On Nahiem Ajmal’s (the so-Called ‘Mufti’ Abu Layth al-La’nati or MALM) allegations of Hakim al-Ummah Mawlana Ashraf ‘Ali Thanwi (rahimahullah) promoting “pedophilia.”

By Umar Rumi

There are three simple but important
points to keep in mind:

1. As has been demonstrated with several quotes, what has been mentioned in Bahishti Zewar (whoever its actual compiler is) is in line with similar hypothetical rulings that explain “what to do” in case X happens, without it necessarily meaning that X is fine. Such discussion of hypothetical rulings taking account different scenarios is ubiquitous in fiqh works, such as all the scenarios being discussed regarding what to do in case one’s fasting is broker for x or y reason: does it mean that fuqaha promote breaking one’s fast? Obviously
not. Whether the specific case mentioned is permissible or not, depends on several details and is discussed in the same classical works that discuss this mas’alah (including works of the very same school
he ridiculously lay claims to).

2. Those quotes are by classical
authorities who preceed any “Deobandi” scholar of centuries. So why did Nahiem Ajmal specifically pinpoint Mawlana Ashraf Ali Thanwi’s quote? The only reason is, as an emotional-drivenreaction to the recent exposing by Mawlana Usman and Mawlana Abdul Haleem he was
attacked by “Deobandis”, so his only
answer is make up some supposedly
“outrageous ruling”.

As well as for another not-so-hidden truth: Nahiem Ajmal, Nizami, Rashad Ali and others from the Awnist Gang are pushed by the local intelligence of their country to obsessively hit against Deobandis because they’re considered to be the group constituting the main obstacle to
the deformist project of “British Islam”(notwithstanding the increasing number of absolutely deplorable selling out and deviance from more and more graduates” who turn their back to the actual Deobandi minhaj to embrace secularism, interfaith, awnism, etc). Similar obsessed-based attacks directed
by certain individuals under the excuse of opposing Hazrat-worship” have to be understood in the same light.

3. As it’s the case also with his rejection of hudud and his ridiculing of well-known agreed upon rulings, he’s in all this just a follower of the popular reformist deformist scholars (such as Bin Bayyah, Ali Gomaa, Qaradawi) who embraced liberal modern western ideologies as their
“wahy” and pretend to judge religious
rulings on the basis of those, thus calling established practice as “barbarian”, “savage”, “inhuman” “paedophíilia”, etc. All of this is kufr and it clearly shows how his religion are in reality those man-made
ideologies that he uses as guide and
criteria of “right and wrong”.

A Glimpse of the “Liberated Woman” of the “Advanced Civilized West” – A Piece of Advise and warning to South Asian Women

By Miss Gul

The modern concept of liberation has
reduced the status of women to that of a Trash Bin.

If you’ve been to any great city of Western Civilization you would’ve noticed that there are areas where people go to get “hammered”. Bars, pubs and eateries are lined up and hoards of girls/ women come
there to get drunk, do drugs and then get picked up by guys for sex. Some people get started on the roads and in taxis there! The next morning the liberated female wakes up and gets on with her life. Some of them do expect the guy to stay in touch after he made her feel loved, even though for a brief amount of time, but most of them have learnt to not expect any attachment.

When I think of such women the only
image that comes to my mind is that of a Trash Bin that says “Use Me”.
I mean this is what they’re basically doing. In order to achieve some gratification and self worth they have to get themselves knocked out of their senses and then get *used* by a guy who usually doesnt give a damn a few hours later.

This is why Abortion is a burning topic in western countries as it rescues women from the consequence of their actions. This is why feminists classify Abortion as ‘Healthcare’ lol

In South Asian countries too when liberals March chanting the slogan of “azaadi” (liberty, freedom) this is what they’re actually looking to achieve. Women to be allowed to do whatever with their bodies without any regard for their long term physical, mental (& spiritual?) health and without any regard for its wider social impact.

When we see videos of desi girls
(Including hijabis) and guys proposing to each other, in universities, we are actually witnessing the degradation of
Womanhood. The status of that girl for me is like that of a cigarette or a tissue paper. Like how people place a cigarette between their lips as long as it burns, then throw it on the ground and crush it. Like how a tissue is used to wipe the face and then crumpled and tossed away.

The image, reputation and honour of that girl, especially if she’s a hijabi, is ruined forever. Say, if this current proposal and haraam love affair doesn’t work out then what will
become of her? I mean her man in this situation can get off easy. He can move on without much hassle if his profile is right. But she can’t.

Any man with self respect wouldn’t accept her. And maybe rightly so. Have you seen any sane person pick up a worn cigarette and put it in his mouth? Have you seen any normal individual pick out a used tissue from the trash and use it?

The last half a century has, specially the last couple of decades have, done a lot, seriously a lot, of damage to the western woman. The sparkling image of her happiness and liberty presented to us is an elaborate scheme. You can check the statistics, data and studies related to her
state of life. You’ll be surprised.

Something worse has been planned to be done with brown women but their religion and conservative culture stands in the way. So sanctions are given to fund educational circles, activist groups, social organizations and community events. These are there to indoctrinate a girl with
a warped sense of self worth, with a
shallow understanding of individual
dignity. She is taught that it’s okay to do whatever pleases her and it’s okay to rebel if it displeases others, even God.

Young brown girls float with the gusto of the unsinkable Titanic into the sea of the world as time passes and one day some reality of an iceberg will hit them. After that it will be the usual phase of blaming the society, patriarchy, family, religion andthe system. Then the silent acceptance of
what’s become will follow with the cycle of “use me” for as long as she is usable! After which it will get a lot darker with unbearable suffering and loneliness till one final day it’s her miserable end.

Allah’s refuge and guidance is sought.

Sunni Stance Vs Shia Stance Concerning Majoosi Nowruz

By brother Abbasi (a former Iranian Shi’ite convert to Islam)

Nowruz (or Norooz, Nowrooz) is not just some cultural holiday/’Eid to Iranian people (and to a a lesser extent to other Iranic people and those who have been influenced by them), it is THE major ‘Eid in
the Zoroastrian religion and has thus
religious connotations from so many
angles. This itself refutes the argument of some (including some ‘Sunnis) who claimthat this Majoosi ‘Eid is just a cultural practice where families meet for a picknick and what not.

As for Ahlus-Sunnah, the case is clear: All four schools and major jurists of the past to this very day reject and declare this ‘Eid as a pagan custom (the same they do with Arab pagan ‘Eids!). Some Shaadh views exist in some schools, however, they are
insignificant and rejected and can be
easily refuted.

As for the Rafidah, the Twelver Imamites:

Many Shia apologists (especially the
fooled Arab ones) claim, that Majoosi
(Zoroastrian) Nowrooz is just some
cultural festival of Iranic people,
especially of Iranians. Apparently it has nothing to do with Shi’ism.

The truth is: Majoosi Nowrooz is an
integral part of Twelver Imamite Shi’ism and is sanctified by top Shia authorities of the past to this very day (Ayatullats) who have dedicated entire chapters (!) in their works for the merits (!) of Majoosi Nowruzand the so called recommended (mustahabb!) deeds and actions that a
Shi’i must perform on that day. Worse,
they have literally fabricated narrations claiming that the Ahlul-Bayt venerated that day and scolded Arabs for having
forsaking it!

Majoosification 2.0! Whoever doubts the Majoosism of the Rafidah is either
ignorant of the reality of Rafidism or one of them.

NOTE: Shia apologists and other
simpletons always commit the mistake and blunder by pointing out how many ‘Sunnis’ celebrate Nowruz too, especially in Sunni Kurdistan and Sunni Afghanistan. The response to this is easy:

This is a faulty analogy and the reason
why is because in Sunnism, Nowruz (or any other Eid other than the two Islamic Eids) has never been condoned and sanctified, as a matter of fact, it is condemned and rejected. Religious Sunni Kurds in Iraq don’t celebrate it at all, it’s only the secular ones, in Iran even Persian
Sunnis don’t celebrate it, and the Iranic Baluch (101% Sunni) don’t celebrate it at all, not even their secular folk. In Iran and Afghanistan it is (unsurprisingly) the Shia
who celebrate it along with the secular folks and nationalists.

In Shi’ism Nowruz is a blessed and holy day that the Arabs have forsaken and the Persians have preserved! Sunnis (a minority among them) who celebrate Nowruz are going against their own religion, thus it is no wonder that most of these so called Sunnis are either of the extreme ignorant and superstitious type or
extremist secularists.

