Category Archives: refuting the lies of gift2deobandis.com and other such sites

Shah Waliullaah (rahmatullah alayh) and the Ghair Muqallideen

A moronic La-Madhabi website says:

Ahle hadeeth means the follower of Hadeeth. Ahlur Rai means the follower of Rai (human wisdom). Those who seek solutions of all problems of life on the basis of the holy Quran and saheeh Hadeeth are known as Ahle hadeeth.On the other hand… those who take solutions of the problems of life from Fiqhi Usool i.e. the formulas of practical laws made by any earlier scholar, they, according to Shah Waliullah, are known as Ahlur Rai. They do not seek Hadeeth of the Prophet (sallallahu alaihi wasallam) and Athar of Sahaba  in making solutions to any problem, rather they try to solve it by making comparison with any Fiqhi decision or any Fiqhi principle given by an earlier Mujtahid Faqeeh and bring out its various branches and sub-branches with the help of Qias i.e. analogical method.

Our Comment: This is a big lie from the La-Madhabi’s part that he says Ahlur Rai never use Hadith nor athar but just qiyas, the more bigger lie is that this statement is falsely attributed to a great scholar like Shah Waliullah Muhaddith Dehlwi (rahimahullah), such fake claim only proves that the la-Madhabi’s are deceivers and nothing else!.

RESPONSE: In Reality, Shah Waliullah (rahimahullah) describes exactly the opposite of what the misguided la-madhabi has claimed.

Shah  Waliullah (rahmatullah alayh) is  among  the  greatest  Muhadditheen  of  the Ummat.  He  is  the  Musnidul  Hind  i.e.  all  the  Sanads  of  Hadeeth  in the  sub-continent  pass  through  him.  To  lend  weight  to  their  cause, the  Ghair  Muqallids  of  Hind  claim  that  Shah  Saahib  was  like  them. This  is  a  common  ploy  of  these  types.  In  this  way  they  try  to mislead simple-minded Muslims.

And  listen!  Those  of  you  who  are  not  linked  to  the  Ulama  are  at risk of being misled by these chancers – Anyhow,  to  set  it  straight,  in  Hujjatullaahul  Baalighah,  he  has written  on  the  topic  in  great  detail.  He  wrote  about  the  two  schools: the “Ahlur Ra’i” and the “Ahlul Hadeeth” and who they are.

The  Imaams  of  the  ‘Ahlur  Rai’  are  Imaam  Sha’bi,  Ibraaheem Nakha’ee,  Auzaa’ee,  Ibn  Abi  Laila,  Shubrumah, Abu  Hanifah  and his students (rahimahumullah).

The Imaams  of  the  Ashaabul  Hadeeth  are  The  7  Fuqahaa  of Madeenah, Imaam Maalik,  Shaafi’ee, Ahmad, Sufyaan  Thauree, Ibn Mubaarak (rahimahumullah) etc.

The Importance of Taqleed:

The  Fiqh  of  the  Ahlur  Rai  was  then  codified  by  Imaam  Abu Hanifah (rahimahullah). After this there was no great Ikhtilaaf among this group.

The Ashaabul  Hadeeth  had  many  differences  in  their  Fiqh  among themselves. Several  Madhabs  originated  among  them.  With  the passage  of  time,  these  Madhabs  then  evolved  and  were incorporated  into  three.  In  this  way,  four  Madhabs  were  codified and  accepted.  These  four  Madhaahib  in  turn  encompassed  all  the Ilm  of  the  Aimmah  and  the  various  Fataawah  (Rulings)  of  the SahaabahTaqleed  of  the  four  Imaams  was  then  unanimously accepted by the ’Ijmaa of the Ummat

There is great wisdom and protection in this Taqleed

After this, Shah Saahib (rahimahullah) writes:

People  should  beware,  and  not  confuse  the  Ashaabul  Hadeeth mentioned  above  with  the  present  day  newly  emerged  sect  who  call themselves  the  Ahlul  Hadeeth.  The  Ahlul  Hadeeth  of  today  are  very much  similar  to  the  Zaahiriyyah  sect  of  the  earlier  period.  These people  are  the  Laa  Madhabiyyah  and  Ghair  Muqallideen.  They  do not  accept  the  Ijmaa’  of  the  Sahaabah  and  the  Aimmah,  nor  the Aathaar  (sayings  and  actions)  of  the  Sahaabah,  nor  do  they  accept Qiyaas  (analogical  reasoning)  as  a  Hujjat  in  Deen.  These  are  not  part of the Ashaabul Hadeeth.” 

In  another  Kitaab,  ‘Al  Aqdul  Jayyid’,  he  has  dealt  with  this  subject in  detail.

Salafiyyat – A deception: In  more  recent  times,  these  Ghair  Muqallids  have  taken  on  a  new name  i.e.  ‘Salafi’.  So  they  have  presented  the  same  old  thing  in  a new  guise.  Many  fresh  and  free  youngsters  have  fallen  into  their  trap and  the  group  suddenly  gained  a  fresh  wind  –  and,  as  with  most deviant  groups,  the  bulk  of  their  followers  are  ignorant  masses.  The common  layman  cannot  understand  the  finer  details  of  Usool Ad Deen  (the  principles  of  Deen).  Anything  presented  to  him  will  be swallowed.  This  is  because  he  cannot  judge  these  things  in  the  light of  Ilm  due  to  lack  of  it.  This  is  how  falsehood  spreads  among  the So  these  are  two  paths  in  front  of  us;  One  is  a  new  way,  invented  by ‘enlightened  mushrooms’  of  this  belated  age  –  the  other  is  an attested  path,  laid  down  by  men  who  were  oceans  of  Ilm  and mountains  of  Taqwa.  The  ‘Muqallideen’  are  the  followers  of  the Aslaaf  (pious  predecessors)  and  are  thus  the  true  “Salafis”.  The Ghair  Muqallid  crowd  are  on  a  path  of  their  own.  They  have opposed  the  Aslaaf  at  every  turn.  They  have  hijacked  the  term  Salafi in  a  most  deceptive  way  –  And  a  strange  world  it  is.

Differences in understanding Nusoos

Understanding  Qur’an  and  Hadeeth  correctly  is  not  the  work  of every  doctor,  professor  and  cabbage  farmer!  This  is  a  very  deep  and specialized  field.  There  is  no  shortcut  in  this  path.  And  it  is impossible  to  lay  claim  to  Itaa’at  (obedience)  of  Allaah  and  His Rasul (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) without following the great Aimmah of the past.

