealous effort was for saving and protecting the dignity of the Muslim centrality, which was associated with the centrality of the Ottoman Caliph. The total amount, which was collected and delivered to the Ottoman Consulate in Bombay, reached 1.2 million rupees[41]. During that period, which was of severe financial scarcity and economic anarchy in India, this amount was outstanding and historic.[42]According to the financial circumstances at that period, collection of this amount was unimaginable, even today this amount is believed to be a huge financial support to any cause.

After the amounts were received at the Ottoman Consulate, the receipts were delivered to the donors with this commitment that this outstanding donation will be published in Al-Jawa’ib[43]. Later on the amounts were received at Bab-i Aali; the then Prime Minister of Ottoman Empire Ibrahim Adaham sent a letter of thanks to Al-Nanawtawi and other elders of Madrasah Islamiyah ArabiyahDeoband (Dar al-Uloom, Deoband)on May 23, 1877 corresponding to Jamadi al-Awal 9, 1294 AH.[44]

After the success of the first step Imam Muhammad Qasim Al-Nanawtawi motivated his disciples and colleagues for raising the second step and this was to join the Mujahidin and Turkish forces in Balkan. However, in contrast to the public call of financial support by everyone and by each individual the call to fight shoulder to shoulder with the Turk forces was not made public. Al-Nanawtawi knew that each individual is not capable to join the armed jihad, this service needs specific training and energy, thus, even having the enthusiasm for an armed jihad everybody is not capable to join the Turk troops at the fronts of the war.

Al-Nanawtawi further explains that an action becomes obligatory when there is a need of this action. Thus, joining troops for each individual Muslim neither is practical nor is mandatory. And in such case that the untrained individuals would bring damages more than the benefit, more important is they provide moral and financial support to the Mujahidin. In this decree, Al-Nanawtawi writes that motivating unarmed and untrained individuals for joining the troops at the fronts of war is not so important. More important is to provide the Ottoman troops with financial support. He was of this opinion that the numbers of the trained and official troops at the fronts of war is sufficient but for war expenditures financial support is obligatory. Al-Nanawtawi wrote that it is not possible that everybody can join the war and fight against the infidel forces but it is very possible that everybody can provide financial support according to his or her capacity. By quoting the Qur’an[45] Al-Nanawtawi wrote that Allah commands for both kinds of the jihad—with arms and with finance, and do not destroy yourself by hoarding the money while your brothers are in need.[46] In dire conditions, spending money for the cause of Allah is compulsory and there is no maximum and minimum limit of this support, and those who still are not willing to spend the money they could face harms in both of the lives.[47]

The ‘ulama decided to travel to Hijaz for getting better glimpse of the situation in Balkan. A huge number of ‘Ulama began traveling for Hajj. Sayyid Asghar Husayn writes that in Shawwal 1294 AH the elders of the ‘Ulama decided to travel for holy journey to Makkah. The leaders of the caravan were Muhammad Qasim Al-Nanawtawi and Rashid Ahmad Gangohi. Due to this famous leadership, a huge number of common people and ‘Ulama gathered. Hundreds of poor and rich religious Muslims planned their journey to Makkah.[48]He further writes,

“From India such a sacred group of people and popular caravan journeyed (to Makkah) that there is neither any example in the entire history nor is there any hope in the future.”[49]

Though during the Russia-Turk war, the British Government was in support of Turkey against Russia but it was also not easy to announce openly to travel for the purpose of jihad. The ‘Ulama were aware about the sensitivity of this journey from political and social point of view. Therefore, no direct announcement was done of this purpose that the ‘Ulama along with the common citizens ultimately aim to travel to Balkan after performing Hajj. Ashiq Ilahi gives an account of this fact,

“When common Muslims of India saw that all of a sudden a community of elite is moving towards Hejaz, so whoever could be able, they immediately agreed to join this caravan. Itself a belief developed in the mind of people that these people, for religious support but as a pretext to Hejaz, are actually travelling to Rome. For the side of Turkish Empire they will join voluntarily Mujahidin, and in whose fate is a martyrdom he will receive an eternal life.”[50]

In the Context of Religion Al-Nanawtawi’s Arguments to Support Turks against Russian Forces

Al-Nanawtawi’s original decree related to this war was published in several magazines and booklets at that time.[51] The original manuscript is preserved at Mufti Allah Bakhsh Academy, Kandhla, Muzaffarnagar. This decree was conceived as a motivating factor for collecting financial and moral support to the Turkish army against Russians. Al-Nanawtawi has written this letter to Maulana Ahmad SaÑId. In this letter, he explained the importance of this jihad, need to support the Turks and especially financial support by collecting the money. All his arguments are from the point of Qur’an’s view and prophetic traditions. He commences his decree with the support of the Qur’anic verse[52] and says that in situation of the aggression from the enemies jihad becomes eminent and according to the Qur’anic[53] measurements it becomes compulsory to provide support to the mujahidin.[54]

Al-Nanawtawi wrote a very brief annotation in this epistle and described the verse[55] of the Qur’an. Al-Nanawtawi explains in the light of the verse that despite necessity the people who do not emigrate from a state, which is a Dar al-Harb, they fall in the class of the infidels. Al-Nanawtawi gives further support to this argument from al-Tawbah[56] and explains that such people who are no more in state of consociation, they are no more firm believers (mu’min).Furthermore, in desperate situation support of downtrodden people becomes deontic and obligatory. For fulfilling this deontological duty to follow the fundamentals of Iman and maintaining the state of consociation is compulsory. So in such a condition support to the mujahidin becomes deontological and obligatory.[57] In case solidarity between infidels[58]against Islam, a consociation amongst Muslims is compulsory. It is also obligatory upon Muslims to stand firmly for protecting the sanctity[59] of the holy shrines in Makkah and Madinah.

Al-Nanawtawi counts three reasons for supporting Ottoman Empire and the Ottoman caliph. First reason is infidels’ expeditions against Muslims and the Qur’an[60] advocates this support against the invaders, secondly, because Muslims seek support from other Muslims[61] and thirdly, for protecting the sanctity of the Holy Shrines in Makkah and Madinah.