Modern-day Shi’ism is beyond doubt
influenced by pagan and superstitious (pre-Islamic) Persian rituals, customs, and beliefs. Of course, there is no
contradiction in saying that Shiism is
Yahoodi-Sabaite in spirit/origin and
Majoosi at the same time, as Rafidism
has always been a cocktail of all sorts of heresies.

Note: of course not everything that non-Muslims do and believe is rejected in Islam, similarities are not a reason for blanket condemnation and rejection (that would be a logical fallacy) of their beliefs and actions (after all we agree with them,
especially the Ahl al-Kitab, on some
beliefs, generally speaking of course)
however, similarities in matters which are not sanctified and approved in Islam (like Shia fire-walking, veneration of Nowrooz)
are rightfully rejected and called out for the heresies they are.

Rafidi Shi’ism is often referred to as a form of pre-Islamic Persian paganism with a thin quise of Islam, even by Iranian nationalists who prefer it anyday over actual (Sunni) Islam for a reason.

Refutation of a False Accusation of the Barelwis on Maulana Qasim Nanotwi (rahmatullah alayh) about An Ummati/Follower being superior to the Prophets in Deeds/Actions

By Mujlisul Ulama

Another false allegation made by the Barelwis against Hadhrat Maulana Qaasim Nanotwi (rahmatullah alayh), is their claim. “Moulvi Qasim Nanotowi was condemned a kaafir because he declared that ‘Prophets are superior only in terms of Knowledge. As far as action is concerned, apparently the Ummah (followers) become equal rather than lead.” (The atrocious wording is that of
the Barelwis).

This statement which the Barelwis have placed in inverted commas to create the impression that, these are the exact words of
Hadhrat Nanotwi, is a distorted version. Hadhrat Nantowi (rahmatullah alyh) did not make this claim stated in the statement
which the Barelwis attribute to him.

How is it possible for Maulana Qasim Nanotwi (rahmatullah alayh) to hold the belief that an Ummati is superior in amal
(Deeni action) than Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) or any other Nabi when every follower of Hadhrat Nanotwi believes that “one mudd (a small measure) of wheat which a Sahaabi gives in charity exceeds a mountain of gold which a non-Sahaabi gives in charity”? Maulana Nanotwi (rahmatullah alayh) did not claim that an Ummati can become superior than Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) in so far as righteousness is concerned as the deviate bid’atis claim and slander.

In his kitaab, Tahzeerun Naas, Maulana Nanotwi (rahmatullah alayh) says:

“In their Ummah, the Ambiya are outstanding in Knowledge. In so far as practical deeds are concerned, outwardly it will appear that frequently an Ummati is equal and even surpasses.”

The statement does not claim that an Ummati can become superior than Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) in action
(i.e. in practical deeds). The Urdu term ‘mumtaaz’ does not mean ‘superior’ as the Barelvis have attempted to show. An Ummati
can never become superior to a Nabi by virtue of his righteous deeds even though his righteous acts may quantitively surpass the
deeds of a Nabi.

There is Islamically nothing wrong in stating the truth regarding this quantitive dimension of ibadat. After all, it is a known fact that Hadhrat Uthmaan (radiallahu anhu) contributed more in charity than Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). It is known that Khaalid Bin Walid (radhiallahu anhu) participated in more Jihaad campaigns than Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Many Sahaabah and non-Sahaabah made more tilaawat of the Quraan than Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). Many Sahaaba and Auliya kept more Nafl fasts than
Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). But, such quantitive abundance of acts of Ibaadat does not make them superior to any Nabi. It is precisely for this reason that Hadhrat Maulana Nanotwi said that the equality in quantitive terms of practical deeds or even
the rendition of more deeds quantitively speaking, by an Ummati pertains to the external dimension of quantity. However such quantitive abundance in no way elevates a non-Nabi over a Nabi or even makes him the equal of a Nabi.

When it is Maulana Nanotwi’s belief and the belief of the entire Ummah that the greatest Wali and all the Auliya combined can never attain the rank of the lowest Sahaabi—of even that Sahaabi who was stoned to death for adultery—how could it be conceivable that Hadhrat Nanotwi (rahmatullah alayh) had claimed that an Ummati can become superior to a Nabi?

The purport of Maulana Nanotwi’s statement is simply to convey that the outstanding feature of a Nabi is not an abundance
of supererogatory (Nafl) acts of ibaadat, but Knowledge of Wahi. If deeds had to be fixed as the outstanding and conspicuous
feature of Nubuwwat, many Auliya too will be associated in this feature since quantitively speaking, many among them executed more deeds than even the Ambiya. Denial of this fact is the product of either ignorance or mischief.

But in so far as the Knowledge of Wahi and the loftiest rank of Divine Proximity are concerned no one other than a Nabi can lay
claim to these celestial treasures. No one can be associated in this Knowledge. Thus, the Ambiya are outstanding (mumtaaz) in this
respect. They are known as Ambiya on account of their Knowledge of Wahi, not on account of their deeds of piety which are associated with all Muslims.

 

Abundance of pious acts does not necessarily mean superiority over another person who has rendered lesser acts in comparison. Qualitively speaking, no non-Nabi can ever come on par with a Nabi in righteousness even though the non-Nabi’s acts may be
more quantitively speaking.

The aforegoing explanation is adequate to show that Maulana Nanotwi (rahmatullah alayh) committed no act of kufr. He simply
stated an Islamic truth, viz., that a Nabi’s outstanding feature is his Knowledge of Wahi and not his practical deeds of piety.

 

 

KHATM-E-BUKHARI MERRYMAKING BID’AH JALSAHS

By Mujlisul Ulama

TAQI SAHIB WAKING UP A BIT TOO LATE!

Commenting rather flaccidly on the Bid’ah of Bukhari Khatam merrymaking haraam jalsahs (functions), Taqi Sahib said on 12 March at such a Bid’ah khatam function in Pakistan:

Now since there is very little time, I shall therefore, Insha Allah, according to the directive, recite the last Baab of Bukhari Shareef Insha Allah, and my dear students have submitted that I give them ijaazat of Hadith. Insha Allah I shall do that as well.

However, before that I wish to submit (guzaarish) something. The guzaarish is that for some time now the ceremonies of Bukhari Shareef that have started in every street, every neighbourhood, every Madrasah; in such a way that I fear that these are going in the direction of Bid’at. This is also becoming an Urs. And I am the culprit behind it. For perhaps I was the first; upon Hazrat Maulana Nazeer Ahmed Saheb telling me in Faisalabad’s Jaamia Imdaadiyah Khatme-e-Bukhari. I attended and for several years I would attend.

At that time this thing was not so widespread. But now for Khatm-e-Bukhari elaborate invitations are printed and handed out; notices are put up and then people are invited; and then someone is called from out of town; an extravagant gathering (ijtima) is enacted. My heartfelt appeal is that this should be reviewed.

This is a place [the Madrasah] where Bid’aat are uprooted. They are uprooted or not? So, if from here, if the end of this Bid’at is announced then it will be much appreciated. Or I don’t say that it is a Bid’at, but it will become (a Bida’t), if such importance is attached to it. Is it not so, O Maulana Abdul Ghaffaar Saheb? (Jee, Jee)

For this reason, it is my appeal that you reconsider. There were Khatm-e-e-Bukharis in Darul Uloom Deoband as well. There were also by Hazrat Shaikhul Hind (Rahmatullahi alaih); also by Hazrat Shah Anwar Shah Saheb Kashmiri (Rahmatullahi alaih) also by Hazrat Maulana Madani (Rahmatullahi alaih). Did you ever here that those illustrious personalities organized a Huge Jalsah for Khatm-e-Buhakri?!

Since some things initially seem appealing, however, later when it is incumbently carried out, and if any Madrasah does not have it then it is looked upon as strange. “They did not even have a Bukhari Khatm!”. So, this Iltizaam Maa Laa Yalzam (making incumbent that which is not incumbent) is in fact the beginning of Bid’aat.

So my request to all my brothers and friends; Maulana Abdul Ghaffaar is sitting; Maulana Zahoor Ali’s son is sitting; my request to all of them is, and I shall, Insha Allah also send this message out, that in future do not allow this to become a Bid’at. If there is dastaarbandithen let it be. However, the Saheeh Bukhari Khatm with the title Saheeh Bukhari Jalsah which are now taking place, I understand that we should desist from it. (Emphasis added)

(End of Taqi Sahib’s comments)

Decades ago The Majlis had criticized this Bid’ah function which the Madaaris organize purely for nafsaani and worldly objectives. Hubb-e-Maal (Love for money) and Hubb-e-Jaah (Love for cheap name and silly fame) constitute the driving force behind all these jalsahs without any exception.

