Category Archives: Shia/Raafidhi


By Jamiatul Ulama Gauteng

There is one easy way of determining the authenticity of any sect that claims to be Muslim, and this is by investigating their origin and the legal structure of their religion.

Basis of Islam & Basis of Shi’ism

* Started with the advent of Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam in 570 AC.

* It caught on primarily amongst the Arabs who were tutored well by Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam, and who then took the flag of Islam to all corners of the world.

* The  life  and  achievements of Rasulullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam and the Sahabah are well-documented as far as the planting and spreading of Islam is concerned.

* Started with the false accepting of Islam by Abdullah ibn Saba,   an erudite Jewish scholar, sometime during the latter part of Sayyadina ‘Uthman Radiallahu Anhu’s Caliphate.

It was meant to weaken Islam from within as the Jews, up to that stage, had failed to defeat the Muslims militarily.

* It caught on primarily amongst the new Persian and Egyptian converts who were not well-grounded in faith. They all contributed towards the anarchy in the Muslim world and imported all their foreign ideas into it.

* The role of ibn Saba and his devoted band of instigators like Malik al-Ashtar is well documented as far as their role in creating political turmoil, disunity and religious discord in Islam, even by Shi’ah scholars themselves!

* The first primary source is the present complete Qur’an which we have before us.  It will be safeguarded from distortion until the Last Day.

* Muslims believe  it  to  be  a  perfect source of guidance, whose authority can never be cancelled or overridden.

* The first primary source is the Qur’an which is fabricated and incomplete.

* Besides the Qur’an, there are various other scriptures like the Mushaf-e-Fatimi and the white and red Jifr (leather containers) which are not in our midst, but with the fictitious “hidden” Imam in the cave.

* The understanding and interpretation of  the  Qur’an  follows strict principles known as ‘Ulum al- Qur’an. Anyone can learn these principles and understand Allah’s Word. There is no clergy in Islam.

* The Qur’an has an “inner” dimension which only the Imams or their representatives know, or are in a position to interpret. There is a privileged clergy class to perform this function.

*The understanding and interpretation of  the  Qur’an  follows strict principles known as ‘Ulum al- Qur’an. Anyone can learn these principles and understand Allah’s Word. There is no clergy in Islam. * The Qur’an has an “inner” dimension which only the Imams or their representatives know, or are in a position to interpret. There is a privileged clergy class to perform this function.

* The second primary source is the Ahadith (Sayings of Rasulullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam.

* These  sayings are  accepted on  the authority of all 124 000 Companions, as Muslims believe “As-Sahabatu Kulluhum ‘Adul (All the Sahabah are Just)”.

* Eminent traditionists like Imam al- Bukhari and Muslim  sifted  through the entire corpus of hadith as well as those who narrated them, and presented many thousands of authentic ahadith which can be safely relied on till today. There was a dire need  for  this  copious recording and sifting process because many ahadith were being fabricated.

* The second primary source is the sayings of  some  of  the  Ahlul  Bait  only,  or  their narrations from Rasulullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam.

* Shi’ahs reject all the Noble wives, all the daughters of Rasulullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam besides Fatimah, and the Hassanid line of Sayyids. They favour the Huseinid line as he married Sherbano, the daughter of the last Persian Monarch, Yezdgird, and only the children from this lineage who have Persian blood qualify to be the Imam. It’s a doctrine of racial supremacy and pride alien to Islam.

* Besides 3-4 Sahabah like Sayyadina Salman al-Farsi Radiallahu Anhu and Miqdad bin Aswad Radiallahu Anhu they regard all others as renegades and do not accept their narrations from Rasulullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam

* The chief narrators of Shi’ah ahadith are all known  as  liars,  devious  and  innovators. Even Shi’ite scholars regard them as unreliable. These include Zuraarah the Liar (upon which half of Shi’ah narrations depend), Abu Busair the Drunkard, Abu Mikhnaf  and  Abdullah  ibn  Abi  Ya’fur  of Kufah who falsely attributed many lies and shameless sayings to Imam Baqir, Imam Musa Kazim and Ja’far as-Sadiq.

* The third source of Islam is the Ijma (Consensus) of the Sahabah.

* The third source is the sayings and directions of the 12 Infallible Imams, whose words are regarded as binding and divine.