Some of the opponents have questioned the nature of this war. Some people believed that this war was not a religious one (jihad Fi sabil Allah), it was merely a political war. Al-Nanawtawi answered their doubt. Other than Allah none knows the intentions of any one. If someone blames us that our prayers and fasts (Salat wa sawm) are for show (riya), how would we justify it? Similarly, none has the right to question the Jihad of Turk forces. If prayer (Salat)means to face towards qiblah and performing the actions of the prayers, thus, jihad means Muslims fight against infidels. If for jihad a sound intention is required similarly for Salat a good intention is also required. If the intentions of the Turks are not good, how is good your intentions? What is proof of the bad intentions of the Turks and how would you prove good intentions of yours?[62]Furthermore, there is a hope of good reward from Allah on the payment to a non-Muslim architect of a mosque, so why will there not be a reward on the financial support to a mujahid, even suppose in his intention he is fighting for worldly benefits? By the efforts of an architect, the religion is served and the house of Allah is built. Similarly, a mujahid protects the religion and implications of his efforts remain long lasting which help protect the religion (din).[63]

Further to support his decree, Al-Nanawtawi wrote a comparison between few verses of the Holy Qur’an.[64] Elaborating these verses, Al-Nanawtawi wrote that the most important compulsion upon a Muslim is to sacrifice his life, if it is not so, a Muslim must sacrifice his wealth and as per the least action a Muslim should donate some of his wealth to please his God. Al-Nanawtawi ends his decree by explaining that our life and wealth both are already of God. The verse, “they fight in the path of God”[65]absolutely indicates the compulsion of fighting in the cause of Allah and avoiding it is just like denying a King on his public call for a special kind of support even the King is fully capable to protect his sovereignty without any outside support, but those who will defy King’s call will face the wrathof the King.[66]

Impact of Al-Nanawtawi’s Religio-political Thoughts upon the Later Generations of the Ulama

Al-Nanawtawi’s political thinking brought massive and most significant impact on his most distinguished disciple Shaykh al-Hind Mahmoud Hasan. At the time of Sepoy’s Mutiny in 1857 Hasan was not in the contact of Al-Nanawtawi. But during the Russia-Turk war he closely watched and observed the activities of his teacher and other eminent Ulama. At that time Hasan was a young man, who was fully aware about the sentiments of his teacher. Later he could trace the roots of the political ideas of his teacher and contemporary Ulama, they were striving for independent cultural, political and social identities of Muslims not only in India but everywhere in the world.[67] These thoughts, which were developing Hasan’s personality, played very important role in the future, they helped him to develop as an Islamic political leader and freedom fighter for India’s independence. In original sense Mahmoud Hasan did not inherit Al-Nanawtawi’s intellectual legacy only, but in true sense he was the original and the only interpreter of Al-Nanawtawi’s religio-political ideology.

In the later age, India’s prime political leaders and freedom fighters got ideological strength from Mahmoud Hasan. The very prominent leaders like Ansari, Ajmal Khan, Muhammad Ali, and Abul Kalam Azad were influenced by Mahmoud Hasan. Among these political leaders, Ansari paid allegiance to him.[68]

The growing political tussle between the British regime and the Muslims in India and the Balkan war of 1912 provided an opportunity of the establishment of Nazarah al Ma’rif. This was an ideological training center with the aim of keeping alive the spirit of religious political ideas among Muslim youths.[69]

An impression of Al-Nanawtawi’s training is evidently witnessed upon his most distinguished disciple and student Mahmoud Hasan. Mahmoud Hasan was detained by the British government. In Feb 1917, he was sent to Malta because of his anti-British government campaign in India and his rapidly growing influence.[70] He was released from Malta jail in March 1920.[71]After his arrival back to Dar al-Uloom Deoband a decree (fatwa) about Non-cooperation Movement was asked from him. Mahmoud Hasan asked his three distinguished disciples Mufti Kifayat Allah, Husayn Ahmad and Shabbir Ahmad Uthmani to write this decree. His disciples hesitated and requested that in his presence it is not possible for them to write a decree. Shaykh al-Hind Mahmoud Hasan replied,

“Sentimentally, I am filled with full hatred against the English people. Therefore, I am not confident that I shall do justice and it would be against Qur’an’s instruction—[72]“Stand out firmly for Allah, as witnesses to fair dealing, and let not the hatred of others to you make you swerve to wrong and depart from justice.”[73]

Al-Nanawtawi left such paradigms, which helped his successors to reinstate the political influence of Muslims in the later stage. It included rebuilding the confidence of Muslim community.  After the fall of Delhi and failed mutiny of 1857, the aggressive British rulers got all kinds of superiority and advantages upon the conquered Muslim community. It has also changed the direction of British politics and diplomacy.[74]

According to the new policy of the new and colonial government, the last aggression was intellectual. It was decided now to defeat the Muslim community at intellectual level by raising questions on Islam’s viability and relevance.[75]Al-Nanawtawi was proved the most significant pillar in the defense of Islam’s intellectual heritage. He also changed his strategy, instead of fighting with sword, he designed new policy and it was to counter the intellectual aggression of British forces against Islam and Muslims. In the new policy of Al-Nanawtawi and his colleagues, they suspended entirely political ambitions. They were of this opinion that any political effort now would bring more serious disaster to the Muslim intellectualism. For them it was now the most important priority to protect the Islamic faith and Muslim beliefs from the new policy of the Imperial British Government.

Conclusion

In fact, Al-Nanawtawi was the last bearer of the legacy of Shah Wali Allah of Delhi. Al-Nanawtawi picked the essence of Shah Wali Allah’s cultural, social, political and religious thoughts and believed that Muslims cannot give up their right to rule the land of God. But the module of the governance of Muslims needs appropriate strategy and it is not merely diplomatic and political. He also observed that in the time of political suppression intellectual superiority, governed by a sublime Islamic ideology, should be maintained. At any rate, Muslims should never lose their link with their intellectual heritage; community’s connection with intellectual heritage is the best fight against social, political and cultural anomalies.

According to Al-Nanawtawi’s belief political suppression is timely, while intellectual loss is most disastrous and dangerous; its impacts are long lasting. Al-Nanawtawi insisted on the changing nature of strategy and policy. He himself produced the paradigms of changes. His life is categorized with three different phases. The first phase of his life is full of political struggle, while in the second phase, he changed his policies and engaged in polemics with Christian and Hindu missionaries and in addition continued several revival movements. The third and the most successful phase of his life is the intellectual and academic revolution, for which he became most famous. But in all three phases of his life, Al-Nanawtawi always was struggling for Muslim political and intellectual superiority.

Thus, the paradigms left by Al-Nanawtawi became footprints for his successors; they sporadically and permanently were engaged in different political movements. But none of his successors ever differed from the main maxim, which Al-Nanawtawi has set for them in the last stage of his life and it was Muslim inclination and absolute reversion towards religio-cultural heritage and it was preserved in the intellectual heritage of Islam.

 

* Dr. Atif Suhail Siddiqui is the founder president of Deoband Institute of Islamic Thoguht.

[1] Akhtar Imam Adil, Tahaffuz-e Din ke Masa’i-e Jamilah- Mawlana Nanawtawi—Ahad awr Khidmat, in Hujjat al-Islam Imam Muhammad Qasim Al-Nanawtawi: Hayat, Afkar, Khidmat, (New Delhi: Tanzim Abna-e Qadim Dar al-Ulum Deoband, 2005), 114-115.