Taqi Sahib is part and parcel of the Bid’ah cartel. For years has he participated in these evil functions without executing the obligation of Amr Bil Ma’roof Nahy Anil Munkar. In fact, he is guilty of participating flagrantly in worse functions – functions of fisq and fujoor. Bootlicking the Pakistani kufr government, Taqi Sahib along with all his Madrasah students participated in the haraam independence day celebrations and merry making where a variety of immoralities are perpetrated.

Taqi Sahib is the prime culprit and criminal in the haraam legalization of pictography with his stupid ‘digital picture argument which is bereft of Shar’i substance.

In South Africa, the Ulama of the Darul Ulooms dishonestly and deceptively aligning themselves with Hadhrat Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi (Rahmatullah alayh), are in the forefront organizing the satanically extravagant, merrymaking Bukhaari Jalsahs where their primary activities are to eat, excrete and make merry, all in the name of the Deen. These Ulama should hang their heads in shame. They teach Bukhaari Shareef and other Hadith Kutub, and they should be well aware of Islaami Akhlaaq, yet they harden their hearts, push out from their minds the suffering of millions of Muslim refugees and others in order to make merry, eat and excrete in the name of Bukhaari Shareef.

They should close down their Darul Ulooms, flee into the wilderness and lament their abject state of moral degradation.

It will be interesting to see what their reaction will be to Taqi Sahib’s call to abandon these Bid’ah functions. When it suits their vain desires, they take Taqi Sahib for their guru due to his liberalism – haraam liberalism. We trust that they shall follow his advice and abandon all these haraam, bid’ah merrymaking functions. Even their Seerat jalsahs are deceptions and bid’ah organized in the name of the Deen for worldly and nafsaani purposes. And, this attitude is among the Signs of Qiyaamah. In this regard, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:

“Deen will be acquired for purposes other than the Deen.”

Hadhrat Abdullah Ibn Mas’ood (Radhiyallahu anhu) narrated: “The dunya will be pursued with the amal of the Aakhirat.” That is: the Deen will be used to camouflage their dishonest motives for which they design their ‘deeni’ stunts.

Disciples of Jesus and the Forgotten Letter

Source: https://muslimskeptic.com/2021/03/11/disciples-of-jesus-and-the-forgotten-letter/

وَإِذْ أَوْحَيْتُ إِلَى ٱلْحَوَارِيِّـۧنَ أَنْ ءَامِنُوا۟ بِى وَبِرَسُولِى قَالُوٓا۟ ءَامَنَّا وَٱشْهَدْ بِأَنَّنَا مُسْلِمُونَ

And ˹remember˺ when I inspired to al-Hawariyyun [the disciples], “Believe in Me and in My messenger.” They said, “We believe and bear witness that indeed we are Muslims.”

In 1873, the bishop of Nicaea discovered a strange text in the library of a monastery in Constantinople. The short writing introduced itself as “The Didache” (The Teaching), an early church manual that had been lost for over a thousand years.

Many of the earliest Christian writers mention the Didache in their commentaries, testifying that this text was commonly attributed to the disciples of Jesus (peace be upon him). Numerous others quote or refer to some of the passages found in the Didache. Yet, Roman Church authorities were suspicious of its contents, and it was ultimately rejected as being spurious. This certainly contributed to the gradual disappearance of the text, and it was practically impossible to locate a copy of it when Bible scholars first began to systematically examine the Christian religion in the 18th century.

It was therefore an extraordinary event when bishop Philotheos Bryennios published the Greek text of the Didache in 1883, and this amazing discovery was celebrated by Bible scholars all around the world. There was a slight problem, however. The Didache did not contain anything about crucifixion, trinity, or God having children.

Christian priest Alan Garrow laments:

“Initial excitement turned to frustration and then disinterest. In the second half of the twentieth century the Didache became a text often referred to in passing but very seldom considered in detail. The discovery that promised so much could not be made to deliver on that promise because it proved all but impossible to determine its geographical, historical and literary context”. [1]

After several decades of confused discussion, most Western scholars and Christian commentators silently decided to abandon the Didache. It had almost nothing in common with the rest of their research material. They could not make any sense of it. It was different from the New Testament and all the Christian works originating from it. The convoluted and nonsensical doctrines of Paul had no influence on the author of this document. The main body of the text did not contain the current forms of Christianity that we know in our present day, or even the earliest Trinitarian Christianity first enforced by the Roman Empire three centuries after Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ).

Western researcher James D. Tabor describes the situation well:

“The most amazing thing about the Didache in terms of the two types of Christian faith—that of Paul and that of Jesus—is that there is nothing in this document that corresponds to Paul’s “Gospel”—no divinity of Jesus, no atonement through his body and blood, and not even any direct reference to Jesus’ resurrection from the dead. In the Didache, Jesus is the one who has brought the knowledge of life and faith, but there is no emphasis whatsoever upon the figure of Jesus apart from his message. Sacrifice and forgiveness of sins in the Didache come through good deeds and a consecrated life. What we have surviving in the Didache is an abiding witness to a form of the Christian faith that traces directly back to Jesus and was carried on and perpetuated by James, and the rest of the twelve apostles.” [2]

The Didache currently remains ignored by most Christians [3], other than a few honest scholars trying to investigate the early origins of Christianity. However, the text has never been properly analyzed by Muslim researchers.

Indeed, even the most superficial reading of the Didache makes it obvious that it was originally written by a community on the Straight Way. The core text clearly contains the echoes of a revelation from the Almighty. And although it has been clumsily translated from the Aramaic original into Greek and heavily redacted by unknown Trinitarian Christians of the Roman Empire, its strong tawhid and correct understanding of religion still manage to shine through to those who know what they are looking for.

Text of the Didache

The most complete textual witness available to us, that Greek version scribed in 1056 and discovered by bishop Bryennios in the Jerusalem Codex in 1873, was recorded perhaps a thousand years after the original text and shows numerous signs of tampering and insertions. Known inconsistencies within the textual tradition of the Didache suggest that other writings were later incorporated into the original text, and there are several passages that disagree with the Religion of Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) that we know through revelation. Since this article is only meant to be a quick introduction, we will suffice with the most superficial and straightforward readings of the manuscript. The detailed textual analysis and full exposition of all the unique material in this document is left to future Muslim scholarship, which will certainly arise by the grace of God and prove worthy of this important task.

The following text relies mostly on the translations of B.D. Ehrman [4] and A. Harrington [5]. Known corruptions to the text were removed wherever possible.

The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles

There are two ways: one of the life and one of the death. But there is great difference between the two ways. Therefore, this is the way of the life:

First, love the God who made you, and second, your neighbor as yourself. And whatever you do not want to happen to you, do not do to another.

Now this is the teaching regarding these matters:

Do not murder.

Do not commit adultery.

Do not corrupt boys.

Do not commit sexual immorality.

Do not steal.

Do not practice magic.

Do not use enchanted potions.

Do not murder a child in corruption, or kill it after it is born.

Do not desire what belongs to your neighbor.

Do not break an oath.

Do not give false testimony.

Do not speak insults.

Do not bear grudges.

Do not be of two minds or speak from both sides of your mouth, for speaking from both sides of your mouth is a snare of death.

Your word must not be empty or false.

Do not be greedy, rapacious, hypocritical, spiteful, or haughty.

Do not entertain a wicked plot against your neighbor.

Do not hate anyone — but reprove some, pray for others, and love still others more than yourself.

The Jerusalem Codex includes a second title in smaller letters below the main title: “The teaching of the Lord through the twelve apostles to the gentiles”. As is common with most Greek writings, the word ‘Lord’ can either mean ‘our master (Jesus)’ or ‘God’, and Trinitarian Christians generally did not preserve the distinctions between these meanings when copying texts. This same manuscript also records an additional paragraph about turning the other cheek, but this is not present in all versions of the document and breaks both the flow and the grammar of the introduction. Most researchers are of the opinion that it was inserted later, and not part of the original text.

The document continues with fatherly advice:

My child, flee from every wicked thing and everything like it. Do not be prone to anger, for anger leads to murder; nor be zealous, contentious, or irascible. For from all these are born acts of murder.

My child, do not be filled with passion, for passion leads to sexual immorality; nor be foul-mouthed or lecherous. For from all these are born acts of adultery.