Here  is  one  example:

The differences in the method of Iqaamah: There  is  a  Hadeeth:  “Bilaal (radhiyallahu anha) was  ordered  to  say  the  Adhaan  in  two’s (evenly) and the Iqaamat in one’s (odd no.)

According  to  Imaam  Shaafi’ee  and  Ahmad (rahimahumullah),  it  means  to  say  the words  of  Iqaamat  once  each,  but  ‘Qad  Qaamatis  Salaat’  will  be  said twice. (the Takbeers will be said twice).

According to Imaam Maalik (rahimahullah) even ‘Qad Qaamah’ will be said once. 

Imaam  Abu  Haneefah  (rahimahullah) says  the  meaning  of  the  Hadeeth  is  to  say every set of words in one breath. The further Daleel (proof) is the Riwaayat  (narrations)  in  Abu  Dawood  reported  by  Abu  Mahdhoorah  who  was  appointed  as  Muadhin  in  Makkah. He  says  that Nabi (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) taught him to say the Iqaamah in 17 sentences. 

The Hanafis thus practice upon both Ahaadeeth in this way. 

The  other  thing  is  that  the  other  A’immah,  according  to  their prescribed  method  of  Iqaamah  are  not  practicing  on  the  first Hadeeth  either  because  the  Takbeer  and  Qad-Qaamah  are  both  said twice.

This is how differences in understanding Nass come about.

Some  of  the  Imaams  practice  on  ‘Asahhu  maa  fil  Baab’  the  most Saheeh  Hadeeth  in  the  chapter.  Imaam  Abu  Haneefah’s  method  is  of Tatbeeq  and  Jama’  (reconciling  Ahaadeeth  and  practicing  upon  all the  Ahaadeeth  in  question).

Our difference with the Ghair Muqallids

So  one  of  our  fundamental  differences  with  the  Ghair Muqallideen  is  that  they  do  not  accept  the  Ijmaa’  (consensus  of opinion)  of  Ummat  as  a  Hujjat  (proof).  They  are  ardent Muqallids  of  their  Ghair  Muqallid  Ulama.  For  all  the  hue  and cry  against  Taqleed,  they  are  the  most  hardline  Muqallids themselves.  All  the  fuss  is  nothing  but  a  plot  to  create  confusion among  the  Muslims  and  thus  take  them  off  their  objective  i.e. Amal  (practice)

No getting around Taqleed:

Listen!  In  all  fields  of  life,  pertaining  to  Deen  or  Dunya,  there  is  no getting  around  Taqleed.  Call  it  what  you  will,  every  person  is  a Muqallid  in  his  field.  The  question  is  whose  Taqleed  –  so  in  the matter  of  Deen,  you  will  either  have  to  follow  the  mainstream  Ahlus
Sunnah  and  the  true  Salafis  i.e.  one  of  the  four  Madhabs  or  else you  have  the  option  of  following  these  self-styled  scholars  who reject  the  Aathaar  of  Sahaabah  and  the  Ijmaa’  of  the  believers.

The Ahle Hadeeth:

One  group  claimed  to  be  Ahle  Qur’an.  This  term  is  deceptive.  They are  not  people  of  Qur’an.  We  are  the  people  of  Qur’an.  They  are  a group  who  reject  Hadeeth  and  Ijmaa’  while  claiming  to  follow Qur’an.

Similar  is  the  case  of  the  Ahle  Hadeeth.  We  are  the  followers  of Hadeeth.  They  claim  to  accept  Qur’aan  and  Hadeeth  while  rejecting the  Aathaar  and  Ijmaa’  of  Sahaabah.  It  does  not  mean  that  they follow Hadeeth while we follow our Imaams and not Hadeeth

Go  and  have  a  look  in  the  Islamic  Libraries!  The  Imaams,  their Ustaads  and  their  students  have  authored  all  the  major  Kitaabs  on Hadeeth.  Let  the  Ghair  Muqallids  present  any  reputable  work  on Hadeeth!  The  entire  treasury  of  Hadeeth  that  is  before  the  Ummat today  is  the  fruit  of  the  toil  of  the  Muqallideen. These  fellows  then came  along  and  either  plagiarized  the  works  of  others  or  added  their unwanted  side  notes  and  useless  commentaries  on  the  great  works  of the Ulamaa

The  Ghair  Muqallid/  Salafi/  Ahle  Hadeeth  are  sects  who  accept Qur’an  and  Hadeeth  only.  They  do  not  accept  the  Ijmaa’  of  the Sahaabah  nor  the  Ijmaa’  of  the  Ahlus  Sunnah.  They  will  not  admit this  directly,  but  have  a  look  at  their  Madhab  –  it  will  shine  forth brighter than daylight.

Exactly  the  same  is  the  case  of  the  confounded  Qadiyani  sect. They  will  never  negate  the  Khatme  Nabuwwah openly.  They  say Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) is  Khaatamul  Ambiyaa –  then  they  say  Ghulaam Ahmad  is  also  a  Rasul!  So  they  invent  their  own  concept  of  Khatme Nabuwwat.  Neither  here  nor  there.  Just  like  all  the  others…  Again have  a  look  at  their  works.

The Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaa’ah:

We are the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaa’ah. Remember this!

We follow  the  path  of Prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam)  and  His  companions  –  the  way of  the  Khulafaa e rashideen.  This  encompasses  all  that  is  in  the Qur’an  and  Hadeeth  in  the  most  complete  way.  This  way  was handed  down  to  us  by  our  Imaams  who  were  the  safe  guarders  and trustees of the Ilm of Nabuwwah

We follow  the  Qur’an,  the  Rasul  and  the  path  of  the  Mu’mineen.  

“And  whoever  opposes  the  Rasul  after  the  Guidance  has  become clear  to  him,  and  follows  a  way  other  than  that  of  the Mu’mineen,  we  shall  allow  him  to  do  what  he  does  and  then  we shall  throw  him  into  hell  –  and  it  is  the  worst  abode”_(Surah  An Nisaa  –  115)

Advertisements

Shah Waliullaah (rahmatullah alayh) and the Ghair Muqallideen

A moronic La-Madhabi website says:

Ahle hadeeth means the follower of Hadeeth. Ahlur Rai means the follower of Rai (human wisdom). Those who seek solutions of all problems of life on the basis of the holy Quran and saheeh Hadeeth are known as Ahle hadeeth.On the other hand… those who take solutions of the problems of life from Fiqhi Usool i.e. the formulas of practical laws made by any earlier scholar, they, according to Shah Waliullah, are known as Ahlur Rai. They do not seek Hadeeth of the Prophet (sallallahu alaihi wasallam) and Athar of Sahaba  in making solutions to any problem, rather they try to solve it by making comparison with any Fiqhi decision or any Fiqhi principle given by an earlier Mujtahid Faqeeh and bring out its various branches and sub-branches with the help of Qias i.e. analogical method.