[2] Shams Tabriz Khan, Fikr-i Qasmi ke Chand Asasi Rujhanat, in Hujjat al-IslAm Imam Muhammad Qasim Al-Nanawtawi: Hayat, Afkar, Khidmat, 125.

[3] For detailed biography of Muhammad Qāsim Al-Nānawtawī see, Manazir Ahsan Gīlānī, Sawānh-i Qāsmī, (Deoband: Maktabah Dārul Ulum, 1383AH); Muhammad Ya’qub Nānawtawī, Hālāt Janāb-i Tayyab Mawlvī Muhammad Qāsim Sahab (Bhawalpur: Matba’ Sādiqul Anwār, AH 1297); Muhammad Anwrul Hasan Qāsmi, Anwār-i-Qāsmī(Pakistan: Idārah Sa’diyah Mujaddadiyah, 1969) and Nur al-Hasan Rāshid Kāndhalwi, Qāsim al-Ulum HaÌrat Mawlānā Qāsim Nānawtawī: AÍwāl wa Óthār wa Bāqiyāt wa Muta’lliqāt, (Muzaffarnagar: Maktaba-E Noor, 2000).

[4] Nadim al-Wajidi, “Hazrat Mawlana Qāsim Nānawtawī ki fikri Basirat awr Dawr-i Hazir men uski Ma’nwiyat”, in Hujjat al-Islam Imam Muhammad Qasim Al-Nanawtawi: Hayat, Afkar, Khidmat, 135-136.

[5]Thana Bhawan is a small town in Muzaffarnagar District in the North Indian state of Uttar Pradesh around 120 km from Delhi. During 1857 war of independence Thana Bhawan became the center of strategy against British colonial forces which ultimately turned in the famous Battle of Shamli, which took place between the forces of Haji ImdAd Allah and Britain. See, Shaykh Muhammad Ikram, Tarikh-e Hindustan Mawj-e Kawthar, (Delhi: Adabi Dunya, n. d.), 196, Husayn Ahmad Madani, Naqsh-i Hayat,(Deoband), 43, Sayyid Muhammad Miyan, Ulema-I Hind ka Shandar Mazi, v. 4, (Karachi: Maktabah Rashidiyah, 1986), 281.

[6] Husayn, 43.

[7] Shamli is a city and district headquarters in the North Indian state of Uttar Pradesh, it became the battle ground between the forces of Mujahidin, led by Haji Imdad Allah and Al-Nanawtawi against British colonial forces in 1857. The battle of Shamli is one of the important chapters in India’s freedom struggle. See Manazir, v. 2, 121-204

[8] A bullet hurt him, but the injury was not serious. It was recovered very soon. See, Muhammad Ya’qub Nānawtawī, Hālāt Janāb-i Ùayyab Mawlvī Muhammad Qāsim Sahab (Bhawalpur: MaÏbaÑ Øādiqul Anwār, AH 1297), in Nur, 202.

[9] Ikram,196.

[10] Al-Nanawtawi here refers to the Messenger of God Muhammad (peace be upon him and mercy of God). The Holy Prophet went on hiding for three days in Thawr Cave enroute from Makkah to Madinah. See Manazir, v. 2, 173.

[11] ManāÐir, v. 2, 49. The arrest warrant remained effective until the British Government announced clemency against those who were declared rebels throughout the country. But Al-Nanawtawi’s name remained in the record of the British police, which always affected his activities. During the period of warrant, there were several police raids on possible hideouts. But Al-Nanawtawi could never be arrested. See, Muhammad Ya’qub Nānawtawī, in Nur, 202. Also his biographers, Manazir,  Ya’qub and others have given accounts of the events how always Al-Nanawtawiescaped from the arrests despite sudden raids on his possible hideouts. There is an interesting and famous account mentioned about his escape from arrest in Masjid Chattah by his biographers, Al-Nanawtawi was standing in the mosque, suddenly one police officer entered the mosque who did not know Al-Nanawtawi by face. The police officer asked Al-Nanawtawi “Did you see Muhammad Qasim?” Al-Nanawtawi moved two-three steps behind from his place and replied to the police officer, “Yes, Muhammad Qasim was standing here and pointed out the place from where he moved a few steps.” The police officer did not ask any further question and left the mosque quickly. His biographers write that he never spoke lie and God saved him due to his piety and pious intentions. See, Ashiq Ilahi, Tadhkirah Al-Rashid,v. 1, (Saharanpur: Kutub Khanah Isha’at al-Ulum, 2014), 120, Manazir, v. 2, 176-177. Al-Nanawtawi’s colleague Rashid Ahmad Gangohi writes that, “I was arrested because before the battle of Shamli I was confused and Al-Nanawtawi was never arrested because he was fully confident before the battle, God helped him because he was fully relying on the support from Allah.” See, Akhtar,116.

[12] Sayyid Muhammad Miyan, Ulema-e- Hind kA Shandar Mazi, v. 4, 287

[13] Manazir, 123.

[14] Imdad was the most revered personality of his time. His fame was due to his piety, which attracted thousands of common people and hundreds of contemporary eminent Ulema. They all paid allegiance to him. According to Al-Nanawtawi’s biographer, nobody could dare to oppose his name as the Chief, because he was fulfilling all the conditions, which a person requires for appointing as a Chief of the Believers. Thus, without any opposition all opponents of the battle of Shamli agreed to pay the allegiance to Imdad and agreed upon his leadership. See, Manazir, v. 2, 125-126.

[15] Ashiq, Tadhkirah Al-Rashid, v. 1, 114.

[16] Ibid.

[17] Muhammad Salim Qasmi, “Al-Imam Muhammad Qasim Al-Nanawtawi ki Shakhsiyat ke imtiyazi pahlu”, in Hujjat al-IslAm Imam Muhammad Qasim Al-Nanawtawi: Hayat, Afkar, Khidmat,71-72.

[18] Ibid.

[19] Manazir, v. 2, 127.

[20] Ibid, 129.

[21] Ibid. Also see the Qur’an, upon which Al-Nanawtawi made the premise of his  arguments, (Qur’an, 31:15)

[22] During the battle of Shamli Al-Nanawtawi was the young man of 25, his parents had not also reached to this age that they needed his services. His parents also not crossed age of 45, their health was absolutely fine, and his parents used to work themselves without any support and help.

[23] Manazir, v. 2, 129.

[24] Ibid.

[25] Nur, 146.

[26] In this report the letters from Al-Nanawtawi and the officials including Prime Minister of Ottoman Empire are described. This report is a fine example of how Al-Nanawtawi, his disciples and his colleagues were engaged in a conversation with the high officials of Ottoman Empire and in what manner the Ottoman Empire acknowledged this support. See, Rudad Chandah-i Balqan, (Meerut: Matba’ Hashmi, 1294 A. H.), 1-5.

[27] Ibid.

[28] Ibid.

[29] Ibid.