My child, do not practice divination since this leads to idolatry; nor use incantations or astrology or rites of purging, nor even wish to see or hear these things. For from all these is born idolatry.

My child, do not be a liar, since lying leads to robbery; nor be fond of money or vain. For from all these are born acts of robbery.

My child, do not be a complainer, since this leads to blasphemy; nor be insolent or evil-minded. For from all these are born blasphemies.

But be meek, since the meek will inherit the earth. Be patient, merciful, innocent, gentle, and good, trembling at the words you have heard.

Do not exalt yourself or become impertinent. You should not join forces with the high and mighty, but should associate with the upright and humble.

Welcome whatever happens to you as good, knowing that nothing occurs apart from God.

My child, night and day remember the one who speaks the word of God to you; honor him as the Lord. For where his lordship is discussed, there the Lord himself is. Every day seek out the company of the holy ones, that you may find comfort in their words.

Do not create division, but bring peace to those who are at fighting. Give a fair judgment; do not show favoritism when you reproach others for their trespasses.

Do not be of two minds [when you pray], whether it will be granted or not.

Do not be one who reaches out your hands to receive but draws them back from giving. If you acquire something with your hands, give it as a ransom for your sins. Do not doubt whether to give, nor grumble while giving. For you should recognize the Good-Repayer of the reward.

Do not shun a person in need, but share all things with your brother and do not say that anything is your own. For if you are partners in what is eternal, how much more in what is mortal?

This last passage seems to discourage private property; however, it must be kept in mind that this was a small community that was being outcast, persecuted and perhaps boycotted like the Believers in Mecca.

Do not lift your hand from your son or daughter, but from their youth teach them the fear of God.

Do not give orders to your servant or servant-girl —who hope in the same God— out of bitterness, lest they do not fear the God who is over you both. For He does not come to call those of high status, but those who have been prepared in the spirit. And you who are servants must be subject to your masters as to an example of God, with respect and reverential fear.

Hate all hypocrisy and everything that is not pleasing to the Lord.

Do not abandon the commandments of the Lord, but guard what you have received, neither adding to them nor taking away. Confess your trespasses, and do not come to prayer with an evil conscience. This is the way of life.

And the way of death is this:

First of all it is evil and filled with a curse: murders, adulteries, desires, sexual immoralities, robberies, idolatries, feats of magic, sorceries, rapacious acts, false testimonies, hypocrisies, double-heartedness, deceit, arrogance, malice, insolence, greed, obscenity, jealousy, impertinence, pride, haughtiness, irreverence. It is filled with persecutors of the good, haters of the truth, lovers of lies, who do not know the reward of righteousness, nor cling to the good nor to a fair judgment, who are alert not to do good but to do evil; from whom meekness and patience are far removed. For they love what is vain and pursue rewards, showing no mercy to the poor nor toiling for the oppressed nor knowing the One who made them; murderers of children and corruptors of what God has fashioned, who turn their backs on the needy, oppress the afflicted, and support the wealthy. They are lawless judges of the poor, altogether sinful.

Be delivered, children, from all such people.

Take care that no one lead you astray from the way of this teaching, since such a person teaches you other than God. For if you can bear the entire yoke of the Lord, you will be complete; but if you cannot, do as much as you can. And concerning food, sustain what you can. But especially abstain from things sacrificed to idols; for it is a worship to dead gods.

Based on this gradual and gentle approach taken with new converts, a few Western researchers have expressed the opinion that the Didache could actually be the same Apostolic Letter mentioned in the Chapter 15 of the Book of Acts.

The common language spoken by Children of Israel during the time of Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) was Aramaic, since Hebrew language had fallen out of everyday use. Aramaic word for complete is ‘Mushlam’. It also means Muslim; along with other grammatical forms such as ‘Mishlmana’. Other meanings of this same Aramaic root include: Perfect, Fulfill, Conclude, Obey, Follow, Surrender, Submit, to become a Muslim.

A quick search through the New Testament will demonstrate that these specific words are sometimes found in narratives about Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ), where the actual meaning is clearly ‘Muslim’ (e.g. Matt 5:48, Matt 19:21, Luke 6:40, James 1:4). Another relevant observation is that, the word ‘Muslim’ fulfills the intended meaning better than ‘perfect/complete’ only in those parts of the New Testament that are based on (unknown but hypothesized) Aramaic source-texts. The numerous letters originally written in Greek do not demonstrate this same interchangeability, whereas the stories of Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) and the epistle attributed to James are often improved by exchanging the word ‘Muslim’ instead of ‘perfect/complete’.

The Didache, after separating right from wrong, continues with rituals and worship:

And with respect to baptism, baptize as follows: Having said all these things in advance, baptize in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, in running water. But if you do not have running water, baptize in some other water. And if you cannot baptize in cold water, use warm. But if you have neither, pour water on the head three times in the name of Father and Son and Holy Spirit. And both the one baptizing and the one being baptized should fast before the baptism, along with the others if they can. But command the one being baptized to fast one or two days in advance.

Here we see the notorious Trinitarian formula clumsily inserted into the text. This expression of trinity came into use many centuries after the Didache first began to circulate, and is considered to be a corruption of the original text by the consensus of Western scholars. The original Teaching was likely to baptize in the name of God (Alaha in Aramaic).

And while some Muslims will dislike the idea of ‘baptism’ as a religious ceremony, Quran tells us that different nations were ordered to worship through different rituals (Quran 22:67). The stories of John (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) baptizing people in the Jordan River have reached us through numerous sources and are in good agreement. Baptism is also alluded to in the Quran as ‘sibghat’, as noted in several tafasir of Surat al-Baqara (Quran 2:138) [6].

The Didache continues:

And do not keep your fasts with the hypocrites. For they fast on second and fifth days [Monday and Thursday]; but you should fast on fourth day and the day of preparation [Wednesday and Friday].

Nor should you pray like the hypocrites, instead you should pray in this manner, as the Lord commanded in his Evangelion [Injil / Gospel]:

“Our Father in heaven

may your name be made holy

may your kingdom come

may your will be done on earth as in heaven.

Give us today our daily[έπιούσιον] bread.

And forgive us our debt,

as we forgive our debtors.

And do not bring us into temptation

but deliver us from evil.

For the power and the glory are yours forever.”

Pray in this manner three times a day.

This chapter regarding fasting and salat is the perhaps most striking part of the Didache.

Just like the nation of Muhammad (ﷺ), this community was ordered to fast on different days so as to be distinct from those who went astray before them. The implication here is that the followers of Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) set themselves apart in their acts of worship from the rest of Second Temple Judaism, most of whom had apostatized by rejecting the Messenger of God (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) that was sent to them.

The community that wrote this text referred to the dominant sects of their day as ‘Hypocrites’. This is in agreement with the New Testament narrative where Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) teaches his followers not to pray in public or repeat endless empty phrases as ‘the hypocrites’ do [7], but to recite these words in prayer. All Western commentators who possess a shred of integrity agree that the ‘praying’ mentioned in this context is the Jewish prayer that involved washing, facing Jerusalem, reciting, bowing, and prostrating to Almighty God [8].

Numerous researchers have noted the similarity of this short prayer to Al-Fatiha [9]. It is perhaps the best attested teaching of Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ), transmitted to us by the lost Q source, Matthew, Luke and Didache. And this manual from the followers of Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) explicitly tells us that they were commanded to read it during their three daily prayers [10]. The Didache names the source of this prayer as “The Injil”, although it is not possible to say whether this attribution was part of the original text, or just a later comment inserted by a scribe who was referring to the narration in Matthew.

We do not have the Aramaic original text of this prayer, therefore it is hard to speculate whether the first line originally read “Our Rabb above the heavens” or “Oh Alaha in heaven” or otherwise. Given that this manuscript was copied ten centuries after Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ), it is inevitable that some Greek scribe along the way replaced the original reading of the first line with what he found in his own Trinitarian books. God is above such things as fatherhood.

The word έπιούσιον epiousion in the fifth line is one of the greatest mysteries of the Greek New Testament. It occurs nowhere else in the history of Greek writing. Its meaning was unknown even to the earliest church fathers who were native speakers of Greek, and they all reported there is no such word in the Greek language. None of the later translators of the Bible knew what to do with it, and it is alternatively translated as daily, supersubstantial, or tomorrow’s. Morphological analysis of the word suggests that it was constructed to translate a specific Aramaic or Hebrew word for which no translation could be found, again demonstrating that certain parts of the New Testament were translations into Greek from the original language of Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ).