Our Comment: This is a big lie from the La-Madhabi’s part that he says Ahlur Rai never use Hadith nor athar but just qiyas, the more bigger lie is that this statement is falsely attributed to a great scholar like Shah Waliullah Muhaddith Dehlwi (rahimahullah), such fake claim only proves that the la-Madhabi’s are deceivers and nothing else!.

RESPONSE: In Reality, Shah Waliullah (rahimahullah) describes exactly the opposite of what the misguided la-madhabi has claimed.

Shah  Waliullah (rahmatullah alayh) is  among  the  greatest  Muhadditheen  of  the Ummat.  He  is  the  Musnidul  Hind  i.e.  all  the  Sanads  of  Hadeeth  in the  sub-continent  pass  through  him.  To  lend  weight  to  their  cause, the  Ghair  Muqallids  of  Hind  claim  that  Shah  Saahib  was  like  them. This  is  a  common  ploy  of  these  types.  In  this  way  they  try  to mislead simple-minded Muslims.

And  listen!  Those  of  you  who  are  not  linked  to  the  Ulama  are  at risk of being misled by these chancers – Anyhow,  to  set  it  straight,  in  Hujjatullaahul  Baalighah,  he  has written  on  the  topic  in  great  detail.  He  wrote  about  the  two  schools: the “Ahlur Ra’i” and the “Ahlul Hadeeth” and who they are.

The  Imaams  of  the  ‘Ahlur  Rai’  are  Imaam  Sha’bi,  Ibraaheem Nakha’ee,  Auzaa’ee,  Ibn  Abi  Laila,  Shubrumah, Abu  Hanifah  and his students (rahimahumullah).

The Imaams  of  the  Ashaabul  Hadeeth  are  The  7  Fuqahaa  of Madeenah, Imaam Maalik,  Shaafi’ee, Ahmad, Sufyaan  Thauree, Ibn Mubaarak (rahimahumullah) etc.

The Importance of Taqleed:

The  Fiqh  of  the  Ahlur  Rai  was  then  codified  by  Imaam  Abu Hanifah (rahimahullah). After this there was no great Ikhtilaaf among this group.

The Ashaabul  Hadeeth  had  many  differences  in  their  Fiqh  among themselves. Several  Madhabs  originated  among  them.  With  the passage  of  time,  these  Madhabs  then  evolved  and  were incorporated  into  three.  In  this  way,  four  Madhabs  were  codified and  accepted.  These  four  Madhaahib  in  turn  encompassed  all  the Ilm  of  the  Aimmah  and  the  various  Fataawah  (Rulings)  of  the SahaabahTaqleed  of  the  four  Imaams  was  then  unanimously accepted by the ’Ijmaa of the Ummat

There is great wisdom and protection in this Taqleed

After this, Shah Saahib (rahimahullah) writes:

People  should  beware,  and  not  confuse  the  Ashaabul  Hadeeth mentioned  above  with  the  present  day  newly  emerged  sect  who  call themselves  the  Ahlul  Hadeeth.  The  Ahlul  Hadeeth  of  today  are  very much  similar  to  the  Zaahiriyyah  sect  of  the  earlier  period.  These people  are  the  Laa  Madhabiyyah  and  Ghair  Muqallideen.  They  do not  accept  the  Ijmaa’  of  the  Sahaabah  and  the  Aimmah,  nor  the Aathaar  (sayings  and  actions)  of  the  Sahaabah,  nor  do  they  accept Qiyaas  (analogical  reasoning)  as  a  Hujjat  in  Deen.  These  are  not  part of the Ashaabul Hadeeth.” 

In  another  Kitaab,  ‘Al  Aqdul  Jayyid’,  he  has  dealt  with  this  subject in  detail.

Salafiyyat – A deception: In  more  recent  times,  these  Ghair  Muqallids  have  taken  on  a  new name  i.e.  ‘Salafi’.  So  they  have  presented  the  same  old  thing  in  a new  guise.  Many  fresh  and  free  youngsters  have  fallen  into  their  trap and  the  group  suddenly  gained  a  fresh  wind  –  and,  as  with  most deviant  groups,  the  bulk  of  their  followers  are  ignorant  masses.  The common  layman  cannot  understand  the  finer  details  of  Usool Ad Deen  (the  principles  of  Deen).  Anything  presented  to  him  will  be swallowed.  This  is  because  he  cannot  judge  these  things  in  the  light of  Ilm  due  to  lack  of  it.  This  is  how  falsehood  spreads  among  the So  these  are  two  paths  in  front  of  us;  One  is  a  new  way,  invented  by ‘enlightened  mushrooms’  of  this  belated  age  –  the  other  is  an attested  path,  laid  down  by  men  who  were  oceans  of  Ilm  and mountains  of  Taqwa.  The  ‘Muqallideen’  are  the  followers  of  the Aslaaf  (pious  predecessors)  and  are  thus  the  true  “Salafis”.  The Ghair  Muqallid  crowd  are  on  a  path  of  their  own.  They  have opposed  the  Aslaaf  at  every  turn.  They  have  hijacked  the  term  Salafi in  a  most  deceptive  way  –  And  a  strange  world  it  is.

Differences in understanding Nusoos

Understanding  Qur’an  and  Hadeeth  correctly  is  not  the  work  of every  doctor,  professor  and  cabbage  farmer!  This  is  a  very  deep  and specialized  field.  There  is  no  shortcut  in  this  path.  And  it  is impossible  to  lay  claim  to  Itaa’at  (obedience)  of  Allaah  and  His Rasul (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) without following the great Aimmah of the past.

Here  is  one  example:

The differences in the method of Iqaamah: There  is  a  Hadeeth:  “Bilaal (radhiyallahu anha) was  ordered  to  say  the  Adhaan  in  two’s (evenly) and the Iqaamat in one’s (odd no.)

According  to  Imaam  Shaafi’ee  and  Ahmad (rahimahumullah),  it  means  to  say  the words  of  Iqaamat  once  each,  but  ‘Qad  Qaamatis  Salaat’  will  be  said twice. (the Takbeers will be said twice).