* Muslims believe that the Sunnah of the Khulafa al-Rashidun and the Consensus of the Sahabah are binding on this ummat and constitute a source of law.* The lives, actions, words of the Sahabah and the Khulafa al-Rashidun have no weight in this regard.
*In  the  absence of  the  Imams,  the Ayatollahs and Shi’ah Mullahs act as their “representative.” They have wide-ranging powers of legislation, based mostly on “inspiration,” which is nothing but devilish whispers.

* The fourth source is Qiyas (Systematic Analogical Deduction) in the absence of the above three sources.

* The Imams of the four recognized Mazahib used this principle based on a methodology gleaned from the Qur’an, Sunnah and the Sahabah. Imaam Abu Hanifa states: ‘I follow the book of Allah and if I find no solution there, I follow the Sunnah of Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam. If I find no solution in either the Qur’aan or the Sunnah, I follow whichever of the pronouncements of the Sahabah I prefer and leave whichever I wish. If there is a pronouncement on a particular matter by any of the Sahabah, I  would not adopt any other opinion made by any other Scholar. But if I found a solution only in the opinions of Ibrahim, al Sha’bi, Ibn Sirin, Hasan al Basri, Ata or Sa’di ibn al Musayyab, I would make Ijtihad just as they did.” (Tarikh Baghdad Vol. 31, p 368)

* Included  in  this  are  various  other fiqhi devices like Masalih al-Mursalah (expediency), urf (customary law) etc.

* Shi’ahs do not accept this fourth category, as the word of the “Infallible” Imam is sufficient.

* There is no systematic methodology in Shi’ah fiqh, called Ja’fari Fiqh, and nor can it be called a Mazhab.

* Shi’ahs believe that the Ja’fari Fiqh is not developed via Shar’i legal sources, but wholly attributed to an Imam who is equal to the Qur’an and can make Haraam-Halaal and Halaal-Haraam. They believe that this Imam is divinely appointed, nominated and does not  need the Qur’an or  the Sunnat, and is above the law. Ironically, this “Imam” as well as his teachings and correct Qur’an, are all missing, leaving a void for any Tom, Dick and Harry to opine in Islam according to their whim!

* There  is  a  vast  difference  between  an Imam of Fiqh who is not ma’sum (innocent) and can make ijtihadi errors,  to an Imam of the Ja’fari Fiqh  who is  ma’sum (innocent) and receives revelation.

* Ja’fari fiqh is not an acceptable “fifth” Mazhab amongst Muslims as it’s not a fiqh at all!

Shi’ahs account for approximately 15 percent of the total Muslim population. It has the greatest influence presently in Iran where nearly 90 percent of its people are disbelieving Shi’ites, but they are also the majority in Iraq, Bahrain, and Yemen.



By Mujlisul Ulama


Whether it is Yahudi kufr, Nasaara kufr, Hindu kufr, Chinese kufr, Buddhist kufr, white kufr, brown kufr, yellow kufr, black kufr or SHIAH kufr, it – all kufr – is a single satanic breed. All kufr is the antithesis of Imaan, and all kuffaar cherish an inveterate hatred for Islam and Muslims.

The most virulent variety of kufr is SHIAH kufr. Relative to the kufr of all its shaitaani siblings, Shiah kufr is of the worst kind. Compared to Shiah kufr, all other forms of kufr are of peripheral import. The virulence and venom which Shi’ism excretes for the illustrious Sahaabah – venom which is in reality intended for Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) – are not the features of any other brand of kufr.

The fundamental doctrines of the Shiah religion are:

(1) Hatred for the Sahaabah. It is their belief that barring a handful (about half a dozen), the entire Jama’ah of Sahaabah (124,000) had reneged from Islam after the demise of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).

From among the vast Assembly of Sahaabah, the Shiahs have selected Hadhrat Abu Bakr, Hadhrat Umar, Hadhrat Uthmaan and Hadhrat Aishah (Radhiyallahu anhum) as special targets for the worst kind of vilification and abuse.

(2) The Qur’aan which the entire Muslim Ummah reveres and accepts as the Kalaam of Allah Ta’ala, is denied by Shiahs. They believe that the Qur’aan which we have is a fabrication of the Sahaabah. Never be deluded by any contrary claims made by present-day Shiahs, neo-Shiahs, and pro-Shiahs who masquerade as Muslims. These are all agents of Iblees who peddle the satanic political agenda of the Khomeini Iranian regime.