The author continues with yet another form of worship:

And with respect to the thanks-giving [Eucharist], you shall give thanks as follows:

First, with respect to the cup: “We give you thanks, our Father, for the holy vine of your servant David, which you made known to us through your servant Jesus. To you be all glory forever.”

And with respect to the broken bread: “We give you thanks, our Father, for the life and knowledge that you made known to us through your servant Jesus. To you be the glory forever. Just as this bread was scattered upon the mountains and was gathered to become one, so may your assembly be gathered together from the ends of the earth into your kingdom. For the glory and the power are yours through Jesus the Christ forever.”

But let no one eat or drink from your thanks-giving unless they have been baptized in the name of the Lord. For also the Lord has said about this, “Do not give what is holy to the dogs.”

Here the followers of Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) are commanded to hold a ritual meal to give thanks to God. The text explicitly refers to David and Jesus as servants of God. The community is also warned not to invite outsiders to their holy meals, referring to the Jesus-rejectors. Baptism as performed by John (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) is cited as the base requirement to become a part of their community.

A second prayer follows this first one, and researchers are divided regarding whether both prayers were part of the original document or not:

And when you have had enough to eat, you should give thanks as follows:

“We give you thanks, holy Father, for your holy name which you have made reside in our hearts, and for the knowledge, faith, and immortality that you made known to us through your servant Jesus. To you be the glory forever. You, Ο Master Almighty, created all things for the sake of your name, and gave both food and drink to humans for their refreshment, that they might give you thanks. And you graciously provided us with spiritual food and drink, and eternal life through your servant. We thank you above all things because you are Powerful. To you be the glory forever. Remember your assembly, Ο Lord; save it from all evil, and perfect it in your love. And gather it from the four winds into your kingdom, which you prepared for it. For yours is the power and the glory forever. May grace come and may this world pass away. Hosanna to the House of David! [11] If anyone is holy, let him come; if anyone is not, let him repent. Maranatha! Amen.”

But permit the prophets to hold thanks-giving as they wish.

As we see here, the way the Didache describes their remembrance meal is very different from the flesh and blood eating rituals currently observed by many Trinitarian Christians.

Christian scholar John Dominic Crossan suggests that there are two traditions “as old as we can trace them” of this meal: that of Paul, reflecting the Antioch Church’s tradition, and that of the Didache, the first document to give explicit instruction regarding prayers to be said at a celebration that it called the Eucharist. The cup/bread liturgy of the Didache, from the Jerusalem tradition, does not mention Passover, or Last Supper, or Death of Jesus/blood/body, and the sequence is meal plus a thanks-giving ritual [12].

Indeed, the “Last Supper” accounts found in the New Testament are all based on Paul’s Letter to Corinthians [13], and do not trace their origins to a Jerusalem source like the Q document. Current consensus among Christian researchers is that the original meal of Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) and his disciples likely took place around 30 CE, Paul (who never actually met Jesus, and was not present at the meal) wrote the flesh-and-blood version of this event in his First Letter to Corinthians around 55 CE, and the Synoptic (Mark, Matthew, and Luke) accounts of this event were written sometime between 70 and 110 CE at the earliest. It is abundantly clear to most Bible textual critics that the Synoptics follow the Pauline description of this event almost word for word.

The description we are given in the Didache is different. Here we see the Jesus-followers solemnly gathered to break bread, drinking from a cup (does not even mention wine!) and giving abundant thanks to God for his favors. And although this version of the Didache comes to us through 11th century Greek Trinitarians, some things still manage to shine through: they are not ritually eating Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ), but giving thanks for something. But what? What event is it that the followers of Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) are commemorating?

˹Remember˺ when the disciples asked, “O Jesus, son of Mary! Would your Lord be willing to send down to us a table spread with food from heaven?” Jesus answered, “Fear God if you are ˹truly˺ believers.”

They said, “We ˹only˺ wish to eat from it to reassure our hearts, to verify you are indeed truthful to us, and to become its witnesses.”

Jesus, son of Mary, prayed, “O God, our Lord! Send us from heaven a table spread with food as a feast [eid] for us—the first and last of us—and as a sign from You. Provide for us! You are indeed the Best Provider.”

God answered, “I am sending it down to you. But whoever among you denies afterwards will be subjected to a torment I have never inflicted on anyone of My creation.”

(Quran 5:112-115)

Once again, the lost tradition that reaches us in the Didache is in conformity with the Quran and reality, and in stark opposition to Trinitarian claims.

It is also seen from the text that the correctly-guided Children of Israel who followed Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) had a deep respect for David (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) and his descendants, the House of David, which is also likened to a branch of vine that reached their time long after the Babylonian exile. They are invoking blessings upon the family of David with ‘Hosanna!’. Indeed, the few fragments that survive from the lost works of Hegesippus records that the uncles and other relatives of Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) were leading the community after he was taken up to heaven [14].

“The Kingdom”, a common motif found in earliest Christian texts, is also mentioned here as a future occurrence. It is characterized as a favor from God that will cause this scattered community of believers to be gathered together on Earth once again.

The text then switches to another subject, and unfortunately the document becomes increasingly confounded. Western researchers have noted that these last sections of the extant manuscripts of Didache seem to incorporate outside material, thereby blurring the original Teaching regarding Messengers and Prophets:

And so, welcome anyone who comes and teaches you everything mentioned before. But if the teacher should himself turn away and teach a different teaching, undermining these things, do not listen to him. But if his teaching adds to righteousness and the knowledge of the Lord, then welcome him as the Lord.

But act towards the messengers and prophets as the Evangelion decrees. Let every apostle who comes to you be welcomed as the Lord. But he should not remain more than a day. If he must, he may stay one more. But if he stays three days, he is a false prophet. When a messenger leaves he should take nothing except bread, until he arrives at his night’s lodging. If he asks for silver, he is a false prophet.

Do not test or condemn a prophet speaking in the Spirit. For every sin will be forgiven, but not this sin. Not everyone who speaks in the Spirit is a prophet, but only one who conducts himself like the Lord. Thus the false prophet and the prophet will both be known by their conduct. No prophet who ordains a table in the Spirit eats of it; if he does, he is a false prophet. Every prophet who teaches the truth but does not do what he himself teaches is a false prophet. But [you are not to condemn] any prophet who has been approved and is true, and who acts on behalf of the earthly instruction of the assembly, but is not teaching others to do as much as he himself is doing – he will not be judged with you, since he has his judgment with God. For even the ancient prophets behaved in this way. Do not listen to anyone who says in the Spirit, “Give me silver” (or something else). But if he tells you to give to others who are in need, let no one judge him.

In the spirit” refers to ‘the state of receiving revelation from the Holy Spirit’, which (according to Pauline doctrine) can be experienced by anyone who confesses that Jesus died on the cross for their sins. Greek Christian tradition, which was founded almost entirely by Paul, refers to early teachers of Christianity as ‘apostles/messengers’ and anyone who claims to receive divine revelations as ‘prophets’. They claim that being ‘in the Spirit’ will allow them to speak in tongues unknown, make prophecies, and many other nonsense. This apparently resulted in ridiculous scenes in early Pauline sects, to the point where even Paul himself had to tell them to calm down and placed limitations on what a person could do in a state of revelation [15].

Recently, Pentecostal Christians have revived these long-abandoned Pauline traditions, as can be seen in these linked videos here and here.

It appears that the Greek Trinitarian understanding of ‘revelation’ was unfortunately incorporated into this Greek edition of the Didache, and we have no Aramaic manuscripts telling us what the awaited Messenger and Prophet was actually supposed to be like. There are still some indications of an authentic tradition underlying this corrupted text; such as the True Prophet being recognized by his conduct, that he will build on the earlier revelation and not tear it down, that a Prophet would not eat from certain foods brought to him (as is described in the lengthy narration of Salman the Persian [16], likely reflecting the knowledge of a dying Nazarene community in Syria in the 7th century CE ), that a Prophet might like ancient Prophets before him teach his congregation to pray a certain amount but himself pray more in private.

The text continues with yet more instructions that are of uncertain origin:

Everyone who comes in the name of the Lord should be welcomed. Then, when you exercise your critical judgment, you will know him; for you understand what is true and what is false. If the one who comes is simply passing through, help him as much as you can. He should not stay with you more than two or three days, if need be. If he wants to remain with you, and is a tradesman, let him work and eat. If he does not have a trade, use your foresight to determine how a Christian will not live among you while being idle If he does not want to behave like this, he is a Christ-peddler. Avoid such people.