According to Imaam Maalik (rahimahullah) even ‘Qad Qaamah’ will be said once. 

Imaam  Abu  Haneefah  (rahimahullah) says  the  meaning  of  the  Hadeeth  is  to  say every set of words in one breath. The further Daleel (proof) is the Riwaayat  (narrations)  in  Abu  Dawood  reported  by  Abu  Mahdhoorah  who  was  appointed  as  Muadhin  in  Makkah. He  says  that Nabi (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) taught him to say the Iqaamah in 17 sentences. 

The Hanafis thus practice upon both Ahaadeeth in this way. 

The  other  thing  is  that  the  other  A’immah,  according  to  their prescribed  method  of  Iqaamah  are  not  practicing  on  the  first Hadeeth  either  because  the  Takbeer  and  Qad-Qaamah  are  both  said twice.

This is how differences in understanding Nass come about.

Some  of  the  Imaams  practice  on  ‘Asahhu  maa  fil  Baab’  the  most Saheeh  Hadeeth  in  the  chapter.  Imaam  Abu  Haneefah’s  method  is  of Tatbeeq  and  Jama’  (reconciling  Ahaadeeth  and  practicing  upon  all the  Ahaadeeth  in  question).

Our difference with the Ghair Muqallids

So  one  of  our  fundamental  differences  with  the  Ghair Muqallideen  is  that  they  do  not  accept  the  Ijmaa’  (consensus  of opinion)  of  Ummat  as  a  Hujjat  (proof).  They  are  ardent Muqallids  of  their  Ghair  Muqallid  Ulama.  For  all  the  hue  and cry  against  Taqleed,  they  are  the  most  hardline  Muqallids themselves.  All  the  fuss  is  nothing  but  a  plot  to  create  confusion among  the  Muslims  and  thus  take  them  off  their  objective  i.e. Amal  (practice)

No getting around Taqleed:

Listen!  In  all  fields  of  life,  pertaining  to  Deen  or  Dunya,  there  is  no getting  around  Taqleed.  Call  it  what  you  will,  every  person  is  a Muqallid  in  his  field.  The  question  is  whose  Taqleed  –  so  in  the matter  of  Deen,  you  will  either  have  to  follow  the  mainstream  Ahlus
Sunnah  and  the  true  Salafis  i.e.  one  of  the  four  Madhabs  or  else you  have  the  option  of  following  these  self-styled  scholars  who reject  the  Aathaar  of  Sahaabah  and  the  Ijmaa’  of  the  believers.

The Ahle Hadeeth:

One  group  claimed  to  be  Ahle  Qur’an.  This  term  is  deceptive.  They are  not  people  of  Qur’an.  We  are  the  people  of  Qur’an.  They  are  a group  who  reject  Hadeeth  and  Ijmaa’  while  claiming  to  follow Qur’aan.

Similar  is  the  case  of  the  Ahle  Hadeeth.  We  are  the  followers  of Hadeeth.  They  claim  to  accept  Qur’aan  and  Hadeeth  while  rejecting the  Aathaar  and  Ijmaa’  of  Sahaabah.  It  does  not  mean  that  they follow Hadeeth while we follow our Imaams and not Hadeeth

Go  and  have  a  look  in  the  Islamic  Libraries!  The  Imaams,  their Ustaads  and  their  students  have  authored  all  the  major  Kitaabs  on Hadeeth.  Let  the  Ghair  Muqallids  present  any  reputable  work  on Hadeeth!  The  entire  treasury  of  Hadeeth  that  is  before  the  Ummat today  is  the  fruit  of  the  toil  of  the  Muqallideen. These  fellows  then came  along  and  either  plagiarized  the  works  of  others  or  added  their unwanted  side  notes  and  useless  commentaries  on  the  great  works  of the Ulamaa

The  Ghair  Muqallid/  Salafi/  Ahle  Hadeeth  are  sects  who  accept Qur’an  and  Hadeeth  only.  They  do  not  accept  the  Ijmaa’  of  the Sahaabah  nor  the  Ijmaa’  of  the  Ahlus  Sunnah.  They  will  not  admit this  directly,  but  have  a  look  at  their  Madhab  –  it  will  shine  forth brighter than daylight.

Exactly  the  same  is  the  case  of  the  confounded  Qadiyani  sect. They  will  never  negate  the  Khatme  Nabuwwah openly.  They  say Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) is  Khaatamul  Ambiyaa –  then  they  say  Ghulaam Ahmad  is  also  a  Rasul!  So  they  invent  their  own  concept  of  Khatme Nabuwwat.  Neither  here  nor  there.  Just  like  all  the  others…  Again have  a  look  at  their  works.

The Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaa’ah:

We are the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaa’ah. Remember this!

We follow  the  path  of Prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam)  and  His  companions  –  the  way of  the  Khulafaa e rashideen.  This  encompasses  all  that  is  in  the Qur’an  and  Hadeeth  in  the  most  complete  way.  This  way  was handed  down  to  us  by  our  Imaams  who  were  the  safe  guarders  and trustees of the Ilm of Nabuwwah

We follow  the  Qur’an,  the  Rasul  and  the  path  of  the  Mu’mineen.  

“And  whoever  opposes  the  Rasul  after  the  Guidance  has  become clear  to  him,  and  follows  a  way  other  than  that  of  the Mu’mineen,  we  shall  allow  him  to  do  what  he  does  and  then  we shall  throw  him  into  hell  –  and  it  is  the  worst  abode”

_

(Surah  An Nisaa  –  115)

Refutation to the La-Madhhabi Article: “The Sufi Gaze !!!”

To deceive the masses about ‘Ulama e Deoband the spiritually barren La-Madhhabi’s never leave anything behind, In yet another article of deception posted at gift2deobandis.com where they’ve attempted to slander the scholars of Deoband and the karaamaat’s (miracles) of the pious ‘Auliya, the La-Madhhabi shaitaan has averred:
                 
(                The Sufi Gaze !!!