(3) Shiah Imaams: Shiahs believe in the superiority over the Ambiya of their hallucinority sinless imaams whom they believe were the recipients of Wahi via the agency of Jibraeel (Alayhis salaam) in the same way as Wahi was sent to the Ambiya by Allah Ta’ala.

(4) Taqiyah or Holy Hypocrisy is of paramount importance in the doctrinal system of Shi’ism. This belief requires the proclamation of blatant lies, viz. Concealment of beliefs from Muslims to mislead and delude, and to entrap ignorant Muslims in the tentacles of Shi’ism. Thus, on the basis of Taqiyah, Shiahs will vociferously proclaim that they too accept our Qur’aan; that they do not revile the Sahaabah, etc. But all such claims are satanic LIES which their confounded doctrine of Taqiyah constrains. Their books of theology – of all Shiah priests – unequivocally declare the true, stinking, corrupt beliefs of Shiah kufr.

Besides these few beliefs, there are more doctrines of virulent kufr and practices which engender absolute revulsion in people of sane intellect.


The one and only way of combating and neutralizing kufr is by means of Ta’leem. Satanic kufr is the product of gross jahaalat (ignorance). The cure for ignorance is education. It devolves in general on intelligent Muslims and in particular on the Ulama, to embark on programmes of educating ignorant Muslim and in particular our children about the religion of the Shiahs. This department of Amr Bil Ma’roof Nahyi Anil Munkarhas been grossly neglected by the Ulama in general. Without education, there is no way of combating the ugly influences of Shi’ism which operates by conspiracy and by capitalizing on Muslim ignorance, and by dangling the bait of Iranian money in front of such juhala Muslims who are suffering with poverty.


One of the most dangerous threats to Imaan is the deceptive shaitaani call of Shiah-Sunni Unity. There can never be such unity. The chasm between kufr and Imaan, especially Shiah kufr, is unbridgeable.

Muslims should also refrain from becoming enmeshed in debates with Shiahs. Such debates are destructive. Shiahs have their holy-hypocrisy doctrine of Taqiyah which is their potent weapon used for upsetting the apple cart of Truth. Since the ignorant public is satanically ignorant of Shiah LIES based on Taqiyah, they are swayed by deception to fall into the trap of LIES and FALSEHOOD proclaimed by the Shiahs.

The Ulama should suffice with intelligent rebuttals and with programmes of education to educate Muslims, especially the children of the Ummah. Ultimately, Hidaayat (the guidance of Imaan) is Allah’s prerogative. The Qur’aan Majeed repeatedly states that “Allah guides whomever He wills, and misleads whomever He wills.” Our obligation is to only deliver the Message of Truth.

Turbah or Mohr

Shiites prostrate on a small block of earth, called a Turbah, which is usually made from clay from the grave of Hussein Ibn Ali in Karbala – Iraq.

Shiites claim that prostration must only be performed on pure earth or what grows on it, provided that it is not eaten or worn. This includes dust, stone, sand and grass, provided that it is not a mineral. Prostration on paper is permitted, because it is made of a material which grows on earth, but not cloth or carpets.

They present no evidence from Quran or hadeeth to backup this edict and none has the right to legalize or prohibit except with evidence.

The Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) lived a simple and cheap life and praying on the earth and mat was certainly his tradition and those around him but he never prohibited praying on any other substances like rich carpets.

• Narrated Abu Sa’id al-Khudri: I saw Allah’s Apostle (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) prostrating in mud and water and saw the mark of mud on his forehead.
[Al-Bukhari, (Eng), vol. 1, book 12, no. 798; vol. 3, book 33, no. 244]

• Narrated Anas bin Malik: We used to pray with the Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) in scorching heat, and if someone of us could not put his face on the earth then he would spread his clothes and prostrate over them.
[Al-Bukhari, (Engl), vol. 2, book 22, no. 299]

Shiites always present the above hadeeths to backup their innovated ideologies. But the hadeeths have nothing to do with turbah or mohr. Do the Shiites expect the prophet to pray on rich carpets which never existed in his lifetime.