Every true prophet who wants to settle down with you deserves his food. So too a true teacher, like the worker, deserves his food. Therefore you shall take every first portion of the produce from the wine vat and the threshing floor, and the first portion of both cattle and sheep, and give it to the prophets. For they are your high priests. If you do not have a prophet, then give it to the poor. If you make bread, take the first portion and give it according to the commandment. So too if you open a jar of wine or oil, take the first portion of it and give it to the prophets. And take the first portion of your money, clothing, and everything you own, as it seems good to you, and give it according to the commandment.

While the general context of ‘giving the First Fruits’ refers to the religious obligation of Zakat as practiced by the Children of Israel, this text also talks about wandering prophets visiting random small communities and uses the word ‘Christian’ which belongs to the Antioch tradition that later devolved into mainstream Christianity.

On the Lord’s day, when you gather together, break bread and give-thanks; after you have confessed your sins beforehand that your sacrifice may be pure. Let no one quarreling with his neighbor join you until they are reconciled, that your sacrifice may not be defiled. For this is the sacrifice mentioned by the Lord: “In every place and time, bring me a pure sacrifice. For I am a great King, says the Lord, and my name is considered marvelous among the Gentiles.” [17]

And so, elect for yourselves overseers and ministers who are worthy of the Lord, gentle men who are not fond of money, who are truthful and approved. For these also conduct the ministry of the prophets and teachers among you. And so, do not disregard them. For these are the ones who have found honor among you, along with the prophets and teachers. Do not reprimand one another in anger, but in peace, as you have learned from the Evangelion. Let no one speak with a person who has committed a sin against his neighbor, nor let him hear anything from you, until he repents. But say your prayers, give to charity, and engage in all your activities as you have learned in the Evangelion of our Lord.

It is again difficult to determine whether these were authentic passages written by the original followers of Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) talking about the real Injil. These may be later insertions that are referencing the man-made texts that were mistakenly called Injil long after Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ).

Switching to an entirely different topic, the last chapter of the Didache talks about the end-times:

Be watchful for your life. Do not let your lamps be extinguished or your robes be loosed; but be prepared. For you do not know the hour when our Lord is coming. Gather together frequently, seeking the things pertaining to your souls. For the entire time of your faith will be of no use to you, if you are not found perfect at the final moment.

The author is telling us: “A lifetime of faith will not save you, if you do not pass away as a Mishlmana.” Western commentators on the other hand, have struggled to understand the meaning of this sentence since the discovery of the document.

For in the final days the false prophets and corruptors of the faith will be multiplied. The sheep will be turned into wolves, and love into hatred. For when lawlessness increases they will hate, persecute, and betray one another. Then the world-deceiver will be manifest as a son of God. He will perform signs and wonders, and the earth will be delivered over into his hands. He will perform lawless deeds, unlike anything done from the earliest times. Then all human creation will come to the fire of testing, and many will fall away and perish, but those who endure in their faith will be saved by the-one-that-is-cursed-upon.

Then the signs of truth will be manifest: first a sign of a rip in the sky, then a sign of the sound of a trumpet, and third a resurrection of the dead. Then the world will see the Lord coming on the clouds of the sky…

This is the last sentence. The Didache as recorded in the Jerusalem Codex ends abruptly, and many researchers have noted that Leo the Scribe who copied it in 1056 left an unusually large amount of empty space below this ending. One guess is that the old manuscript he was copying from was frayed at the bottom end, and he knew there was more written at the end of this document.

Fortunately for us, Christian researchers located this missing ending in another textual witness from 4th century [18], and it can be reconstructed thus:

Then the world shall see the Lord [19]

coming upon the clouds of heaven

[Jerusalem Codex breaks off here]

and all his holy ones with him.

on his royal throne.

to judge the world-deceiver

and to reward each according to his deeds.

Then shall go away the evil

into eternal punishment

but the righteous shall enter into life eternal

inheriting those things

which eye has not seen

and ear has not heard

and which has not arisen in the heart of man.

Those things which God has prepared for those who endure for Him.

As we shall see, these final lines are extremely important. Firstly, these exact words show up in our tradition as a hadith qudsi, a narration from God. 600 years after Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ), Abu Huraira reported that Muhammad the Messenger of God (ﷺ) stated thus:

Allah has said, “I have prepared for my upright servants what eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor has entered into the heart of man.”

(Sahih Bukhari 97/123)

Secondly, they are reminiscent of Quran in style, strength, and beauty; even after suffering two translations.

“Only those believe in Our signs who, when they are reminded by them, fall down in prostration and exalt with praise their Lord, and they are not arrogant.

They abandon their beds; supplicating their Lord in fear and hope, and from what We have provided them, they spend.

And no soul knows what delights have been hidden for them as reward for what they used to do.” (Quran 32:15-17)

Thirdly, Paul partially quotes this same passage as “Scripture” around 55 CE.

But, as it is written:

“What no eye has seen, nor ear heard,

nor the heart of man imagined,

what God has prepared for those who love him”

(1Co 2:9)

However, this quote does not exist in the Hebrew Bible or the New Testament [20][21]. This is proof that there was another source that was used as a ‘Scripture’ in the years after Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ), now lost.

If the Didache actually is a letter from the real followers of Jesus (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ), all of these proofs taken together should all but establish that they concluded their letter with verses from the real Injil. And God knows best.

Notes

[1] Alan J.P. Garrow; “The Gospel of Matthew’s Dependence on the Didache”, 2004
[2] James D. Tabor; “Paul and Jesus”, 2012
[3] Nowadays, the only time Didache is publicly mentioned is when Christians need to bring up textual evidence for the impermissibility of abortion, which is not explicitly prohibited in the New Testament.
[4] Bart D. Ehrman; “The Apostolic Fathers”, 2003
[5] http://biblicalaudio.com/text/didache.pdf
[6] See; “Asbab Al-Nuzul” by Wahidi, “Tafhim al-Quran” by Maududi, additionally “Muhammad in the Bible” Chapter 13 by Abdulahad Keldani
[7] Matthew 6. It is also very interesting that Matthew 6:7 recalls this same tradition where Jesus teaches people what to recite when praying, but uses the word ἐθνικοί ethnikoi which generally means ‘Gentiles, non-Jews’. “7 And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans [ἐθνικοί], for they think they will be heard because of their many words.” However, there are issues with this narration: ‘Gentiles’ were polytheists, did not pray to God of Abraham in the way known to the people of Judea. However, Pharisees were known to pray a long and repetitive supplication known as ‘Amidah’, which was (according to the Rabbinical sources) written by their priests. A well-known saying in Judea claimed “Every one that multiplies prayer is heard”. Therefore, this sentence would make far more sense if it was talking about the recitations of ‘hypocrites’, a word which occurs twice before this sentence and once afterwards in the same chapter. Curiously, the 4th century Codex Vaticanus records this word as υποκριται hypokritai instead of ἐθνικοί ethnikoi, in agreement with the Didache.
[8] See various Bible commentaries on Matt 6:5, Luke 6:12, Acts 3:1, Acts 10:9, et cetera. “The standing posture in prayer was the ancient practice, alike in the Jewish and in the early Christian Church.” Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary on Matt 6:5; “The word translated ‘prayer’ (proseuchè) had come to be applied to the place dedicated to prayer—the chapel or oratory by the river-side, or on the mountain-side, where there was a running stream available for ablutions, to which devout Jews could retire for their devotions” Ellicott’s Commentary on Luke 6:12; “Both practices passed into the usage of the Christian Church certainly as early as the second century, and probably therefore in the first. The three hours were observed by many at Alexandria in the time of Clement (Strom, vii. p. 722).” Ellicott’s Commentary on Acts 3:1; “it seems at least to have been customary, in the first ages of the Christian Church, to offer up their daily prayers at the third, the sixth, and the ninth hour.” Benson Commentary on Acts 10:9; “we again find St. Peter observing the Jewish hours of prayer.” Ellicott’s Commentary on Acts 10:9; “According to Schürer, […] there is no ground for supposing that the third, sixth, and ninth hours of the day were regular stated times for prayer. The actual times were rather (1) early in the morning at the time of the morning sacrifice; (2) in the afternoon about the ninth hour (three o’clock), at the time of the evening sacrifice; (3) in the evening at sunset. […] This custom of prayer three times a day passed very early into the Christian Church, Didache 1, viii. 3. To Abraham, Isaac and Jacob the three daily times of prayer are traced back […]” Expositor’s Greek Testament on Acts 3:1
[9] Although there is an authentic hadith describing Fatiha as “a Surah the likes of which has neither been revealed in the Tawrat, nor the Injil, nor the Zabur, nor in the entire Qur’an” (Jami al-Tirmidhi 45/1) this may be referring to the relative superiority of the Fatiha rather than stylistic uniqueness. And God knows best.
[10] Children of Israel prayed Morning, Noon and Evening salat (Psalms 55:17)
[11] Although the Jerusalem Codex reads “God of David”, a Coptic manuscript records the words “House of David” here, which significantly improves the meaning.
[12] John D. Crossan; “The Historical Jesus”, 1992
[13] 1 Corinthians 11:23-26 — Note that Paul claims to have received this knowledge straight from ‘The Lord’ as a revelation. He goes on to explain that although he initially promised that none of this congregation would ever die if they believed in his religion, some of them still died because they did not eat god properly (1Co 11:30).
[14] Eusebius; “Historia Ecclesiastica”, ii.23; iii.20; iii.32; iv.8; iv.22
[15] 1 Corinthians 11–14
[16] Musnad Ahmad 5/441
[17] Malachi 1:11
[18] “Apostolic Constitutions”, Book VII
[19] James D Tabor notes: “The key phrases are taken from Zechariah and Daniel: “The Lord will come and all of his holy ones with him” and “Then the world will see the Lord coming on the clouds of the sky.” Both references to the ‘Lord’ here are to the God of Israel” (Eloah in ancient Hebrew)
[20] As Muslim researcher Abu Zakariya points out: “Paul is quoting some other scripture that has preceded him, as he says ‘as it is written’. Nowhere can we find such a statement in the Old Testament, however something very similar can be found in the apocryphal book the Gospel of Thomas: “Jesus said: ‘I will give you what no eye has seen and what no ear has heard and what no hand has touched and what has not entered into the heart of man’” (Gospel of Thomas, saying 17). It’s quite interesting that the Gospel of Thomas attributes this teaching directly to Jesus. So here we have the perfect example of a remnant of some genuine revelation discussing elements of the unseen that has been preserved in the modern Bible and the apocrypha.” Link.
[21] Although most Bible versions will cite Isaiah 64:4 to provide a reference for this quote, that verse reads “Since ancient times no one has heard, no ear has perceived, no eye has seen any God besides you, who acts on behalf of those who wait for him.” This saying contains similar meanings, but it is not the same verse. None of the readings in the Great Isaiah Scroll, Masoretic text, or the Septuagint version match this quote. However, the Didache, Paul’s First Letter to Corinthians, and Epistle of Clement all contain this exact saying, all of them from the 1st century. It should be noted that Clement of Rome uses the word “wait/endure” rather than “love”, and his narration was used here as it is potentially stronger than Paul’s.