[30] Ibid.

[31] Ibid.

[32] Ibid.

[33] Ibid.

[34] Ibid.

[35] Ibid.

[36] Nur, 99-100.

[37] Ibid.

[38] Manazir, v. 1, 511.

[39] Ibid, 513.

[40] Through Rashid Ahmad Gangohi three installments of amount comprising of 784 Rupees, 87.5 Rupees and 200.25 Rupees were delivered to the Consulate of Ottoman Empire in Bombay, while Ahmad Ali of Saharanpur delivered total amount of 4230 Rupees in five installments. This receipt of amount was published in a report by the Consulate of Ottoman Empire, See, Daftar A’anat-i Hindiyah, (Bombay: Consulate of Turkish Empire in India, n. d.), 1-161; See also Nur, 103.

[41] The comparative value of the currency in the 80s of 19th century and first decade of 21st century is highly different. Now this amount is equal to more than 100 million rupees. See, Nur, 104.

[42] Nur, 103.

[43]Al-JawA’Ib was the official weekly mouthpiece of Ottoman Empire, which used to be published from Bab-i Aali (the administrative town or block of the Ottoman Empire). The first publication began in 1860.  Few copies of Al-Jawa’ib are preserved in the library of Nadwatul Ulema, Lucknow, India.

[44]Rudad, 10-11.

[45] Qur’an, (2: 195).

[46] Al-Nanawtawi, Makateb, op. cit.

[47] Ibid.

[48] Sayyid Asghar Husayn, HayAt-i Shaykh al-Hind, (Lahore: Idarah Islamiyit, 1977), 22.

[49] Ibid.

[50] Ashiq, Tadhkirah al-Rashid, v. 1, (Deoband), 229.

[51] Nur, 146.

[52] Qur’an, (2: 38).

[53] Qur’an, (8: 72; 9: 38).

[54] Al-Nanawtawi, Maktub ba silsilah-i Jang Rus wa Turki, (1294 AH),see in Nur, 149-150.

[55] Qur’an, (8:72).

[56] Qur’an, (9:71).

[57]Al-Nanawtawi, Maktub, opcit.

[58] Qur’an, (8:73).

[59] Qur’an, (9:28).

[60] Qur’an, (9:38).

[61] Qur’an, (8: 72, 8:73).

[62] Ibid.

[63] Ibid.

[64] Qur’an (9: 19-22, 9:111).

[65] Qur’an, (9:111).

[66]Al-Nanawtawi, Maktub, op. cit.

[67] Nur, 93.

[68] Sayyid Muhammad Miyan, Ulema-i Haq awr unke Mujahidanah Karname, v. 1, (Deoand: Faisal Publications, 2003), 93.

[69] Miyan, 93.

[70] Miyan, Safarnamah Asiran-e Malta, (Deoband: Kutub Khanah Na’imiyah, 2002), 73.

[71] Ibid.

[72] Manazir, 84.

[73] Abdullah Yusuf Ali, The Meaning of the Holy Qur’an, (5:8).

[74] Akhtar, 118.

[75] Punjab and Sind, Miss NSS, 249, see in Nasim Ahmad Qasmi, “Hujjat al-Islam Mawlana Muhammad Qasim Al-Nanawtawi, Khidmat awr Karnamay”in Hujjat al-IslAm Imam Muhammad Qasim Al-Nanawtawi: Hayat, AfkAr, Khidmat,107.

THE FIRST ANGLO-AFGHAN WAR

By Firas al-Khateeb

Few regions in the Muslim world have seen as much warfare in modern times as Afghanistan. Foreign interventions and invasions have been an almost constant threat to the nation since the early 1800s. The Soviet Union in the 1980s and the United States in the 2000s experienced what it means to fight in Afghanistan’s unforgiving environment, but the first Western power to foray into the region was Britain. Back in the 1800s, when Britain was just solidifying its control over India, it looked to the northwest, to Afghanistan, to serve as a buffer to the growing Russian Empire. The result was the First Anglo-Afghan War, which lasted from 1839 to 1842.

Background


Ethnic groups of Afghanistan. The Pashtuns dominate the South and East and have traditionally provided the bulk of support to Kabuli governments.

Throughout history, Afghanistan and the surrounding region has been marked by ethnic and tribal divisions. Pashtuns dominate the East and South of the country, the center is mostly Hazara, and the Turkmen, Uzbeks, and Tajiks can be found throughout the North. Each group has historically had their own identity, culture, language, and loyalties, and thus any kind of national unity among the numerous ethnic groups has been hard to come by. Furthermore, since the rise of the gunpowder empires in the sixteenth century, Afghanistan has served as a point of contention between Safavid Persia to the west and Mughal India to the east.

Despite the ethnic divisions and the almost constant state of imperial war, the first Afghan state began to take shape in the late 1700s under the leadership of Ahmad Shah Durrani (r. 1747-1772), who established a kingdom based in Kandahar that managed to survive between the Mughal and Safavid realms. He relied mostly on the Pashtuns for support, but he also included the other ethnic groups of the region in his administration, thus preventing his kingdom from falling into ethnic civil war.

But the Afghan state founded by Ahmad Shah soon had to deal with the rise of the British and Russian Empires in the 1800s. The British East India Company had managed to use a combination of patronage, bribery, and outright warfare to bring large tracts of India under its control in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Meanwhile, the Russian Empire slowly annexed large portions of Central Asia’s Turkic khanates that bordered Afghanistan to the north.

To the British, the growth of Russia was a threat. They worried that if the Russians continued to expand southward, they could use Afghanistan as a base from which to attack British India. With the Himalaya Mountains providing a secure northern border to India, the only way for an overland invasion was through mountain passes high in the Afghan-controlled Hindu Kush Mountains. Indeed, this had been the main entry point for numerous invasions into India throughout history.

The British thus tried to use Afghanistan as a buffer against Russian expansion in the 1830s. The emir (equivalent to king) of Afghanistan at the time was Dost Mohammad Khan, who ruled from the city of Kabul in the east of Afghanistan, close to the passes that lead to India. If Dost Mohammad could keep the Russians from invading Afghanistan, the British would feel more secure in India, thus they hoped for peaceful relations between the Afghans and the Russians and no warfare.

Dost Mohammad’s diplomatic skills were lacking, however, and in the late 1830s, the Russians allied with the Persians against the Afghans under the pretext of regaining the city of Herat for Persia. At this point, the British decided that any hopes of diplomacy holding the Russians back were fading. Instead, they favored a new approach which involved a full scale invasion of Afghanistan, the overthrow of Dost Mohammad Khan, and the establishment of a new emir, Shah Shujah Durrani, who would be staunchly pro-British.