If they really seek the customs of the prophet then the hadeeth is clear. Let them also pray on wide spread clothes or on bare land without carpets.
Another hadeeth they present to establish their misleading innovations

• Narrated Maymuna: Allah’s Apostle (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) used to pray on a Khumra.
[Al-Bukhari, (Eng), vol. 1, book 8, no. 378]

Al-Khumra is totally different from turbah.

Khumra is a small mat sufficient just for the face and the hands while prostrating during prayers. While turbah is a block basically made from the soil of Hussein’s (radhiyallahu anhu) grave at karbala sufficient for only the forehead.

Shiites claim that Ibn al-Athir a renowned famous sunni scholar in his Jamil al Usul legalized the use of turbah which is a total lie. The scholar legalized khumra mat not turbah.
[Ibn al-‘Athir, Jami’ al-Usul, (Cairo, 1969), vol. 5, p. 467]

If the Shiites really seek the revival of the prophet’s customs, let them use Alkhumra not turbah because they are two different things.

We’re obliged to adhere to the Prophet’s (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) customs not innovations.
Even Imaam Jaafar ( ﺭﺣﻤﻪ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ) whom the Shiites claim to be the source of their fiqh school never at any moment in his lifetime did he use turbah during prayers.

The Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), his households (ahlul bayt) and the entire Muslim community of companions none ever used turbah for prostration in prayer.

I repeat; “The Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), Ali, Fatima, Hassan and Hussein (radhiyahhlahu alayhim ajma’een) none of them prostrated on Turbah blocks”

History of the Shia beliefs about the Qur’an

Enquiry: Who amongst the scholars of the Shi’ite first proclaimed that the Qur’an was Incomplete, superfluous and distorted?

Response: It was their sheikh Hisham bin Al-Hakam (d. 190), who proclaimed exaggeration.(1) He claimed that the Qur’an was written during the era of the third rightly guided Khalifah, Uthman bin Affaan (Allah be pleased with him), and that the real Qur’an was taken up to the heavens when the companions became apostate, according to him”.(2)

The first of the Shi’ite books in which they claim incompleteness and excesses of the Qur’an Shareef

It was written by their scholar Sulaim bin Qais Al-Hilaali (d. 90). Al-Hajjaaj wanted to kill him, but he succeeded in escaping to Abbaan bin Abi ‘Ayyaash”.(3) And when Sulaim was on his death bed, he handed this book to Abu Ayyaash who later reported the book. No other person reported the book apart from him. (4)

It is the very first book to emanate for the Shiites (5), and is one of their original sources. It is also one of the oldest books written in Islam.

In fact, there is not a single controversy between the scholars of Shiites that:

 “The book of Sulaim is one of their greatest fundamental books, which has been narrated by scholars and people bearing the traditions of Rasulullah’s Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam family and that it is also the earliest of their books. That everything contained in it are sayings of Rasulullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam and Ali Radiallahu Anhu. That Abu Abdullah As-Saadiq (Allah be pleased with him) said: “Anyone from our Shiites and lovers who does not have with him the book of Sulaim bin Qais Al-Hilaali has nothing of our matter and he knows nothing concerning our cause. The book is the backbone of the Shiites and a secret amongst the secrets of the family of Muhammad Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam.” (7)

According to Al-Kashshi, Abbaan read the book to Ali bin Al-Husein (Allah be pleased with him) and he said: “Sulaim is correct, may Allah have mercy on him. This is a narration we know”.(8)

Inconsistencies in the Book of Sulaim and Ascribing of Partners to Allah Ta’ala

This book contains the fundamental belief of the sab’a Shiites scholars which deify Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) to have qualities which are exclusive to Allah Ta’ala:

It has in it, that whenever the Shiite scholars called upon Ali, they attribute Names of Allah to him such as “The First, The Last, The Open, The Hidden, The One Who knows everything”. These are in some editions of the book of Sulaim.

It is narrated therein, in their usual fabricating manner, that:

Ali, the leader of the believers, in company of Abubakar, Umar and a group of Ansar and Muhaajiroon (Radiallahu Anhum), stepped out one morning to a place in Baqee’ and stood on a solid portion of the earth. As the sun rose, he said: ‘Peace be upon you, o you new and obedient creature of Allah.’  They overheard a loud voice from the sky saying in response: ‘And Peace be unto you, O The First, The Last, The Open, The Hidden, and The One Who knows everything.’ When Abubakr, Umar, the Ansar and Muhaajiroon (Radiallahu Anhum) heard this, they fainted. They regained consciousness hours later (or after a long period of time) and Ali had already left the place. They came to the Rasulullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam and said: ‘You tell us that Ali is human like us, but he has been addressed by the sun just as Allah addressed Himself. ‘”  (9)

This belief has held sway in their most fundamental books and sources.