The Politics Of International Trade

Trading is a normal part of human existence. Naturally, it has been addressed in Islam, as Islam gives solutions to all human affairs. The issue of international trade demonstrates how Islam has comprehensive laws that are compatible with life. International trade also shows how closely tied trade and politics are. Such subjects demonstrate more clearly how Islam and politics are one.

The Property Allah Almighty Has Bestowed

Allah Almighty madepmade a means by which the son of Adam may benefit in this dunya. However, Allah Almighty restricted, through His laws, the ways in which we may acquire it. He allowed trading as a way to gain interests (masaleh) in this world.

“O You who believe! Squander not your wealth among yourselves in vanity, except it may be a trade by mutual consent.” [4:29]

“…Allah has permitted trade and forbidden usury.” [ 2:275]

The exchange of goods and services has always been an intrinsic part of human society. Historically civilizations have had concepts of barter and exchange. A landmark in the chronicles of man was the advent of common currency. Since the introduction of money, as a medium of exchange, transactions changed dramatically. Business between individuals flourished. This change marked the end of an era when the individual existed as an island. It is in this context that another major landmark in history emerged; the phenomena of international trade. Here trade took on a whole new complexion, becoming intertwined with all the complexities of human interaction. International trade sat hand in glove with politics.

International Trade

International trade is not a recent issue. Generations before the birth of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) the Quraysh established the winter journey to Yemen and the Summer journey to Syria as a major feature of life in Makkah.

“For the familiarity of the Quraysh, their familiarity with the journeys by winter and summer,” [106: 1-2]

The barren plain surrounded by hills had no agriculture and no industrial base. Trading with the visiting pilgrims became the main stay of the Makkan economy. Trade routes were paramount to life in the valley. The life of Rasool Allah (saw) before revelation ran in harmony with the two journeys, as did the lives of his family and forefathers. An understanding of the caravan journeys is paramount to understanding the cultural and political climate which greeted the first revelation and later the climate that moulded the development of the first state in Madinah.

In the modern world international trade maintains its significance. Camels, horses and the Hilf-ul-fadhul (Pact of Chivalry) have been transformed into trans-national corporations, transcontinental pipelines, trans-atlantic treaties, super-tankers, superguns, supersonic planes, superhighways, GATT, EMU and NAFTA.

The enormous gains at stake associated with international trade exposes a whole realpolitik. Men fight tenaciously over the development of existing markets and acquisition of new ones. Strong nations haggle and compete for easy markets where their merchandises can be offloaded and from which raw materials can be exported. International relations were to a large extent founded upon the very desire for foreign trade. Undoubtedly, both domestic and foreign trade, have contributed immensely to moulding the global political climate.

Export Of Culture

Trading and the proliferation of ideas go hand in hand and have always enjoyed a synchronous relationship. Spreading ideas and values creates demand and makes cultures more disposed to accept foreign products to satisfy newly awakened desires. Congruously, trade is a highly effective way of spreading and promoting ideas. Adopting the products and the ideas of other nations is often seen as the means to achieving similar successes, even if such ideas emanate from a source which contradicts your own viewpoint.

This was indeed understood by the Muslims. Islam was brought to SE Asia via the merchants. Similarly much of West and East Africa and the Islands of the coast of East Africa was introduced to Islam by traders. With every new trade stop, Islamic traders brought the Qur’an to the towns they traded with. Alas the latest legacy has seen a role reversal, and it is now the likes of Microsoft, Coca Cola, Kodak-Eastman, Time Warner and the Petroleum giants who dominate. Their pernicious practices and precepts penetrate the hearts and minds of the population in these regions.

Trading Routes

Trade routes allow the passage of traders and their wares, allowing the purchase of imports and revenues from exports. Cutting off the trade routes to a community means isolation and control of the community. Control of routes means control of trade and the vast profits that follow. Naturally trade has strategic significance, allowing whole communities to be held to ransom. Christopher Columbus ventured Westward precisely to search for a trade route that avoided the Muslims. The main global commodity of the time, being spice from Indonesia. The Gulf war, Suez crisis etc. have all been about trading routes. Similarly the extensive railway system of India was built by the British for the British. In fact the British Empire was built on the strategic manipulation of straits, canals, passages and land strips.

As mentioned, established trading routes were essential to the Qurayshite community. This in turn affected the whole peninsula. This played a role in the preludes to many of the battles between them and the Madinan State. The Muslims launched numerous raids on the Qurayshite caravans. In the Makkan period of the Seerah these routes had a significance, the importance of which was illustrated by the response of the Quraysh to the conversion of Abu Dhar (ra). His (ra) tribe al-Ghifar lived in the Waddan Valley to the North East of Makkah. They survived not on honest trade or agriculture, but by raiding the laden Makkah-bound caravans en route from Syria. Abu Dhar felt drawn to Makkah and the news of a new prophet. On meeting him (saw) and accepting Islam he exclaimed “…I will announce my conversion to Islam publicly amongst them (i.e. the infidels)”. Abu Dhar (ra) went to the mosque, where some people from Quraysh were present, and said, “O folk of Quraysh! I testify that there is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is His slave and Messenger.” On hearing that the Quraishi men got up and beat him to near death. Al-’Abbas saw him and threw himself over him to protect him. He then faced them and said, “Woe to you! You want to kill a man from the tribe of Ghifar, although your trade and your communications are through the territory of Ghifar?” They then left him alone. This incident was understood by all concerned that any reprisal from Ghifar would have dire economic ramifications. Although they loved their idols, and found Abu Dhar’s words repugnant, they loved their trade even more. The mere mention of their precious trade route was enough to make the Men of Makkah as inanimate as their gods.

Who Is In Control Today?

