It is simple fact to understand that the removal of a bucket of water from the ocean will reduce the quantity of the ocean by one bucket. Although this reduction cannot be perceived by the eye, the intelligence of man understands it. Thus, removal of a bucket of water from the ocean does represent a change in the volume of the water. This change can be given an equation. If the ocean is X and the bucket is Y, the new volume will be X-Y. But no such equation can be posited for the Zaat of Allah Ta’ala. While change can be understood in finite and dimensional objects, it cannot be imagined in The Eternal and Infinite Being of Allah Azza Wa Jal.
Mentally, logically and rationally it is possible to deplete Allah Ta’ala (Nauthu billah!) in terms of the ludicrous theory of the Logos and Nebula innovated by the Ahl-e-Bid’ah. Such kufr is incompatible with Islamic Tauhid.
The neo-pantheistic belief of the Grave-Worshippers implies the doctrine that Allah’s Zaat is everything in creation and everything in creation is Allah. If the Noor-e-Muhammadi is part of Allah, it will follow that it is also Allah (Nauthubillaah!). Since there cannot be any difference in the Zaat of Allah Ta’ala, it will have to be acknowledged that the conception given out by the Qabar Pujaaris must necessarily and logically espouse the unity of Allah’s Zaat and Nur-e- Muhammadi. If any difference is argued between Allah’s Zaat and Nur-e-Muhammadi, it will give rise to the conclusion that the Unity of Allah’s Zaat is composed of different parts and different qualities. But such an idea is both absurd and kufr in direct confrontation with the pure concept of Islamic Tauhid.
Then, if Nur-e-Muhammadi is part of Allah and the universe was created out of this Nur or nebula or logos, it will follow that all creation is part of Allah Ta’ala. This multi-facetted stupid interpretation of Allah’s Being is intolerable to the Islamic doctrine of Tauhid.
This type of pantheistic theory supports only the kufr belief of all creation again being absorbed into Allah Azza Wa Jal. In fact, this is precisely the interpretation which the jaahil Bid’atis ascribe to the Sufi concept of Wahdatul Wujood. By assigning such kufr meanings of pantheism to the pure concept of Wahdatul Wujood of which the Auliya speak, the Grave-Worshippers endeavour to convey the idea that the illustrious Auliya subscribed to the pantheistic beliefs of kufr. But, there can be nothing further from the truth.
ALLAH’S CREATIVE POWER
The Qur’aan Majeed is explicit in its claim that Allah Ta’ala creates by His Command: ‘Kun’ (BE’) Allah Azza Wa Jal created Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam ) and his Nur in the celestial realm by His power of creation: He created this Nur out of the state of pure non-existence and nothingness. He did not create the Nur of Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) out of His Zaat.
For the sweeping claims which the Qabar-Pujaari sect makes in regard to creation and the bestowal of divinity (Godhood) to our Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wasallam), it draws support from the doctrines of the kuffaar and cites Qur’aanic verses which bear no relevance to the topic under discussion. Since the Qur’aan and the Hadith are silent on the subject of the details of the origin of the universe, the Qabar Pujaari sect is left with no basis for substantiating its kufr and shirk conception other than the doctrines of the kuffaar as conveyed by the stupid logos and nebula theories.
Those who had rejected the teachings of the Ambiya and those who had fallen in the snares of shaitaan mardud were constrained to propound their own theories for the origin of the universe. Since the knowledge of this fact does not form part of the Islamic conception of Hidaayah imperative for Najaat in the Aakhirah, Islam does not cast the mind and energy of man into futile and spiritually unproductive avenues. Simple, unadulterated Imaan and A’maal-e-Saalihah are the requirements for man’s earthly sojourn until he reaches his ultimate destination.