  Below are some powers attributed to the sufis of the Chisti Tariqah by Zakariya Khandlawee al-Deobandee al-Hanafee (Mashaikh-e-Chist, Eng.Trans. Saadiq publications)

Any person, on whom Hazrat (Nizamuddin Deen al-Umri) cast his gaze would become a Shahid-e-Shuhood immediately. (Shahid-Shuhood is a high ranking Wali those who dwell in a lofty state of Divine Presence and Perception – Translator of Mashaikh-e-Chist) (page.192, Saadiq publications)

By a gaze of Hazrat Abu Ahmad (Khawajah Abu Ahmad Abdaal Chisti), a man could be transformed into a performer of karaamat. (page.145, published Majlisul Ulama of South Africa)

Hazrat Shaykh Abdul-Haqq Quddus Gangohi cast a powerful gaze of Tawajjuh on Moulana Jalal Deen. In consequsnce, his entire treasure of knowledge was affected. (page.188, Saadiq publications)

His (Khawajah Moinud Deen Chisiti) gaze was sufficiant to transform a man into a Sahib-e-Marifat. (page.45, Saadiq publications)

Khawajah Moinud Deen Chist became ba’yt to Hazrat Uthmaan Haaruni, and by his virtue of Tawajjuh, Moinud-Deen Chishti attained perfection in sulook in a single day. (page.145, Saadiq publications)

Khawajah Moinud Deen Chisti once passed by an orchard of a hostile Shiah chief, who would kill any person who adopted the names, Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthmaan. Moinud Deen Chisti sat near the pond. The Shiah appeaerd in a furious state intending to kill Moinud Deen Chisti. But when Hazrat glanced at him, the shiah fell down. When he gained his consciousness, he was a transformed person and a staunch follower. (page.147, Saadiq publications)

Comment:

The Prophet’s ( ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ) uncle Abu Talib was within sight of the Prophet ( ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ), but he was not able to bring him to Islaam and Allaah said to him ( ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ):

“Indeed, you (Muhammad ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ) guide not whom you like, but Allaah guides whom He wills. And He knoes best those who are the guided” (Qur’aan 28:56)

Furthermore, the son of Nuh ( ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ) and the father of Ibraheem ( ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ) were within sight of these great Prophets, but they were unable to guide them.

Do the Deobandi’s believe in every tale without asking why the Prophets did not have these powers? ”          [End of the Deception])

ANSWER:

La-Madhhabi’s prove by posting such silly allegation that they are truely  morons. They’re denying the validity of karaamat of such pious servants of Allah.

The Karaamaat of the Auliya are the Haqq. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had performed thousands of Mu’jizaat.

The fact that Abu Talib did not
embrace Islam is because Allah Ta’ala had decreed kufr for him. No Tawajjuh, no Mu’jizah and no Karaamat can change Allah’s Taqdeer.

Those who were guided by the Tawajjuh of the Auliya, were such
persons for whom Allah Ta’ala had ordained Imaan and khair.

Whilst they changed certain people with Tawajjuh, their Tawajjuh could not change thousands of others for whom Hidaayat was not ordained.

To deny the karaamaat of the Auliya on the basis that Rasulullah
(Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) did not perform that same miracle, is
moronic. Auliya had even flown in the air and transformed stones into gold. This cannot be denied on the basis that Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) did not effect such specific miraculous acts.

THE VALIDITY OF KARAMAAT OF THE AULIYA IKRAAM’S

Imam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullah) on the Miracles of Saints

“It is said that after the Seal of Prophets (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam), revelation does not descend upon anyone else. Why not?? In fact it does, but then it is not called ‘revelation.’ It is what the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) referred to when he said, ‘The believer sees with the Light of God.’ When the believer looks with God’s Light, he sees all things: the first and the last, the present and the absent. For how can anything be hidden from God’s Light? And if something is hidden, then that is not the Light of God. Therefore the meaning of revelation exists, even if it is not called revelation.”
(From Fihi ma fihi)

Ibn Taymiyyah continues in the same book, Majmu’a Fatawa Ibn Taymiyya :

“What is considered as a miracle for a saint is that sometimes the saint might hear something that others do not hear or see something that others do not see, not while asleep, but in a wakened state of vision. He can know things that others cannot know, through revelation or inspiration.”

In another book, Mukhtasar al-Fatawa al-Masriyya, published by al-Madani Publishing House, 1980, page 603, he writes:

“The miracles of saints are absolutely true and correct, and acknowledged by all Muslim scholars. The Qur’an has pointed to it in different places, and the Hadith of the Prophet (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) have mentioned it, and whoever denies the miraculous power of saints are innovators or following innovators.”

Imam Ibn Taymiyya mentions in Al Majmua Fatwa Ibn Taymiyya , page 190:

“A servant of Allah, Almighty and Exalted, cannot be considered a saint unless he is a true believer. Allah mentions in Qur’an, Surat Yunus, 62-63: “Now surely, on the friends of Allah there is no fear, nor shall they grieve; those who believe and guard against evil.”

He then quotes the famous hadith from Sahih Bukhari:

“My servant draws not near to Me with anything more loved by Me than the religious duties I have enjoined upon him, and My servant continues to draw near to Me with supererogatory works so that I shall love him. When I love him I am his hearing with which he hears, his seeing with which he sees, his hand with which he strikes and his foot with which he walks. Were he to ask [something] of Me, I would surely give it to him, and were he to ask Me for refuge, I would surely grant him it. I do not hesitate about anything as much as I hesitate about [seizing] the soul of My faithful servant: he hates death and I hate hurting him.”

He explains the phrase, “Whoever comes against one of My saints is challenging Me to fight” thus: “It means that Allah is expressing: ‘I will seek revenge against anyone who comes against My saints like an aggressive lion.’” (p. 314)
He said (volume 11, page 313): “Allah Almighty will unveil to his saints states that have never been unveiled before and He will give them support without measure. If that saint begins to speak from the things of the unseen, past or present or future, it is considered from the viewpoint of Bab al- ilm al-khariq , miraculous knowledge. Anything that a saint does which is from the unseen, for people or for listeners, of healing or teaching knowledge, it is accepted and we must thank Allah for it.”

He continues quoting the Prophet’s saying about the saints: “You are the witnesses of Allah on earth.”

Which can be read: 3:18 Allah witnesses that there is no deity except Him, and [so do] the angels and those of knowledge – [that He is] maintaining [creation] in justice. There is no deity except Him, the Exalted in Might, the Wise.

KARAMAAT E AHLE HADITH!

The La-Madhhabis pick statements of the events of Karaamaats and Kashf’ of Auliya from the treatises of Ulama e Haqq and label it as the beliefs of Ulama e Deoband and make insults of the pious Auliya of this ummat, their ‘ulama have compiled many treatises against karaamats and Kashf, especially against the book Fadha’il e A’maal. They narrate the events of Auliya from our books and claim that these are the beliefs of Ulama e Deoband  and make slanderous conclusion that beliefs of both Deobandis and Ahle Shirk (Barelwi’s) are one and the same.