They also have another fabrication in which Allah said regarding Ali (Allah be pleased with him): “O Muhammad! Ali is The First, The Last, The Open, The Hidden, The One Who knows everything”. He replied: “O My Lord! Isn’t that You?” (11)

This was exactly what Abdulhusein Al-’Aamili, openly proclaimed in his words:

O Abu Hasan! You are the Eye of Allah

And the Eye of His Most High Ability

You encompass Knowledge of the hidden

Not even the most hidden can be hidden from you

And you are the …. of all that exist

And the reason for its remaining existence

To you belong all matters, as you save

Or punish at your own will (12)

Another poet of theirs also said concerning Ali (May Allah be pleased with him):

In him are gathered all attributes of the Lord

And only for a secret and wisdom did they gather (in him)(13)

A Mortal Blow for Shiite Scholars:

On reading through the book of Sulaim, scholars of the Twelver Shiites discovered an issue of very great importance that could put their acclaimed beliefs in shambles. The danger they discovered is that the book of Sulaim put the number of their Imams at thirteen. This continues to hunt down the foundation of the Twelver Shiites.

Source: Enquiries into Shi’ism


(1) See: Mu’jam Rijaal Al-Hadeeth vol. 20 p. 328 Discussion 3 (13361: Hishaam bin

Saalim) by Al-Khauni.

(2) At-Tanbeeh wa Ar-Radd pp. 25-26 by Al-Malti; Wasf Shuyookh Al-Shee’ah Hishaam bin Al-Hakam bi annahu ‘thiqah fee Ar-Riwaayaat, Hasan At-Tahqeeq’ jawaabaat Ahl Al-Mousil by Al-Mufeed, p. 45 footnote No. 5. The reason for this fabrication was that the Qur’an never mentioned their Imams and Hishaam was the first to mention Imamate. Shiite scholars said regarding Hishaam:”He opened discussion about the Imamate and also rectified the thought of Shiites. Among his books is ‘The Imamate’. Al-Fahrasat vol.1 p. 170 (The second Art from the Fifth Article in Al-Fahrasat on Information about scholars and names of books they wrote) by Muhammad bin Ishaaq An-Nadeem (d. 380)

(3) He is Abbaan bin Abi “Ayyaash Fairooz Abu Ismaa’eel (d. 138). Al-Hasan bin Ali Al-Hulli (d. 726) said that Abbaan bin Abi Ayyaash is weak narrator. It was said he fabri- cated the book of Sulaim bin Qais. Rijaal Ibn Dawood Al-Hulli p. 226 (The Second Part, Chapter of Hamzah No. 2).

Also see: Jaami’ Ar-Ruwaat wa Izaahat Al-Ishtibaahaat ‘an At-Turq wa Al-Isnaad vol. 1 p. 9 (Chapter of Alif ); Rijaal At-Tousi p. 126 No. 1264 (Companions of Abu Ja’far Muhammad bin Ali bin Al-Husein Allah be pleased with them).

(4) Ar-Rijaal pp. 3-4 by Abu Ja’far Ahmad bin Muhammad Al-Barqi (d. 274); Al-Fahrasat by Ibn An-Nadeem vol. 1 p. 219 (Scholars of Shiites and their Hadeeths Narrators. The Fifth Art from the Sixth Article in Al-Fahrasat on information about scholars and names of books they wrote. It contains reports on Shiites Jurisprudents and names of books they wrote); Rijaal Ibn Dawood Al-Hulli p. 249 (The Second Part: Chapter of As-seen Al-Muh- malah No. 226); Al-Dharee’at ilaa Tasaaneef Al-Shee’ah vol. 2 p. 154 No. 590. But Sulaim bin Qais is nowhere mentioned in any of the books of bibliographies of Ahlus-sunnah.