The Invasion

In late 1838, the British mobilized over 20,000 soldiers for the invasion of Afghanistan, most of them being Indians who served as sepoys in the British East India Company’s private army. The British army was a modern, disciplined, and well-trained force. The Afghans, however, did not have the latest technology on the battlefield, and did not conform to European modes of warfare. Instead of the neat and steady lines of infantry and musket volleys that European generals preferred, Afghan warriors operated as an irregular fighting force. And although Dost Mohammad had almost 40,000 cavalry at his disposal and could call up tens of thousands of Ghilzai warriors from the regions around Kabul, discipline and loyalty were rare among his soldiers. Furthermore, rivalries and competing interests between different tribes that made up the armed forces prevented the entire army from operating as a single unit. Despite this, the Ghilzais in particular had the potential to be a very effective fighting force based on their tenacity and ability to ambush. They were not full time soldiers and were thus very difficult to track and pursue in battle, since they could abandon the battle and blend in with the local population. Their ability in battle would later prove to be decisive after the initial invasion.

When the British invaded early in 1839, they came through the Bolan Pass, south of Afghanistan, instead of the expected invasion route that ran through the Khyber Pass. By the time Dost Mohammad realized it, it was too late for him to defend Kandahar, his southernmost city, which fell to the British in April of 1839. Dost Mohammad hoped that his entrenched forces at Ghazni, a fortress on the road to Kabul, would hold up the British long enough for him to mobilize his forces, especially the Ghilzais.

But Ghazni proved to be no obstacle for the British. Modern artillery coupled with their disciplined forces managed to rout the fortress. Between 500 and 1200 Afghans were killed while the British only lost 17 men in the siege. Dost Mohammad knew that the British would arrive in Kabul soon and attempted to make a final stand on the outskirts of his capital. But news of the British ability in war spread quick, and the emir had trouble rallying soldiers to defend the city. Only 3000 men offered their services. Most of his army disbanded and diffused into local villages and rural areas.

Dost Mohammad was thus forced to escape to Central Asia where he hoped to recruit an army in exile that would push the British out. The British, meanwhile, entered Kabul in August, where they helped Shah Shujah Durrani claim the throne as emir of Afghanistan. Shah Shujah was not a popular figure in the capital, and was widely seen as nothing more than an agent of the invaders. His administration was weak and had trouble managing Afghanistan, but the British achieved their goal of securing the northern approaches to India from a possible Russian invasion. It was mission accomplished.

The Insurgency

The eventual expulsion of British troops did not come from the exiled emir. Dost Mohammad’s attempt to invade Afghanistan in 1840 ended in failure as he surrendered and was exiled to Calcutta, India. Instead, popular opposition to the British came from the people living under the foreign occupation.

The British occupation, centered on Kabul, brought huge changes to the lives of ordinary Afghans. Based on their experiences in India, the British believed that in order to make their occupation of Afghanistan worthwhile, they had to reform the government and military of the country to resemble those of European nations. Thus, the traditional payments doled out by Kabul to tribal chiefs for their loyalty were cut, in some cases by 50%. This weakened the already low level of loyalty to Shah Shujah outside of Kabul, and hampered the ability of rural tribes to live in Afghanistan’s harsh environment due to lack of food and supplies.

Furthermore, inflation caused by the British occupation made life very difficult in the cities, particularly Kabul and Kandahar. As the British and their supporters settled in the cities, they brought huge amounts of currency with them, which reduced the value of money overall. The urban populations thus suffered as they saw their relative incomes and purchasing power go down, just as inflation and high demand drove the price of food up. The religious scholars, the ulema, in particular suffered, as they relied on fixed stipends which were now almost worthless. Furthermore, many of the charitable institutions they managed were seized by Shah Shujah’s government to provide more tax revenue, a move they saw as contrary to Islamic law.

It was in this environment of disaffection and frustration that the first big protest against the British occupation occurred in November of 1841. Angry demonstrators, led by tribal elders and the ulema, spread out throughout the city to protest signs of British influence in the capital. In the mayhem, a British official was killed. And when the British did nothing to avenge the death in the days after the protest, the Afghans took the opportunity to continue to build momentum.

Tribal elders and ulema fanned out into the surrounding countryside, rallying men to come to Kabul and expel the British. Around 15,000 responded and assembled in Kabul. It’s important to note that the irregular nature of Afghanistan’s warriors proved to be an advantage, as civilians could pick up weapons and fight when needed and then go back to the villages and disperse into civilian life when threatened. This fact prevented the British from being able to stop the growth of the resistance, which quickly spread throughout the country.

Since the British were based in numerous cities and fortresses throughout Afghanistan, groups of British soldiers could easily be surrounded and pinned down by Afghan warriors. Even in Kabul, the center of British control, the foreign troops were unable to do much outside of their own bases as Afghan warriors captured British supply stores. The commander of the British forces in Kabul, General William Elphinstone, recognized that his forces were outnumbered and outmatched, especially when Mohammad Akbar, the son of Dost Mohammad arrived in Kabul to command the resistance forces. Elphinstone thus managed to secure an agreement allowing for a British retreat to Jalalabad, about 150 kilometers to the east.

Elphinstone’s army of 4,500 along with around 12,000 camp followers thus left Kabul in January 1842 and began the march out of Afghanistan. As is bound to happen in a tribal society like Afghanistan, treaties and agreements made by the central government meant nothing to the Ghilzai tribes that lined the road to Jalalabad. Throughout the march, Elphinstone’s army was harassed by waves of Ghilzai warriors who would regularly rush out of the hills to ambush the British in narrow mountain passes. Adding to their problems, the winter climate of mountainous Afghanistan made the march even slower and more dangerous and hundreds of British and Indian troops died just from the environment.

After four days of marching, only about 150 soldiers and 4,000 camp followers were still alive and marching to Jalalabad. Within two more days, after continued Ghilzai attacks and harsh weather, about 20 were left. By the time Jalalabad was reached, there was just one lone survivor, Dr. William Brydon, an assistant surgeon. From a force of almost 20,000, only one man managed to avoid being killed or captured during the retreat from Afghanistan’s capital. Just as quickly as the British had invaded and captured Kabul, they had been defeated and forced out of Afghanistan’s heartland.

Aftermath

The complete destruction of Elphinstone’s army was a major victory for the Afghans. Despite tribal and ethnic disunity, they had managed to unite long enough to decisively defeat the world’s greatest superpower. The British puppet government in Kabul quickly collapsed and Shah Shujah was assassinated in April of 1842. Dost Mohammad Khan was released from captivity by the British and returned to Afghanistan to retake the position of emir later that year.

The defeat of the British helped foster a sense of national unity in Afghanistan, although tribal affiliations still generally meant more to the average Afghan. Throughout the country, an acute sense of xenophobia developed in response to the punishing British occupation. This would continue as Afghanistan was invaded by Britain again in the 1870s and 1910s and by the Soviets and Americans over 100 years later. From the British perspective, the defeat meant the absolute end of any possible friendly relations between the two nations. The Afghans were caricatured as barbaric, uncouth, and treacherous, and any attempt to engaged Afghanistan afterwards was colored by this mindset. More importantly, however, the defeat meant the loss of respect among Indians living under British rule in the subcontinent, which would play a role in the Sepoy Rebellion of 1857 in India.