If they had the intention of targetting our beliefs, they should’ve bought proofs specifically from the treatises of Aqaa’id compiled by our scholars of truth where they search to find statements like for example: “Auliya had the knowledge of Ghayb (unseen)” or “Even Auliya are deemed for help”  etc etc. But in reality, they couldn’t find anything like that from our books of beliefs, so they targetted the books compiled on the events of the kashf and karaamaats of Auliyaa ikram and began objecting and accusing us that those statements contained in the stories of Auliya are the beliefs of Deobandi scholars. Now lets take a look at their own book compiled by their own scholar who are accusing us of having such aqaa’id’s (beliefs)

Usually one could observe from the articles, lectures of the La-Madhhabi Jahils that they always make the treatises of others as their primary targets for slandering and thereby, deceiving laypersons by mis-representing the views of Ulama e Haqq but they themselves don’t bother to have a look at their own book written by their La-Madhhabi scholars, till today we have never viewed any such posts from La-Madhhabi blogs like gift2deobandis.com or Tawhidmovement.com etc etc extracting statements from the treatises containing the episodes of the kashf and Karaamaat of their own scholars of Ahle Hadith and thereby criticizing or insulting by presenting them as being the “Aqaai’d” of their own scholars, This exposes their double standards and cheap tactics to deceive the masses. They serve criticism for other scholars while hiding their own treatises compiled by their own scholars about the same events of Sufi Gaze and so on! If they’re not deceivers then we don’t know who they are!

In this piece of truth, we’ll discuss about one such book which the deceivers from the Ahle Hadith hide it from all of us.

A book which goes by the name “Karaamat e Ahle Hadith” whose editor is Maulana Abdul Majeed Sohdrawi, It is mentioned in the book named Fatawa Ulama e Hadees that: “Maulana Abdul Majeed was a great and respected scholar, a muqarrir and one of the most highly regarded amongst the Ahle Hadith sect. He dedicated his lifetime in service to Jamaat e Ahle Hadith. He compiled several treatises and he himself was the editor of those treatises, His book titled “Raahe Kaamil” is one of his best works and his love for the Prophet can be observed in it. He passed away in 1379 A.H” (Fatawa Ulama e Hadith, Volume 5, Page 79, scan below)

image

The Compilator of this book is a scholar of Ahle Hadith sect named Maulana Idrees Faruqi. Maulana Faruqi writes in Page 28 of the book karaamat e Ahle Hadith:

The occurence of Karaamaat through the means of Ghair e Ambiya is Haqq. Rejecting that is incorrect because this concept (of Karaamaat and Kashf) has been proved through the Qur’an and Ahadith” He says further, “presenting false kinds of karaamats and recording it in books or narrating it from the pulpit is incorrect. Instead of earning any good ot becomes a source of deviancy, beliefs of the people gets corrupted, Nabawi mission gets effected, then he cries avout the muqallideens and says: “Our Taqleedi brothers sometimes go against Qur’an and Hadith in an attempt to state fabricated karaamaats”

image

On page No. 29, He states: The main discussion in this book is those of karaamaats. Karaamaats defines sainthood and ‘azmat. Whenever Allah ta’ala wishes to increase the status of his beloved slaves (the Auliyaas), He blesses them with them with manifestations of Karaamaats. But before this, one has to remember certain points, Then he states 10 points regarding true karaamaats and fabricated or fake karaamaats, In point no. 8 he says: Just like narrating fabricated Hadiths, False narrations, fake dreams are sins, similarily, Narrating false and fabricating karaamaats too are sinful. After stating the 10 points he avers regarding the present-day deceivers who fool people with false karaamaats:

“Nowadays, people never recognize between karaamaat (miracles and supernatural occurences through people of Taqwa blessed by Allah Ta’ala) and Istedraaj (Occurrence of miracle through magicians deceivers done by the help of Devils) and whomever they wish, they take them as a wali of Allah and they accept anything as true karaamat. (Karaamaat e Ahle Hadith, Page 29-30)

image

Atlast he declares: So people with deficency in knowledge and out of Jihaalat (ignorance) have made it famous that Ahle Hadith sect neither consists of any saints nor nor any Saahib e karaamat, such people should remove their view of ignorance and go through this book with open heart and decide for themselves as to how much sincerity is left in their claim (that there are no people of karaamaat in Ahle Hadith sect, original scan below)

image

With these statements of Maulana Muhammad Idrees Saheb, we understand that fabricated karaamaats or narrating karaamaat which goes against Qur’an wa Hadith is sinful, neither such karaamaats will be written down in this book (i.e Karaamaat e Ahle Hadith) nor will be narrated in pulpits of Masaajids, narrating fake karaamaats are prohibited.
So this again confirms that Maulana Idrees Sahab has never written down any reports of false karaamaats which goes against Qur’an wa Hadith in his book. So, the Karaamaats mentioned in this book are true and all in all exclusively related to the karaamaats of the shaykhs of Ahle Hadith sect!

Now let’s relate a couple of  “Sufi Gaze” type of karaamaats narrated from the book of their own scholars to those who giggle at the same karaamaat mentioned in our books:

JUST ONE GAZE TRANSFORMED A DRUG-ADDICT BEGGAR INTO AN AALIM AND SUFI!

Once a Drunkard, Drug Addict beggar approached Maulana Abdur Rahman Sahab. This beggar was clean shaved, had lengthy moustache, his face was against the Sunnah, he used to sing and beg from the Maulana. Maulana Saheb instructed one of his shagird (student) to offer 1 paisa to the beggar, the beggar said: “Maulana, what can be afforded from in 1 Paisa?? Give me some more, neither i could get bhaang nor Charaas” (Wine-like stuff and charaas is a type of drugs)

Maulana Saheb asked: “You need something more??” And just when Maulana’s sight met the sight of the beggar, he started to shiver and fell down. And he fell down in such a way that he lost his consciousness, the students proceeded to grab hold of him , he was unconscious like as if he is dead.