But shaitaan (La’anatullah), perpetually engaged in his occupation of deviating mankind from the Path of Rectitude, conspired to divert the minds of men from Allah Ta’ala. He thus chanelled their minds into dhalaal (deviation) and by involving them in futile and absurd mental exercises which are of no benefit, either in this world or the next. Instead of the mind engrossing itself in Dhikrullaah, the purpose of its creation, shaitaan succeeded in saturating it with absurd ideas and futile mental exercises such as the kufr logos and nebula theories. By such idle mental pursuits the Greek philosophers and the expounders of shirk and the deniers of Allah Ta’ala managed to manipulate the ignorant masses, plunging them into spiritual deviation.
Grave-Worship (Qabar Puja) destroys the mental equilibrium of the human being. The spiritual pollution produced by idolatry and grave worship blinds the intelligence, rendering it incapable of straight and simple thinking. We, therefore, find the Qabar Pujaaris making these unabashed and stupid claims about the Nur of Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) being the logos of the pantheistic kuffaar and the nebula of the atheist scientists who refute the existence of Allah Ta’ala without the slightest hesitation.
By what stretch of imagination can a Muslim postulate that the Nur of Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) could ever be the miserable entities specified in conceptions and theories which are the products of kuffaar and satanic thinking? The corruption which qabar puja wroughts to the brains of a Muslim is akin to the corruption brought about by atheism and shirk.
Endorsing the kufr theory of the origin of the universe and man propounded by the deniers and denigration of Allah Azza Wa Jal, the Grave Worshippers describe Rasulullah’s Nur as the ‘nebula’. The atheist scientists and astronomers define ‘nebula’ as follows:
“A relatively dense but still tenuous mass of gas or dust (or a mixture of both) in the space between the stars, which may glow by its own emission or by starlight reflected from dust surrounding the stars. Dark nebulae may be detected by their obscuration of the light from stars.
“Cloud of dust or gas within the galactic system illuminated by neighbouring stars. A luminous mass believed to consist of an enormous number of stars….”
Most certainly, the Nur of Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) was not a mass of cloud and dust nor was it a mixture of cloud and gas illuminated by other units of creation, viz., stars. The mind of the Mu’ min, although not so apprised by the Shariah, readily believes and understands that the illumination in that Splendid Nur was an inherent quality created in the Nur by Allah Ta’ala.
Most certainly, the Nur of Muham mad (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) was not a dark nebula obscuring the light emitted by stars as postulated by the nebular theory of the atheists. The Light of Hidaayah which emanated from the Nur of Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) illuminated the minds and hearts of men and jinn, expelling the darkness of kufr and shirk—the type of kufr and shirk in which the votaries of grave-worship wallow.
It is most ridiculous to attempt to highlight the splendour and grandeur of the Nur of Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) by striking up an alliance with the absurd conceptions propounded by kaafirs, mushriks, heretics and atheists. Even the utilization of their terminology for Rasulullah’s Nur and for Allah Azza Wa Jal is to denigrate Allah Ta’ala and His illustrious Rasool. The employment of kuffaar terminology—terms coined by the kuffaar to describe their kufr theories—is haraam.
Terms which convey kufr and atheism cannot be used to describe the Nur of Prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) nor for the Zaat of Allah Azza Wa Jal. But, these worshippers of the graves, not only use the terminology of kufr, they in fact aver that the Nur of Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wasallam ) is actually the logos (deity of kufr) and the nebula or the mass of cloud, dust and gas of the nebular hypothesis of the atheists. This antitheis of Shar’i Tauhid expounded by the people of baatil is an unpardonable sin, for it is shirk about which the Qur’aan says:
“Verily, Allah does not forgive shirk committed with Him. And, He forgives besides this (shirk) for whomever He pleases.”
The theory of shirk which the votaries of grave-worship have interwoven around the Nur of Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) stands condemned and rejected by the fundamental ethos created by Tauhid in the hearts of the Mu’mineen. In its doctrine of Tauhid, Islam is uncompromising. It does not brook the slightest vestige of shirk.