(5) Al-Fahrasat by Ibn An-Nadeem vol. 1 p. 219 (Scholars of Shiites and their Hadeeths Narrators. The Fifth Art from the Sixth Article in Al-Fahrasat on information about scholars and names of books they wrote. It contains reports on Shiites Jurisprudents and names of books they wrote); Bihaar Al-Anwaar vol. 108 p. 8 (Fee Al-Bihaar wa maa feehi wa ta’reefuhu: al-muqaddimah ath-thaaniyyah fee taraajim mu’allifee masaadir al-kitaab); Al-Dharee’at ilaa Tasaaneef Al-Shee’ah vol. 2 p. 153 No. 590.

(6) Bihaar Al-Anwaar vol. 108 p. 8 (Fee Al-Bihaar wa maa feehi wa ta’reefuhu: al-muqad- dimah ath-thaaniyyah fee taraajim mu’allifee masaadir al-kitaab).

(7) Al-Dharee’at ilaa Tasaaneef Al-Shee’ah vol. 2 p. 152 No. 590.

(8) Rijaal Al-Kashshi vol. 2 p. 184 Discussion No. 167 (Sulaim bin Qais Al-Hilaali). Also see: Tahdheeb Al-Ahkaam vol. 9. P. 2174 Discussion No. 14 (Chapter: Al-Wasiyyah wa wujoobuha); Wasaa’il Al-Shee’ah vol. 18 p. 353 Discussion 78 (Chapter: It is compulsory to work with the ahaadeeth of the prophet (PBUH) and the Imams reported in approved books, their authenticity and confirmation); Bihaar Al-Anwaar vol. 1 p. 79 (Chapter Five: Inevitable Quotations from those cited by Authors of books…).

(9) The bookof Sulaim bin Qais pp. 453-454 (The leader of the believers speaking to the sun with the instruction of the Prophet (PBUH)).

(10) The Book of Virtue p. 70 (The Sun Speaking with Ali (Allah be pleased with him)) by

Shaadhaan bin Jibraa’eel Al-Qummi(d. 660).

(11) Basaa’ir Ad-Darajaat Al-Kubraa vol. 2 p. 475 Discussion 37 (Chapter of rare reports about the Imams and their miracles); Bihaar Al-Anwaar vol. 18 p. 377 Discussion 82 (Chap- ter: Confirming ascension, its manner, what happened in it and describing Al-Barraaq).

(12) Diwaan Shu’araa Al-Husein, Part 1 of the Second Section for Arabic Literature, p. 48. Published by Muhammad Baaqir Al-Arwaani, Tahran Ed. 1374.

(13) Daa’irat Al-Ma’aarif Ash-Shee’iyyah vol. 1 p. 153 by Muhammad Husein Al-A’lami Al-Haa’iri.


[By Mujlisul Ulama]


Shi’i Priest Calling Shiahs to Obliterate the Sunnah and Ahlus Sunnah

Dear Honourable Friends!

We wish to inform you that now you are going to a sacred battle

Now you are going to Syria – to Shaam – to kill the Ahlus Sunnah.

Yes, now you are going take revenge from the Bani Umayyah.

You – the Shiah of Iran; the Shiah of Afghanistan; the Shiah of Hezbollah.

Yes, you are the Shiah of the Lebanese and the Palestinians.

Now you are going to Shaam; to a sacred battle.

Yes, now we are preparing you to go to demolish their Musaajid and build Husainiyyaat (Shia Temples).

If there are men among the Ahlus Sunnah then let them come forward.

We are waiting for them on the battlefield.

Yes, if there are men among the Ahlus Sunnah who wish to defend their Musaajid and who wish to defend the Sahaabah then let them graciously come onto the battle arena.

Labbaik, Labbaik, Labbaik!

Dear Friends!

Now we are going to fight to drive back these people.

These people now are enamoured; are engrossed with the dunya; engrossed with money; engrossed with relaxation.

Now friends, it is OUR TIME. Now it is OUR TIME.

Labbaik, Labbaik, Labbaik!

Now we are going to inflict a severe blow to the Sunnah (sic). [Emphasis of the Shi’i priest]

Now we are going take revenge from the Sunnah (sic). [Emphasis of the Shi’i priest]


We are the Shiah.

I said to you a short while ago that we are going to take revenge from these people.

We will face you soon.

If you have among you men, the battlefield is ready.