After 3 hours he gained his consciousness. Maulana asked him, “what do you need??” The beggar replied: “I’ve already taken whatever i needed, now just convert me to Islam” Maulana called for a barber and shaved the beggar’s lengthy moustache. He repented from his drinking habits and taking drugs and started to study with the Maulana. Later he became an ‘Aalim Sufi and served Maulana Saheb for 18 years. (Karamat e Ahle Hadith, Page: 61-63) scan:-

image

A Sikh Woman converts to Islam :

Muhammad Umar narrates that Molana Gulam Rasool was on his way to home after the morning prayers, Even I accompanied him, On the way, a Sikh Woman was reciting “Waahe guru, Waahe Guru” as she was walking by, Maulana said to her, “Not Waahe Guru but recite “WAHDAHU”, and it is the truth, By the Will of Allah, she began to recite “Wahdahu, Wahdahu”, this words began to flow from her in such a way that even after a thousands of attempts to stop it , she failed, atlast she converted to Islam” (Karamat e Ahle Hadees, Page : 75) Scan:-

image

CONCLUSION

If the same kind of incidents are quoted in our books, the answer and clarification for it is as the same as what the author of this very book Karaamaat e Ahle Hadith has given for such incidents of Pious people (which i quoted above), we accept that such incidents are related to Kashf and Ilhaam and Karamaat of the saints  . But these la-Madhhabi’s who do taqleed of blogs like gift2deobandis.com or people like Meraj Rabbani ,who have gone so astray that they deny true karaamaats which, in reality is Haqq according to their own  book! 

Indeed, these people are imitators of the Jews, while the Jews had doubts on their own Prophets and they killed them,the La-Madhabi’s have doubts upon the miracles of the Auliya’s of Islam! And they keep bashing our scholars without  Haqq.

Had this events been narrated by any scholar of Deoband, then these la-Madhhabi sect bloggers (a.k.a deceivers) would’ve made a big fuss of it with the intent of deceiving laypersons as they have made an attempt with the statements of the book Mashaaikh e chist.

May Allah Ta’ala save all of us from the lies and deceptions of such people and their misleading sects . Aameen!

Did Haji Imdadullah Al-Makki (rahimahullah) Create a “Deobandi Recipe On How To Become Allah”??

QUESTION: Some Salafi websites are accusing Hadhrat Haji Imdaadullah Muhaajir Makki (rahmatullah alayh) of shirk. They say that Haji Imdadullah advised his mureeds of a ‘recipe to become Allah” – Nauthubillah. Levelling their accusation, they say:

“And what these (deobandis) interested in? To make Allah!!! He, Imdaadullah says: And after this he should be engrossed in Dhikr “Hoo Hoo” so much so that the one doing Dhikr becomes the Mazkoor i.e. Allah himself.” (End of verbatim translation of the Salafi atrocity of stupidity).

Please explain this conundrum.

ANSWER: Let us momentarily forget what Hadhrat Haji Imdadullah (rahmatullah alayh) wrote in his kitaab, kulliyat e imdadia. Let us see what Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) himself said about the Thaakir (the one who makes thikr) and Mathkoor (the One whose thikr is made, i.e. Allah Azza Wa Jal).

The concept of the Thaakir ‘becoming Mathkoor’, is fully within the confines of the Qur’aan and Sunnah. It is endorsed in the following Hadith-e-Qudsi.

Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), reporting a Hadith Qudsi, said that Allah Ta’ala said:

“Whoever bears animosity for My Wali, verily, I issue to him an ultimatum of war. There is nothing more beloved to Me for a servant gaining My proximity than that which I have made obligatory on him. The servant incrementally gains My proximity with Nawaafil until I love him. Then when I love him, I become his ears with which he hears; his eyes with which he sees; his hands with which he touches, and his feet with which he walks.” (Bukhaari)

In another narration, reported by Abdul Waahid, it also appears: “And (I become) his heart with which he thinks and his tongue with which he speaks.”

Another Hadith also affirming the correctness of the Sufiya’s concept is the following Hadith:
Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “Verily, on the Day of Qiyaamah Allah Ta’ala will say to a man: ‘O son of Aadam! I was sick, but you did not visit Me.’ The man will say: ‘O my Rabb! How could I visit you whilst you are Rabbul Aalameen?’ Allah Ta’ala will say:

‘Don’t you know that My certain friend was sick and you did not visit him? Don’t you know that if you had visited him, you would have found Me by him?’

‘O son of Aadam! I asked food from you, but you did not feed Me.’ The man will say: ‘O my Rabb! How can I feed You whilst You are Rabbul Aalameen?’ Allah Ta’ala will say: ‘Did you not know that a certain friend of Mine had asked you for food, but you did not feed him? Did you not know that if you had fed him, you would have found Me by him?’

‘O son of Aadam! I had asked you for water to drink, but you did not give it to Me.’ The man will say: ‘O my Rabb! How can I give You water to drink when You are Rabbul Aalameen?’ Allah Ta’ala will say: ‘A certain friend of Mine asked you for water, but you did not give it to him. If you had given him water to drink, you would have found that by Me.” (Muslim)

Similarly, as Hadhrat Thaanvi (rahimahullah) has elucidated, in the second Hadith (above) Allah Ta’ala explicitly states that He becomes the ears, eyes, heart, hands and feet of His devotee, and that it is He who is doing all the actions emanating from His devotee. Despite this unification expressed in the Hadith, there is no real or actual unification or hulool of Allah Ta’ala into the person or into any of His creation. The extreme and lofty level of Divine Proximity which the devotee is bestowed with by virtue of his love and obedience for Allah Ta’ala, is in fact the meaning of Hajji Imdaadullah’s (rahimahullah) statement which the moron Salafis fail to understand due to their spiritual barrenness and moral depravity. It means nothing else other than to signify obliviousness of self and permeation with Allah’s Remembrance. The true thaakir becomes an embodiment of Divine Remembrance, and that is all what Haaji Imdaadullah’s (rahmatullah alayh) statement means, but which morons and deviates distort and kick up a lot of stinking dust. It does not refer to the kufr concept of hulool or incarnation or of Allah’s pervasion in insaan or in any aspect of His creation.

Likewise, in the third Hadith, Allah Ta’ala attributes the devotee’s sickness to Himself, saying that He was sick, and He was hungry and He was thirsty. Any Muslim in possession of some brains not deranged by stupidity and Salafi deviation, will understand that these are metaphorical expressions denoting the lofty state of Divine Proximity (Qurb-e-Ilaahi) and Divine Acceptance (Maqbooliyat) which the devotee enjoys. It is this metaphorical ‘unity’ which is termed Wahdatul Wujood of the Sufiya-e-Kiraam, which the spiritually barren baboons of crass materialism have interpreted to mean divine hulool/incarnation/pervasion, but such conception of kufr did not dawn in the pure Souls of the Auliya of Allah Azza Wa Jal.