The First Anglo-Afghan War helped Afghanistan gain a reputation as the “graveyard of empires”. A mystique developed around the country that it was unconquerable and persists until today. And while these characterizations of Afghanistan may not be entirely true, they continue to play a major role in the national consciousness of Afghanistan, and the way it is viewed by outsiders.

Bibliography:

Ewans, Martin. Afghanistan: A Short History of Its People and Politics. New York: HarperCollins, 2002.

Johnson, Robert. The Afghan Way of War: Culture and Pragmatism: A Critical History. London: Hurst &, 2011.

Brief History of the Shi’ite Safawid Dynasty

[By Hadhrat Muhammad Ishaq Sindhelwi (Rahimahullah)]

It is an established fact that Iran was a Sunni nation until the tenth century of the Hijri calendar. During this period, Iran produced thousands of scholars in every discipline; the most salient of these facts is that the six most authentic Hadith books (i.e. Bukhari, Muslim, Abu Dawood, Nasai, Ibn Majah & Tirmidhi) were written by scholars from Iran, or scholars who received their education in Iran.

However, when the Safawid Shi’ites took control, they established their government on the skulls of the Sunni scholars and jurists. This was one of the reasons for the evacuation of the large cities that were the foremost centres of the Islamic sciences, such as Tabriz, Isfahan, Ray and Tus. Many Sunni Muslims were murdered, forced into Shi’ism and compelled to flee to the mountains, leaving Iran as a centre for conspiracies against Islam and the Muslims.

Ferdinand, the ambassador to the Austrian King, remarked, “Had it not been for the Safawids in Iran, we would have been reading the Qur’an this day like the Algerians,” meaning that his nation would have been introduced to Islam by the Ottomans. However, the Safawids conspired with the crusaders and the imperialists to halt the Islamic expansion into France and Vienna.

The rise of the Safawid dynasty started in 905 A.H in Iran and Khurasan. While under the rule of the Mongols, in the 1200s (596 A.H), the Persians had given up on politics and militarism and had submerged themselves in ibaadah. During this time, Iran was constantly visited by Mongol and Turkish immigrants who adopted the Persian language and Persian customs. In the 1300s (699 A.H), a dynasty founded by a grandson of Genghis Khan, Halaku Khan, ruled in Iran. Meanwhile a heretical Shi’ite order, the Safawids, appeared with their homebase at Ardebil – west of the Caspian Sea.

By 1500 C.E (905 A.H), the Safawids had implemented the Dogmas of the Ithna Ashari Shi’ite sect. Safawid males wore red headgear for identification (representing their beliefs in the twelve Imams), and they were eager to advance Shi’ism by any possible means.

In the year 1500 C.E (905 A.H), the thirteen-year old son of a recently deceased Safawid leader set out to conquer territory. By 1501 C.E (906 A.H), the Safawids seized Tabriz and made it their capital. They also butchered their way into Armenia, Azerbaijan & Khorasan. The Safawids became the strongest force in Iran, and their leader, Isma’il (905 A.H – 930 A.H) now fifteen, was declared “Shah” (King).

Shah Isma’il descends from the lineage of Shaykh Safiuddin 1334 C.E (734 A.H), the student and son-in-law of Shaykh Zaahid Gilani 1300 C.E (699 A.H). Amongst the primary teachings of Shaikh Saifuddin was the notion of fanatical love for the ‘Ahlul Bayt’. They believed that the Ummahatul Mu’mineen, the noble wives of Nabi are not included in the ‘Ahlul Bayt’. On the other hand, the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah firmly believe that respect and love for all the family members of Nabi  is an integral part of Imaan.

In the Shi’ite terminology love for the ‘Ahlul Bayt’ is termed as ‘Tawalla’ and hatred for the Ummahatul Mu’mineen and the Sahaaba (whom the Shi’ite consider the enemies of the Ahlul Bayt) is termed as ‘Tabarra’.

It was this very spark of ‘pretentious love for the Ahlul Bayt’ that established the foundation of Shi’ism. There were also seven Turkish tribes (Istaajilo, Turklo, Biharlo, Dhul Qadr, Shaamilo, Qaachar and Afshaar) who assisted the Safawids in their ascent to kingship. These tribes were influenced and brainwashed by the Safawid fake Sufis, who indoctrinated their beliefs with Shi’ism.

When the Safawids established their rule, they realised that their own beliefs with regards to the hidden Imam will become an unnecessary impediment. They needed to find a ruse to allow their governors to rule upon the masses as the Imams would have as the Shi’ites believed that only the Imams were innocent and were lawmakers.

Once, Isma’il went out of Tabriz with his ministers and friends. Upon reaching a stream he ordered his companions to wait for him whilst he entered the cave. A few hours later he emerged from the cave and announced that he met with the hidden Imam of the Shi’ites who had granted him permission to become his representative on earth and the time for his (the hidden Imam) appearance is near.

Thereafter, he declared that he saw Sayyidina Ali bin Abi’ Talib (radhiyallahu anhu) in a dream who ordered to gather his followers in the Grand Masjid of Tabriz. They should all be armed  and ready to oppose those who are against Shi’ite ideologies and the establishment of a Shi’ite state. After these declaration he began oppressing the Sunnis, forcing the to accept Shi’ism.

In 1510 C.E (915 A.H), Isma’il Safawi waged war against Shaybani Khan who was a sunni ruler. A bloodbath ensued at Merv where unfortunately Shaybani Khan was defeated. Isma’il Safawi severed his head and filled it with jewels.

Thereafter, Isma’il Safawi began to instigate his followers to crush the Ottoman Empire. Eventually, Sultan Selim I responded to this mischief. A great war ensued near Tabriz where by the grace of Allah Ta’ala, Isma’il Safawi was defeated. It is mentioned no one ever saw Isma’il Safawi smiling after his disgraceful defeat by Sultan Selim I.

Evil Habits and Traits of the Safawids

⚫ The Safawids believed that the Persians were the chosen people of Allah 7000 years prior to Islam. The basis for them believing that they were the most noble of people is because, Sayyidina Hussain ibn Ali (Radhiyallahu Anhu) married the daughter of Yazdgerd (a Persian), from whom Sayyidina Zainul Abideen (rahimahullah) whom the Shi’ites regard as one of their Imams was born. This is why, Isma’il Safawi declared himself as the representative of Allah, the Khalifah of the twelve Imams and the representative of the hidden Imam on earth.