Labbaik, Labbaik, Labbaik. (End of the speech of the Devil)

About these shayaateen in human bodies, the Qur’aan Majeed states:

“Verily hatred has poured from their mouths (for you), but what their hearts conceal is worse.”

Iraq is the terrain of the Shiah kuffaar, hence the Shiah priests over there feel comfortable to give the fullest expression to the hatred in their hearts for the Sahaabah and the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama’ah. However, when they are not on their home terrain, they emerge from their holes of nifaaq as snakes and with extreme hypocrisy and huge hyperbole raise slogans of ‘brotherhood’ for the Ahlus Sunnah. Without the hyperbole and gross lies they will not be able to hoodwink even stupid Muslims.

Their stercoraceous doctrines of falsehood and lies are satanically adorned with further compounded lies to ensnare the morons and the zindeeqs while in their home terrain they do not demonstrate the slightest restraint in letting loose the filth of hatred devouring their hearts and souls. The opprobrium of these shaitaan-hearted sub-human specimens of humanity revulses all people of sanity whether Muslim or non-Muslim. The terror of Shiah cruelty is all-pervasive and it compels human beings to recoil with shock. Their inhumanity is too visible to camouflage. Their inhumanity, especially towards the Ahlus Sunnah, is absolutely revulsive.

Then they hypocritically fabricate stupidities such as the ‘Cape Accord’ to entrap stupid Muslims, and Zindeeqs who masquerade as Muslims such as the modernists, and those whose Imaan dangles by a thread.


The Narrators of the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah and the Narrators of the Shia

Our Deen is based on the Qur’aan Majeed and Mubaarak Sunnah of Rasulullah (sallallahu ‘alaihi wasallam). If one examines the Qur’aan Majeed and Mubaarak Sunnah, he will find that both are transmitted to the ummah via the illustrious Sahaabah (radhiyallau ‘anhum) of Rasulullah (sallallahu ‘alaihi wasallam), those regarding whom Allah Ta’ala had granted the glad tidings of Jannah in this very world. Allah Ta’ala declares in the Qur’aan Majeed:

رَضِیَ اللّٰهُ عَنْهُمْ وَرَضُوْا عَنْهُ

Allah Ta’ala is pleased with them and they are pleased with Allah Ta’ala.

In the Mubaarak Ahaadith, Rasulullah (sallallahu ‘alaihi wasallam) bore testimony to the fact that his Sahaabah (radhiyallau ‘anhum) are the greatest of this ummah. Rasulullah (sallallahu ‘alaihi wasallam) said, “My Sahaabah (radhiyallau ‘anhum) are like guiding stars for my ummah. Whichever of them you follow, you will be rightly guided.” (Muntakhab Musnad Abd ibnu Humaid #781)

Rasulullah (sallallahu ‘alaihi wasallam) had cursed all those who revile his Sahaabah (radhiyallau ‘anhum) saying, “May the curse of Allah Ta’ala be on such people who are the worst of the creation.” (Sunan Tirmizi #3866)

The crux of the matter is that the Sahaabah (radhiyallau ‘anhum) – the greatest of this ummah – are the narrators of the Qur’aan Majeed and Hadith and their integrity and reliability is impeccable.

On the contrary, when we study the religion of the Shia, we find that their religion is based on the statements of their Imaams. They regard the statements of their Imaams to be higher than the statements of the Ambiya (alaihimus Salaam).

Khumaini, an Iranian shia scholar, writes regarding the rank of their Imaams:

وإن من ضروريات مذهبنا أن لأئمتنا مقاما لا يبلغه لا ملك مقرب ولا نبي مرسل

“Among the essential and fundamental beliefs of our religion (Shia) is the belief that our Innocent Imaams hold the station which could not be reached by any favoured Angel, Prophet or Messenger” (Alhukumatul islaamiyyah Pg. 52)

We have witnessed that the Sahaabah (radhiyallau ‘anhum) – the narrators of the Qur’aan and Hadith – are the greatest of the Ummah, as testified to by Allah Ta’ala and Rasulullah (sallalahu alaihi wasallam). Let us now examine the narrators of the Shia religion, those who narrate from their Imaams.

Among the main books of the Shia is the book “Usool-ul-Kaafi”. This book holds an extremely high position among them similar to the position of Saheeh Bukhaari among the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaa’ah. When one has to examine the narrations found in this kitaab (as well as other Shia books), he will find that a great portion is narrated on the authority of a person named Zuraarah.