It is a technical term having a methaphorical connotation. Never did the Sufiya intend thereby hulool ( i.e. the pervasion/incarnation of Allah Ta’ala physically into the being of the devotee) Nauthubillaah!

Now the deviate moron Salafis are free to accuse Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) of having uttered ‘shirk’ since he ‘equated’ Allah Ta’ala with created man. He said that Allah Ta’ala becomes the heart, mind, eyes, ears and limbs of created man. In otherwords, man has become Allah – Nauthubillaah! But in terms of Salafi moronic logic, this is the logical conclusion of applying literal connotations to figurative expressions.

The thaakir becoming Mathkoor is a figurative expression to convey total absorption in Divine Remembrance resulting in the state of self-obliviousness. It means nothing else.

By Maulana Ahmad Sadiq Desai D.B

Did Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi rahimahullah ‘Insult’ any Qur’anic Verse?? Let’s Answer the Liar

Do the Deobandi Ulama Approve of Such Disrespect of the Qur’an that Which the Ghair-Muqallid Jaahil of gift2Deobandis.com alleges??

[PROCLAMATION OF “INSULT”]

Flaunting his  moronic ignorance, the buffoon utters the following notoriety against Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi (Rahimahullah) in his blog over here

He asks:

I ask my brothers and sisters that adhere to this book (Behishti Zewar) to please help me increase my knowledge for the sake of Allaah and tell me if its alright to tie quranic aayah on thighs of women. Allah has given us thighs that is very very near the private parts. Is there Any Quranic aayah, any sahi hadeeth or any saying of Imam Abu Hanifa rahimahullah to justify this? This book is supposed to be one of the top books on hanafi fiqh according to deobandis

The Jaahil is not the first deceiver to proclaim Hadhrat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi (rahmatullah alayh) as an ‘insulter’. Whilst the Qabar Pujaaris (Grave Worshippers) label Hadhrat an ‘insulter’ for his strident criticism of their grave-worshipping stunts and other bid’ah activities, The Munkar e Fiqah of the moronic ilk clutch at the straw of this one single Ta’weez prescription mentioned in A’maal-e-Qur’aani. Besides the jaahil’sfatwa of Insulter’ being hilariously stupid, it displays his appalling ignorance of the Shariah.

Before proclaiming Hadhrat Thanvi (rahmatullah alayh) an ‘insulter of Qur’anic verses’ on the stupid basis of the misconception of the Ta’weez around the thigh being an act of insult, the accuser should supposed to have checked the kutub of the Shariah to ascertain what the other primary Imaams, viz.

Shaikh Ibn Taimiyyah, and Hadhrat Imaam Ahmad Bin Hanbal (rahmatullah alayh), and the many other authorities of the Shariah have to say on the type of Ta’weez which constitutes the basis for the moron’s ‘fatwa’ of jahaalat – his ‘fatwa of insulter’ against Hakimul Ummat Hadhrat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi (rahmatullah alayh). Let us first, with Shaikh Ibn Taimiyyah’s fatwa, dispel the moronic-haze which shrouds the brains of the Jaahil.

In his Majmu’ Fataawa, Vol. 19, page 63, Shaikh Ibn Taimiyyah states:

“It is permissible to write from Kitaabullah (the Qur’aan Majeed) and His Thikr with permissible ink something for the benefit of one stricken (with a problem) and for sick persons, and to wash (what has been written from the Qur’aan) and to give it to them (the stricken and the sick) to drink as Imaam Ahmad and others have explicitly said.

Abdullah, the son of (Imaam) Ahmad said: ‘I recited to my father (Imaam Ahmad) —the chain of the Hadith – that Ibn Abbaas (radhiyallahu anhu) said: ‘When birth pangs become difficult for a woman, then write:

(The relevant Qur’aanic verses)

My father (Imaam Ahmad) said: ‘Aswad Bin Aamir narrated with his Chain of Narration similarly, and he said: ‘It should be written in a clean basin and given to drink.’ My father (Imaam Ahmad) said:

Waqee’ added: ‘It should be given to her to drink and (the balance of the water) should be sprinkled (on the area) below her navel.’

Abdullah (Imaam Ahmad’s son) said: ‘I saw my father write (these Qur’aanic verses and the other athkaar) on a clean basin for a woman (in labour).”

Whilst Hadhrat Maulana Thanvi (rahmatullah alayh) prescribed a Ta’weez sewn securely in a cloth to be tied around the thigh of the lady suffering birth pangs, the Sahaabah, Taabi-een, Tab-e-Taabieen, Imaam Ahmad Bin Hanbal (rahmatullah alayh), Shaikh Ibn Taimiyyah (rahimahullah) and all the Fuqaha and Auliya of Islam prescribed water on which Qur’aanic verses are recited to be sprinkled on the genital organ of the woman.

Now whose so-called ‘insult’ is greater?? The ‘insult’ of Hadhrat Thaanvi or the ‘insult’ of the galaxy of illustrious personalities mentioned above?? What is ‘worse’ – the thigh or the genital organ?? Whilst Hadhrat Thanvi’s Ta’weez containing the mubaarak Qur’aanic verse is applied to only the thigh, the water on which the mubaarak verses are recited are applied to both the thigh and the genital organ in terms of the prescription of the illustrious personalities mentioned above.

In the book, Amalul Yaum wal-Lailah, page 188 appears the following narration:

“Ibn Abbaas narrated from Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wasallam): ‘When labour becomes difficult for a woman, then the verses… (of the Qur’aan)…………………… Should be written on a clean basin. Then it should be washed and given to the woman to drink, and it (the water) should be sprinkled on her stomach and her genital organ (farj).”

Will the jaahil Ghair Muqallid now apply his fatwa of ‘insult’ to even Hadhrat Ibn Abbaas (radhiyallahu anhu) and to even Rasulullah (salallahu alayhi wasallam)?? There is the need for the moron to proclaim all of the Salaf-e-Saaliheen ‘Insulters’ before even the slightest attention could be afforded to his branding of Hadhrat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi (rahmatullah alayh). His argument is bereft of even an iota of Shar’i substance.

Hadhrat Thanvi’s Beheshti Zewar is indispensable for laymen. It is the ‘Scholar’ which resides or should reside in the home of every follower of the Hanafi Math-hab. A’maal-e-Qur’aani is an extremely beneficial kitaab. Every prescription in this kitaab is fully in accord with the Shariah regardless of how much the jaahil and the deviant Ghair-Muqallideens howl and disgorge their epithets of insult.

[By Maulana Ahmad Sadeq Desai (Emphasis is mine)]