⚫ The grandfather of Isma’il Safawi had married his daughter to Zaahid Kasaani, an individual who had claimed prophethood.

⚫ The Safawid kings consumed alcohol, punished whomsoever they wanted whenever they wanted and were involved in all sorts of wrongdoings.

⚫ Isma’il Safawi enforced the ritual and compulsory cursing of the first three Khulafah, Sayyidina Abu Bakr (radhiyallahu Anhu), Sayyidina ‘Umar (radhiyallahu Anhu) and Sayyidina Uthman (radhiyallahu Anhu) as usurpers, from all the Masajid, disbanded Sunni groupsand seized their assets, used state patronage to develop Shia shrines, institutions and arts and imported Shia scholars to replace Sunni scholars.

⚫ They introduced the statement Ashhadu Anna Aliyyan Waliyallah (I bear witness that Ali is the delegate of Allah) in the Adhan.

⚫ The Safawis shed Sunni blood and destroyed and desecrated the graves and Masajid of the Sunnis. The Ottoman Sultan Bayazid II advised and asked Isma’il Safawi to stop the anti-Sunni actions. However, Isma’il was strongly anti-Sunni, ignored the Sultans warning and continued to spread the Shia faith by the sword.

⚫ In 1512 C.E (917 A.H) all the Sunni scholars of Iran who opposed the imposed dogmas of the Safawids were slained and butchered. Two-thirds of the population of Tabriz was forced into Shi’ism. Over one million Sunnis were slained and butchered. Streams of blood ran along the streets of Tabriz.

⚫ As soon as Isma’il Safawi has established his kingdom he ordered his clerics to educate the masses with one belief only, and that is Ashhadu Anna Aliyyan Waliyallah, whilst every other important beliefs of Islam should be discarded.

⚫ No Sunni scholar was allowed to lecture or deliver a Khutbah on the day of Jumu’ah. The Ulama’ of the Ahlus Sunnah were slaughtered, so much so that the bones of great scholars who had passed away (such as Imam Abu Hanifah (rahimahullah), Qadhi Hamdani (rahimahullah and Allamah Nasruddeen Baydawi (rahimahullah), were dug from their graves and burnt in public.

⚫ Islamic literature, books and manuscripts with authentic Islamic sciences were seized and burnt.

⚫ The Safawid dynasty destroyed all existing Islamic literature and encouraged the propagation of Shi’ism forcefully because prior to the rise of the Safawid dynasty the majority in Iran were Hanafi Sunni Muslims.

⚫ With the establishment of the Safawid rule, there was a raucous and colourful, almost carnival-like holiday on the 26th of Dhul-Hijjah exhibiting their happiness for the martyrdom of Sayyidina Umar (Radhiyallahu Anhu). The highlight of the day was making an effigy to be cursed, insulted and finally burned.

⚫ In 1501 C.E (906 A.H), Isma’il invited all Shi’ite adherents livinh outside Iran to settle in Iran and be assured of protection from the Sunni majority.

⚫ The early Safawid rulers took a number of steps against the Sunni Ulama’ of Iran. These steps included giving the Ulama the choice of conversion, death or exile.

Coalition of the Safawid Dynasty and the Imperialists against the Ottoman Empire

The Ottoman Empire had established a true Islamic Nation. Sultan Muhammad Fatih had conquered Constantinople. His conquest and valour had overawed the hearts of the Europeans. Upon his demise, the grand pope declared that the Roman Catholics should celebrate thanksgiving for three continous days. 

The Safawi Shi’ites were known for conspiring against the Ottoman Empire, with the aim of hindering the progress and expansion of Islam. The Shi’ites had signed an agreement with the disbelievers that they will assist them against the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah, that is the Ottoman Empire.

A German historian, Brookman writes: “From 1588 C.E to 1619 C.E (996 A.H – 1038 A.H) the Safawid dynasty was expanding exponentially. Shah Abbas Safawi had received all the assistance he needed from the British to expand his tyrannical conquest. The British fervently assisted the Safawids in their efforts to destroy the Ottoman Empire; and the Safawids returned the favour by comimg to their aid against the Austrians.

A coalition between the Safawids and the Crusaders was created during the lifetime of Isma’il Safawi. Isma’il met with Leo, Maximillan and King Charles the fifth and made an agreement to assist them against the Ottoman Empire.

Innovations and Mischief of the Safawids

⚫ Isma’il Safawi declared that he is sinless and that there is no difference between him and Hadhrat Mahdi (alayhis salaam)

⚫ He claimed that Sayyidina Ali (radhiyallahu anhu) was a Nabi and he would prostrate to Sayyidina Ali

⚫ Sultan Tehmasep Safawi was a drunkard whose son was in love with a young lad. He passed away in the house of the same lad.

⚫ It was compulsory to celebrate the martyrdom of Sayyidina Hussain bin Ali (radhiyallahu anhu)

⚫ Christian rituals were introducted it their religious gatherings

⚫ They introduced the sentence ‘Hayya Alaa Khayril Amal’ in the Adhan

⚫ Performing Sajdah on tablets of sand (dedicated to the land of martyrdom of Sayyidina Hussain radhiyallahu anhu)

⚫ Performing Sajdah to their leaders and clerics

⚫ Changing the Qiblah of the Masjid in Iran

⚫ Burying their dead in coffins and caskets

⚫ The Safawid Shi’ite clerics toom possession of the Awqaf system. They believe that they have the right to make that which is haraam, as halal whenever it suited them. For example, when the Moghul king Khudabanda issued three divorces to his wife, Ibn Mutahhir Halli (a Safawid Shi’ite cleric) stated that such a divorce is baseless.

⚫ The Safawid clerics went to the extent of stating that only Sayyidatuna Fatima (radhiyallahu anha) was the daughter of Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). The other daughters of Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) from Sayyidatuna Khadijah (radhiyallahu anha) were from her previous marriage.

⚫ They also negated Sayyidatuna Aisha and Hafsa (radhiyallahu anhuma) as being the noble wuves of the Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wasallam.

⚫ The Safawids would celebrate the 10th of Muharram as a day of mourning for Sayyidina Hussain (radhiyallahu anhu). Abbas Safawi would wear black clothing only and he would apply mud on his face to express his grief.

⚫ The Shi’ites would lash and cut themselves with daggers on the day of Ashurah. Such actions have no basis in Islam. Even their British and Western allies have commentated that they have not seen such animosity and ignorance anyone else.

Mulla Baqir Majlisi

Muhammad Baqir Ibn Muhammad Taqi Ibn Mansur al-Majlisi, also known as Mulla Baqir Majlisi is considered as the most renown and reliable scholar of the Shi’ite faith. He was the grand cleric of the Safawid Dynasty.