Gone are the days of merchants being held to ransom by bandits, or are they? With the domination of global bodies the trade routes are no longer merely passageways through a geographical terrain. A whole network of rules, regulations and institutions seek to regulate, and benefit from other peoples trade. The modern trader must circumnavigate a host of legislative pitfalls and negotiate diverse political pressures. The modern trade route is laden with tariffs, boycotts, taxes, duties, and sanctions. Bandits such as the IMF, World Bank, EU and World Trade Organisation control the passage of trade. They say who can trade with who, what can be traded, what can’t and at what price. These institutions not only govern International Trade, but also use such power as a means to stretch their influence so as to meddle with the internal domestic policies and decisions of nations. The use of trade sanctions as a lethal weapon has really come into its own in the latter part of the 20 th century. The sanctions imposed on Iraq were never used as an alternative to bombing but as an additional tool to augment the damage done by bombing. It is an inhuman blood letting that is not executed by soldier in khaki but by bureaucrats in pin stripes.

The Banana Wars

As another example, to demonstrate how politics is inseparable from trade, early March 2007 saw the US and EU in head on conflict. The theory of the conflict was simple; a trade dispute. However, this actuality involved political sleaze, boycotts, thousands of jobs, millions of dollars and cashmere sweaters but most important of all; bananas. The issue showed how US has no friends, merely interests. Free trade when it suits her interests, unilateral sanctions when it does not. US imposed 100% tariffs on Scottish cashmere because Britain and the EU have preferential trade agreements for their former colonies.

This preference has damaged some of the US multinationals that operate in Latin America. Dole, Chiquita and Del Monte control two-thirds of the world fruit market between them. They want the right to penetrate the European market. Europe has condemned the action as serving “purely domestic political motives”; Japan joined the European chorus of condemnation, describing the unilateral US action as “a flouting of global rules.” Carl Linder, chief executive of Chiquita, has made huge donations to both the Democrats and the Republican parties to make sure that his voice is heard in Washington. Linder is one of the main players that pushed for the agreement with the WTO on 7 April. It is also noteworthy that the agreement excludes Ecuador, a major Latin American banana producer. The Ecuadorian ambassador to the WTO even complained that the US was not acting in their interests. This is understandable as their banana plantations are not controlled by the US corporations. The banana is just one of the trade issues where the US will act unilaterally; others include steel, GM food and beef raised on hormones.

This illustrates how trade, and its withdrawal, is used as a weapon, to achieve hegemonic goals in accordance with national interests.

Islam Has Laid Down Rules For This Type Of Relation

Allah has given us clear and decisive rules on how to trade, not just vague guidelines about honesty and corruption, but detailed rules relating to taxation, imports, exports, currency, what can be traded, who can trade, when to trade and how to trade. As an example, it would be forbidden for citizens of the Islamic governed regions (Muslims and non- Muslims) to export to nations whom it was technically at war with but not actually fighting, that which would aid their war effort. It would be allowed to trade clothing, foodstuffs and other such commodities with such nations, providing that such goods were not needed by the state for itself. It would be forbidden to trade anything with a country we were actually engaged in fighting, as such a move would constitute rebellion. A citizen of the state would be allowed to import anything that a Muslim is allowed to own. Covenantors would be treated according to the trade clauses of the treaties which the state would have signed with them, whether in imports or exports. However, they would not be allowed to purchase any weaponry or military hardware that may be used in a war effort.

Not referring to Islam as the arbitrator of trade leaves a vacuum, which is filled by the rules of kufr. Rules that benefit the disbelieving nations, boost their trade, exploit our resources, and spread their ideas.

Islam And Politics Are Inseparable

Trading is a normal part of human existence. Islam is a complete way of life giving solutions to all human affairs. Trading affects hundreds of other issues and Islam has detailed rules concerning it. The issue of international trade demonstrates how closely tied trade and politics are. When we consider the laws of international trade we must always consider them in the light of the predominate political climate. Islam and politics are one. Few subjects demonstrate this more than the subject of international trade.

3rd March 1924…Every Nation Remembers…..

EVERY NATION REMEMBERS. Its
victories. Its losses. Events that sha
and define the future. The history th
is passed down from one generatio
to the next, to preserve a nation’s
identity.

America will not forget 9/11. Britain
will not forget Dunkirk. Australia and
New Zealand will not forget ANZAC
day. Japan will not forget Hiroshima
and Nagasaki. Even the Serbs still
remember the Battle of Kosovo of
1389 and their defeat to the
OttomansS.

Yet there is one date the Muslim
Ummah has been made to forget. It
has been steadily wiped away fromour collective culture, being replaced by nationalistic days and pre-lslamic history

How many of us know what befell this
ummah on this day, 97 years ago?

It is a day that this ummah needs to
be familiar with. Our old, our young,
our men, and our women. For it has
defined what this Ummah has gone
through ever since and still suffers
today.

So, what should the Muslims
remember?

We should remember the 3rd of
March 1924 when the Khilafah, the
obligatory system of ruling ordained
by Allah & and His Messenger , was
abolished by the colonialist powers
and their supporters in the aftermath
of the First World War.

That ruling system for which the
sahaba left the Prophet unburied
whilst they debated who should be
the khalifah to look after the affairs of
the Muslims and take the light of
Islam to the world.

That ruling system that the ulema of
the past described as the mother of
all obligations without which most of
the obligations of Islam cannot be
fulfilled.

That ruling system without which the
ummah has been left orphaned
without a shield to protect her and
without which our lands have been
divided, our wealth stolen, our people
dishonoured and our blood split
without consequence.

That ruling system without which the
ummah has not been able to solve her
problems and move forward as a
leading light.

That ruling system without which the
entire world has been plunged into
darkness, unbalanced with ever-
increasing inequity and oppression by
the powerful upon the powerless.

That ruling system that is on the lips
of every world leader today. Not in
order to bring it forth into the light but to tarnish and repress it. Whilst
imposters like IS distort it and are
used to create hatred against it.

Today we live in fear and uncertainty
across the world. Myanmar, China, Palestine, Syria, Yemen is happening before our eyes.

Even in the West, we are questioning
our futures with incidents like
Christchurch occurring? We are
questioning whether we can raise our
children with iman left in their hearts?

And yet, despite all that, hope
remains. Muslims across the world
are slowly but surely discovering their roots once again. Looking to a system that is the natural extension of their aqeedah.

Turning away from all the false -isms’
that have got us nowhere in the last
100 years.

The Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “There will be
Prophethood for as long as Allah willsit to be, then He will remove it when He wills, then there will be Khilafah on the Prophetic method and it will be for as long as Allah wills, then He will remove it when He wills, then there will be biting Kingship for as long as Allah Wills, en He will remove it when He wills, then there will be oppressive kingship for as long as Allah wills, then He will remove it
when He wills, and then there will be
Khilafah upon the Prophetic method”
and then he remained silent. (Ahmed)
The prophecy will come to pass as the
promise of Allah and His Messenger, are always true. I do not know if I will be able to experience it in my lifetime. Or my children.

But the reward, as always, is not in the victory but in the struggle.

Selfitis

By Jamiatul Ulama Gauteng

Among the greatest qualities of a Believer is humility. Conversely, pride and arrogance are among the worst diseases that can afflict a person. A humble person is beloved to Allah Ta‘ala and is also loved by people, while a proud person or one who loves to “show off” falls from the grace of Allah Ta‘ala and is disliked by people as well, though they may appear to respect him.

Pride and vanity are not detected by means of an X-ray or CT scan. Instead they are manifested in one’s utterances, reactions to situations, choices, manner and general conduct. One of the recently discovered symptoms is “selfitis”.

Inflamed Ego

The American Psychiatric Association has defined “selfitis” as being “the obsessive, compulsive urge to take photos of one’s self and upload them on social media.” In essence, the victims of this illness are major attention seekers. The APA further explained that the suffix “itis” by which the word ends generally refers to inflammation. Hence bronchitis refers to inflammation of the lungs and tonsillitis to the inflammation of the tonsils. Thus this mental disorder was named “selfitis” as the people who suffer from it are generally prone to having “inflamed egos.”

The ahaadeeth have sounded numerous warnings for people who engage in the sin of photography. Apart from these warnings, when a person is filled with such vanity and conceit that his ego tricks him into thinking that the entire world is simply dying to share every moment of his mundane life with him, and thus he cannot see past his own face, how is he supposed to see the majesty and glory of Allah Ta‘ala?

When we will stop trying to attract the attention of people to ourselves in whichever way, including posting pictures of ourselves or our activities on social media, insha-Allah we will attract the special attention and blessings of Allah Ta‘ala towards us. This will make our lives in this world contented and peaceful.

Sourced from UswatulMuslima