Zuraarah reports from personalities whom the Shiah consider to be among their twelve Imaams viz. Imaam Muhammad Baaqir (rahimahullah) and Imaam Ja‘far Saadiq (rahimahullah).

When Imaam Ja‘far Saadiq (rahimahullah) was asked regarding the narrator Zuraarah who narrates from him, he said,

ما أحدث أحد في الإسلام ما أحدث زرارة من البدع عليه لعنة الله

“No person has innovated in Islam the innovations which Zuraarah has innovated. May the curse of Allah Ta’ala be upon him” (Rijal al Kashshi pg. 149)

On another occasion, Imaam Ja‘far Saadiq (rahimahullah) said regarding Zuraarah:

زرارة شر من اليهود والنصارى، ومن قال: إنّ مع الله ثالث ثلاثة

Zuraraah is worse than the Jews, the Christians, and those who say that Allah is but one of the trinity. (Rijal al Kashshi pg. 160)

Despite this being the pathetic condition of the Shia narrator, Zuraarah, who formed the basis of a great portion of the Shia religion, and despite their Imaams declaring him a fabricator and liar, they still latch onto his narrations in their religion.



The Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) says:

They are not among us, ones who hit their cheeks and tear the necks of their clothes. (Bukhari)

The Arabs used to scream, cry, hit their cheeks, tear the necks of their clothes and hit their breasts when a family member died. The Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) condemned this practice in very harsh terms even stating that those who engage in such practices are not among us.

The practices of taazia and maatam are similar to those described above. Therefore even a person of average intelligence can easily understand that they are in contradiction with the teachings of Islâm and are therefore totally forbidden.

The taazia and maatam are so abominable in the eyes of Islâm that not only is it forbidden to practice them but it is also forbidden to attend. Those who do it are to blame and are considered sinners, because their presence encourages those who participate in it. Allah says:

Do not help one another in sin and transgression. (Qur’an 5:2)

As for what happened to Hadhrat Imam Hussain (Radhiyallahu anhu) in Karbala, every Muslim who has a heart must feel deep sadness. But, as already said, this sorrow must be expressed while respecting the principles of Islâm. On this there is no greater example than the behavior of the Holy Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) at the moment when his son, Ibrahim, breathed his last. Holding him in his arms, the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) says:

“The eyes are overflowing with tears and the heart full of sorrow, but we only say what pleases our Creator. Surely we are very sad to be separated from you, O Ibrahim.” (Bukhari)

The Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) did not shout or hit his cheeks or chest and tore the neckline of his clothes. He showed his Ummah that even in sadness (or any other circumstance), one must never forget the order of Allah. This is how a true believer must act.

The Prophet (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) is the model of all Muslims. There is salvation by only following his principles.

In addition to taazia and maatam, there are other practices that are observed during the first ten days of the month of Muharram. The scholars of are categorical and all agree that these practices are prohibited.

Here are the fatwas of some scholars on this subject:

Hadhrat Imam Hussain (Radhiyallahu Anhu):

After my shahaadat do not make maatam and do not tear your clothes either. Be patient (Sabr). [Tarikh Ibn Khaldoon]

Imam Hussain (Radhiyallahu Anhu)’s son Hadhrat Zainul Aabidin (Rahimahullah):

When a person named Mukhtaar Thaqafi invented customs on Ahlé Bait,  Hazrat Zainul Aabideen (Rahimahullah) opposed these inventions. He stood near the Ka’bah and cursed Mukhtaar. [Tabaqaat]

Imam Abu Hanifah (Rahimahullah):

O Muslims, it is forbidden to shout and cry during the first ten days of the month of Muharram. If you observe these practices then you will become just like the raafidha. [Matalib-ul-Mu’mineen]

Hadhrat Shaykh Abdul Qaadir Jeelaani (Rahimahullah):

If it were permissible to consider the day when Imam Hussain (Radhiyallahu anhu) attained martyrdom as a day of mourning, then the day of Monday would be all the more deserving because it was that day that Allah gave wafaat to the Prophet (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) and to Hadhrat Abû Bakr Siddîq (Radhiyallahu anhu). [Al-Ghuniyat al-Taalibeen].