He is the same person who invented and promoted the beliefs regarding Mut’ah, Raj’at and reincarnation. He has fabricated numerous accusations against the first three Khulafah, the Sahabah and the Umaahatul Mu’mineen and he promoted these fabrications as authentic Ahadith. An example of his heresy as he writes in his book ‘Jila al-Uyun’:

Ali (alayhis salaam) narrates that Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “There is a coffin in Jahannum in which twelve individuals are imprisoned. Six of them are from the previous nations and six are from my nation. This coffin is at the bottom of a well filled with lave and fire. It has been closed with a huge boulder. When Allah will intend to set Jahannum ablaze, he will order the Angels to remove this huge boulder and the lava and fire of this well will consume Jahannum.

The narrator then asked Sayyidina Ali (alayhis salaam) ‘who are these twelve individuals?’ And he answered, “the six accursed individuals from the previous nations are:

1. Qabil
2. Namrud
3. Fir’awn
4. The person who killed the Camel of Nabi Salih (alayhis salaam)
5. The two individuals who misguided the Bani Isra’eel after the demise of Nabi Musa (alayhis salaam)

And the six individuals from this Ummah are:

1. Dajjal
2. Abu Bakr
3. Umar
4. Abu Ubaidah al-Jarrah
5. Saalim Mawla Hudhaifah
6. Sa’d al-‘Aas

May Allah Ta’ala protect us from such utterances.

In another narration, he states that Iblis said, “When Allah cursed me and I was driven out of Jannah, I asked Allah if there is anyone more accursed than me. The angel in-charge of Jahannum was ordered to take me to the farthest section of Jahannum where I was shown those who are more accursed than me. The fire and punishment of that place was of such an extent that I thought I would die. I saw two individuals who were shackled and were being punished. I asked the angel, “Who are they?” He replied, “Didn’t you read what was written on the Arsh 2000 years ago before the creation of Adam. Iblis said, “It is written “There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is His messenger and I (Allah) assisted Muhammad through Ali”. These two, who ae shackled in flames are the enemies of Ali, they are Abu Bakr & Umar.”

These are the some of the beliefs and teachings that were promoted by the Safawid Shi’ite clerics. Even the Shi’ite scholars have attested that the Safawids have drifted against humanity, reason and Islam.

Today, the same ideologies have been implemented by the stooges of Khomeini who regard every Sunni to be a disbeliever. These sons of the Safawids have picked up exactly where their forefathers left off. Chastising the Ummahatul Mu’mineen and noble Sahabah (radhiyallahu anhum) is a part of their religion.

Did you Know?

⚫ Although there are around 2 million Sunnis living in Tehran, there is not a single Masjid where they can perform their Jumu’ah but Tehran is home to 40 Christian Churches and a cemetry for the Baha’is.

⚫ The publication of Sunni books are illegal in Iran.

⚫ A third of the population of Iran are being deprieved of their most basic rights.

⚫ Sunnis living in Iran are not allowed to name their children as they like. There is a book of permitted names at civil registers, and no one can pick up a name that is not in this book. For instance, Iranian authorities do not allow people to name their children Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman or Aisha. Civil registers will not put these names on ID cards.

⚫ On the day of the martyrdom of Sayyidina Umar (radhiyallahu anhu), the Shi’ites hold a ceremony called Jashn-e-Umar Koshan (the celebration of the killing of Umar). An effigy is erected. Dirt and other filthy things are thrown on it. This ceremony is still held in the south of Tehran and other parts of the country.

⚫ Schools in predominantly Muslim regions teach Shi’ite beliefs.

Today, Muslims in Iran number approximately 15 million. The above facts clearly prove that in the past centuries and currently there is ongoing oppressive Shi’ite sectarian discrimination in Iran against the Muslims.

May Allah Ta’ala guide us all and protect the Ummah from the scrouge of Shi’ism and other mischiefs. May Allah Ta’ala elevate the status of the Sahabah in this world and the hereafter.

Brief History of the West’s Hate Propaganda of the Prophet ﷺ & Islam

History of Europe’s Islam hate writing and publishing material for distorting the image of Muhammed ﷺ and Islam.

It was Nicetas of Byzantium around 860 A.D who first wrote “Refutation of Quran” to mislead people to believe that Quran is made up book[1] ﻧَﻌُﻮْﺫُﺑِﺎﻟﻠﻪ He wrote it at the request of Michael III who was the Byzantine Emperor of Amorian dynasty
By this time Muslims have destroyed entire Persian Empire and took Levant (Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Palestine), North Africa from Roman Empire, Spain was under the rule of Muslims and Muslims fought battle of Tours in Western France. Roman Empire was shaken by all of this conquest and feared that it’s days are numbered, so in all this hysteria “Refutation of Quran” was written to stop and belittle Muslims.

Then there was a long pause as Muslims were a dominant force on the horizon and masses were contend with Muslims rule and there was no Popular uprising in Islamic history with the exception to Ummayyad dynasty which was violently overthrown by the Abbasids [2]. Other than that Islamic history have not witnessed violent popular uprisings until after Colonialism.

But after the Conquest of Constantinople in 1453 Muslims have reached the peak and downfall started from west with the Spanish inquisition. Muslims lost Spain. By now Printing technology was available and anything can be printed in Mass, so now in 1537 Venetian printers Paganino and Alessandro Paganini produced printed Blasphemous, misleading edition of Quran to distribute to Muslims under Ottomon Empire [3] and this was the reason why there was a ban in Ottomon Empire on printing anything in Arabic to prevent the above. Unlike the Secular Liberal westernized Muslims with deep inferiority complex who claim this Ottomon empire ban is the reason of our falling back in Technology and Science and our eventual downfall.[4][5] Under Ottomon Empire Printing was allowed for anything in non-Arabic. Books in Arabic were hand written under the supervision of learned scholars and Muslims with deep understanding of Islam. By 1727 even this Arabic ban was also lifted.

Anyway going back to the subject of Blasphemous publication by Europe. So after 1537 a series of Blasphemic material was published about Prophet Muhammed ﷺ and Islam and most notable is the Chronicles of Theophanes which was first written back in 817-818 A.D and was Printed centuries later and taught at universities in the west and Secular liberal misguided Muslims use it as a references for their “Research.” So in our time this whole Jyllands Posten and Geert Wilders Blasphemous cartoons are the continuation of that hate. But this Cancellation of Cartoons by Geert wilders in Netherland is the first retreat by the west.

References:

1) https://www.hse.ru/data/2012/07/02/1254237135/Ulbricht%20RP.pdf

2) https://layyin1137.wordpress.com/2014/02/19/collapse-and-continuity-in-the-umayyad-and-abbasid-regimes/

3) http://www.historyofinformation.com/expanded.php?id=
405

4) http://icraa.org/ottomans-and-the-printing-press-answering-misconceptions/

5) https://www.dailysabah.com/feature/2015/06/08/myths-and-reality-about-the-printing-press-in-the-ottoman-empire

Providing Information about Various aspects of Islam